Skip to main content

Simplification of Epistemic Networks Using Parsimonious Removal with Interpretive Alignment

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Advances in Quantitative Ethnography (ICQE 2021)

Abstract

A key goal of quantitative ethnographic (QE) models, and statistical models more generally, is to produce the most parsimonious model that adequately explains or predicts the phenomenon of interest. In epistemic network analysis (ENA), for example, this entails constructing network models with the fewest number of codes whose interaction structure provides sufficient explanatory power in a given context. Unlike most statistical models, however, modification of ENA models can affect not only the statistical properties but also the interpretive alignment between quantitative features and qualitative meaning that is a central goal in QE analyses. In this study, we propose a novel method, Parsimonious Removal with Interpretive Alignment, for systematically identifying more parsimonious ENA models that are likely to maintain interpretive alignment with an existing model. To test the efficacy of the method, we implemented it on a well-studied dataset for which there is a published, validated ENA model, and we show that the method successfully identifies reduced models likely to maintain explanatory power and interpretive alignment.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    In this study, the original model includes eight Codes. We took combination of k Codes (k = 1, 2, …, 5) to be removed from the original model. The maximum value of k is 5 since ENA needs at least three Codes to be constructed.

References

  1. Cannon-Bowers, J.A., Salas, E.E.: Making decisions under stress: implications for individual and team training. Acta Physiol. 103, 337–341 (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Cutcliffe, J.R., Harder, H.G.: The perpetual search for parsimony: enhancing the epistemological and practical utility of qualitative research findings. Int. J. Nursing Stud. 46(10), 1401–1410 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Hutchins, S.G., et al.: Principles for aiding complex military decision making. In: Proceedings of the Second International Command and Control Research and Technology Symposium, p. 22 (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Johnston, J.H., et al.: Application of cognitive load theory to develop a measure of team cognitive efficiency. Mil. Psychol. 25(3), 252–265 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Marquart, L.C., et al.: rENA. https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/rENA/citation.html. Accessed 29 June 2020

  6. Mees, A.: Parsimonious dynamical reconstruction. Int. J. Bifurcat. Chaos. 3(03), 669–675 (1993)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  7. Raykov, T., Marcoulides, G.A.: On desirability of parsimony in structural equation model selection. Struct. Equ. Model. Multidisc. J. 6(3), 292–300 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Shaffer, D.W.: Quantitative Ethnography. Cathcart Press, Madison (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Shaffer, D.W., Ruis, A.R.: Epistemic network analysis: a worked example of theory-based learning analytics. In: Handbook of Learning Analytics, pp. 175–187. Society for Learning Analytics Research (SoLAR) (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Swiecki, Z., et al.: Assessing individual contributions to collaborative problem solving: a network analysis approach. Comput. Hum. Behav. 104, 105876 (2020)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Vandekerckhove, J., et al.: Model Comparison and the Principle of Parsimony. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2015)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work was funded in part by the National Science Foundation (DRL-1661036, DRL-1713110), the Wisconsin Alumni Research Foundation, and the Office of the Vice Chancellor for Research and Graduate Education at the University of Wisconsin-Madison. The opinions, findings, and conclusions do not reflect the views of the funding agencies, cooperating institutions, or other individuals.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yeyu Wang .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Wang, Y., Swiecki, Z., Ruis, A.R., Shaffer, D.W. (2021). Simplification of Epistemic Networks Using Parsimonious Removal with Interpretive Alignment. In: Ruis, A.R., Lee, S.B. (eds) Advances in Quantitative Ethnography. ICQE 2021. Communications in Computer and Information Science, vol 1312. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-67788-6_10

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-67788-6_10

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-67787-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-67788-6

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics