Skip to main content

Development of a New Robotic Platform for Microsurgery

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Robotics in Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery

Abstract

While robotics has primarily penetrated laparoscopic surgery with the product offering of Intuitive Surgical and to a lesser extent orthopedic, spinal, and brain surgery, plastic surgery has remained largely untouched by robotics to date, partially due to the absence of a dedicated robotic technology. In this chapter, we examine the technology gaps that have contributed to this scenario and describe how the resulting criteria for a robotic platform for reconstructive microsurgery have propelled an end-user-driven development of a robotic platform with wristed robotic microinstruments for open surgery.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Bouget D, Allan M, Stoyanov D, Jannin P. Vision-based and marker-less surgical tool detection and tracking: a review of the literature. Med Image Anal. 2017;35:633–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Burbank, WA. Four-cable wrist with solid surface cable channels. US 2010/0011901 A1. U.S. Patent and Trademark Office. 2010.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Cau R. Design and realization of a master-slave system for reconstructive microsurgery. Technische Universiteit Eindhoven. 2014. https://doi.org/10.6100/IR763107.

  4. Cooper TG. Surgical tool having positively positionable tendon-actuated multi-disk wrist joint. PCT US2002/020884. World International Patent Office. 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Das H. Tool actuation and force feedback on robot-assisted microsurgery system. US 6,233,504 B1. US Patent and Trademark Office. 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Feng AL, Razavi CR, Lakshminarayanan P, Ashai Z, Olds K, Balicki M, Gooi Z, Day AT, Taylor RH, Richmon JD. The robotic ENT microsurgery system: a novel robotic platform for microvascular surgery. Laryngoscope. 2017;127:2495–500.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Ibrahim AE, Sarhane KA, Pederson JC, Selber JC. Robotic harvest of the rectus abdominis muscle: principles and clinical applications. Semin Plast Surg. 2014;28:26–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Itkowitz B. Patient-side surgeon interface for a minimally invasive, teleoperated surgical instrument. US20110118748A1. US Patent and Trademark Office. 2013.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Liverneaux PA, Berner S, Bednar M, Mantovani Ruggiero G, Selber JC. Telemicrosurgery. Springer Paris; 2012.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Maire N, Naito K, Lequint T, Facca S, Berner S, Liverneaux P. Robot-assisted free toe pulp transfer: feasibility study. J Reconstr Microsurg. 2012;28:481–4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Podolsky DJ, Fisher DM, Wong Riff KWY, Looi T, Drake JM, Forrest CR. Infant robotic cleft palate surgery: a feasibility assessment using a realistic cleft palate simulator. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2017;139:455e–65e.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Saraf S. Robotic assisted microsurgery (RAMS): application in plastic surgery. In: Medical robotics. Rijeka: IntechOpen; 2008. p. 363–76.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Saxena A, Patel RV. An active handheld device for compensation of physiological tremor using an ionic polymer metallic composite actuator. In: In 2013 IEEE/RSJ international conference on intelligent robots and systems; 2013. p. 4275–80.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Selber JC, Baumann DP, Holsinger FC. Robotic latissimus dorsi muscle harvest: a case series. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2012;129:1305–12.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Siemionow M, Ozer K, Siemionow W, Lister G. Robotic assistance in microsurgery. J Reconstr Microsurg. 2000;16:643–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Sutherland GR (2006). Microsurgical robot system. US Patent 7,155,316. US Patent and Trademark Office.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Renaissance: a new generation of robots is about to enter the operating theatre. The Economist. 2017;425(9067):71–2.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Willems JIP, Shin AM, Shin DM, Bishop AT, Shin AY. A comparison of robotically assisted microsurgery versus manual microsurgery in challenging situations. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2016;137:1317–24.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Innocenti M, Menechini G, Malzone G. Robotics in super-microsurgery: making a more reliable and reproducible surgery. Barcelona: World Society of Lymphatic Surgery; 2020.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hannah Teichmann .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Teichmann, H., Innocenti, M. (2021). Development of a New Robotic Platform for Microsurgery. In: Selber, J.C. (eds) Robotics in Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-74244-7_11

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-74244-7_11

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-74243-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-74244-7

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics