Skip to main content

Toward Green Ferroalloys: Replacement of Fossil Reductants in the Pre-reduction Process of Chromite by Bio-Based Alternatives

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
REWAS 2022: Developing Tomorrow’s Technical Cycles (Volume I)

Part of the book series: The Minerals, Metals & Materials Series ((MMMS))

Abstract

The production of ferrochrome via carbothermic reduction in submerged arc furnaces is an energy-intensive process relying on the usage of coal and coke as reducing agents. The pre-reduction of chromite in a rotary kiln is currently carried out to decrease the specific electric energy consumption in the smelting furnace. However, as fossil reductants are still needed for reduction, CO2 is emitted. The usage of bio-based carbon with a faster carbon cycle compared to fossil reductants could be an option to decrease the specific CO2 footprint of Ferrochrome production. In this paper, the pre-reduction of chromite was investigated using various bio-based reducing agents and lignite coke as a fossil reference. Isothermal reduction trials were conducted at 1000, 1150, and 1300 °C and different holding times. While at lower temperatures the pre-reduction was insufficient, the bio-based reducing agents yield a degree of reaction between 61.0% and 65.4% at 1300 °C reaction times of 360 min. The highest degree of reaction is reached using coconut charcoal, followed by corn, olive, and bamboo charcoal. Coke results in the lowest degree of reaction with 51.9%. While the bio-based reducing agents performed similar after long reaction times, significant deviations were observed for shorter reaction times. X-ray diffraction was carried out to investigate the obtained product, which showed that the pre-reduction was mostly due to the formation of carbides, while the intensity of metals in the sample was rather low.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Sommerfeld M, Friedrich B (2021) Replacing fossil carbon in the production of ferroalloys with a focus on bio-based carbon: a review. Minerals 11(11):1286. https://doi.org/10.3390/min11111286

  2. Fick G, Mirgaux O, Neau P, Patisson F (2014) Using biomass for pig iron production: a technical, environmental and economical assessment. Waste Biomass Valorization 5(1):43–55. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12649-013-9223-1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Suopajärvi H, Umeki K, Mousa E, Hedayati A, Romar H, Kemppainen A, Wang C, Phounglamcheik A, Tuomikoski S, Norberg N, Andefors A, Öhman M, Lassi U, Fabritius T (2018) Use of biomass in integrated steelmaking—status quo, future needs and comparison to other low-CO2 steel production technologies. Appl Energy 213:384–407. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2018.01.060

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Mousa E, Wang C, Riesbeck J, Larsson M (2016) Biomass applications in iron and steel industry: an overview of challenges and opportunities. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 65:1247–1266. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2016.07.061

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Quader MA, Ahmed S, Ghazilla RAR, Ahmed S, Dahari M (2015) A comprehensive review on energy efficient CO2 breakthrough technologies for sustainable green iron and steel manufacturing. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 50:594–614. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.RSER.2015.05.026

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Suopajärvi H, Kemppainen A, Haapakangas J, Fabritius T (2017) Extensive review of the opportunities to use biomass-based fuels in iron and steelmaking processes. J Clean Prod 148:709–734. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.02.029

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Rosenfeld DC, Böhm H, Lindorfer J, Lehner M (2020) Scenario analysis of implementing a power-to-gas and biomass gasification system in an integrated steel plant: a techno-economic and environmental study. Renew Energy 147:1511–1524. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.RENENE.2019.09.053

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Mandova H, Leduc S, Wang C, Wetterlund E, Patrizio P, Gale W, Kraxner F (2018) Possibilities for CO2 emission reduction using biomass in European integrated steel plants. Biomass Bioenerg 115:231–243. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biombioe.2018.04.021

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Suopajärvi H, Pongráczb E, Fabritiusa T (2013) The potential of using biomass-based reducing agents in the blast furnace: a review of thermochemical conversion technologies and assessments related to sustainability. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 25:511–528. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2013.05.005

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Gupta RC (2003) Woodchar as a sustainable reductant for ironmaking in the 21st century. Min Proc Ext Met Rev 24(3–4):203–231. https://doi.org/10.1080/714856822

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Wei R, Zhang L, Cang D, Li J, Li X, Xu CC (2017) Current status and potential of biomass utilization in ferrous metallurgical industry. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 68:511–524. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2016.10.013

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Basson J, Daavittila J (2013) High carbon ferrochrome technology. In: Gasik M (ed) Handbook of ferroalloys. Elsevier/Butterworth-Heinemann. Amsterdam, The Netherlands, pp 317–363

    Google Scholar 

  13. Kleynhans ELJ, Beukes JP, van Zyl PG, Fick JIJ (2017) Techno-economic feasibility of a pre-oxidation process to enhance prereduction of chromite. J S Afr Inst Min Metall 117(5):457–468. https://doi.org/10.17159/2411-9717/2017/v117n5a8

  14. Kleynhans ELJ, Neizel BW, Beukes JP, van Zyl PG (2016) Utilisation of pre-oxidised ore in the pelletised chromite pre-reduction process. Miner Eng 92:114–124. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mineng.2016.03.005

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Kleynhans ELJ, Beukes JP, van Zyl PG, Bunt JR, Nkosi NSB, Venter M (2017) The effect of carbonaceous reductant selection on chromite pre-reduction. Metall Mater Trans B 48(2):827–840. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11663-016-0878-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. van Staden Y, Beukes JP, van Zyl PG, Ringdalen E, Tangstad M, Kleynhans ELJ, Bunt JR (2018) Damring formation during rotary kiln chromite pre-reduction: effects of pulverized carbonaceous fuel selection and partial pellet melting. Metall Mater Trans B 49(6):3488–3503. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11663-018-1376-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Mohale GTM, Beukes JP, Kleynhans ELJ, van Zyl PG, Bunt JR, Tiedt LR, Venter AD, Jordaan A (2017) SEM image processing as an alternative method to determine chromite pre-reduction. J S Afr Inst Min Metall 117(11):1045–1052. https://doi.org/10.17159/2411-9717/2017/v117n11a9

  18. Neizel BW, Beukes JP, van Zyl PG, Dawson NF (2013) Why is CaCO3 not used as an additive in the pelletised chromite pre-reduction process? Miner Eng 45:115–120. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mineng.2013.02.015

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Paktunc D, Thibault Y, Sokhanvaran S, Yu D (2018) Influences of alkali fluxes on direct reduction of chromite for ferrochrome production. J S Afr Inst Min Metall 118(12). https://doi.org/10.17159/2411-9717/2018/v118n12a9

  20. Sokhanvaran S, Paktunc D, Barnes A (2018) NaOH-assisted direct reduction of Ring of Fire chromite ores, and the associated implications for processing. J S Afr Inst Min Metall 118(6). https://doi.org/10.17159/2411-9717/2018/v118n6a4

  21. Yu D, Paktunc D (2018) Kinetics and mechanisms of the carbothermic reduction of chromite in the presence of nickel. J Therm Anal Calorim 132(1):143–154. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10973-017-6936-6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Sommerfeld M, Friedrich B (2021) Proposition of a thermogravimetric method to measure the ferrous iron content in metallurgical-grade chromite. Minerals 12(2):109. https://doi.org/10.3390/min12020109

  23. Bale CW, Bélisle E, Chartrand P, Decterov SA, Eriksson G, Gheribi AE, Hack K, Jung I-H, Kang Y-B, Melançon J, Pelton AD, Petersen S, Robelin C, Sangster J, Spencer P, van Ende M-A (2016) FactSage thermochemical software and databases, 2010–2016. Calphad 54:35–53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.calphad.2016.05.002

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to M. Sommerfeld .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 The Minerals, Metals & Materials Society

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Sommerfeld, M., Friedrich, B. (2022). Toward Green Ferroalloys: Replacement of Fossil Reductants in the Pre-reduction Process of Chromite by Bio-Based Alternatives. In: Lazou, A., Daehn, K., Fleuriault, C., Gökelma, M., Olivetti, E., Meskers, C. (eds) REWAS 2022: Developing Tomorrow’s Technical Cycles (Volume I). The Minerals, Metals & Materials Series. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-92563-5_65

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics