Skip to main content

Formulated Professional Identity of Learning Designers and the Role of Open Education in Maintaining that Identity

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Handbook for Online Learning Contexts: Digital, Mobile and Open

Abstract

Educators and educational systems, whether they are in the corporate, higher education or school sector, face significant challenges and competition including more cries for accountability, improving results and the ubiquity of technology. Meanwhile, learning designers, despite lack of clarity about the nomenclature, are in demand as organisations of all kinds strive to meet the challenges of the twenty-first century. This nexus offers opportunities to further define a professional identity of learning designers, as well as challenging the de-professionalisation of teaching. Rather than suggesting learning design and teaching are exclusive, this chapter argues that teachers working in contemporary contexts now need to draw on the skills practised by learning designers, in the way suggested by Goodyear (HERDSA Review of Higher Education 2:27–50, 2015), who argued that teaching is an act of design itself. Doing so empowers teachers to assert professional standing, and thus become greater advocates for the importance of education and teachers. This chapter presents a framework for this expanded definition of teaching and discusses how it might fit within existing learning design frameworks. This extended definition is closely linked to more attention being paid to open educational resources, infrastructure and other tools, as opposed to proprietary platforms. Teachers, utilising a reinvigorated professional identity, are well placed to act as advocates for such open educational approaches.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 189.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 249.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 249.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Adoniou, M. (2016, July 8). What went wrong at Aurukun School? The Conversation. https://theconversation.com/what-went-wrong-at-aurukun-school-62175

  • Association of Educational Communications & Technology. (2018). History of LIDT. In R. E. West (Ed), Foundations of learning and instructional design technology: The past, present, and future of learning and instructional design technology (1st ed). EdTech Books. Retrieved from https://edtechbooks.org/lidtfoundations

  • Beetham, H., & Sharpe, R. (2007). Rethinking pedagogy for a digital age. London: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Branch, R. M. (2009). Instructional design: The ADDIE approach. Boston: Springer International Publishing.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Branch, R. M., & Dousay, T. A. (2015). Survey of instructional design models. Association for Educational Communications & Technology.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carr-Chellman, A. A. (2015). Instructional design for teachers: Improving classroom practice. New York: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • CAST (2020). About Universal Design for Learning. http://www.cast.org/our-work/about-udl.html?utm_source=udlguidelines&utm_medium=web&utm_campaign=none&utm_content=homepage#.XlhE4C17FHR

  • Compass Education. (n.d.) Terms of Use.https://sites.google.com/a/jdlf.com.au/policies/. Retrieved 13 Aug 2020.

  • Conole, G. (2013). Designing for learning in an open world. Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Conole, G. (2015). The 7Cs of learning design. In J. Dalziel (Ed.), Learning Design (pp. 129–157). Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Conole, G., & Wills, S. (2013). Representing learning designs–making design explicit and shareable. Educational Media International, 50(1), 24–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Council of Australian Governments Education Council. (2019). Alice Springs (Mparntwe) Education Declaration. Carlton: Education Council.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dalziel, J., & Dobozy, E. (2015). Reflections on metaphors for learning design. In J. Dalziel (Ed.), Learning Design (pp. 75–89). Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dalziel, J., Conole, G., Wills, S., Walker, S., Bennett, S., Dobozy, E., Cameron, L., Bdailescu-Buga, E., & Bower, M. (2015). The Larnaca declaration on learning design—2013. In J. Dalziel (Ed.), Learning Design (pp. 13–53). Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deloitte Access Economics (Firm). (2018). Australia’s digital pulse: driving Australia’s international ICT competitiveness and digital growth.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dousay, T. A. (2018). Instructional design models. In R. E. West (Ed.), Foundations of learning and instructional design technology: The past, present, and future of learning and instructional design technology. EdTech Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Evers, J., & Kneyber, R. (Eds.). (2015). Flip the system: changing education from the ground up. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gibbons, A. S. (2003). What and how do designers design? TechTrends, 47(5), 22–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hager, P., & Beckett, D. (2019). The emergence of complexity: Rethinking education as a Social Science. Springer Nature.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koehler, M. J., & Mishra, P. (2008). Introducing TPCK. In AACTE Committee on Innovation and Technology (Ed.), The handbook of technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPCK) for educators. New York: American Association of Colleges of Teacher Education and Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laurillard, D. (2012). Teaching as a design science – Building pedagogical patterns for learning and technology. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Netolicky, D. M., Andrews, J., & Paterson, C. (Eds.). (2018). Flip the system Australia: What matters in education. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paniagua, A., & Istance, D. (2018). Teachers as designers of learning environments: The importance of innovative pedagogies. Paris: Educational Research and Innovation. OECD Publishing.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Parchoma, G., Koole, M., Morrison, D., Nelson, D., & Dreaver-Charles, K. (2019). Designing for learning in the Yellow House: A comparison of instructional and learning design origins and practices. Higher Education Research & Development, 39, 1–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Persico, D., Pozzi, F., & Goodyear, P. (2018). Teachers as designers of TEL interventions. British Journal of Educational Technology, 49(6), 975–980.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rieber, L. (1998). The proper way to become an instructional technologist. Retrieved from http://lrieber.coe.uga.edu/pdean/

  • Rowland, G. (2008). What do instructional designers actually do? An Initial Investigation of Expert Practice. Performance Improvement Quarterly, 5(2), 65–86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sahlberg, P. (2016). The global educational reform movement and its impact on schooling. In K. Mundy, A. Green, B. Lingard, & A. Verger (Eds.), The handbook of global education policy (pp. 128–144). Chichester: Wiley.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Seek.com.au. (n.d.). Instructional Designer. Retrieved 13 Aug 2020, from https://www.seek.com.au/career-advice/role/instructional-designer

  • Stevenson, & Gilliland. (2016). Teacher Unions at the Heart of a New Democratic Professionalism. In J. Evers & R. Kneyber (Eds.), Flip the system: Changing education from the ground up (pp. 108–119). Routledge: Taylor & Francis Group.

    Google Scholar 

  • The Hewlett Foundation. (2014). Open Educational Resources. http://www.hewlett.org/programs/education/open-educational-resources

  • Trede, F., & Jackson, D. (2019). Educating the deliberate professional and enhancing professional agency through peer reflection of work-integrated learning. Active Learning in Higher Education. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1177/1469787419869125

  • Tripp, S. (1994). How should instructional designers be educated? Performance Improvement Quarterly, 7(3), 116–126.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • UNESCO Institute for Lifelong Learning (2014). Mandate. http://uil.unesco.org/unesco-institute/mandate

  • University of Technology Sydney. (2017, March 2). Learning Design & Technology Support for Staff. Retrieved from https://help.online.uts.edu.au/information-for-staff/support-for-staff/iml-learning-technologists/

  • Wagner, E. (2011). Essay: In search of the secret handshakes of ID. The Journal of Applied Instructional Design, 1(1), 33–37.

    Google Scholar 

  • Watters, A. (2019a, July 12). The History of the Future of the ’Learning Engineer. Hack Education. http://hackeducation.com/2019/07/12/learning-engineers

  • Watters, A. (2019b, December 21). The 100 Worst Ed-Tech debacles of the decade. Hack Education. http://hackeducation.com/2019/12/31/what-a-shitshow

  • Weller, M. (2018, July 2). 20 years of EdTech. Educause Review 53(4). Retrieved from https://er.educause.edu/articles/2018/7/twenty-years-of-edtech

  • Wiggins, G., & McTighe, J. (1998). Understanding by Design. Alexandria: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiley, D. (2014, September 18). The MOOC misstep and the open education infrastructure. Open Content. Retrieved from https://opencontent.org/blog/archives/3557

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Keith Heggart .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Heggart, K. (2021). Formulated Professional Identity of Learning Designers and the Role of Open Education in Maintaining that Identity. In: Marcus-Quinn, A., Hourigan, T. (eds) Handbook for Online Learning Contexts: Digital, Mobile and Open. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-67349-9_3

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-67349-9_3

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-67348-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-67349-9

  • eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics