Skip to main content

Ontology-Driven Artificial Intelligence in IoT Forensics

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Breakthroughs in Digital Biometrics and Forensics

Abstract

The continued and rapid development of Internet of Things (IoT) devices in our modern world has brought significant changes to how society is being productive and connected. The widespread uptake and application of IoT devices in the past 10 years alone has seen how technology has advanced to aid in our daily lives and is now considered an integral factor to living. However, this advancement has come with a cost, the art of performing digital forensic investigations, particularly with IoT devices, has stagnated. Traditional methods that have been developed and applied in computer forensics over the last 20 years cannot be directly applied to the new domain of IoT forensics, mainly due to its greater complexity and being crossover with network and cloud forensics.

New forensic methods must be researched and established that can address these issues, while still maintaining the core principle of digital forensics, namely, to maintain the chain of custody throughout the investigative process. An approach still in its infancy is applying artificial intelligence (AI) to the IoT forensics domain, particularly a semantic-based ontology driven by machine learning (ML). This chapter focuses on the proposed methodologies and benefits that integrating ontologies and AI offer digital forensics investigators.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. M.M. Abdul Jalil, C.P. Ling, N.M. Mohamad Noor, F. Mohd, Knowledge representation model for crime analysis. Procedia Comput. Sci. 116, 484–491 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2017.10.067

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. N.A. Adderley, Graph-Based Temporal Analysis in Digital Forensics (Publication Number 2241), (Air Force Institute of Technology, 2019). https://scholar.afit.edu/etd/2241

  3. A. Akremi, M.-F. Sriti, H. Sallay, M. Rouached, Ontology-based smart sound digital forensics analysis for web services. Int. J. Web Serv. Res. 16(1), 70–92 (2019). https://doi.org/10.4018/IJWSR.2019010104

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. D. Allemang, J. Hendler, RDF—The basis of the Semantic Web, in Semantic Web for the Working Ontologist (Second Edition), ed. by D. Allemang, J. Hendler, (Morgan Kaufmann, 2011), pp. 27–50. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-385965-5.10003-2

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  5. F. Amato, G. Cozzolino, A. Mazzeo, N. Mazzocca, Correlation of digital evidences in forensic investigation through semantic technologies, in 2017 31st International Conference on Advanced Information Networking and Applications Workshops (WAINA), Taipei, Taiwan, 2017

    Google Scholar 

  6. S. Amiroon, C. Fachkha, Digital forensics and investigations of the internet of things: A short survey, in 2020 3rd International Conference on Signal Processing and Information Security (ICSPIS), Dubai, United Arab Emirates, 2020

    Google Scholar 

  7. H.F. Atlam, E. El-Din Hemdan, A. Alenezi, M.O. Alassafi, G.B. Wills, Internet of things forensics: A review. Internet Things 11, 100220 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iot.2020.100220

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. O. Brady, R. Overill, J. Keppens, Addressing the increasing volume and variety of digital evidence using an ontology, in 2014 IEEE Joint Intelligence and Security Informatics Conference, The Hague, Netherlands, 2014

    Google Scholar 

  9. E. Casey, Interrelations between digital investigation and forensic science. Digit. Investig. 28, A1–A2 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.diin.2019.03.008

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. E. Casey, G. Back, S. Barnum, Leveraging CybOX™ to standardize representation and exchange of digital forensic information. Digit. Investig. 12, S102–S110 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.diin.2015.01.014

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. A. Cuzzocrea, G. Pirrò, A semantic-web-technology-based framework for supporting knowledge-driven digital forensics, in Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Management of Digital EcoSystems, Biarritz, France, 2016. https://dl.acm.org/doi/pdf/10.1145/3012071.3012099

  12. H. Henseler, J. Hyde, Technology assisted analysis of timeline and connections in digital forensic investigations, in LegalAIIA@ ICAIL, Montreal, Canada, 2019

    Google Scholar 

  13. M. Herman, M. Iorga, A.M. Salim, R.H. Jackson, M.R. Hurst, R. Leo, R. Lee, N.M. Landreville, A.K. Mishra, Y. Wang, R. Sardinas, NIST Cloud Computing Forensic Science Challenges, 2020. https://doi.org/10.6028/NIST.IR.8006

  14. V.R. Kebande, R.A. Ikuesan, N.M. Karie, S. Alawadi, K.-K.R. Choo, A. Al-Dhaqm, Quantifying the need for supervised machine learning in conducting live forensic analysis of emergent configurations (ECO) in IoT environments. Forensic Sci. Int. Rep. 2, 100122 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fsir.2020.100122

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. A. Kumar, K.S. Kuppusamy, G. Aghila, FAMOUS: Forensic analysis of MObile devices using scoring of application permissions. Futur. Gener. Comput. Syst. 83, 158–172 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.future.2018.02.001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. A. Kuppa, S. Grzonkowski, N. Lekhac, Enabling trust in deep learning models: A digital forensics case study, in 2018 17th IEEE International Conference On Trust, Security And Privacy in Computing and Communications/12th IEEE International Conference On Big Data Science and Engineering (TrustCom/BigDataSE), New York, USA, 2018

    Google Scholar 

  17. K. Kurniawan, A. Ekelhart, E. Kiesling, D. Winkler, G. Quirchmayr, A.M. Tjoa, Virtual knowledge graphs for federated log analysis, in The 16th International Conference on Availability, Reliability and Security, Vienna, Austria, 2021. https://dl.acm.org/doi/pdf/10.1145/3465481.3465767

  18. A. Rhayem, M.B.A. Mhiri, F. Gargouri, Semantic web technologies for the internet of things: Systematic literature review. Internet Things 11, 100206 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iot.2020.100206

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. H.I. Sahib, M.Q. AlSudani, M.H. Ali, H.Q. Abbas, K. Moorthy, M.M. Adnan, Proposed intelligence systems based on digital Forensics: Review paper. Materials Today: Proceedings, 2021. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2021.07.007

  20. D.J. Schelkoph, Digital Forensics Event Graph Reconstruction (Publication Number 1822), (Air Force Institute of Technology, 2018). https://scholar.afit.edu/etd/1822/

  21. F. Servida, E. Casey, IoT forensic challenges and opportunities for digital traces. Digit. Investig. 28, 22–29 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.diin.2019.01.012

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. L.F. Sikos, AI in digital forensics: Ontology engineering for cybercrime investigations. WIREs Forensic Sci. 3(3), e1394 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1002/wfs2.1394

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. M. Stoyanova, Y. Nikoloudakis, S. Panagiotakis, E. Pallis, E.K. Markakis, A survey on the internet of things (IoT) forensics: Challenges, approaches, and open issues. IEEE Commun. Surv. Tutor. 22(2), 1191–1221 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1109/COMST.2019.2962586

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. B. Turnbull, S. Randhawa, Automated event and social network extraction from digital evidence sources with ontological mapping. Digit. Investig. 13, 94–106 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.diin.2015.04.004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. W. Yang, M.N. Johnstone, L.F. Sikos, S. Wang, Security and forensics in the internet of things: Research advances and challenges, in 2020 Workshop on Emerging Technologies for Security in IoT (ETSecIoT), Sydney, Australia, 2020

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Alexander E. Grojek .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Grojek, A.E., Sikos, L.F. (2022). Ontology-Driven Artificial Intelligence in IoT Forensics. In: Daimi, K., Francia III, G., Encinas, L.H. (eds) Breakthroughs in Digital Biometrics and Forensics. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-10706-1_12

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-10706-1_12

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-031-10705-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-031-10706-1

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics