Abstract
In many fields, network analysis is used to investigate complex relationships. The increased availability of temporal network data opens the way to the statistical analysis of the network topology and its dynamics. In addition network data are subject to measurement errors and random fluctuations. This calls for realistic time series models which account for relevant features of the data. In this chapter, we propose a new modeling and inference framework for studying matrix-valued panel data characterized by nonlinear dynamics and heavy tails. We assume a smooth transition model for the dynamics and a matrix-variate t distribution for the error term and show how the model can be used in temporal network analysis. Some properties of the model including the close-form expression for the predictor are given. We adopt a Bayesian approach to inference and design an efficient Markov chain Monte Carlo algorithm for approximating the posterior distribution. We apply the proposed model to a volatility network among European firms and an international oil production network and show its ability to account for structural changes. Our framework is motivated by temporal network data, nevertheless, it is general and can be of interest to all researchers interested in the analysis of matrix-variate time series.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
- 1.
The study of financial spillovers can also be performed by focusing on tail networks obtained from return quantile regressions [14]. We leave this application to future extensions of the proposed STR-MAR model.
- 2.
The list of the firms, the countries, and the information about their GICS sectors and industries are available upon request to the Authors.
- 3.
The estimation algorithm has been parallelized and implemented in MATLAB on two nodes at the High-Performance Computing (HPC) cluster at VERA, Ca’ Foscari University of Venice. Each node has 2 CPUs Intel Xeon with 20 cores 2.4 GHz and 768 GB of RAM.
References
Acemoglu, D., Ozdaglar, A., & Tahbaz-Salehi, A. (2015). Systemic risk and stability in financial networks. American Economic Review, 105(2), 564–608.
Acharya, V., Engle, R., & Richardson, M. (2012). Capital shortfall: A new approach to ranking and regulating systemic risks. American Economic Review, 102(3), 59–64.
Al Rousan, S. ., Sbia, R. ., & Onur Tas, B. K. (2018). Analysis of OPEC and non-OPEC members. A dynamic network analysis of the world oil market. Energy Economics, 75, 28–41.
Anderson, H. M., Nam, K., & Vahid, F. (1999). Asymmetric nonlinear smooth transition GARCH models. In Nonlinear time series analysis of economic and financial data (pp. 191–207). Springer.
Andrieu, C., & Thoms, J. (2008). A tutorial on adaptive MCMC. Statistics and Computing, 18(4), 343–373.
Atchadé, Y. F., & Rosenthal, J. S. et al. (2005). On adaptive Markov chain Monte Carlo algorithms. Bernoulli, 11(5), 815–828.
Bacon, D. W., & Watts, D. G. (1971). Estimating the transition between two intersecting straight lines. Biometrika, 58(3), 525–534.
Bastian, M., Heymann, S., & Jacomy, M. (2009). Gephi: an open source software for exploring and manipulating networks. In Third International AAAI Conference on Weblogs and Social Media.
Billio, M., Casarin, R., Costola, M., & Frattarolo, L. (2019). Opinion dynamics and disagreements on financial networks. Advances in Decision Sciences, 23(4), 1–27.
Billio, M., Casarin, R., Costola, M., & Iacopini, M. (2021). COVID-19 spreading in financial networks: A semiparametric matrix regression model. Econometrics and Statistics, forthcoming.
Billio, M., Casarin, R., Costola, M., & Iacopini, M. (2021). A matrix-variate t model for networks. Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence, 4, 49.
Billio, M., Getmansky, M., Lo, A. W., & Pelizzon, L. (2012). Econometric measures of connectedness and systemic risk in the finance and insurance sectors. Journal of Financial Economics, 104(3), 535–559.
Boccaletti, S., Bianconi, G., Criado, R., Del Genio, C., Gómez-Gardenes, J., Romance, M., et al. (2014). The structure and dynamics of multilayer networks. Physics Reports, 544(1), 1–122.
Bonaccolto, G., Caporin, M., & Panzica, R. (2019). Estimation and model-based combination of causality networks among large us banks and insurance companies. Journal of Empirical Finance, 54, 1–21.
Calderón, S. A. V., & Nieto, F. H. (2017). Bayesian analysis of multivariate threshold autoregressive models with missing data. Communications in Statistics-Theory and Methods, 46(1), 296–318.
Camacho, M. (2004). Vector smooth transition regression models for US GDP and the composite index of leading indicators. Journal of Forecasting, 23(3), 173–196.
Carvalho, C. M., & West, M. et al. (2007). Dynamic matrix-variate graphical models. Bayesian Analysis, 2(1), 69–97.
Casarin, R., Iacopini, M., Molina, G., ter Horst, E., Espinasa, R., Sucre, C., & Rigobon, R. (2020). Multilayer network analysis of oil linkages. The Econometrics Journal, 23(2), 269–296.
Celeux, G., Forbes, F., Robert, C. P., & Mike, D. (2006). Titterington. Deviance information criteria for missing data models. Bayesian Analysis, 1(4), 651–673.
Chan, F., & McAleer, M. (2002). Maximum likelihood estimation of STAR and STAR-GARCH models: Theory and Monte Carlo evidence. Journal of Applied Econometrics, 17(5), 509–534.
Chan, F., & McAleer, M. (2003). Estimating smooth transition autoregressive models with GARCH errors in the presence of extreme observations and outliers. Applied Financial Economics, 13(8), 581–592.
Chen, C. W. S., & Lee, J. C. (1995). Bayesian inference of threshold autoregressive models. Journal of Time Series Analysis, 16(5), 483–492.
Chen, C. Y.-H., Härdle, W. K., & Okhrin, Y. (2019). Tail event driven networks of sifis. Journal of Econometrics, 208(1), 282–298.
Chen, E. Y., Tsay, R. S., & Chen, R. (2020). Constrained factor models for high-dimensional matrix-variate time series. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 115(530), 775–793.
Chen, R., Xiao, H., & Yang, D. (2021). Autoregressive models for matrix-valued time series. Journal of Econometrics, 222(1), 539–560.
S., Tiwari, R. C., & Jammalamadaka, S. R. (1988). Bayes prediction in regressions with elliptical errors. Journal of Econometrics, 38(3), 349–360.
Chini, E. Z. (2018). Forecasting dynamically asymmetric fluctuations of the US business cycle. International Journal of Forecasting, 34(4), 711–732.
Cohen, M. (2010). STEO supplement: Why are oil prices so high.
Davis, G. M., & Ensor, K. B. (2007). Multivariate time-series analysis with categorical and continuous variables in an lstr model. Journal of Time Series Analysis, 28(6), 867–885.
Diebold, F. X., & Yılmaz, K. (2014). On the network topology of variance decompositions: Measuring the connectedness of financial firms. Journal of Econometrics, 182(1), 119–134.
van Dijk, D., Teräsvirta, T., & Franses, P. H. (2002). Smooth transition autoregressive models-a survey of recent developments. Econometric Reviews, 21(1), 1–47.
Economou, E., Agnolucci, P., Fattouh, B., & De Lipis, V. (2017). A structural model of the world oil market: The role of investment dynamics and capacity constraints. Oxford Institute for Energy Studies.–2017.–WPM, 75:40.
Eitrheim, Ø., & Teräsvirta, T. (1996). Testing the adequacy of smooth transition autoregressive models. Journal of Econometrics, 74(1), 59–75.
Elliott, M., Golub, B., & Jackson, M. O. (2014). Financial networks and contagion. American Economic Review, 104(10), 3115–53.
Espinasa, R., Horst, E. T., Reyes, S. G., Manzano, O., Molina, G., & Rigobon, R. (2017). A micro-based model for world oil market. Energy Economics, 66, 431–449.
Fonseca, T. C., Ferreira, M. A. R., & Migon, H. S. (2008). Objective Bayesian analysis for the Student-t regression model. Biometrika, 95(2), 325–333.
Franses, P. H., Neele, J., van Dijk, D. et al. (1998). Forecasting volatility with switching persistence GARCH models. Technical report, Econometric Institute, Erasmus University Rotterdam.
Garman, M. B., & Klass, M. J. (1980). On the estimation of security price volatilities from historical data. Journal of Business, 53(1), 67–78.
Gelman, A., Carlin, J. B., Stern, H. S., Dunson, D. B., Vehtari, A., & Rubin, D. B. (2014). Bayesian data analysis. CRC Press.
Gerlach, R., & Chen, C. W. S. (2008). Bayesian inference and model comparison for asymmetric smooth transition heteroskedastic models. Statistics and Computing, 18(4), 391.
Geweke, J. (1993). Bayesian treatment of the independent Student-t linear model. Journal of Applied Econometrics, 8(S1), S19–S40.
Geweke, J., & Terui, N. (1993). Bayesian threshold autoregressive models for nonlinear time series. Journal of Time Series Analysis, 14(5), 441–454.
González, A., Teräsvirta, T., & van Dijk, D. (2005). Panel smooth transition regression models. Technical report, SSE/EFI Working Paper Series in Economics and Finance.
González-Rivera, G. (1998). Smooth-transition GARCH models. Studies in Nonlinear Dynamics & Econometrics, 3(2).
Gupta, A. K., & Nagar, D. K. (1999). Matrix variate distributions. CRC Press.
Hamilton, J. D. (1990). Analysis of time series subject to changes in regime. Journal of Econometrics, 45(1–2), 39–700.
Holmes, J. B., & Schofield, M. R. (2020). Moments of the logit-normal distribution. Communications in statistics—Theory and methods, forthcoming.
Johnson, N. L. (1949). Systems of frequency curves generated by methods of translation. Biometrika, 36(1–2), 149–176.
Kilian, L. (2009). Not all oil price shocks are alike: Disentangling demand and supply shocks in the crude oil market. American Economic Review, 99(3), 1053–1069.
Kilian, L. (2019). Measuring global real economic activity: Do recent critiques hold up to scrutiny? Economics Letters, 178, 106–110.
Kumins, L. C., & Bamberger, R. (2005). Oil and gas disruption from hurricanes Katrina and Rita. Congressional Research Service, Library of Congress.
Landim, F., & Gamerman, D. (2000). Dynamic hierarchical models: An extension to matrix-variate observations. Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, 35(1), 11–42.
Leng, C., & Tang, C. Y. (2012). Sparse matrix graphical models. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 107(499), 1187–1200.
Li, K., Fang, L., & Tao, L. (2019). Bayesian panel smooth transition model with spatial correlation. Plos One, 14(3), e0211467.
Lin, C.-F. J., & Teräsvirta, T. (1994). Testing the constancy of regression parameters against continuous structural change. Journal of Econometrics, 62(2), 211–228.
Livingston, Jr. G., & Nur, D. (2017). Bayesian inference for smooth transition autoregressive (STAR) model: A prior sensitivity analysis. Communications in Statistics-Simulation and Computation, 46(7), 5440–5461.
Lubrano, M. (2000). Bayesian analysis of nonlinear time-series models with a threshold. In W. A. Barnett, D. F. Hendry, S. Hylleberg, T. Terasvirta, D. Tjostheimand, & A. W. Wurtz, (Eds.), Nonlinear Econometric Modeling in Time Series: Proceedings of the Eleventh International Symposium in Economic Theory. Cambridge University Press.
Lundbergh, S., & Teräsvirta, T. et al. (1999). Modelling economic high-frequency time series with STAR-STGARCH models. Tinbergen Institute.
Lütkepohl, H., & Netšunajev, A. (2017). Structural vector autoregressions with smooth transition in variances. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, 84, 43–57.
McAleer, M., & Medeiros, M. C. (2008). A multiple regime smooth transition heterogeneous autoregressive model for long memory and asymmetries. Journal of Econometrics, 147(1), 104–119.
Osiewalski, J., & Steel, M. F. J. (1993). Bayesian marginal equivalence of elliptical regression models. Journal of Econometrics, 59(3), 391–403.
Osiewalski, J., & Steel, M. F. J. (1993). Robust Bayesian inference in elliptical regression models. Journal of Econometrics, 57(1), 345–363.
Peguin-Feissolle, A. (1994). Bayesian estimation and forecasting in non-linear models application to an LSTAR model. Economics Letters, 46(3), 187–194.
Robert, C. P. (2007). The Bayesian choice: From decision-theoretic foundations to computational implementation. Springer.
Robert, C. P., & Casella, G. (2004). Monte Carlo statistical methods. Springer.
Silvennoinen, A., & Teräsvirta, T. (2009). Modeling multivariate autoregressive conditional heteroskedasticity with the double smooth transition conditional correlation GARCH model. Journal of Financial Econometrics, 7(4), 373–411.
Silvennoinen, A., & Teräsvirta, T. (2021). Consistency and asymptotic normality of maximum likelihood estimators of a multiplicative time-varying smooth transition correlation garch model. Econometrics and Statistics, forthcoming.
Steel, M. F. J. (1998). Bayesian analysis of stochastic volatility models with flexible tails. Econometric Reviews, 17(2), 109–143.
Teräsvirta, T. (1994). Specification, estimation, and evaluation of smooth transition autoregressive models. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 89(425), 208–218.
Teräsvirta, T. (1998). Modeling economic relationships with smooth transition regressions. In A. Ullah & D. E. A. Giles (Eds.), Handbook of applied economic statistics. CRC Press.
Thompson, G. Z., Maitra, R., Meeker, W. Q., & Bastawros, A. F. (2020). Classification with the matrix-variate-t distribution. Journal of Computational and Graphical Statistics, 29(3), 668–674.
Tong, H. (2011). Threshold models in time series analysis-30 years on. Statistics and its Interface, 4(2), 107–118.
Triantafyllopoulos, K. (2008). Missing observation analysis for matrix-variate time series data. Statistics & Probability Letters, 78(16), 2647–2653.
Wang, D., Liu, X., & Chen, R. (2019). Factor models for matrix-valued high-dimensional time series. Journal of Econometrics, 208(1), 231–248.
Wang, H., & West, M. (2009). Bayesian analysis of matrix normal graphical models. Biometrika, 96(4), 821–834.
Wang, J. J. J., Chan, J. S. K., & Boris Choy, S. T. (2011). Stochastic volatility models with leverage and heavy-tailed distributions: A Bayesian approach using scale mixtures. Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, 55(1), 852–862.
Yu, L., He, Y., Kong, X., & Zhang, X. (2021). Projected estimation for large-dimensional matrix factor models. Journal of Econometrics, forthcoming.
Zellner, A. (1976). Bayesian and non-Bayesian analysis of the regression model with multivariate Student-t error terms. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 71(354), 400–405.
Acknowledgements
This research used the SCSCF and the HPC multiprocessor cluster systems provided by the Venice Centre for Risk Analytics (VERA) at the Ca’ Foscari University of Venice. MB, RC, and MC acknowledge financial support from the Italian Ministry MIUR under the PRIN project Hi-Di NET—Econometric Analysis of High-Dimensional Models with Network Structures in Macroeconomics and Finance (grant agreement no. 2017TA7TYC). MI acknowledges financial support from the Marie Skłodowska-Curie Actions, European Union, Seventh Framework Program HORIZON 2020 under REA grant agreement no. 887220.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Appendix—Posterior approximation
Appendix—Posterior approximation
The Gibbs sampler iterates the following steps:
-
1.
Draw \((\nu ,\textbf{W})\) from the joint posterior distribution \(P(\nu ,\textbf{W} | \textbf{Y},\textbf{x},B_1,B_2,\Sigma _1,\Sigma _2,\alpha ,\delta )\) with a collapsed-Gibbs step that first samples \(\nu \!\sim \! P(\nu |\textbf{Y},B_1,B_2,\Sigma _1,\Sigma _2,\alpha ,\delta )\) and then \(\textbf{W} \!\sim \! P(\textbf{W} | \textbf{Y},\textbf{x},B_1,B_2,\Sigma _1,\Sigma _2,\nu ,\alpha ,\delta )\).
-
2.
Draw \({\text {vec}}(B_j)\) from the multivariate normal distribution \(P(\textrm{vec}\big (B_j\big ) | \textbf{Y},\textbf{x},\textbf{W},\Sigma _1,\Sigma _2,\alpha ,\delta )\).
-
3.
Draw \(\Sigma _1\) from the Wishart distribution \(P(\Sigma _1 | \textbf{W},\nu )\).
-
4.
Draw \(\Sigma _2\) from the inverse Wishart distribution \(P(\Sigma _2 | \textbf{Y},\textbf{x},B_1,B_2,\textbf{W},\alpha ,\delta )\).
-
5.
Draw \(\alpha \) and \(\delta \) from their joint full conditional distribution \(P(\alpha ,\delta |\textbf{Y},\textbf{x},B_1,B_2,\textbf{W},\Sigma _2)\) using an adaptive Metropolis–Hastings algorithm.
In the following, we provide the derivation of the full conditional distributions used in the Gibbs sampler and discuss the sampling methods.
Sampling \(B_1\). Let \(\tilde{Y}_t = Y_t - (1-\phi (x_t; \alpha ,\delta ))B_2\). The coefficient matrix \(B_1\) is drawn from the posterior full conditional distribution
where
meaning that \(\textrm{vec}\big (B_1\big ) \sim \mathcal {N}_{n^2}(\textrm{vec}\big (\overline{M\big )_1},\overline{\Omega }_1)\).
Sampling \(B_2\). Let \(\bar{Y}_t = Y_t - \phi (x_t; \alpha ,\delta )B_1\). The coefficient matrix \(B_2\) is drawn from the posterior full conditional distribution
where
meaning that \(\textrm{vec}\big (B_2\big ) \sim \mathcal {N}_{n^2}(\textrm{vec}\big (\overline{M\big )_2},\overline{\Omega }_2)\).
Sampling \(W_t\). The auxiliary covariance matrices \(W_t\), \(t=1,\ldots ,T\), are drawn from the posterior full conditional distribution
where
Sampling \(\Sigma _1\). Given a Wishart prior, the posterior full conditional distribution for \(\Sigma _1\) is conjugate and obtained as follows:
where
Sampling \(\Sigma _2\). Given an inverse Wishart prior, the posterior full conditional distribution for \(\Sigma _2\) is conjugate. Using the properties of the Kronecker product and of the vectorization and trace operators, we obtain
where we defined \(S_2 = \sum _{t=1}^T (Y_t-M_t)' W_t^{-1} (Y_t-M_t)\) and
Sampling \(\nu \). Combining the prior distribution and the likelihood in Eqs. (19)–(21), one gets
where
We sample from this distribution using an adaptive RWMH step with truncated lognormal proposal distribution [5, 6].
Sampling \(\alpha \) and \(\delta \). Combining the prior distribution and the likelihood in Eqs. (20)–(21) one gets
We sample from this distribution using an adaptive RWMH step [5, 6, see] with lognormal proposal for the parameter \(\alpha \). Let \(\boldsymbol{\eta }=(\log \alpha , \delta )'\) the value of the MCMC chain the iteration \((j-1)\), the candidate is generated as follows:
and \(\boldsymbol{\eta }^{(j)}=\boldsymbol{\eta }^{*}\) with probability \(\rho ^{(j)}=\min (1,r^{(j)})\), where \(r^{(j)}=\) and \(\boldsymbol{\eta }^{(j)}=\boldsymbol{\eta }^{(j-1)}\) with probability \(1-\rho ^{(j)}\). The updating scheme for the adaptation parameters is as follows
where \(\gamma ^{(j)}=C/j^\kappa \) with \(\kappa =0.65\), and the target acceptance rate is \(\rho ^* = 0.30\).
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Billio, M., Casarin, R., Costola, M., Iacopini, M. (2022). Matrix-variate Smooth Transition Models for Temporal Networks. In: Bekker, A., Ferreira, J.T., Arashi, M., Chen, DG. (eds) Innovations in Multivariate Statistical Modeling. Emerging Topics in Statistics and Biostatistics . Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-13971-0_7
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-13971-0_7
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-031-13970-3
Online ISBN: 978-3-031-13971-0
eBook Packages: Mathematics and StatisticsMathematics and Statistics (R0)