Abstract
Theodor Ziehen was a well-known German psychiatrist and experimental psychologist of the first half of the twentieth century. But he was also an obscure philosopher who developed a very sophisticated and radical form of panpsychism. While Ziehen’s work left few traces within the history of philosophy itself, his epistemology enjoyed significant influence within German evolutionary biology. Most prominently, Ziehen had a great impact on the “co-architect” of the German evolutionary synthesis, the zoologist Bernhard Rensch. Our paper has two major objectives: first, to sketch Ziehen’s distinctive contribution to philosophy and, second, to explain his importance for Rensch. Our hypothesis is that Ziehen’s monism and nomotheism constituted the philosophical foundation of Rensch’s evolutionary universalism. Monism was a prominent philosophical position within the German tradition of evolutionary biology beginning with Ernst Haeckel and remained influential thereafter due to Rensch and some other of his contemporaries. Nomotheism, the idea of elevating biological regularities to the level of universal laws also became prominent in biology due to Ernst Haeckel and, in a modified form, was promoted by Rensch as well. For Rensch, universal selectionism best satisfied the philosophical requirements of monism and nomotheism. Furthermore, Rensch’s monism and his version of determinism (polynomic determination) turned out to be a selectionist interpretation of the idea of directionality in evolution.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
- 2.
One of Ziehen’s reasons for introducing the term Gignomene was to encompass the possibility of using plural and single forms of the “given”. In the following, we use gignomena for plural and gignomenon for a single form.
- 3.
Ziehen and Rensch were under Spinoza’s influence; compare, e.g. with Spinoza, Ethics, Part 1, Th. 32, esp. Cor. 1, 2 (Spinoza 1996).
- 4.
German original: “Eine bedeutsame Erweiterung erfährt unsere Auffassung schließlich noch dadurch, daß wir mit vielen großen Philosophen Parallelprozesse—in der üblichen Terminologie ‘Beseelung’—allem Gegebenen zuschreiben. Erst mit diesem Schritt zum Hylopsychismus wird die Einheitlichkeit des Weltbildes vollständig” (Ziehen 1924).
- 5.
German original: “Auf der Grundlage eines solchen panpsychistischen Identismus stellt sich also nicht nur die Evolution des Sonnensystems, der Erde, der Pflanzen und Tiere sowie des Menschen, sondern auch der tierischen und menschlichen geistigen Fähigkeiten als ein einheitlicher kontinuierlicher Ablauf dar […]” (Rensch 1991, p. 258).
- 6.
Rensch’s italics.
- 7.
Here, Rensch employs the same term, “Höherenentwicklung”, which was central for discussion about evolutionary progress in German lands in the first half of the twentieth century.
- 8.
- 9.
With all probability, he read Ziehen’s Die Grundlagen der Psychologie (1915).
References
Baldwin T (ed) (2003) The Cambridge history of philosophy. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Blackmore J, Itagaki R, Tanaka S (eds) (2001) Ernst Mach’s Vienna 1895–1930. Boston studies in the philosophy of science, vol 218. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht
Bowler PJ (1983) The eclipse of Darwinism. The John Hopkins University Press, Baltimore & London
Bowler PJ (2003) Evolution: the history of idea, 3rd edn. University of California Press, Berkeley, London
Castell R (2003) Geschichte der Kinder- und Jugendpsychiatrie in Deutschland in den Jahren 1937 bis 1961. Vandehoek & Ruprecht, Göttingen
Delisle RG (2009) The uncertain foundation of neo-Darwinism: metaphysical and epistemological pluralism in the evolutionary synthesis. Stud Hist Phil Biol Biomed Sci 40(2):119–132
Delisle RG (2017) Darwinism or a kaleidoscope of research programs and ideas? In: Delisle R (ed) The Darwinian tradition in context. Springer, Cham
Dücker G (ed) (2000) 100 Jahre Bernhard Rensch: Biologe - Philosoph – Künstler. LIT Verlag, Münster
Gabriel G (2004) Ziehen, Theodor. In: Enzykopädie Philosophie und Wissenschaftstheorie. J.B. Metzler, Stuttgart
Gerhard U-J (2004) Theodor Ziehen, M.D., Ph.D., 1862–1950. Am J Psychiatr 161:1369
Gerhard U-J, Blanz B (2004) Theodor Ziehen. Am J Psychiatr 161(8):1369
Gerhard U-J, Blanz B (2002) Theodor Ziehen (1862–1950). Nervenarzt 73:905–907
Gliboff S (2012) Monism and morphology at the turn of the twentieth century. In: Weir TH (ed) Monism. Palgrave Macmillan, N.Y., pp 135–158
Heberer G (ed) (1943) Die Evolution der Organismen. Gustav Fischer, Jena
Honderich T (ed) (2005) The Oxford companion to philosophy, 2nd edn. Oxford University Press, Oxford
Hopwood N (2015) Haeckel’s embryos: Images, evolution, and fraud. The University of Chicago Press, Chicago & London
Hörz H, Liebscher H, Löther R, Schmutzer E, Wollgast S (eds) (1997) Philosophie und Naturwissenschaften. Pahl-Rugenstein, Bonn
Hoßfeld U (1997) Gerhard Heberer (1901–1973) Sein Beitrag zur Biologie im 20. Jahrhundert. Berlin, VWB
Hossfeld U (2010) Absolute Ernst Haeckel. Orange Press, Freiburg
Hoßfeld U (2013) Protestantismus und Monismus - Das Beispiel Ernst Haeckel. In: Spurenlese. Kulturelle Wirkungen der Reformation. Hg. von der Reformgeschichtlichen Sozietät der Martin-Luther-Universität Halle-Wittenberg, Evangelische Verlagsanstalt, Leipzig, pp 219–241
Hossfeld U, Watts E, Levit GS (2017) Valentin Haecker (1864-1927) as a pioneer of phenogenetics: building bridge between genotype and phenotype. Epigenetics 10(4):247–253
Hossfeld U, Levit GS, Watts E (2019) 100 years of phenogenetics: Valentin Haecker and his examination of the phenotype. Mol Genet Genom 294(2):445–456
Huxley J (ed) (1940) The new systematics. At the Clarendon Press, Oxford
Junker T (2004) Die zweite Darwinsche Revolution: Geschichte des Synthetischen Darwinismus in Deutschland 1924 bis 1950. Acta Biohistorica, Bd. 8. Marburg
Junker T, Hossfeld U (2002) The architects of the evolutionary synthesis in national socialist Germany: science and politics. Biol Philos 17(2):223–249
Kolchinsky EI (2014) The unity of evolutionary theory in the 20th century divided world. Nestor-Historia, St. Petersburg
Kutschera U, Niklas KJ (2004) The modern theory of biological evolution: an expanded synthesis. Naturwissenschaften 91:255–276
Levit GS, Hoßfeld U (2006) The forgotten “old Darwinian” synthesis: the evolutionary theory of Ludwig H. plate (1862-1937). NTM Int J Hist Ethics Nat Sci Technol Med 14:9–25
Levit GS, Hoßfeld U (2011) Darwin without borders? Looking at “generalised Darwinism” through the prism of the “hourglass model”. Theory Biosci 130:299–312
Levit GS, Hossfeld U (2017) Major research traditions in twentieth-century evolutionary biology: the relations of Germany’s Darwinism with them. In: Delisle R (ed) The Darwinian tradition in context. Cham, Springer Nature, pp 169–193
Levit GS, Hossfeld U (2019) Ernst Haeckel in the history of biology. Curr Biol 29:R1269–R1300
Levit GS, Hoßfeld U (2020) Biology and Panpsychism: German evolutionists and a philosopher Theodor Ziehen (1862–1950). Vestnik of the Saint-Petersburg University: philosophy and conflict studies, 36(2): 240–253
Levit GS, Simunek M, Hoßfeld U (2008) Psychoontogeny and psychophylogeny: the selectionist turn of Bernhard Rensch (1900-1990) through the prism of panpsychistic identism. Theory Biosci 127:297–322
Mach E (2005) Analysis of sensations [translated into Russian]. Territoria Budustchego, Moscow
Mayr E (1982) The growth of biological thought. The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Mass
Mayr E (1999) Thoughts on the evolutionary synthesis in Germany. In: Junker T, Engels E-M (eds) Die Entstehung der Synthetischen Theorie: Beiträge zur Geschichte der Evolutionsbiologie in Deutschland. Verlag für Wissenschaft und Bildung, Berlin, pp 19–30
Nenadić I (2011) Der übermenschliche Patient: Nitzsches Behandlung in der Jenaer Psychiatrie. Weimar-Jena die Große Stadt 4(1):31–45
Nöthlich R, Weber H, Hoßfeld U, Breidbach O, Krauße E (2006) “Substanzmonismus” und/oder “Energetik”: Der Briefwechsel von Ernst Haeckel und Wilhelm Ostwald (1910–1918). Zum 100. Jahrestag der Gründung des Deutschen Monistenbundes. VWB, Berlin
Overhage O (1959) Um Die Ursachliche Erklarung Der Hominisation Biologisch Hypothesen über den Ursprung des Menschen. Acta Biotheoretica, Supplementum Primum, vol XII. E.J. Brill, Leiden
Reif W-E, Junker T, Hoßfeld U (2000) The synthetic theory of evolution: general problems and the German contribution to the synthesis. Theory Biosci 119:41–91
Rensch B (1933) Zoologische Systematik und Artbildungsproblem. Akademische Verlagsgesellschaft, Leipzig
Rensch B (1939) Typen der Artbildung. Biol Rev 14:180–222
Rensch B (1947) Neuere Probleme der Abstammungslehre. Die transspezifische Evolution. Ferdinand Enke Verlag, Stuttgart
Rensch B (1954) Neuere Probleme der Abstammungslehre. Die transspezifische Evolution. Zweite, stark veränderte Auflage. Ferdinand Enke Verlag, Stuttgart
Rensch B (1968) Biophilosophie auf erkenntnistheoretischer Grundlage (Panpsychistischer Identismus). Gustav Fischer Verlag, Stuttgart
Rensch B (1970) Neuere Probleme der Abstammungslehre. Ferdinand Enke Verlag, Stuttgart
Rensch B (1971) Biophilosophy. Columbia University Press, New York
Rensch B (1972) Neuere Probleme der Abstammungslehre. Die transspezifische Evolution. Dritte, durch einen Anhang erweiterte Auflage. Ferdinand Enke Verlag, Stuttgart
Rensch B (1979) Lebensweg eines Biologen in einer turbulenten Zeit. Gustav Fischer, Stuttgart, New York
Rensch B (1988) Probleme genereller Determiniertheit allen Geschehens. Parey, Berlin/Hamburg
Rensch B (1991) Das Universale Weltbild. Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft, Darmstadt
Rieppel O (2006) On concept formation in systematics. Cladistics 22:474–492
Rieppel O (2007) The metaphysics of Hennig’s, phylogenetic systematics: substance, events and laws of nature. Syst Biodivers 5(4):345–360
Rieppel O (2012) Hugo Dingler (1881–1954) and the philosophical foundation of the German evolutionary synthesis. Biol Theory 6:162–168
Rieppel O (2016) Willi Hennig as a philosopher. In: Williams D, Schmitt M, Wheeler Q (eds) The future of phylogenetic systematics: the legacy of Willi Hennig. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 356–376
Robertson M, Light E, Lipworth W, Walter G (2017) Psychiatry, genocide and the National Socialist State: lessons learnt, ignored and forgotten. In: Marczac N, Shields K (eds) Genocide Perspectives V. UTS ePRESS, Sydney, pp 69–89
Romanes GJ (1895) Darwin and after Darwin: post-Darwinian questions: heredity and utility. Open Court, Chicago
Ruschmeier I (1999) Das philosophische Werk Bernhard Renschs. Eine kritische Auseinandersetzung mit Renschs wissenschaftlichem Weltbild anhand klassischer Probleme der Philosophie. (= Naturwissenschaft – Philosophie – Geschichte (Hg. v. Hucklenbroich P) Band 9). Lit-Verlag. Münster, Hamburg, London
Seeman MV (2005) Psychiatry in the Nazi Era. Can J Psychiatr 50:218–225
Spinoza B (1996) Ethics. Penguin Classics, London
Ziche P (2000) [Hg.] Monismus um 1900. Wissenschaftskultur und Weltanschauung. VWB, Berlin
Ziehen T (1907) Psychophysiologische Erkenntnistheorie. Zweite Auflage. Gustav Fischer, Jena
Ziehen T (1915) Die Grundlagen der Psychologie. B.G. Teubner, Leipzig und Berlin
Ziehen T (1922) Grundlagen der Naturphilosophie. Verlag Quelle & Meyer, Leipzig
Ziehen T (1923) Theodor Ziehen. In: Schmidt R (ed) Die Philosophie der Gegenwart in Selbstdarstellungen, vol Bd. 4. Meiner, Leipzig, pp 219–236
Ziehen T (1924) Das Leib-Seele-Problem. Dtsch Med Wochenschr 38:1–7
Ziehen T (1934) Erkenntnistheorie. Teil I. Gustav Fischer, Jena
Ziehen T (1939) Erkenntnistheorie. Teil II. Gustav Fischer, Jena
Acknowledgements
We appreciate suggestions made by Prof. Ian G. Stewart (Halifax, Canada) during his stay at Jena University as an Erasmus-Plus Professor. We are thankful to Dr. Thomas Bach from Ernst-Haeckel-House (Jena, Germany) for providing us with letters of Theodor Ziehen to Ernst Haeckel; Prof. Dmitry Prokudin (St. Petersburg State University, Russia) for establishing citation diagrams; Dr. Alexander Lvov (St. Petersburg State University, Russia) for providing insightful philosophical comments; and Dr. Luise Knoblich (Jena, Germany) for designing visual images.
Cameron Yetman (Canada) contributed a lot to establishing the final version of this paper.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2021 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Levit, G.S., Hossfeld, U. (2021). When Panpsychism Met Monism: Why Did the Philosopher Theodor Ziehen Become a Crucial Figure for the Evolutionary Biologist Bernhard Rensch?. In: Delisle, R.G. (eds) Natural Selection. Evolutionary Biology – New Perspectives on Its Development, vol 3. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-65536-5_9
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-65536-5_9
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-65535-8
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-65536-5
eBook Packages: Biomedical and Life SciencesBiomedical and Life Sciences (R0)