Skip to main content

Air-Blast Response of Free-Standing: (1) Unreinforced Brick Masonry Wall, (2) Cavity RC Wall, (3) RC Walls with (i) Bricks, (ii) Sand, in the cavity: A Macro-Modeling Approach

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Proceedings of SECON’21 (SECON 2021)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Civil Engineering ((LNCE,volume 171))

Abstract

In the current scenario of insecurity from different sources, the role of the compound wall is more important than ever. In addition to stability, the strength of such walls from the explosion point of view is of considerable interest to the engineers. In this paper, the finite element simulations of 6000 mm × 2500 mm × 350 mm (length × height × thickness) free-standing compound unreinforced brick masonry wall subjected to experimental blast peak overpressures available in the open literature are performed. A high-fidelity FEM-based software package ABAQUS/CAE has been called for and a continuum/macro-modeling technique is adopted to optimize the computational time. Damage is simulated considering the available concrete-damaged plasticity (CDP) model for the non-linear response of the walls. Dynamic responses including maximum displacement, damage dissipation energy, and crack/damage patterns have been evaluated for the scaled distances of 2.28 and 1.81 m/kg1/3. The height of the burst is 1250 mm from the ground. With the objective to improve the blast performance of the wall, a 230 mm thick reinforced concrete (RC) wall with a 70 mm wide cavity is considered in the study. To dissipate the explosion energy, bricks on edge, and sand are also taken as softcore materials in the cavity of the wall. The cavity is interrupted by the cross RC elements at an interval of 1.10 m. Analyses results have been discussed and a novel design of the blast-resistant free-standing wall is recommended.

S. M. Anas is a doctoral candidate at the Jamia Millia Islamia (Central University), studying Civil Engineering, with an emphasis in Structural Engineering. His current research interests include blast dynamics, strengthening techniques, FE modeling, structural performance, concrete-steel composite compression members, and composite materials. “Scopus Author ID: 57219929545”.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 259.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 329.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 329.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Szyszka M, Jasienko J, Ochsendorf AJ (2018) Out-of-plane behavior of two-layered free-standing walls: analytical solutions and small-scale tests. Eng Struct 163:11–24

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Mazzon N, Valluzzi RM (2010) Influence of grout injection on the dynamic behavior of stone masonry buildings. Ph.D. thesis, Università degli Studi di Padova, Veneto, Italy, pp 1–272

    Google Scholar 

  3. Felice DG (2011) Out-of-plane seismic capacity of masonry depending on wall section morphology. Int J Archit Heritage 5:466–482

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Derakhshan H, Griffith CM, Ingham MJ (2013) Airbag testing of multi-leaf unreinforced masonry walls subjected to one-way bending. Eng Struct 57:512–522

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Ahmad S, Elahi A, Pervaiz H, Rahman AGA, Barbhuiya S (2014) Experimental study of masonry wall exposed to blast loading. Mater De Constr 64(313):1–11

    Google Scholar 

  6. Andrea I, Nigel S (2015) Discrete element modeling of stone masonry walls with varying core conditions: prince of wales fort case study. Int J Archit Heritage Conserv Anal Restor 9(5):564–580

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Pereira MJ, Campos J, Lourenco BP (2015) Masonry infill walls under blast loading using confined underwater blast wave generators (WBWG). Eng Struct 92(1):69–83

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. ABAQUS/CAE FEA program (2017) Concrete-damaged plasticity model, explicit solver, three dimensional solid element library. ABAQUS DS-SIMULIA User Manual

    Google Scholar 

  9. Valente M, Milani G (2016) Non-linear dynamic and static analyses on eight historical masonry towers in the north-east of Italy. Eng Struct 114(1):241–270

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Valente M, Milani G (2016) Seismic assessment of historical masonry towers by means of simplified approaches and standard FEM. Constr Build Mater 108(1):74–104

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Payan M, Khoshini M, Chenari JR (2020) Elastic dynamic young’s modulus and poisson’s ratio of sand-silt mixtures. J Mater Civ Eng ASCE 32(1):1–13

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Hafezolghorani M, Hejazi F, Vaghei R, Jaafar BSM, Karimzade K (2017) Simplified damage plasticity model for concrete. Struct Eng Int 27(1):68–78

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Anas SM, Ansari MdI, Alam M (2020) Performance of masonry heritage building under air-blast pressure without and with ground shock. Aust J Struct Eng 21(4):329–344

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Anas SM, Alam M, Umair M (2020) Performance of one-way concrete slabs reinforced with conventional and polymer re-bars under air-blast loading. In: Chandrasekaran S, Kumar S, Madhuri S (eds) Recent Advances in Structural Engineering. Lecture Notes in Civil Engineering, vol 135. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-33-6389-2_18

  15. Anas SM, Alam M, Umair M (2020) Performance of one-way composite reinforced concrete slabs under explosive-induced blast loading. In: IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, vol 614, 1st International Conference on Energetics, Civil and Agricultural Engineering 2020, 14–16 October 2020, Tashkent, Uzbekistan, https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/614/1/012094

  16. Anas SM, Ansari Md I, Alam M (2021) A study on existing masonry heritage building to explosive-induced blast loading and its response. Int J Struct Eng (Article in press)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Anas SM, Alam M, Umair M (2021) Experimental and numerical investigations on performance of reinforced concrete slabs under explosive-induced air-blast loading: a state-of-the-art review. In: Structures, vol 31. Elsevier, pp 428–461. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.istruc.2021.01.102

  18. Hao H, Hao Y, Li J, Chen W (2016) Review of the current practices in blast-resistant analysis and design of concrete structures. Adv Struct Eng 19(8):1193–1223

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. TM 5-1300 (1990) Structures to resist the effects of accidental explosions. Technical Manual, Joint Department of the Army, the Navy, and the Air Force, US

    Google Scholar 

  20. IS 4991 (1968) Criteria for blast resistant design of structures for explosions above ground. Bureau of Indian Standards, New Delhi

    Google Scholar 

  21. Wu C, Hao H (2005) Modeling of simultaneous ground shock and airblast pressure on nearby structures from surface explosions. Int J Impact Eng 31(6):699–717

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Goel DM, Matsagar AV (2014) Blast-resistant design of structures. Practice periodical on structural design and construction. ASCE 19(2):040140071-9

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors wish to acknowledge Prof. T. K. Datta, Department of Civil Engineering, IIT-Delhi, India, for their precious suggestions and discussions concerning the whole numerical blast simulations presented in this study.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Anas, S.M., Alam, M. (2022). Air-Blast Response of Free-Standing: (1) Unreinforced Brick Masonry Wall, (2) Cavity RC Wall, (3) RC Walls with (i) Bricks, (ii) Sand, in the cavity: A Macro-Modeling Approach. In: Marano, G.C., Ray Chaudhuri, S., Unni Kartha, G., Kavitha, P.E., Prasad, R., Achison, R.J. (eds) Proceedings of SECON’21. SECON 2021. Lecture Notes in Civil Engineering, vol 171. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-80312-4_78

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-80312-4_78

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-80311-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-80312-4

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics