Skip to main content

Abstract

In The Principle of Hope Ernst Bloch makes use of a paradoxical conceptual arrangement, juxtaposing categories that tend to be treated as if they were mutually exclusive: utopia, on the one hand, and realism, on the other. “Realism in art,” he writes, “is not a descriptive or explicative stocktaking. Rather, it holds up a mirror of immanent anticipation in an activating way. It is tendentious, Utopian realism.” Once deployed in a utopian context, the referential function of the realist text is reconfigured. It makes reference to reality not in its given state but in view of its “future-laden properties.” What then are the structural features of a textual practice shaped in accordance with this principle? On what set of discursive operations does it rest? And how does it achieve this “activation,” over and above mere depiction? These questions will also be broached in relation to Elias Canetti’s “Realism and New Reality,” a text which stages its own encounter between the two main categories at stake here.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 119.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Adorno, Theodor W. 2002. Aesthetic Theory, ed. Gretel Adorno and Rolf Tiedemann, trans. Robert Hullot-Kentor. London: Continuum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Adorno, Theodor W., and Ernst Bloch. 1988. Something’s Missing: A Discussion Between Ernst Bloch and Theodor W. Adorno on the Contradictions of Utopian Longing. In The Utopian Function of Art and Literature: Selected Essays, ed. Ernst Bloch, trans. Jack Zipes and Frank Mecklenburg, 1–17. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barthes, Roland. 1989. Sade, Fourier, Loyola, trans. Richard Miller. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blanchot, Maurice. 1997. The Apocalypse Is Disappointing. In Friendship, trans. Elizabeth Rottenberg, 101–108. Stanford: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bloch, Ernst. 1986–1995. The Principle of Hope, 3 vols, trans. Neville Plaice, Stephanie Plaice, and Paul Knight. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. Original edition: Bloch, Ernst. 1985. Das Prinzip Hoffung. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1989. The Utopian Function of Art and Literature: Selected Essays, trans. Jack Zipes and Frank Mecklenburg. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brecht, Bertolt. 2003. Notes on the Realist Mode of Writing. In Brecht on Art and Politics, ed. Tom Kuhn and Steve Giles, trans. Laura Bradley, Steve Giles, and Tom Kuhn, 242–262. London and New York: Bloomsbury.

    Google Scholar 

  • Canetti, Elias. 1978. The Human Province, trans. Joachim Neugroschel. New York: Seabury Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1979. Realism and New Reality. In The Conscience of Words, trans. Joachim Neugroschel, 55–59. New York: Seabury Press. Original Edition: Canetti, Elias. 1981. Realismus und neue Wirklichkeit. In Das Gewissen der Worte, 72–77. Frankfurt am Main: Fischer Taschenbuch Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Derrida, Jacques. 1984. No Apocalypse, Not Now (Full Speed Ahead, Seven Missiles, Seven Missives), trans. Catherine Porter and Philip Lewis. Diacritics 14 (2): 20–31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Enzensberger, Hans Magnus. 1982. Two Notes on the End of the World. In Critical Essays, ed. Reinhold Grimm and Bruce Armstrong, 233–241. New York: Continuum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grosz, Elizabeth. 2001. Embodied Utopias: The Time of Architecture. In Architecture from the Outside: Essays on Virtual and Real Space, 131–150. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jameson, Fredric. 2005. Archaeologies of the Future: The Desire Called Utopia and Other Science Fictions. London and New York: Verso.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2013. The Antinomies of Realism. London and New York: Verso.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roth, Michael S. 2012. Trauma: A Dystopia of the Spirit. In Memory, Trauma and History: Essays on Living with the Past, 87–103. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scheerbart, Paul. 1972. Glass Architecture; Alpine Architecture, ed. Dennis Sharp, trans. James Palmes and Shirley Palmer. London: November Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tarde, Gabriel. 2004. Underground (Fragments of Future Histories), trans. Cloudesley Brereton. Updated Liam Gillick.Brussels: Maîtres de Forme Contemporains; Dijon: Presses du reel.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zipes, Jack. 1988. Introduction: Toward a Realization of Anticipatory Illumination. In The Utopian Function of Art and Literature: Selected Essays, ed. Ernst Bloch, trans. Jack Zipes and Frank Mecklenburg, xi–xliii. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

McAuliffe, S. (2022). Utopian Realism. In: Marks, P., Wagner-Lawlor, J.A., Vieira, F. (eds) The Palgrave Handbook of Utopian and Dystopian Literatures. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-88654-7_17

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics