Abstract
The Scandinavian countries are often seen as a unity. However, during the COVID-19 pandemic striking differences on how the countries approached the crisis became evident. This quantitative-ethnographic (QE) study aimed to understand political and cultural similarities and differences between the three Scandinavian countries – Denmark, Norway and Sweden – through their crisis communications during the COVID-19 pandemic. Specifically, we focused on how the health authorities of the three countries, in their press releases, treated information about COVID-19 and acted in four fields: reorganization of population behavior, containment of viral transmission, preparation of health systems, and management of socioeconomic impacts. As a methodology, the QE tools nCoder and ENA were applied, respectively: to code the press releases and to correlate the treatment of information with the four fields of action.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
- 2.
- 3.
- 4.
- 5.
- 6.
- 7.
- 8.
- 9.
References
Allcott, H., Boxell, L., Conway, J., Gentzkow, M., Thaler, M., Yang, D.Y.: Polarization and public health: Partisan differences in social distancing during COVID-19. SSRN 3570274 (2020)
Bourdieu, P., Nice, R.: Outline of a Theory of Practice. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1977)
Christensen, T., Lægreid, P.: Balancing governance capacity and legitimacy - how the Norwegian government handled the COVID-19 crisis as a high performer. Public Administration Review n/a(n/a). https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.13241
Coombs, T.: Parameters for Crisis Communication. Blackwell Publishing, Hoboken (2010)
Cuche, D.: La notion de culture dans les sciences sociales. La découverte (2002)
Dahl, R.A.: Polyarchy: Participation and Opposition. Yale University Press, New Haven (1973)
Eagan, B., Brohinsky, J., Wang, J., Shaffer, D.W.: Testing the reliability of inter-rater reliability. In: Proceedings of the ICLAK 2020, pp. 454–461. ACM, New York (2020). https://doi.org/10.1145/3375462.3375508
Holmes, B.J.: Communicating about emerging infectious disease: the importance of research. Health Risk Soc. 10(4), 349–360 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1080/13698570802166431
Hort, S.E.O.: Social Policy, Welfare State, and Civil Society in Sweden [elektronisk resurs], vol. 1 History, Policies, and Institutions 1884–1988 (2017)
Hua, J., Shaw, R.: Corona virus (COVID-19) “infodemic” and emerging issues through a data lens: the case of China. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 17 (2020). https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17072309
Lee, S.H.: Welfare attitudes, political trust and its determinants in Sweden (2018)
Lindert, P.H.: Growing Public: Social Spending and Economic Growth Since the Eighteenth Century Vol. 1 The Story. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2004)
Nygren, K.G., Olofsson, A.: Managing the COVID-19 pandemic through individual responsibility: the consequences of a world risk society and enhanced ethopolitics. J. Risk Res. 0(0), 1–5 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1080/13669877.2020.1756382
OECD: Government at a Glance 2017 (2017). https://bit.ly/2NKWjgU
Olagnier, D., Mogensen, T.H.: The Covid-19 pandemic in Denmark: big lessons from a small country. Cytokine Growth Factor Rev. 53, 10–12 (2020)
Olsson, U.: Folkhälsa som pedagogiskt projekt: Bilden av hälsoupplysning i statens offentliga utredningar. Ph.D. thesis, Uppsala University, Department of Education (1997)
Orso, D., Federici, N., Copetti, R., Vetrugno, L., Bove, T.: Infodemic and the spread of fake news in the COVID-19-era. Eur. J. Emerg. Med.: Official J. Eur. Soc. Emerg. Med. 27(5), 327–328 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1097/MEJ.0000000000000713
Ortiz, R.: A procura de uma sociologia da prática. Pierre Bourdieu: sociologia, pp. 7–29. Ática, São Paulo (1983)
Paek, H.J., Hilyard, K., Freimuth, V.S., Barge, J.K., Mindlin, M.: Public support for government actions during a flu pandemic: lessons learned from a statewide survey. Health Prom. Pract. 9(4\_suppl), 60S–72S (2008). https://doi.org/10.1177/1524839908322114
Brandt, P., Woerlein, J.: Government crisis communication during the coronavirus crisis: comparing France, Germany, and The United Kingdom (2020). https://www.sciencespo.fr/cso/fr/content/government-crisis-communication-during-coronavirus-crisis-comparing-france-germany-and-unite.html. Accessed 30 June 2020
Reynolds, B., Quinn, S.C.: Effective communication during an influenza pandemic: the value of using a crisis and emergency risk communication framework. Health Prom. Pract. 9(4\_suppl), 13S–17S (2008). https://doi.org/10.1177/1524839908325267
Rose, N.: The politics of life itself. Theory Culture Soc. 18(6), 1–30 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1177/02632760122052020
Saliou, P.: Crisis communication in the event of a flu pandemic. Eur. J. Epidemiol. 10(4), 515–517 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01719693
Shaffer, D.W., Collier, W., Ruis, A.R.: A tutorial on epistemic network analysis: analyzing the structure of connections in cognitive, social, and interaction data. J. Learn. Analytics 3(3), 9–45 (1994). https://doi.org/10.18608/jla.2016.33.3
Shaffer, D.W.: Quantitative Ethnography. Cathcart Press, Madison (2017)
Siegrist, M., Earle, T.C., Gutscher, H.: Test of a trust and confidence model in the applied context of electromagnetic field (EMF) risks. Risk Anal. 23(4), 705–716 (2003). https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/1539-6924.00349
Strang, J.: Why do the Nordic countries react differently to the COVID-19 crisis? (2020). https://nordics.info/show/artikel/the-nordic-countries-react-differently-to-the-covid-19-crisis/
Ghebreyesus, T.A.: WHO director-general’s opening remarks at the media briefing on COVID-19 - 11 March 2020 (2020). https://www.who.int/director-general/speeches/detail/who-director-general-s-opening-remarks-at-the-media-briefing-on-covid-19---11-march-2020. Accessed 30 June 2020
Vaughan, E., Tinker, T.: Effective health risk communication about pandemic influenza for vulnerable populations. Am. J. Public Health 99(S2), S324–S332 (2009). https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2009.162537
van der Weerd, W., Timmermans, D.R.M., Beaujean, D.J.M.A., Oudhoff, J., van Steenbergen, J.E.: Monitoring the level of government trust, risk perception and intention of the general public to adopt protective measures during the influenza A (H1N1) pandemic in the Netherlands. BMC Public Health 11(1), 575 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-11-575
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2021 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Schnaider, K., Schiavetto, S., Meier, F., Wasson, B., Allsopp, B.B., Spikol, D. (2021). Governmental Response to the COVID-19 Pandemic - A Quantitative Ethnographic Comparison of Public Health Authorities’ Communication in Denmark, Norway, and Sweden. In: Ruis, A.R., Lee, S.B. (eds) Advances in Quantitative Ethnography. ICQE 2021. Communications in Computer and Information Science, vol 1312. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-67788-6_28
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-67788-6_28
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-67787-9
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-67788-6
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)