Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Representing Women in STEM in Science-Based Film and Television

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
The Palgrave Handbook of Women and Science since 1660

Abstract

Whether as biographical or fictional figures, women in STEM (science, technology, engineering, mathematics) have been offered limited representation in mainstream Anglo-American film and television. Recent examples such as Hidden Figures (2016), Black Panther (2018), and Annihilation (2018) have begun to address the imbalance by incorporating them as protagonists within a community of professional, capable women showing that women scientists and women-led science-based stories do not constitute a barrier to critical and financial success. This chapter focuses on the representation of women scientists in contemporary film and television and considers the different ways in which we might approach the framing and proliferation of women’s representation as scientists. This chapter argues that with a more intersectional approach to the representation of the sciences on screen it may be possible to begin shifting the expectations of what science is, and who scientists are and what they look like.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 149.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alexievich, Svetlana. 2016. Chernobyl Prayer: Voices from Chernobyl: A Chronicle of the Future. Transl. Anna Gunin and Arch Tait. London: Penguin Classics.

    Google Scholar 

  • Archer, Lauren R. 2015. “Science in Stilettos: Shaping Perceptions of Women in Science.” In The Sexy Science of The Big Bang Theory: Essays on Gender in the Series, ed. Nadine Farghaly and Eden Leone, 26–50. Jefferson: McFarland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Attenborough, Frederick Thomas. 2011. “Complicating the Sexualization Thesis: The Media, Gender and ‘Sci-Candy’.” Discourse & Society 22, no. 6: 659–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barton, Ruth. 2011. “Rocket Scientist!: The Posthumous Celebrity of Hedy Lamarr.” In In the Limelight and Under the Microscope: Forms and Functions of Female Celebrity, ed. Diane Negra and Su Holmes, 82–101. New York: Continuum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beede, David, Tiffany Julian, David Langdon, George McKittrick, Beethika Khan, and Mark Doms. 2011. “Women in STEM: A Gender Gap to Innovation.” Office of the Chief Economist. U.S. Department of Commerce, Economics and Statistics Administration. ESA Issue Brief 4, no. 11: 1–11. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED523766.pdf. Accessed 15 July 2019.

  • Blay, Zeba. 2017. “Hidden Figures and the Diversity Conversation We Aren’t Having.” The Huffington Post, February 23. https://www.huffingtonpost.co.uk/entry/hidden-figures-and-the-diversity-conversation-we-arent-having_n_58adc9bee4b0d0a6ef470492. Accessed 1 August 2019.

  • Carrington, André M. 2016. Speculative Blackness: The Future of Race in Science Fiction. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Chambers, Amy C. 2017. “Hidden Figures: Screening Hidden Histories.” Viewpoint 113: 14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chambers, Amy C. 2020. “Star Trek Discovers Women: Gender, Race, Science, and Michael Burnham.” In Fighting for the Future: Essays on Star Trek: Discovery, ed. Mareike Spychala and Sabrina Mittermeier, 267–86. Liverpool: Liverpool University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chambers, Amy C., and Shelley Thompson. 2020. “Women, Science and the Media.” In The International Encyclopedia of Gender, Media, and Communication, ed. Karen Ross. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119429128.iegmc304.

  • Chimba, Mwenya, and Jenny Kitzinger. 2010. “Bimbo or Boffin? Women in Science: An Analysis of Media Representations and How Female Scientists Negotiate Cultural Contradictions.” Public Understanding of Science 19, no. 5: 609–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Christie, Janet. 2019. “Emily Watson on Her New TV Drama, Chernobyl.” The Scotsman, May 4. https://www.scotsman.com/arts-and-culture/film-and-TV/emily-watson-on-her-new-TV-drama-chernobyl-1-4920211. Accessed 31 July 2019.

  • Colatrella, Carol. 2011. Toys and Tools in Pink? Cultural Narratives of Gender, Science, and Technology. Columbus: The Ohio State University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis, Geena. 2018. “Portray Her: Representations of Women STEM Characters in Media [2018 Executive Findings].” The Lyda Hill Foundation and the Geena Davis Institute on Gender in Media. https://seejane.org/wp-content/uploads/portray-her-executive-summary.pdf. Accessed 20 July 2019.

  • Donawerth, Jane. 1997. Frankenstein’s Daughters: Women Writing Science Fiction. New York: Syracuse University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Donoghue, Courtney Brannon. 2019. “Gendered Expectations for Female-Driven Films: Risk and Rescue Narratives around Warner Bros.’ Wonder Woman.” Feminist Media Studies, 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1080/14680777.2019.1636111.

  • Dralega, Carol Azungi. 2018. “The Symbolic Annihilation of Hegemonic Femininity in Black Panther.” International Journal of Gender, Science and Technology 10, no. 3: 462–65.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunlop, Tessa. 2015. The Bletchley Girls. War, Secrecy, Love and Loss: The Women of Bletchley Park Tell Their Story. London: Hodder and Stoughton Ltd.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elena, Alberto. 1997. “Skirts in the Lab: Madame Curie and the Image of the Woman Scientist in the Feature Film.” Public Understanding of Science 6, no. 3: 269–78.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fara, Patricia. 2008. Pandora’s Breeches: Women, Science and Power in the Enlightenment. London: Pimlico.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fara, Patricia. 2018. A Lab of One’s Own: Science and Suffrage in the First World War. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Flicker, Eva. 2003. “Between Brains and Breasts—Women Scientists in Fiction Film: On the Marginalization and Sexualization of Scientific Competence.” Public Understanding of Science 12, no. 3: 307–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Flicker, Eva. 2008. “Women Scientists in Mainstream Films: Social Role Models—A Contribution to the Public Understanding of Science from the Perspective of Film Sociology.” In Science Images and Popular Images of the Science, ed. Bernd Hüppauf and Peter Weingart, 241–56. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gerbner, George, and Larry Gross. 1976. “Living with Television: The Violence Profile.” Journal of Communication 26, no. 2: 173–99.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goddard, Michael N., and Christopher Hogg. 2018. “Introduction: Trans TV as Concept and Intervention into Contemporary Television.” Critical Studies in Television: The International Journal of Television Studies 13, no. 4: 470–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haran, Joan, Mwenya Chimba, Grace Reid, and Jenny Kitzinger. 2008. “Screening Women in SET: How Women in Science, Engineering and Technology are Represented in Films and on Television.” UKRC Research Report Series No. 3. UK Resource Centre for Women in Science, Engineering and Technology. http://orca.cf.ac.uk/17535/1/report_3_haran.pdf. Accessed 28 August 2018.

  • Harding, Sandra. 1995. “Just Add Women and Stir?” In Missing Links: Gender Equity in Science and Technology for Development, ed. Gender Working Group, United Nations Commission on Science and Technology for Development, 295–308. New York: UN Development Fund for Women.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hassel, Holly. 2008. “The ‘Babe Scientist’ Phenomenon: The Illusion of Inclusion in 1990s American Action Films.” In Chick Flicks: Contemporary Women at the Movies, ed. Suzanne Ferris and Mallory Young, 190–203. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haynes, Roslynn D. 2017. From Madman to Crime Fighter: The Scientist in Western Culture. Baltimore, MD: John Hopkins University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Holloway, Daniel. 2019. “Chernobyl [interview with Craig Mazin]. Variety TV Take [podcast].” May 3. https://variety.com/2019/TV/news/listen-chernobyl-ep-craig-mazin-on-making-a-non-traditional-disaster-show-1203204493/. Accessed 15 July 2019.

  • Jain, Parul, and Michael D. Slater. 2013. “Provider Portrayals and Patient–Provider Communication in Drama and Reality Medical Entertainment Television Shows.” Journal of Health Communication 18, no. 6: 703–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jordanova, Ludmilla. 1993. “Gender and the Historiography of Science.” The British Journal for the History of Science 26, no. 4: 469–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jowett, Lorna. 2007. “Lab Coats and Lipstick: Smart Women Reshape Science on Television. In Geek Chic: Smart Women in Popular Culture, ed. Sherrie A. Inness, 31–48. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Kirby, David A. 2008. “Cinematic Science.” In Handbook of Public Communication of Science and Technology, ed. Massimiano Bucchi and Brian Trench, 67–94. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kirby, David A. 2011. Lab Coats in Hollywood: Science, Scientists, and Cinema. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Kitzinger, Jenny, Joan Haran, Mwenya Chimba, and Tammy Boyce. 2008. “Role Models in the Media: An Exploration of the Views and Experiences of Women in SET.” UKRC Research Report Series No. 1, UK Resource Centre for Women in Science, Engineering and Technology. http://orca.cf.ac.uk/17534/1/report_1_kitzinger.pdf. Accessed 1 August 2019.

  • LaFollette, Marcel C. 1988. “Eyes on the Stars: Images of Women Scientists in Popular Magazines.” Science, Technology, & Human Values 13: 262–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lauzen, Martha M. 2018. “Boxed in 2017–18: Women on Screen and Behind the Scenes in Television.” Center for the Study of Women in Television and Film, San Diego State University. https://womeninTVfilm.sdsu.edu/wp-content/uploads/2019/07/2017-18-Boxed-In-Report-1v2.pdf. Accessed 31 July 2019.

  • Lauzen, Martha M. 2019. “The Celluloid Ceiling: Behind the Scenes Employment of Women on the Top 100, 250, and 500 Films of 2018.” Center for the Study of Women in Television and Film, San Diego State University. https://womeninTVfilm.sdsu.edu/wpcontent/uploads/2019/01/2018_Celluloid_Ceiling_Report.pdf. Accessed 31 July 2019.

  • Li, Rashel, and Lindy A. Orthia. 2016. “Communicating the Nature of Science Through The Big Bang Theory: Evidence from a Focus Group Study.” International Journal of Science Education 6, no. 2: 115–36.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lovell, Bronwyn. 2019. “Cosmic Careers and Dead Children: Women Working in Space in Aliens, Gravity, Extant, and The Cloverfield Paradox.” Science Fiction Film and Television 12, no. 1: 73–102.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mafe, Diana Adesola. 2018. Where No Black Woman Has Gone Before: Subversive Portrayals in Speculative Film and TV. Austin: University of Texas Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • McIntosh, Heather. 2014. “Representations of Female Scientists in The Big Bang Theory.” Journal of Popular Film and Television 42, no. 4: 195–204.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Merrick, Helen. 2012. “Challenging Implicit Gender Bias in Science: Positive Representations of Female Scientists in Fiction.” Journal of Community Positive Practices 4: 744–68.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, Karlyn Ruth. 2018. “Dr. Karen Jenson, Hematologist: How 1998’s Blade Set the Stage for Black Women Scientists on Screen. Lady Science. https://www.ladyscience.com/essays/dr-karen-jenson-hematologist-how-1998s-blade-set-the-stage-for-black-women-scientists-on-screen. Accessed 15 July 2019.

  • O’Keeffe, Moira. 2013. “Lieutenant Uhura and the Drench Hypothesis: Diversity and the Representation of STEM Careers.” International Journal of Gender, Science and Technology 5, no. 1: 4–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oreskes, Naomi. 1996. “Objectivity or Heroism? On the Invisibility of Women in Science.” Osiris 11: 87–113.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Page-Kirby, Kristen. 2016. “When the Women of Hidden Figures Needed the Man.” Washington Post, December 23. http://wapo.st/2hZTAj6?tid=ss_tw&utm_term=.42b3d87785cc. Accessed 31 July 2019.

  • Palmer, Lorrie, and Lisa Purse. 2019. “When the Astronaut Is a Woman: Beyond the Frontier in Film and Television.” Science Fiction Film and Television 12, no. 1: 1–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pansegrau, Peter. 2008. “Stereotypes and Images of Scientists in Fiction Films.” In Science Images and Popular Images of the Sciences, ed. Bernd Hüppauf and Peter Weingart, 257–66. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Penley, Constance. 1997. NASA/Trek: Popular Science and Sex in America. London: Verso.

    Google Scholar 

  • Phingbodhipakkiya, Amanda. 2017. “About the Project: Beyond Curie.” https://www.beyondcurie.com/about. Accessed 29 August 2019.

  • Rowbotham, Sheila. 1973. Hidden from History: Rediscovering Women in History from the 17th Century to the Present. London: Pluto Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shetterly, Margot Lee. 2015. Hidden Figures. New York: HarperCollins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sims, David. 2018. “The Problem with Annihilation’s Messy Release.” The Atlantic, January 31. https://www.theatlantic.com/entertainment/archive/2018/01/annihilation-paramount-netflix/551810/. Accessed 2 August 2019.

  • Smith, Stacey L., Marc Choueiti, and Katherine Pieper. 2014. “Gender Inequality in Popular Films: Examining On-Screen Portrayals and Behind-the-Scenes Employment Patterns in Motion Pictures Released Between 2007–2013.” USC Media, Diversity, & Social Change Initiative. https://annenberg.usc.edu/sites/default/files/MDSCI_Gender_Inequality_in_600_films.pdf. Accessed 31 July 2019.

  • Song, Miri. 2020. “Rethinking Minority Status and ‘Visibility’”. Comparative Migration Studies 8, no. 5: 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40878-019-0162-2.

  • Steinke, Jocelyn. 1997. “A Portrait of a Woman as a Scientist: Breaking Down Barriers Created by Gender-Role Stereotypes.” Public Understanding of Science 6, no. 4: 409–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Steinke, Jocelyn. 1998. “Connecting Theory and Practice: Women Scientist Role Models in Television Programming.” Journal of Broadcasting and Electronic Media 42, no. 1: 142–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Steinke, Jocelyn. 2005. “Cultural Representations of Gender and Science: Portrayals of Female Scientists and Engineers in Popular Films.” Science Communication 27, no. 1: 27–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Steinke, Jocelyn. 2010. “Gender Representations of Scientists.” In Encyclopedia of Science and Technology Communication, ed. Susanna Hornig Pries, 322–25. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steinke, Jocelyn. 2017. “Adolescent Girls’ STEM Identity Formation and Media Images of STEM Professionals: Considering the Influence of Contextual Cues.” Frontiers in Psychology 8, no. 716: 1–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steinke, Jocelyn, and Paola Maria Paniagua Tavarez. 2018. “Cultural Representations of Gender and STEM: Portrayals of Female STEM Characters in Popular Films 2002–2014.” International Journal of Gender, Science and Technology 9, no. 3: 244–77.

    Google Scholar 

  • Szwydky, Lissette Lopez, and Michelle L. Pribbernow. 2018. “Women Scientists in Frankenstein Films, 1945–2015.” Science Fiction Film and Television 11, no. 2: 303–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tuchman, Gaye. 1978. “The Symbolic Annihilation of Women by the Mass Media.” In Hearth and Home: Images of Women in the Mass Media, ed. Gaye Tuchman, Arlene Kaplan Daniels, and James Walker Benét, 3–50. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weitekamp, Margaret A. 2015. “‘We’re Physicists’: Gender, Genre and the Image of Scientists in The Big Bang Theory.” Journal of Popular Television 3, no. 1: 75–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of English, Manchester Metropolitan University, Manchester, UK

    Amy C. Chambers

Authors
  1. Amy C. Chambers
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Amy C. Chambers .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK

    Claire G. Jones

  2. Johannes Gutenberg University of Mainz, Germersheim, Germany

    Alison E. Martin

  3. University of Lancaster, Lancaster, UK

    Alexis Wolf

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Chambers, A.C. (2022). Representing Women in STEM in Science-Based Film and Television. In: Jones, C.G., Martin, A.E., Wolf, A. (eds) The Palgrave Handbook of Women and Science since 1660. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-78973-2_23

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-78973-2_23

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-78972-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-78973-2

  • eBook Packages: HistoryHistory (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation