Abstract
Companion robots are social robots often resembling animals with potential wellbeing benefits for older adults. However, some such devices have failed possibly through inappropriate design. Method: Questionnaires were completed by 113 participants at nine health and care events. Participants were predominantly relevant professionals. Participants approached our interaction station, interacted with eight companion robots or alternatives, then completed questionnaires; ranking aesthetic, behaviour, technology, feel and interaction features and estimating affordable price. Results: Features ranked highly were: interactive response to vocalisations and touch, huggable size, soft fur, variety of behaviours/sounds, realistic movements, eye contact with large cute eyes, being realistic, familiar, easy to use and possessing simulated warmth. Participants thought −£225 was affordable. Conclusion: We contribute priority features for stakeholders to inform future developments. Contrasting unfamiliar embodiment of some devices, stakeholders support familiar, realistic aesthetics, with implications for enhanced acceptability, adoption and more consistent wellbeing outcomes.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Moyle, W., Jones, C.J., Murfield, J.E., et al.: Using a therapeutic companion robot for dementia symptoms in long-term care: reflections from a cluster-RCT. Aging Ment. Health. 23(3), 329–336 (2019)
Abbott, R., Orr, N., McGill, P., et al.: How do robopets impact the health and well-being of residents in care homes? A systematic review of qualitative and quantitative evidence. Int. J. Older People Nurs. 14(3), e12239 (2019)
Bradwell, H.L., Edwards, K.J., Winnington, R., Thill, S., Jones, R.B.: Companion robots for older people: importance of user-centred design demonstrated through observations and focus groups comparing preferences of older people and roboticists in South West England. BMJ Open. 9(9), e032468 (2019)
Heerink, M., Krose, B., Vanessa, E., Wielinga, B.: Assessing acceptance of assistive social agent technology: the almere model. Int. J. Soc. Robot. 2, 361–375 (2010)
Forlizzi, J., Disalvo, C., Gemperle, F.: Assistive robotics and an ecology of elders living independently in their homes. Hum.-Comput. Interact. 19, 25–59 (2004)
Heerink, M., et al.: Exploring requirements and alternative pet robots for robot assisted therapy with older adults with dementia. In: Herrmann, G., Pearson, M.J., Lenz, A., Bremner, P., Spiers, A., Leonards, U. (eds.) ICSR 2013. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 8239, pp. 104–115. Springer, Cham (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-02675-6_11
Natoli, R., Zuhair, S.: Rediscovering the Condorcet approach as an aggregation technique for progress measures. Econ. Pap. 30(3), 368–376 (2011)
Bradwell, H.L., Johnson, C.W., Lee, J., et al.: Microbial contamination and efficacy of disinfection procedures of companion robots in care homes. PLOS one, 15(8), e0237069 (2020)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2021 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Bradwell, H., Winnington, R., Thill, S., Jones, R.B. (2021). Prioritising Design Features for Companion Robots Aimed at Older Adults: Stakeholder Survey Ranking Results. In: Li, H., et al. Social Robotics. ICSR 2021. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 13086. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-90525-5_70
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-90525-5_70
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-90524-8
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-90525-5
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)