Abstract
The aim of the present study was to examine the dynamic relationship between willingness to communicate, foreign language anxiety, and foreign language enjoyment using experience sampling method. To this end, a total number of 38 freshman Iranian university students who were studying Teaching English as a Foreign Language (TEFL) as an academic major participated in the study. Results of the study showed significant amount of variability in all three variables over time, both within weekly sessions and from one week to another. Moreover, moving correlations among the three variables showed the correlations between WTC and enjoyment were remarkably consistent, strong, and positive, while moving correlations between WTC and anxiety, and anxiety and enjoyment were inconsistent and majority of them were negative. Finally, research and pedagogical implications were discussed in light of the findings of the study.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
A doubly multivariate ANOVA has more than one dependent variable measured on more than one occasion.
- 2.
Note that this negative correlation disappears when the moving window is expanded to include 6 data points, and that adding one more row of data changes the correlation from −0.58 to 0.54.
References
Arnold, J., & Brown, H. D. (1999). A map of the terrain. In J. Arnold (Ed.), Affect in language learning (pp. 1–24). Cambridge University Press.
Bernales, C. (2016). Towards a comprehensive concept of willingness to communicate: Learners’ predicted and self-reported participation in the foreign language classroom. System, 56, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2015.11.002.
Bolger, N., & Laurenceau, J. (2013). Intensive longitudinal methods: An introduction to diary and experience sampling research. Guilford.
Burgoon, J. K. (1976). The unwillingness-to-communicate: Development and validation. Communication Monographs, 43, 60–69. https://doi.org/10.1080/03637757609375916.
Cao, Y. (2011). Investigating situational willingness to communicate within second language classrooms from an ecological perspective. System, 39, 468–479. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2011.10.016.
Cao, Y. (2014). A sociocognitive perspective on second language classroom willingness to communicate. TESOL Quarterly, 48, 789–814. https://doi.org/10.1002/tesq.155.
Csikszentmihalyi, M. (2009). In S. Lopez (Ed.), The Encyclopedia of positive psychology (pp. 394–400). Blackwell Publishing Ltd.
Czimmermann, E., & Piniel, K. (2016). Advanced language learners’ experiences of flow in the Hungarian EFL classroom. In P. D. MacIntyre, T. Gregersen, & S. Mercer (Eds.), Positive Psychology in SLA (pp. 193–214). Multilingual Matters. https://doi.org/10.21832/9781783095360-009
D’Amico, M. L. (2012). L2 fluency and willingness to communicate: The impact of short-term study abroad versus at-home study. US-China Foreign Language, 10(10), 1608–1625.
Dewaele, J.-M., & Dewaele, L. (2017). The dynamic interactions in foreign language classroom anxiety and foreign language enjoyment of pupils aged 12–18. A pseudo-longitudinal investigation. Journal of the European Second Language Association, 1(1), 12–22. https://doi.org/10.22599/jesla.6
Dewaele, J.-M., & MacIntyre, P. D. (2014). The two faces of Janus? Anxiety and enjoyment in the foreign language classroom. Studies in Second Language Learning and Teaching, 4, 237–274. https://doi.org/10.14746/ssllt.2014.4.2.5.
Dewaele, J.-M., & MacIntyre, P. D. (2016). The predictive power of multicultural personality traits, learner and teacher variables on foreign anxiety and enjoyment in the foreign language classroom. Paper presented at the International Conference on Language and Social Psychology, Bangkok.
Dewaele, J.-M., MacIntyre, P. D., Boudreau, C., & Dewaele, L. (2016). Do girls have all the fun? Anxiety and enjoyment in the foreign language classroom. Theory and Practice of Second Language Acquisition, 2(1), 41–63.
Dörnyei, Z., & Ryan, S. (2015). The psychology of the second language learner revisited. Routledge.
Elahi, S. M., & Taherian, T. (2016). Dynamic emergent patterns of L2 willingness to communicate within the ecology of classroom. Konin Language Studies, 4(4), 415–438.
Fredrickson, B. L. (2013). Positive emotions broaden and build. In P. Devine & A. Plant (Eds.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 47, pp. 1–54). Academic Press.
Frenzel, A. C. (2014). Teacher emotions. In L. Linnenbrink & R. Pekrun (Eds.), Handbook of emotions in education (pp. 494–519). Routledge.
Frijda, N. H. (1986). The emotions. Cambridge University Press.
Ghonsooly, B., Khajavy, G. H., & Asadpour, S. F. (2012). Willingness to communicate in English among Iranian non–English major university students. Journal of Language & Social Psychology, 31(2), 197–211. https://doi.org/10.1177/0261927X12438538.
Gregersen, T., MacIntyre, P. D., & Meza, M. D. (2014). The motion of emotion: Idiodynamic case studies of learners’ foreign language anxiety. Modern Language Journal, 98(2), 574–588. https://doi.org/10.1111/modl.12084.
Hodis, G. M., Bardhan, N. R., & Hodis, F. A. (2010). Patterns of change in willingness to communicate in public speaking contexts: A latent growth modeling analysis. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 38(3), 248–267. https://doi.org/10.1080/00909882.2010.490840.
Horwitz, E. K. (2017). On the misreading of Horwitz, Horwitz, and Cope (1986) and the need to balance anxiety research and the experiences of anxious language learners. In C. Gkonou, M. Daubney, & J.-M. Dewaele (Eds.), New insights into language anxiety: Theory, research and educational implications (pp. 31–47). Multilingual Matters.
Horwitz, E. K., Horwitz, M. B., & Cope, J. (1986). Foreign language classroom anxiety. The Modern Language Journal, 70(2), 125–132. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.1986.tb05256.x.
Joe, H. K., Hiver, P., & Al-, A. H. (2017). Classroom social climate, self-determined motivation, willingness to communicate, and achievement: A study of structural relationships in instructed second language settings. Learning and Individual Differences, 53, 133–144. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2016.11.005.
Khajavy, G. H., Ghonsooly, B., Hosseini, A., & Choi, C. W. (2016). Willingness to communicate in English: A microsystem model in the Iranian EFL classroom context. TESOL Quarterly, 50(1), 154–180. https://doi.org/10.1002/tesq.204.
Khajavy, G. H., MacIntyre, P. D., & Barabadi, E. (2018). Role of the emotions and classroom environment in willingness to communicate: Applying doubly latent multilevel analysis in second language acquisition research. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 40(3), 605–624. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263117000304.
Khodadady, E., & Kahjavy, G. H. (2013). Exploring the role of anxiety and motivation in foreign language achievement: A structural equation modeling approach. Porta Linguarum, 20, 269–286.
Kleinmann, H. (1977). Avoidance behavior in adult second language acquisition. Language Learning, 27, 93–107. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-1770.1977.tb00294.x.
Larson, R., & Csikszentmihalyi, M. (2014). The experience sampling method. In M. Csikszentmihalyi (Ed.) Flow and the foundations of positive psychology: The collected works of Mihaly Csikszentmihalyi (pp. 21–34). Springer Netherlands. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-9088-8_2.
Larsen-Freeman, D. (2016). Classroom-oriented research from a complex systems perspective. Studies in Second Language Learning and Teaching, 6(3), 377–393. https://doi.org/10.14746/ssllt.2016.6.3.2.
Larsen-Freeman, D., & Cameron, L. (2008). Complex systems and applied linguistics. The Modern Language Journal, 92(4), 644–645.
MacIntyre, P. D. (2012a). Currents and waves: Examining willingness to communicate on multiple timescales. Contact, 38(2), 12–22.
MacIntyre, P. D. (2012b). The idiodynamic method: A closer look at the dynamics of communication traits. Communication Research Reports, 29, 361–367. https://doi.org/10.1080/08824096.2012.723274.
MacIntyre, P. D. (2017). An overview of language anxiety research and trends in its development. In C. Gkonou, M. Daubney, & J.-M. Dewaele (Eds.), New insights into language anxiety: Theory, research and educational implications (pp. 11–30). Multilingual Matters. https://doi.org/10.21832/9781783097722-003
MacIntyre, P. D., Babin, P. A., & Clément, R. (1999). Willingness to communicate: Antecedents and consequences. Communication Quarterly, 47, 215–229. https://doi.org/10.1080/01463379909370135.
MacIntyre, P. D., Baker, S., Clément, R., & Donovan, L. A. (2003). Talking in order to learn: Willingness to communicate and intensive language programs. Canadian Modern Language Review, 59, 589–607. https://doi.org/10.3138/cmlr.59.4.589.
MacIntyre, P. D., Burns, C., & Jessome, A. (2011). Ambivalence about communicating in a second language: A qualitative study of French immersion students’ willingness to communicate. Modern Language Journal, 95, 81–96. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.2010.01141.x.
MacIntyre, P. D., & Charos, C. (1996). Personality, attitudes, and affect as predictors of second language communication. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 15, 3–26. https://doi.org/10.1177/0261927X960151001.
MacIntyre, P. D. & Clément, R. (1996). A model of willingness to communicate in a second language: The concept, its antecedents and implications. Presented at the World Congress of Applied Linguistics (AILA), Jyväskylä, Finland.
MacIntyre, P. D., Clément, R., Dörnyei, Z., & Noels, K. A. (1998). Conceptualizing willingness to communicate in a L2: A situational model of L2 confidence and affiliation. Modern Language Journal, 82, 545–562. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.1998.tb05543.x.
MacIntyre, P. D., & Gardner, R. C. (1991). Language anxiety: Its relation to other anxieties and to processing in native and second languages. Language Learning, 41, 513–534. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-1770.1991.tb00691.x.
MacIntyre, P. D., & Gregersen, T. (2012). Emotions that facilitate language learning: The positive-broadening power of the imagination. Studies in Second Language Learning and Teaching, 2, 193–213. https://doi.org/10.14746/ssllt.2012.2.2.4.
MacIntyre, P. D., & Legatto, J. J. (2011). A dynamic system approach to willingness to communicate: Developing an idiodynamic method to capture rapidly changing affect. Applied Linguistics, 32, 149–171. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amq037.
MacIntyre, P. D., MacKay, E., Ross, J., Abel, E. (2017). The emerging need for methods appropriate to study dynamic systems. In L. Ortega & Z. Han (Eds.), Complexity theory and language development: In celebration of Diane Larsen-Freeman. John Benjamins.
MacIntyre, P. D., & Vincze, L. (2017). Positive and negative emotions underlie motivation for L2 learning. Studies in Second Language Learning and Teaching, 7(1), 61–88.
McCroskey, J. C. (1992). Reliability and validity of the willingness to communicate scale. Communication Quarterly, 40, 16–25. https://doi.org/10.1080/01463379209369817.
McCroskey, J. C., & Richmond, V. P. (1991). Willingness to communicate: A cognitive view. In M. Booth-Butterfield (Ed.), Communication, cognition, and anxiety (pp. 19–37). Sage.
Mystkowska-Wiertelak, A., & Pawlak, M. (2014). Fluctuations in learners’ willingness to communicate during communicative task performance: Conditions and tendencies. Research in Language, 12, 245–260. https://doi.org/10.2478/rela-2014-0019.
Pawlak, M., Mystkowska-Wiertelak, A., & Bielak, J. (2016). Investigating the nature of classroom willingness to communicate (WTC): A micro-perspective. Language Teaching Research, 20(5), 654–671. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168815609615.
Peng, J. E. (2014). Willingness to communicate inside the EFL classroom and beyond: An ecological perspective. Multilingual Matters.
Peng, J. E., & Woodrow, L. (2010). Willingness to communicate in English: A model in the Chinese EFL classroom context. Language Learning, 60(4), 834–876. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9922.2010.00576.x.
Peng, J. E., Zhang, L., & Chen, Y. (2017). The mediation of multimodal affordances on willingness to communicate in the English as a foreign language classroom. TESOL Quarterly, 51(2), 302–331. https://doi.org/10.1002/tesq.298.
Savignon, S. J. (1991). Communicative language teaching: State of the art. TESOL Quarterly, 25 261–277.
Uy, M. A., Foo, M.-D., & Aguinis, H. (2010). Using experience sampling methodology to advance entrepreneurship theory and research. Organizational Research Methods, 13, 31–54. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428109334977.
van Dijk, M., Verspoor, M., & Lowie, W. (2011). Variability and DST. In M. Verspoor, K. de Bot, & W. Lowie (Eds.), A dynamic approach to second language development: methods and techniques (pp. 55–84). John Benjamins Publishers.
Weaver, C. (2005). Using the Rasch model to develop a measure of second language learners’ willingness to communicate within a language classroom. Journal of Applied Measurement, 6(4), 396–415.
Wood, D. (2016). Willingness to communicate and second language speech fluency: An idiodynamic investigation. System, 60, 11–28. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2016.05.003.
Yashima, T., MacIntyre, P. D. & Ikeda, M. (2016). Situated willingness to communication in an L2: Interplay of individual characteristics and contextual factors. Language Teaching Research, 1–23.
Yue, Z. (2014). Chinese university students’ willingness to communicate in the L2 classroom: The complex and dynamic interplay of self-concept, future self-guides and the sociocultural context. In K. Csizér & M. Magid (Eds.), The impact of self-concept on language learning (pp. 250–267). Multilingual Matters. https://doi.org/10.21832/9781783092383-015.
Zirkel, S., Garcia, J. A., & Murphy, M. C. (2015). Experience-sampling research methods and their potential for education research. Educational Researcher, 44(1), 7–16. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X14566879.
Acknowledgements
The authors would like to express their sincere appreciation to the students who participated in this research. We also thank the reviewers for their comments on earlier drafts of the paper. The research was facilitated by a grant from the Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada (No. 453-2013-1944) to the second author.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Appendix
Appendix
Week-by-week moving correlations with 5–10 data points.
Week 1:
WTC and Enjoyment
5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
0.79 | 0.77 | 0.78 | 0.77 | 0.79 | 0.85 |
0.83 | 0.83 | 0.83 | 0.84 | 0.88 | Â |
0.82 | 0.83 | 0.86 | 0.91 | Â | Â |
0.77 | 0.87 | 0.91 | Â | Â | Â |
0.78 | 0.88 | Â | Â | Â | Â |
0.96 | Â | Â | Â | Â | Â |
WTC and Anxiety
5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
−0.62 | −0.32 | 0.23 | 0.10 | −0.18 | −0.38 |
−0.23 | 0.33 | 0.21 | −0.09 | −0.31 |  |
0.29 | 0.15 | −0.15 | −0.36 |  |  |
−0.09 | −0.38 | −0.53 |  |  |  |
0.04 | −0.25 |  |  |  |  |
−0.18 |  |  |  |  |  |
Enjoyment and Anxiety
5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
−0.52 | −0.08 | −0.08 | 0.16 | −0.03 | −0.27 |
−0.10 | 0.19 | 0.19 | −0.04 | −0.28 |  |
0.10 | 0.01 | 0.01 | −0.43 |  |  |
−0.56 | −0.71 | −0.71 |  |  |  |
−0.56 | −0.63 |  |  |  |  |
−0.38 |  |  |  |  |  |
Week 2:
WTC and Enjoyment
5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
−0.58 | 0.54 | 0.51 | 0.57 | 0.87 | 0.93 |
0.49 | 0.45 | 0.53 | 0.87 | 0.92 | Â |
0.52 | 0.53 | 0.87 | 0.92 | Â | Â |
0.52 | 0.87 | 0.92 | Â | Â | Â |
0.86 | 0.91 | Â | Â | Â | Â |
0.89 | Â | Â | Â | Â | Â |
WTC and Anxiety
5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
0.64 | 0.55 | 0.54 | 0.53 | 0.23 | −0.04 |
0.45 | 0.43 | 0.39 | 0.01 | −0.33 |  |
0.95 | 0.20 | −0.69 | −0.87 |  |  |
0.27 | −0.68 | −0.87 |  |  |  |
−0.72 | −0.89 |  |  |  |  |
−0.88 |  |  |  |  |  |
Enjoyment and Anxiety
5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
−0.21 | 0.13 | 0.21 | 0.17 | 0.00 | −0.18 |
−0.12 | −0.05 | −0.01 | −0.23 | −0.45 |  |
0.67 | −0.64 | −0.92 | −0.93 |  |  |
−0.64 | −0.92 | −0.92 |  |  |  |
−0.94 | −0.93 |  |  |  |  |
−0.95 |  |  |  |  |  |
Week 3:
WTC and Enjoyment
5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
0.33 | 0.68 | 0.70 | 0.72 | 0.81 | 0.90 |
0.69 | 0.71 | 0.73 | 0.81 | 0.90 | Â |
0.72 | 0.74 | 0.82 | 0.90 | Â | Â |
0.71 | 0.80 | 0.89 | Â | Â | Â |
0.86 | 0.93 | Â | Â | Â | Â |
0.94 | Â | Â | Â | Â | Â |
WTC and Anxiety
5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
0.48 | −0.02 | −0.08 | 0.11 | −0.26 | −0.48 |
−0.12 | −0.16 | 0.08 | −0.30 | −0.51 |  |
−0.46 | −0.10 | −0.42 | −0.60 |  |  |
0.12 | −0.31 | −0.55 |  |  |  |
−0.06 | −0.41 |  |  |  |  |
−0.30 |  |  |  |  |  |
Enjoyment and Anxiety
5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
0.64 | −0.28 | −0.32 | −0.01 | −0.26 | −0.50 |
−0.34 | −0.36 | 0.02 | −0.25 | −0.51 |  |
−0.52 | −0.03 | −0.29 | −0.54 |  |  |
0.29 | −0.07 | −0.45 |  |  |  |
0.05 | −0.38 |  |  |  |  |
−0.21 | −0.28 |  |  |  |  |
Week 4:
WTC and Enjoyment
5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
0.94 | 0.95 | 0.90 | 0.94 | 0.95 | 0.95 |
0.93 | 0.87 | 0.93 | 0.94 | 0.95 | Â |
0.89 | 0.94 | 0.95 | 0.96 | Â | Â |
0.94 | 0.95 | 0.95 | Â | Â | Â |
0.96 | 0.96 | Â | Â | Â | Â |
0.98 | Â | Â | Â | Â | Â |
WTC and Anxiety
5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
0.81 | −0.13 | −0.07 | −0.06 | −0.51 | −0.61 |
−0.27 | −0.14 | −0.12 | −0.55 | −0.62 |  |
−0.14 | −0.12 | −0.54 | −0.61 |  |  |
−0.02 | −0.48 | −0.56 |  |  |  |
−0.38 | −0.48 |  |  |  |  |
−0.25 |  |  |  |  |  |
Enjoyment and Anxiety
5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
0.93 | −0.09 | −0.07 | −0.06 | −0.44 | −0.53 |
−0.21 | −0.18 | −0.16 | −0.49 | −0.55 |  |
−0.19 | −0.16 | −0.49 | −0.54 |  |  |
−0.05 | −0.43 | −0.48 |  |  |  |
−0.30 | −0.39 |  |  |  |  |
−0.23 |  |  |  |  |  |
Week 5:
WTC and Enjoyment
5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
0.79 | 0.80 | 0.80 | 0.83 | 0.85 | 0.86 |
0.65 | 0.64 | 0.69 | 0.74 | 0.75 | Â |
0.97 | 0.94 | 0.92 | 0.92 | Â | Â |
0.95 | 0.91 | 0.91 | Â | Â | Â |
0.61 | 0.58 | Â | Â | Â | Â |
0.66 | Â | Â | Â | Â | Â |
WTC and Anxiety
5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
−0.47 | −0.65 | −0.67 | −0.69 | −0.72 | v0.66 |
−0.57 | −0.59 | −0.60 | −0.66 | −0.60 |  |
−0.50 | −0.50 | −0.57 | −0.51 |  |  |
−0.04 | −0.30 | −0.26 |  |  |  |
−0.39 | −0.09 |  |  |  |  |
−0.28 |  |  |  |  |  |
Enjoyment and Anxiety
5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
−0.16 | −0.31 | −0.34 | −0.38 | −0.57 | −0.56 |
−0.03 | −0.04 | −0.11 | −0.45 | −0.47 |  |
−0.30 | −0.30 | −0.60 | −0.57 |  |  |
0.21 | −0.52 | −0.45 |  |  |  |
−0.69 | −0.48 |  |  |  |  |
−0.50 |  |  |  |  |  |
Week 6:
WTC and Enjoyment
5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
0.88 | 0.94 | 0.57 | 0.55 | 0.57 | 0.77 |
0.99 | 0.45 | 0.45 | 0.46 | 0.73 | Â |
0.49 | 0.50 | 0.52 | 0.75 | Â | Â |
0.52 | 0.54 | 0.76 | Â | Â | Â |
0.62 | 0.82 | Â | Â | Â | Â |
0.92 | Â | Â | Â | Â | Â |
WTC and Anxiety
5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
−0.14 | −0.47 | −0.39 | −0.34 | −0.32 | 0.17 |
−0.27 | −0.24 | −0.20 | −0.17 | 0.32 |  |
−0.26 | −0.23 | −0.20 | 0.32 |  |  |
−0.63 | −0.49 | 0.36 |  |  |  |
−0.50 | 0.41 |  |  |  |  |
0.42 | Â | Â | Â | Â | Â |
Enjoyment and Anxiety
5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
0.05 | −0.43 | −0.41 | −0.40 | −0.37 | 0.04 |
−0.30 | −0.27 | −0.26 | −0.22 | 0.20 |  |
−0.23 | −0.23 | −0.19 | 0.23 |  |  |
−0.32 | −0.21 | 0.35 |  |  |  |
0.10 | 0.57 | Â | Â | Â | Â |
0.33 | Â | Â | Â | Â | Â |
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2021 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Khajavy, G.H., MacIntyre, P.D., Taherian, T., Ross, J. (2021). Examining the Dynamic Relationships Between Willingness to Communicate, Anxiety and Enjoyment Using the Experience Sampling Method. In: Zarrinabadi, N., Pawlak, M. (eds) New Perspectives on Willingness to Communicate in a Second Language. Second Language Learning and Teaching. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-67634-6_9
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-67634-6_9
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-67633-9
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-67634-6
eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)