Abstract
Currently, Holocaust history education faces two challenges: the authentication and availability of its information and the need for more effective pedagogical methods for Historical and Cultural Learning. This study presents the impact of the Future Memory tablet application which combines the active, embodied exploration of historical information with geo-localised presentation using virtual and augmented reality technology. We report three recent studies where the application was tested with a total of 147 participants. The results confirm that active, embodied exploration of historical information facilitates learning more as compared to standard exhibitions. In addition, our results show that memory consolidation and learning is facilitated by prior knowledge while negative emotions can have a detrimental effect on learning outcomes. Lastly, our results show that combining historical information with a spatialised VR/AR environment leads to significantly better learning outcomes as compared to using a spatial representation alone. These results provide strong support for the model of Historical and Cultural Learning pursued in the Future Memory project, which grounds the learning experience in the situated, active and individualised engagement with historical sources.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Aleven, V., Roll, I., McLaren, B. M., & Koedinger, K. R. (2016). Help Helps, But only so Much: Research on Help Seeking with Intelligent Tutoring Systems. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 26(1). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40593-015-0089-1
Azuma, R. T. (1997). A Survey of Augmented Reality. Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments, 6(4), 355–385.
Barth, C. M., & Funke, J. (2010). Negative Affective Environments Improve Complex Solving Performance. Cognition and Emotion, 7, 1259–1268.
Beck, J. (2006). Using Learning Decomposition to Analyse Student Fluency Development. ITS2006 Educational Data Mining Workshop.
Bell, M. A., & Cuevas, K. (2013). Using EEG to Study Cognitive Development: Issues and Practices. Journal of Cognition and Development, 13(3), 1–11.
Bernardet, U., Väljamäe, A., Inderbitzin, M., Wierenga, S., Mura, A., & Verschure, P. F. M. J. (2011). Quantifying Human Subjective Experience and Social Interaction Using the eXperience Induction Machine. Brain Research Bulletin, 85(5).
Billinghurst, M., Cheok, A., Prince, S., & Kato, H. (2002). Real World Teleconferencing. IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications, 22(6), 11–13.
Bisby, J. A., Aidan, J. Horner, Daniel, Bush, & Neil, Burgess. (2018). Negative Emotional Content Disrupts the Coherence of Episodic Memories. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 147(2), 243.
Blancas, M., et al. (Under Review). Learning Phases as Expressed in the Performance of Primary-School Children in a Mathematical Task. The Journal of Experimental Education.
Brooks, J. J. G., & Brooks, M. G. (1999). In Search of Understanding: The Case for Constructivist Classrooms. Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development, 1–136.
Bruner, J. S. (1990). Acts of Meaning (Vol. 3). Harvard University Press.
Brusilovsky, P. (1996). Methods and Techniques of Adaptive Hypermedia. User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction, 6(2–3), 87–129.
Buzsáki, G., & Moser, E. I. (2013). Memory, Navigation and Theta Rhythm in the Hippocampal-Entorhinal System. Nature Neuroscience, 16(2), 130.
Chrastil, E. R., & Warren, W. H. (2012). Active and Passive Contributions to Spatial Learning. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 19(1), 1–23.
Clark, D. B., Tanner-Smith, E. E., & Killingsworth, S. S. (2016). Digital Games, Design, and Learning: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Review of Educational Research, 86(1), 79–122.
Conati, C., & X. Zhou (2002). ‘Modeling Students’ Emotions from Cognitive Appraisal in Educational Games. International Conference on Intelligent Tutoring Systems (pp. 944–954).
Copeland, T. (2006). Constructing Pasts: Interpreting the Historic Environment. In A. Hems & M. R. Blockley (Eds.), Heritage Interpretation (pp. 83–95). Routledge.
El-Hakim, S., Beraldin, J., & Godin, G. (2009). Detailed 3D Reconstruction of Large-Scale Heritage Sites with Integrated Techniques. IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications, 21–38.
Else-Quest, N. M., Higgins, A., Allison, C., & Morton, L. C. (2012). Gender Differences in Self-Conscious Emotional Experience: A Meta-Analysis. Psychology Bulletin, 138(5), 947–981.
Engel, A. K., Friston, K. J., & Kragic, D. (2016). The Pragmatic Turn: Toward Action-Oriented Views in Cognitive Science. MIT Press.
Feiner, S., MacIntyre, B., Höllerer, T., & Webster, A. (1997). A Touring Machine: Prototyping 3D Mobile Augmented Reality Systems for Exploring the Urban Environment. In Proc. of ISWC 1997.
Ferguson, T. J., & Stegge, H. (1998). Measuring Guilt in Children: A Rose by Any Other Name Still Has Thorns. In J. Bybee (Ed.), Guilt and Children (pp. 19–74). Academic Press.
Foster, S., Pettigrew, A., Pearce, A., Burgess, R. H. A., Salmons, P., & Lenga, R.-A. (2016). What Do Students Know and Understand About the Holocaust? UCL Press.
Girasoli, A. J., & Hannafin, R. D. (2008). Using Asynchronous AV Communication Tools to Increase Academic Self-Efficacy. Computers and Education, 51(4), 1676–1682.
Grant, P., & Basye, D. (2014). Personalized learning. A Guide for Engaging Students with Technology. International Society for Technology in Education.
Harland, T. (2012). University Teaching. University Teaching. Routledge.
Helmholtz, H. (1896). Vortrage und Reden. Vieweg.
Hoffman, M. L. (1987). The Contribution of Empathy to Justice and Moral Judgment. In N. Eisenberg & J. Strayer (Eds.), Empathy and Its Development (pp. 47–80). Cambridge University Press.
Isen, A. M., & Labroo, A. A. (2012). Some Ways in Which Positive Affect Facilitates Decision Making and Judgment. In E. Michael Lewis, J. M. Haviland-Jones, & L. Feldman Barrett (Eds.), Emerging Perspectives on Judgment and Decision Research (pp. 365–393). Cambridge University Press.
Khine, M. S., & Saleh, I. M. (Eds.). (2010). New Science of Learning. Springer.
Knutov, E., De Bra, P., & Pechenizkiy, M. (2009). AH 12 Years Later: A Comprehensive Survey of Adaptive Hypermedia Methods and Techniques. New Review of Hypermedia and Multimedia, 15(1), 5–38.
Koedinger, K. R., & Anderson, J. R. (1997). Intelligent Tutoring Goes to School in the Big City. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 8, 30–43.
Kraemer, H. (2013). Interdependence and Consequence: En Route toward a Grammar of Hypermedia Communication Design. In O. Grau (Ed.), Imagery in the 21st Century (pp. 289–305). MIT Press.
Lallee, S., & Verschure, P. F. M. J. (2015). How? Why? What? Where? When? Who? Grounding Ontology in the Actions of a Situated Social Agent. Robotics, 4(2), 169–193.
Law, E. L.-C., & Sun, X. (2012). Evaluating User Experience of Adaptive Digital Educational Games with Activity Theory. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 70(7), 478–497.
Lessiter, J., Freeman, J., & Davidoff, J. (2001). A Cross-Media Presence Questionnaire: The ITC-Sense of Presence Inventory. Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments, 10(3), 282–297.
Maguire, E. A., Frith, C. D., & Morris, R. G. M. (1999). The Functional Neuroanatomy of Comprehension and Memory: The Importance of Prior Knowledge. Brain, 122(10), 1839–1850.
Mathias, M., Zhou, F., Torres-Moreno, J.-M., Josselin, D., Poli, M.-S., & Linhares, A. C. (2017). Personalised Sightseeing Tours: A Model for Visits in Art Museums. International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 31(3), 591–616.
McCullough, M. (2004). Digital Ground. MIT Press.
Mello, S. K. D., Craig, S. D., Witherspoon, A., McDaniel, B., & Graesser, A. (2008). Automatic Detection of Learner' S Affect from Conversational Cues. User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction, 1, 45–80.
Milgram, P., & Kishino, F. (1994). A Taxonomy of Mixed Reality Visual Displays. IEICE TRANSACTIONS on Information and Systems, 77(12), 1321–1329.
Mintzes, J. J., Wandersee, J. H., & Novak, J. D. (2005). Teaching Science for Understanding: A Human Constructivist View. Academic Press.
Narumi, T., Hayashi, O., Kasada, K., Yamazaki, M., Tanikawa, T., & Hirose, M. (2011). Digital Diorama: Augmented Reality Exhibition System to Convey Background Information for Museums. In Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics), 6773, 76–86.
Novin, S., & Rieffe, C. (2015). Validation of the Brief Shame and Guilt Questionnaire for Children. Personality and Individual Differences, 85, 56–59.
Nawijn, J., & Fricke, M. C. (2015). Visitor Emotions and Behavioral Intentions: The case of Concentration Camp Memorial Neuengamme. International Journal of Tourism Research, 17(3), 221–228. Chicago.
Nawijn, J., Isaac, R. K., Gridnevskiy, K., & Van Liempt, A. (2018). Holocaust Concentration Camp Memorial Sites: Anexploratory Study into Expected Emotional Response. Current Issues in Tourism, 21(2), 175–190.
Oliva, L. S., Mura, A., Betella, A., Pacheco, D., Bueno, E. M., Verschure, P. (n.d.). Recovering the History of Bergen Belsen Using an Interactive 3D Reconstruction in a Mixed Reality Space The Role of Pre-Knowledge on Memory Recollection. http://specs.upf.edu
Oliva, L. S., Mura, A., Betella, A., Pacheco, D., Martinez, E., & Verschure, P. (2015). Recovering the History of Bergen Belsen Using an Interactive 3D Reconstruction in a Mixed Reality Space the Role of Pre-knowledge on Memory Recollection. Digital Heritage, 1, 163–165.
Olsen, J. K., Belenky, D. M., Aleven, V., Rummel, N., Sewall, J., & Ringenberg, M. (2014). Authoring Tools for Collaborative Intelligent Tutoring System Environments. Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics), 8474, 523–528.
Pacheco, D., Sánchez-Fibla, M., Duff, A., & Verschure, P. F. M. J. (2017). A Spatial-Context Effect in Recognition Memory. Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience, 11, 1–9.
Pacheco, D., & Verschure, P. F. M. J. (2018). Long-Term Spatial Clustering in Free Recall. Memory, 26(6), 798–806.
Pacheco, D., Wierenga, S., Omedas, P., Oliva, L. S., Wilbricht, S., Billib, S., Knoch, H., & Verschure, P. (2016). A Location-Based Augmented Reality System for the Spatial Interaction with Historical Datasets. Digital Heritage International Congress, 2015, 393–396.
Pacheco, D., Wierenga, S., Omedas, P., Wilbricht, S., Knoch, H., & Verschure, P. F. M. J. (2014). Spatialising Experience: A Framework for the Geolocalisation, Visualisation and Exploration of Historical Data Using Virtual Reality/Augmented Reality Technologies Categories and Subject Descriptors. In Virtual Reality International Conference—Laval. Association for Computing Machinery. https://doi.org/10.1145/2617841.2617842
Pintrich, P. (2004). A Conceptual Framework for Assessing Motivation and SRL in College Students. Educational Psychology Review, 16(4), 385–407.
Porayska-Pomsta, K., Mavrikis, M., D'Mello, S., Conati, C., & Baker, R. S. J. D. (2013). Knowledge Elicitation Methods for Affect Modelling in Education. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 22(3), 107–140. https://doi.org/10.3233/JAI-130032
Pouw, L. B. C., Rieffe, C., Oosterveld, P., Huskens, B., & Stockmann, L. (2013). Reactive/Proactive Aggression and Affective/Cognitive Empathy in Children with ASD. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 34(4), 1256–1266.
Prince, M. J., & Felder, R. M. (2006). Inductive Teaching and Learning Methods: Definitions, Comparisons, and Research Bases. Journal. of Engineering Education, 95(2), 123–138.
Pujol, L., & Champion, E. (2012). Evaluating Presence in Cultural Heritage Projects. International Journal of Heritage Studies, 18(1), 83–102.
Rahaman, H. (2018). Digital Heritage Interpretation: A Conceptual Framework. Digital Creativity, 29(2–3), 208–234.
Rahaman, H., & Tan, B.-K. (2011). 'Interpreting Digital Heritage: A Conceptual Model with End-Users' Perspective. International Journal of Architectural Computing, 9(1), 99–113.
Rogers, Y. (2008). 57 Varieties of Activity Theory. Interacting with Computers, 20(2), 247–250.
Roussou, M. (2002). Virtual Heritage: From the Research Lab to the Broad Public. Virtual Archaeology, Proceedings of the VAST2000 Euroconference, BAugmented Reality International Series, 1075, 93–100.
Siemens, G., & Baker, R. D. J. D. (2012). Learning Analytics and Educational Data Mining. Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Learning Analytics and Knowledge—LAK '12: 252.
Simon, H. A. (2001). Learning to Research About Learning. In S. M. Carver & K. D. Mahwah (Eds.), Cognition and Instruction: Twenty-Five Years of Progress (pp. 205–226). Erlbaum.
Singer Trakhman, L., & Alexander, P. (2016). Reading Across Mediums: Effects of Reading Digital and Print Texts on Comprehension and Calibration. Article in The Journal of Experimental Education, 85(1), 155–172.
Stamper, J. C., & Koedinger, K. R. (2011). Human-Machine Student Model Discovery and Improvement Using Datashop. Lecture Notes in Computer Science (Including Subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics), 6738 LNAI, 353–360.
Stone, R., & Ojika, T. (2000). Virtual Heritage: What Next? IEEE Multimedia, 7(2), 73–74.
Tammaro, A. M. (2016). Participatory Approaches and Innovation in Galleries, Libraries, Archives, and Museums. International Information and Library Review, 48(1), 37–44.
Thompson, E. R. (2007). Development and Validation of an Internationally Reliable Short-Form of the Positive and Negative Affect Schedule (PANAS). Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 38(2), 227–242.
Tilden, F. (1977). Interpreting Our Heritage. The University of North Carolina Press.
Tunbridge, J. E., & Ashworth, G. J. (1996). Dissonant Heritage: The Management of the Past as a Resource in Conflict. J. Wiley.
Van Der Graaff, J., Branje, S., De Wied, M., Hawk, S., Van Lier, P., & Meeus, W. (2013). Perspective Taking and Empathic Concern in Adolescence: Gender Differences in Developmental Changes. Developmental Psychology, 50(3), 881–888.
Verschure, P. F. M. J. (2016). Synthetic Consciousness: The Distributed Adaptive Control Perspective. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological Sciences, 371(1701), 263–275.
Verschure, P. F. M. J., & Wierenga, S. (2021). Future Memory: A Digital Humanities Approach for the Preservation and Presentation of the History of the Holocaust and Nazi Crimes. Holocaust Studies: A Journal of Culture and History.
Vygotsky, L. S. (1962). Thought and Language. MIT Press.
Vygotsky, L. S., & Cole, M. (1978). Mind in Society: Development of Higher Psychological Processes. Harvard University Press.
Wakkary, R., Muise, K., Tanenbaum, K., Hatala, M., & Kornfeld, L. (2008). Situating Approaches to Interactive Museum Guides. Museum Management and Curatorship, 23(4), 367–383.
Acknowledgment
The research reported here was supported by the European Commission CEEDS (EC FP7 258749), IcACCESS (HERA JRP-UP 2016), Dutch Ministry of Health, Welfare and Sports, The Future Memory Foundation, SPECS Lab and Eodyne Systems S.L.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2021 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Blancas, M. et al. (2021). Active Learning in Digital Heritage: Introducing Geo-localisation, VR and AR at Holocaust Historical Sites. In: Walden, V.G. (eds) Digital Holocaust Memory, Education and Research. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-83496-8_7
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-83496-8_7
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-83495-1
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-83496-8
eBook Packages: Literature, Cultural and Media StudiesLiterature, Cultural and Media Studies (R0)