Skip to main content

Male Gaze and Visual Pleasure in Laura Mulvey

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
The Palgrave Handbook of Image Studies

Abstract

Feminist film theory plays a crucial role in examining the concept of spectatorship. Ruby Rich puts it this way:

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 189.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 249.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 249.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Berger, John. 1972. Ways of Seeing, London: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bovenschen, Silvia. 2001. “Is There a Feminine Aesthetic?” In: German Feminist Writings. Ed. by Patricia A. Herminghouse and Magda Mueller. London and New York: Continuum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Citron, Michelle. 1988. “Women’s Film Production”. In: Female Spectators. Ed. by Deidre Pribram. London: Verso.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cowie, Elizabeth. 1997. Representing the Woman: Cinema and Psychoanalysis. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • De Lauretis, Theresa. 1984. Alice Doesn’t: Feminism, Semiotics, Cinema. London: Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • De Lauretis, Theresa. 1987. Technologies of Gender: Essays on Theory, Film and Fiction. Bloomington and Indianapolis: Indiana University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Doane, Mary Anne. 1982. “Film as a Masquerade”. Screen, 23 (3–4): 74–88.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fischer, Lucy. 2014. Shot/Countershot: Film Tradition and Women’s Cinema. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gaines, Jane. 2000. “White Privilege and Looking Relations: Race and Gender in Feminist Film Theory”. In: The Film Studies Reader. Ed. by Joanne Hollows, Peter Hutchings, and Mark Jancovich. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hills, Elisabeth. 1999. “From Figurative Males to Action Heroines: Further Thoughts on Active Women in the Cinema”. Screen, 40 (1): 38–50.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holinger, Karen. 2012. Feminist Film Studies. London and New York: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • hooks, bell. 1996. Reel to Real: Race, Sex, and Class at the Movies. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaplan, Ann E. 1983 “Is the Gaze Male?”. In: Women and Film: Both Sides of the Camera. London: Methuen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lacan, Jacques. 2006. “Jacques Lacan and Bruce Fink”. In: Ecrits: The First Complete Edition in English. New York: W.W. Norton & Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Modleski, Tania. 1988 [2016]. The Women Who Knew Too Much: Hitchcock and Feminist Theory. New York: Routledge and Chapman & Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mulvey, Laura. 1975. “Visual Pleasure and Narrative Cinema”. Screen, 16 (3): 3–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mulvey, Laura. 1989. Visual and Other Pleasures. New York: Palgrave.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Mulvey, Laura. 1996. Fetishism and Curiosity. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mulvey, Laura. 2004. “Looking at the Past from the Present: Rethinking Feminist Film Theory of the 1970s”. Signs 30 (1): 1286–1292.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mulvey, Laura. 2006. Death 24x a Second. London: Reaktion Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mulvey, Laura. 2017. “From a Faculty Seminar with Laura Mulvey: Reflections on Visual Pleasure”. New Review of Film and Television Studies, 15 (4): 385–387.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rich, Ruby B. 1998. Chick Flicks: Theories and Memories of the Feminist Film Movement. Durham: Duke University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Riviere, Joan. 1929. Womanliness as MasqueradeInternational Journal of Psychoanalysis, 10: 303–313.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sassatelli, Roberta. 2011. “Interview with Laura Mulvey: Gender, Gaze and Technology”. Film Culture in Theory, Culture and Society, 28 (5).

    Google Scholar 

  • Silverman, Kaja. 1988. The Acoustic Mirror: The Female Voice in Psychoanalysis and Cinema. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smelik, Anneke. 1998. And the Mirror Cracked: Feminist Cinema and Film Theory. New York: St. Martin’s Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Studlar, Gaylyn. 1988. In the Realm of Pleasure. Von Sternberg, Dietrich, and the Masochistic Aesthetic. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tasker, Yvonne. 1993. Spectacular Bodies. Gender, Genre and the Action Cinema. London and New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thornhill, Susan. 2015. On “Visual Pleasure and Narrative Cinema”. Feminist Media Studies, 15 (5): 881–884.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williams, Linda. 1989. Hard Core: Power, Pleasure and the ‘Frenzy of the Visible’. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Patricia Stefanovic .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Stefanovic, P., Parać, A.G. (2021). Male Gaze and Visual Pleasure in Laura Mulvey. In: Purgar, K. (eds) The Palgrave Handbook of Image Studies. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-71830-5_21

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics