Skip to main content

When Panpsychism Met Monism: Why Did the Philosopher Theodor Ziehen Become a Crucial Figure for the Evolutionary Biologist Bernhard Rensch?

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Natural Selection

Part of the book series: Evolutionary Biology – New Perspectives on Its Development ((EBNPD,volume 3))

Abstract

Theodor Ziehen was a well-known German psychiatrist and experimental psychologist of the first half of the twentieth century. But he was also an obscure philosopher who developed a very sophisticated and radical form of panpsychism. While Ziehen’s work left few traces within the history of philosophy itself, his epistemology enjoyed significant influence within German evolutionary biology. Most prominently, Ziehen had a great impact on the “co-architect” of the German evolutionary synthesis, the zoologist Bernhard Rensch. Our paper has two major objectives: first, to sketch Ziehen’s distinctive contribution to philosophy and, second, to explain his importance for Rensch. Our hypothesis is that Ziehen’s monism and nomotheism constituted the philosophical foundation of Rensch’s evolutionary universalism. Monism was a prominent philosophical position within the German tradition of evolutionary biology beginning with Ernst Haeckel and remained influential thereafter due to Rensch and some other of his contemporaries. Nomotheism, the idea of elevating biological regularities to the level of universal laws also became prominent in biology due to Ernst Haeckel and, in a modified form, was promoted by Rensch as well. For Rensch, universal selectionism best satisfied the philosophical requirements of monism and nomotheism. Furthermore, Rensch’s monism and his version of determinism (polynomic determination) turned out to be a selectionist interpretation of the idea of directionality in evolution.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 219.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 279.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 279.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    https://plato.stanford.edu/search/searcher.py?query=Ziehen

  2. 2.

    One of Ziehen’s reasons for introducing the term Gignomene was to encompass the possibility of using plural and single forms of the “given”. In the following, we use gignomena for plural and gignomenon for a single form.

  3. 3.

    Ziehen and Rensch were under Spinoza’s influence; compare, e.g. with Spinoza, Ethics, Part 1, Th. 32, esp. Cor. 1, 2 (Spinoza 1996).

  4. 4.

    German original: “Eine bedeutsame Erweiterung erfährt unsere Auffassung schließlich noch dadurch, daß wir mit vielen großen Philosophen Parallelprozesse—in der üblichen Terminologie ‘Beseelung’—allem Gegebenen zuschreiben. Erst mit diesem Schritt zum Hylopsychismus wird die Einheitlichkeit des Weltbildes vollständig” (Ziehen 1924).

  5. 5.

    German original: “Auf der Grundlage eines solchen panpsychistischen Identismus stellt sich also nicht nur die Evolution des Sonnensystems, der Erde, der Pflanzen und Tiere sowie des Menschen, sondern auch der tierischen und menschlichen geistigen Fähigkeiten als ein einheitlicher kontinuierlicher Ablauf dar […]” (Rensch 1991, p. 258).

  6. 6.

    Rensch’s italics.

  7. 7.

    Here, Rensch employs the same term, “Höherenentwicklung”, which was central for discussion about evolutionary progress in German lands in the first half of the twentieth century.

  8. 8.

    https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/ernst-mach/

  9. 9.

    With all probability, he read Ziehen’s Die Grundlagen der Psychologie (1915).

References

  • Baldwin T (ed) (2003) The Cambridge history of philosophy. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Blackmore J, Itagaki R, Tanaka S (eds) (2001) Ernst Mach’s Vienna 1895–1930. Boston studies in the philosophy of science, vol 218. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht

    Google Scholar 

  • Bowler PJ (1983) The eclipse of Darwinism. The John Hopkins University Press, Baltimore & London

    Google Scholar 

  • Bowler PJ (2003) Evolution: the history of idea, 3rd edn. University of California Press, Berkeley, London

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Castell R (2003) Geschichte der Kinder- und Jugendpsychiatrie in Deutschland in den Jahren 1937 bis 1961. Vandehoek & Ruprecht, Göttingen

    Google Scholar 

  • Delisle RG (2009) The uncertain foundation of neo-Darwinism: metaphysical and epistemological pluralism in the evolutionary synthesis. Stud Hist Phil Biol Biomed Sci 40(2):119–132

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Delisle RG (2017) Darwinism or a kaleidoscope of research programs and ideas? In: Delisle R (ed) The Darwinian tradition in context. Springer, Cham

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Dücker G (ed) (2000) 100 Jahre Bernhard Rensch: Biologe - Philosoph – Künstler. LIT Verlag, Münster

    Google Scholar 

  • Gabriel G (2004) Ziehen, Theodor. In: Enzykopädie Philosophie und Wissenschaftstheorie. J.B. Metzler, Stuttgart

    Google Scholar 

  • Gerhard U-J (2004) Theodor Ziehen, M.D., Ph.D., 1862–1950. Am J Psychiatr 161:1369

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gerhard U-J, Blanz B (2004) Theodor Ziehen. Am J Psychiatr 161(8):1369

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gerhard U-J, Blanz B (2002) Theodor Ziehen (1862–1950). Nervenarzt 73:905–907

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gliboff S (2012) Monism and morphology at the turn of the twentieth century. In: Weir TH (ed) Monism. Palgrave Macmillan, N.Y., pp 135–158

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Heberer G (ed) (1943) Die Evolution der Organismen. Gustav Fischer, Jena

    Google Scholar 

  • Honderich T (ed) (2005) The Oxford companion to philosophy, 2nd edn. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Hopwood N (2015) Haeckel’s embryos: Images, evolution, and fraud. The University of Chicago Press, Chicago & London

    Google Scholar 

  • Hörz H, Liebscher H, Löther R, Schmutzer E, Wollgast S (eds) (1997) Philosophie und Naturwissenschaften. Pahl-Rugenstein, Bonn

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoßfeld U (1997) Gerhard Heberer (1901–1973) Sein Beitrag zur Biologie im 20. Jahrhundert. Berlin, VWB

    Google Scholar 

  • Hossfeld U (2010) Absolute Ernst Haeckel. Orange Press, Freiburg

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoßfeld U (2013) Protestantismus und Monismus - Das Beispiel Ernst Haeckel. In: Spurenlese. Kulturelle Wirkungen der Reformation. Hg. von der Reformgeschichtlichen Sozietät der Martin-Luther-Universität Halle-Wittenberg, Evangelische Verlagsanstalt, Leipzig, pp 219–241

    Google Scholar 

  • Hossfeld U, Watts E, Levit GS (2017) Valentin Haecker (1864-1927) as a pioneer of phenogenetics: building bridge between genotype and phenotype. Epigenetics 10(4):247–253

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hossfeld U, Levit GS, Watts E (2019) 100 years of phenogenetics: Valentin Haecker and his examination of the phenotype. Mol Genet Genom 294(2):445–456

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Huxley J (ed) (1940) The new systematics. At the Clarendon Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Junker T (2004) Die zweite Darwinsche Revolution: Geschichte des Synthetischen Darwinismus in Deutschland 1924 bis 1950. Acta Biohistorica, Bd. 8. Marburg

    Google Scholar 

  • Junker T, Hossfeld U (2002) The architects of the evolutionary synthesis in national socialist Germany: science and politics. Biol Philos 17(2):223–249

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kolchinsky EI (2014) The unity of evolutionary theory in the 20th century divided world. Nestor-Historia, St. Petersburg

    Google Scholar 

  • Kutschera U, Niklas KJ (2004) The modern theory of biological evolution: an expanded synthesis. Naturwissenschaften 91:255–276

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Levit GS, Hoßfeld U (2006) The forgotten “old Darwinian” synthesis: the evolutionary theory of Ludwig H. plate (1862-1937). NTM Int J Hist Ethics Nat Sci Technol Med 14:9–25

    Google Scholar 

  • Levit GS, Hoßfeld U (2011) Darwin without borders? Looking at “generalised Darwinism” through the prism of the “hourglass model”. Theory Biosci 130:299–312

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Levit GS, Hossfeld U (2017) Major research traditions in twentieth-century evolutionary biology: the relations of Germany’s Darwinism with them. In: Delisle R (ed) The Darwinian tradition in context. Cham, Springer Nature, pp 169–193

    Google Scholar 

  • Levit GS, Hossfeld U (2019) Ernst Haeckel in the history of biology. Curr Biol 29:R1269–R1300

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Levit GS, Hoßfeld U (2020) Biology and Panpsychism: German evolutionists and a philosopher Theodor Ziehen (1862–1950). Vestnik of the Saint-Petersburg University: philosophy and conflict studies, 36(2): 240–253

    Google Scholar 

  • Levit GS, Simunek M, Hoßfeld U (2008) Psychoontogeny and psychophylogeny: the selectionist turn of Bernhard Rensch (1900-1990) through the prism of panpsychistic identism. Theory Biosci 127:297–322

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mach E (2005) Analysis of sensations [translated into Russian]. Territoria Budustchego, Moscow

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayr E (1982) The growth of biological thought. The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Mass

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayr E (1999) Thoughts on the evolutionary synthesis in Germany. In: Junker T, Engels E-M (eds) Die Entstehung der Synthetischen Theorie: Beiträge zur Geschichte der Evolutionsbiologie in Deutschland. Verlag für Wissenschaft und Bildung, Berlin, pp 19–30

    Google Scholar 

  • Nenadić I (2011) Der übermenschliche Patient: Nitzsches Behandlung in der Jenaer Psychiatrie. Weimar-Jena die Große Stadt 4(1):31–45

    Google Scholar 

  • Nöthlich R, Weber H, Hoßfeld U, Breidbach O, Krauße E (2006) “Substanzmonismus” und/oder “Energetik”: Der Briefwechsel von Ernst Haeckel und Wilhelm Ostwald (1910–1918). Zum 100. Jahrestag der Gründung des Deutschen Monistenbundes. VWB, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  • Overhage O (1959) Um Die Ursachliche Erklarung Der Hominisation Biologisch Hypothesen über den Ursprung des Menschen. Acta Biotheoretica, Supplementum Primum, vol XII. E.J. Brill, Leiden

    Google Scholar 

  • Reif W-E, Junker T, Hoßfeld U (2000) The synthetic theory of evolution: general problems and the German contribution to the synthesis. Theory Biosci 119:41–91

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rensch B (1933) Zoologische Systematik und Artbildungsproblem. Akademische Verlagsgesellschaft, Leipzig

    Google Scholar 

  • Rensch B (1939) Typen der Artbildung. Biol Rev 14:180–222

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rensch B (1947) Neuere Probleme der Abstammungslehre. Die transspezifische Evolution. Ferdinand Enke Verlag, Stuttgart

    Google Scholar 

  • Rensch B (1954) Neuere Probleme der Abstammungslehre. Die transspezifische Evolution. Zweite, stark veränderte Auflage. Ferdinand Enke Verlag, Stuttgart

    Google Scholar 

  • Rensch B (1968) Biophilosophie auf erkenntnistheoretischer Grundlage (Panpsychistischer Identismus). Gustav Fischer Verlag, Stuttgart

    Google Scholar 

  • Rensch B (1970) Neuere Probleme der Abstammungslehre. Ferdinand Enke Verlag, Stuttgart

    Google Scholar 

  • Rensch B (1971) Biophilosophy. Columbia University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Rensch B (1972) Neuere Probleme der Abstammungslehre. Die transspezifische Evolution. Dritte, durch einen Anhang erweiterte Auflage. Ferdinand Enke Verlag, Stuttgart

    Google Scholar 

  • Rensch B (1979) Lebensweg eines Biologen in einer turbulenten Zeit. Gustav Fischer, Stuttgart, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Rensch B (1988) Probleme genereller Determiniertheit allen Geschehens. Parey, Berlin/Hamburg

    Google Scholar 

  • Rensch B (1991) Das Universale Weltbild. Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft, Darmstadt

    Google Scholar 

  • Rieppel O (2006) On concept formation in systematics. Cladistics 22:474–492

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rieppel O (2007) The metaphysics of Hennig’s, phylogenetic systematics: substance, events and laws of nature. Syst Biodivers 5(4):345–360

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rieppel O (2012) Hugo Dingler (1881–1954) and the philosophical foundation of the German evolutionary synthesis. Biol Theory 6:162–168

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rieppel O (2016) Willi Hennig as a philosopher. In: Williams D, Schmitt M, Wheeler Q (eds) The future of phylogenetic systematics: the legacy of Willi Hennig. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 356–376

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Robertson M, Light E, Lipworth W, Walter G (2017) Psychiatry, genocide and the National Socialist State: lessons learnt, ignored and forgotten. In: Marczac N, Shields K (eds) Genocide Perspectives V. UTS ePRESS, Sydney, pp 69–89

    Google Scholar 

  • Romanes GJ (1895) Darwin and after Darwin: post-Darwinian questions: heredity and utility. Open Court, Chicago

    Google Scholar 

  • Ruschmeier I (1999) Das philosophische Werk Bernhard Renschs. Eine kritische Auseinandersetzung mit Renschs wissenschaftlichem Weltbild anhand klassischer Probleme der Philosophie. (= Naturwissenschaft – Philosophie – Geschichte (Hg. v. Hucklenbroich P) Band 9). Lit-Verlag. Münster, Hamburg, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Seeman MV (2005) Psychiatry in the Nazi Era. Can J Psychiatr 50:218–225

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spinoza B (1996) Ethics. Penguin Classics, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Ziche P (2000) [Hg.] Monismus um 1900. Wissenschaftskultur und Weltanschauung. VWB, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  • Ziehen T (1907) Psychophysiologische Erkenntnistheorie. Zweite Auflage. Gustav Fischer, Jena

    Google Scholar 

  • Ziehen T (1915) Die Grundlagen der Psychologie. B.G. Teubner, Leipzig und Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  • Ziehen T (1922) Grundlagen der Naturphilosophie. Verlag Quelle & Meyer, Leipzig

    Google Scholar 

  • Ziehen T (1923) Theodor Ziehen. In: Schmidt R (ed) Die Philosophie der Gegenwart in Selbstdarstellungen, vol Bd. 4. Meiner, Leipzig, pp 219–236

    Google Scholar 

  • Ziehen T (1924) Das Leib-Seele-Problem. Dtsch Med Wochenschr 38:1–7

    Google Scholar 

  • Ziehen T (1934) Erkenntnistheorie. Teil I. Gustav Fischer, Jena

    Google Scholar 

  • Ziehen T (1939) Erkenntnistheorie. Teil II. Gustav Fischer, Jena

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We appreciate suggestions made by Prof. Ian G. Stewart (Halifax, Canada) during his stay at Jena University as an Erasmus-Plus Professor. We are thankful to Dr. Thomas Bach from Ernst-Haeckel-House (Jena, Germany) for providing us with letters of Theodor Ziehen to Ernst Haeckel; Prof. Dmitry Prokudin (St. Petersburg State University, Russia) for establishing citation diagrams; Dr. Alexander Lvov (St. Petersburg State University, Russia) for providing insightful philosophical comments; and Dr. Luise Knoblich (Jena, Germany) for designing visual images.

Cameron Yetman (Canada) contributed a lot to establishing the final version of this paper.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Levit, G.S., Hossfeld, U. (2021). When Panpsychism Met Monism: Why Did the Philosopher Theodor Ziehen Become a Crucial Figure for the Evolutionary Biologist Bernhard Rensch?. In: Delisle, R.G. (eds) Natural Selection. Evolutionary Biology – New Perspectives on Its Development, vol 3. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-65536-5_9

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics