Abstract
Global concern on the serious impacts of humans on the natural environment has crystallised in a number of international conventions and agreements. Such agreements contain several commitments and recommendations aimed at different stakeholders, chiefly national governments, at different spatial scales. Those commitments and recommendations can be broadly divided in two complementary strategies for biodiversity conservation: (1) Ex-situ conservation; and (2) In-situ conservation. Ex-situ conservation entails the conservation of selected plant and animal species in facilities outside their natural habitats, such as botanic gardens, zoos, aquariums or gene banks. Insitu conservation is defined as ‘the conservation of ecosystems and natural habitats and the maintenance and recovery of viable populations of species in their natural surroundings’. The most widely used on site conservation tool is protected areas (PAs), although other tools such as Other Effective Conservation Measures (OECMs) or ecological restoration also play an important role in maintaining biodiversity in the Planet.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Almassi B (2017) Ecological Restorations as Practices of Moral Repair. Ethics and the Environment 22: 19–40. https://www.jstor.org/stable/10.2979/ethicsenviro.22.1.02
Arendt F, Matthes J (2014) Nature Documentaries, Connectedness to Nature, and Pro-environmental Behavior. Environmental Communication 10: 453–472. https://doi.org/10.1080/17524032.2014.993415
Bruni CM, Fraser J, Schultz PW (2008) The Value of Zoo Experiences for Connecting People with Nature. Visitor Studies 11: 139–150. https://doi.org/10.1080/10645570802355489
Carabias J, Arriaga V, Cervantes-Gutiérrez V (2007) Public policies of environmental restoration in Mexico: limitations, progress, lags, and challenges. Botanical Sciences 80S: 85–100. https://doi.org/10.17129/botsci.1759
CBD (2015) Biodiversity and the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development. CBD, Montreal. https://www.cbd.int/development/doc/sdg-sep2015-flyer.pdf. Accessed 11 March 2021
CBD (2016) Biodiversity and Sustainable Development: Technical Note. UNEP/CBD/COP/13/10/Add.1. CBD, Montreal. https://www.cbd.int/doc/meetings/cop/cop-13/official/cop-13-10-add1-en.pdf. Accessed 11 March 2021
Ceccon E, Barrera-Cataño JI, Aronson J et al. (2015) The socioecological complexity of ecological restoration in Mexico. Restoration Ecology 23: 331–336. https://doi.org/10.1111/rec.12228
Clayton S, Myers G (2015) Conservation Psychology: Understanding and Promoting Human Care for Nature. John Wiley & Sons, 2nd ed.
Conde DA, Flesness N, Colchero F et al.(2011) An Emerging Role of Zoos to Conserve Biodiversity. Science 331 (6023): 1390–1391. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1200674
Dudley, N. (Editor) (2008). Guidelines for Applying Protected Area Management Categories. IUCN, Gland, 86 pp. https://www.iucn.org/sites/dev/files/import/downloads/iucn_assignment_1.pdf. Accessed 15 July 2021
EAZA (2021) EAZA Ex situ Programmes. https://www.eaza.net/conservation/programmes/. Accessed 11 Mars 2021
Gusset M, Dick G (2011) The global reach of zoos and aquariums in visitor numbers and conservation expenditures. Zoobiology 30(5): 566–569. https://doi.org/10.1002/zoo.20369
Herrick JE, Schuman GE, Rango A (2006) Monitoring ecological processes for restoration projects. Journal for Nature Conservation 14: 161–171. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jnc.2006.05.001
IUCN (2012) IUCN Red List categories and criteria, version 3.1, second edition. IUCN, Gland and Cambridge. https://portals.iucn.org/library/node/10315. Accessed 11 March 2021
Keulartz J (2012) The Emergence of Enlightened Anthropocentrism in Ecological Restoration. Nature and Culture 7(1). https://doi.org/10.3167/nc.2012.070104
Mounce R, Smith P, Brockington S (2017) Ex situ conservation of plant diversity in the world’s botanic gardens. Nature Plants 3: 795–802. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41477-017-0019-3
Palmer MA, Menninger HL, Bernhardt E (2010) River restoration, habitat heterogeneity and biodiversity: a failure of theory or practice? Freshwater Biology 55(1): 205–222. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2427.2009.02372.x
Protected Planet (2021) Management effectiveness (PAME) https://www.protectedplanet.net/en/thematic-areas/protected-areas-management-effectiveness-pame?tab=Results. Accessed 27 August 2021
SER (2021) What is Ecological Restoration? https://www.ser-rrc.org/what-is-ecological-restoration/. Accessed 11 March 2021
Svalbard Global Seed Vault (2021) Safeguarding Seeds for the Future. https://www.seedvault.no/. Accessed 11 March 2021
Wang X, Wang Y, Wang Y (2013) Use of exotic species during ecological restoration can produce effects that resemble vegetation invasions and other unintended consequences. Ecological Engineering 52: 247–251. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoleng.2012.11.007
Westengen OT, Jeppson S, Guarino L (2013) Global Ex-Situ Crop Diversity Conservation and the Svalbard Global Seed Vault: Assessing the Current Status. PLoS ONE 8(5): e64146. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0064146
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Rodríguez-Rodríguez, D., Martínez-Vega, J. (2022). Strategies to Address the Biodiversity Crisis. In: Effectiveness of Protected Areas in Conserving Biodiversity. Strategies for Sustainability. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-94297-7_2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-94297-7_2
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-94296-0
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-94297-7
eBook Packages: Earth and Environmental ScienceEarth and Environmental Science (R0)