Skip to main content

Extending Business Model Development Tools with Consolidated Expert Knowledge

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Business Modeling and Software Design (BMSD 2021)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing ((LNBIP,volume 422))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

Business Model Innovation (BMI) is a creative process that often needs collaboration between different stakeholders with the support of domain experts. Instead of innovation workshops where the domain experts need to be physically present, software-based tools allow reusing the knowledge of many domain experts independent of their actual presence. This reusing of expert knowledge, which improves the quality of the developed business models, is currently not supported by existing Business Model Development Tools (BMDTs). To address this shortcoming, we present an approach to support BMDTs with consolidated knowledge of different experts. In our approach, domain experts formalize their knowledge about business models for particular domains in expert models to make them useable within and transferable between different tools. Business developers can subsequently choose the expert models they need, consolidate the knowledge, and use it within the BMI process. With this approach, we provide a three-fold contribution to the research of BMDTs: First, we design a modeling language to store the business model knowledge of individual experts. Second, we develop a concept to consolidate expert knowledge and detect possible knowledge conflicts. Third, we provide blueprints to add expert knowledge into existing BMDTs. We demonstrate the technical feasibility of our approach with an open-source BMDT implementation and show the applicability with an exemplary instantiation of a local event platform.

This work was partially supported by the German Research Foundation (DFG) within the CRC “On-The-Fly Computing” (CRC 901, Project Number: 160364472SFB901) and the European Regional Development Fund (ERDF, Funding Code: EFRE-0801186).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Language Specification: https://github.com/sebastiangtts/bmdl-feature-modeler/tree/master/specification/.

  2. 2.

    Online Version: https://sebastiangtts.github.io/bmdl-feature-modeler/.

  3. 3.

    Source Code: https://github.com/sebastiangtts/bmdl-feature-modeler/.

  4. 4.

    Website of JSON Schema: https://json-schema.org/.

  5. 5.

    Project Website: https://www.sicp.de/en/projekte/owlkultur-plattform.

References

  1. Alberts, B.T., Meertens, L.O., Iacob, M.-E., Nieuwenhuis, L.B.J.M.: A meta-model perspective on business models. In: Shishkov, B. (ed.) BMSD 2012. LNBIP, vol. 142, pp. 64–81. Springer, Heidelberg (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-37478-4_4

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  2. Alves, V., et al.: An exploratory study of information retrieval techniques in domain analysis. In: 12th International Software Product Product Line Conference (SPLC), pp. 67–76. IEEE (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Apel, S., Batory, D., Kästner, C., Saake, G.: Feature-Oriented Software Product Lines. Springer, Heidelberg (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-37521-7

    Book  Google Scholar 

  4. Augenstein, D., Fleig, C., Maedche, A.: Development of a data-driven business model transformation tool. In: Chatterjee, S., Dutta, K., Sundarraj, R.P. (eds.) DESRIST 2018. LNCS, vol. 10844, pp. 205–217. Springer, Cham (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-91800-6_14

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  5. Boßelmann, S., Margaria, T.: Guided business modeling and analysis for business professionals. In: Pfannstiel, M.A., Rasche, C. (eds.) Service Business Model Innovation in Healthcare and Hospital Management, pp. 195–211. Springer, Cham (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-46412-1_11

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  6. Chesbrough, H.: Business model innovation: it’s not just about technology anymore. Strategy Leadersh. 35(6), 12–17 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Clements, P., Northrop, L.: Software Product Lines: Practices and Patterns, 7th edn. Addison-Wesley, Boston (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Cosenz, F., Noto, G.: A dynamic business modelling approach to design and experiment new business venture strategies. Long Range Plan. 51(1), 127–140 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Dalpiaz, F., Franch, X., Horkoff, J.: iStar 2.0 Language Guide (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Di Valentin, C., Emrich, A., Werth, D., Loos, P.: Business modeling in the software industry: conceptual design of an assistance system. In: Harmsen, F., Proper, H.A. (eds.) PRET 2013. LNBIP, vol. 151, pp. 34–45. Springer, Heidelberg (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-38774-6_3

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  11. Ebel, P., Bretschneider, U., Leimeister, J.M.: Leveraging virtual business model innovation: a framework for designing business model development tools. Inf. Syst. J. 26(5), 519–550 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Fritscher, B., Pigneur, Y.: Supporting business model modelling: a compromise between creativity and constraints. In: England, D., Palanque, P., Vanderdonckt, J., Wild, P.J. (eds.) TAMODIA 2009. LNCS, vol. 5963, pp. 28–43. Springer, Heidelberg (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-11797-8_3

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  13. Gassmann, O., Frankenberger, K., Csik, M.: The Business Model Navigator: 55 Models that Will Revolutionise Your Business. Pearson, Harlow (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Geissdoerfer, M., Bocken, N.M., Hultink, E.J.: Design thinking to enhance the sustainable business modelling process - a workshop based on a value mapping process. J. Clean. Prod. 135, 1218–1232 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. General Electric Inc: GE Global Innovation Barometer 2018. https://www.ge.com/reports/innovation-barometer-2018/

  16. Gordijn, J., Akkermans, H.: Designing and evaluating e-business models. IEEE Intell. Syst. 16(4), 11–17 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Gottschalk, S., Rittmeier, F., Engels, G.: Intertwined development of business model and product functions for mobile applications: a twin peak feature modeling approach. In: Hyrynsalmi, S., Suoranta, M., Nguyen-Duc, A., Tyrväinen, P., Abrahamsson, P. (eds.) ICSOB 2019. LNBIP, vol. 370, pp. 192–207. Springer, Cham (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-33742-1_16

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  18. Gottschalk, S., Rittmeier, F., Engels, G.: Hypothesis-driven adaptation of business models based on product line engineering. In: International Conference on Business Informatics (CBI). IEEE (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Hartmann, P.M., Zaki, M., Feldmann, N., Neely, A.: Capturing value from big data - a taxonomy of data-driven business models used by start-up firms. Int. J. Oper. Prod. Manag. 36(10), 1382–1406 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. John, T., Kundisch, D., Szopinski, D.: Visual languages for modeling business models: a critical review and future research directions. In: Proceedings of the 38th International Conference on Information Systems (ICIS). AIS (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Kästner, C., Apel, S., Kuhlemann, M.: Granularity in software product lines. In: 13th International Conference on Software Engineering (ICSE), p. 311. ACM (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Lüdeke-Freund, F., Bohnsack, R., Breuer, H., Massa, L.: Research on sustainable business model patterns: status quo, methodological issues, and a research agenda. In: Aagaard, A. (ed.) Sustainable Business Models. PSSBIAFE, pp. 25–60. Springer, Cham (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-93275-0_2

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  23. Lüdeke-Freund, F., Carroux, S., Joyce, A., Massa, L., Breuer, H.: The sustainable business model pattern taxonomy–45 patterns to support sustainability-oriented business model innovation. Sustain. Prod. Consumption 15, 145–162 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Meertens, L.O., Iacob, M.E., Nieuwenhuis, L., van Sinderen, M.J., Jonkers, H., Quartel, D.: Mapping the business model canvas to ArchiMate. In: Proceedings of the 27th Annual ACM Symposium on Applied Computing (SAC). ACM (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Nagappan, M., Shihab, E.: Future trends in software engineering research for mobile apps. In: 23rd International Conference on Software Analysis, Evolution, and Reengineering (SANER), pp. 21–32. IEEE (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  26. Osterwalder, A.: The Business Model Ontology: A Proposition in a Design Science Approach. Dissertation, University of Lausanne, Lausanne (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  27. Osterwalder, A., Pigneur, Y.: Business Model Generation: A Handbook for Visionaries, Game Changers, and Challengers. Wiley, Hoboken (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  28. Osterwalder, A., Pigneur, Y.: Designing business models and similar strategic objects: the contribution of IS. J. Assoc. Inf. Syst. 14(5), 237–244 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  29. Osterwalder, A., Pigneur, Y., Tucci, C.L.: Clarifying business models: origins, present, and future of the concept. Commun. Assoc. Inf. Syst. 16 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  30. Pigneur, Y., Fritscher, B.: Extending the business model CanvasA dynamic perspective. In: Proceedings of the Fifth International Symposium on Business Modeling and Software Design, pp. 86–95. SCITEPRESS (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  31. Reman, G., Hanelt, A., Tesch, J., Kolbe, L.: The business model database - a tool for systematic business model innovation. Int. J. Innov. Manag. 21(01) (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  32. Schoormann, T., Behrens, D., Knackstedt, R.: Design principles for leveraging sustainability in business modelling tools. In: Twenty-Sixth European Conference on Information System. AIS (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  33. Szopinski, D., Schoormann, T., John, T., Knackstedt, R., Kundisch, D.: Software tools for business model innovation: current state and future challenges. Electron. Mark. 60(11), 2794 (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  34. Teece, D.J.: Business models, business strategy and innovation. Long Range Plan. 43(2–3), 172–194 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. van Lamsweerde, A.: Goal-oriented requirements engineering: a guided tour. In: International Symposium on Requirements Engineering, pp. 249–262. IEEE (2001)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sebastian Gottschalk .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Gottschalk, S., Kirchhoff, J., Engels, G. (2021). Extending Business Model Development Tools with Consolidated Expert Knowledge. In: Shishkov, B. (eds) Business Modeling and Software Design. BMSD 2021. Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing, vol 422. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-79976-2_1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-79976-2_1

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-79975-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-79976-2

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics