Abstract
This chapter explores mathematical and interdisciplinary modeling within the early and elementary school years, where children’s learning potential often remains untapped. Interdisciplinary modeling, as used in this chapter, encompasses the STEM disciplines as well as aspects of the humanities. Different forms of modeling for grades K-6 are reviewed including model-eliciting activities and STEM-based modeling. Modeling contexts with a focus on cultural and community issues are also explored. To illustrate how elementary students can work effectively with these problems, an MEA and a follow-up STEM-based modeling problem implemented in fourth-grade classrooms (9-year-olds) are presented.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Anhalt, C. O., Cortez, R., & Smith, A. (2017). Mathematical modeling: Creating opportunities for participation in mathematics. In A. Fernandes, S. Crespo, & M. Civil (Eds.), Access and equity: Promoting high quality mathematics in grades 6-8 (pp. 105–119). Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics (NCTM).
Anhalt, C. O., Staats, S., Cortez, R., & Civil, M. (2018). Mathematical modeling and culturally relevant pedagogy. In Y. J. Dori, Z. R. Mevarech, & D. R. Baker (Eds.), Cognition, metacognition, and culture in STEM education (pp. 307–330). Cham, Switzerland: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-66659-4_14
Anhalt, C. O., Turner, E. E., Aguirre, J. M., Foote, M.Q., & Roth McDuffie, A. (2018). The price of guacamole: Designing rigorous and relevant mathematical modeling tasks that build on the strengths of community and cultural contexts. Presentation at the bi-annual meeting of TODOS: Mathematics for all, Scottsdale, AZ.
Arleback, J. B., Doerr, H. M., & O’Neil, A. H. (2013). A modeling perspective on interpreting rates of change in context. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 15(4), 314–336. https://doi.org/10.1080/10986065.2013.834405
Blum, W., & Borromeo Ferri, R. (2009). Mathematical modelling: Can it be taught and learnt? Journal of Mathematical Modelling and Application, 1(1), 45–58.
Blum, W., & Niss, M. (1991). Applied mathematical problem solving, modelling, applications, and links to other subjects – State, trends and issues in mathematics instruction. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 22(1), 37–68.
Bryan, L. A., Moore, T. J., Johnson, C. C., & Roehrig, G. H. (2015). Integrated STEM education. In C. C. Johnson, E. E. Peters-Burton, & T. J. Moore (Eds.), STEM road map: A framework for integrated STEM education (pp. 23–37). New York, NY: Routledge.
Bybee, R. W. (2013). The case for STEM education: Challenges and opportunities. Arlington, VA: NSTA Press.
California Department of Education. (2018). Appendix B: Mathematical modeling of the mathematics framework for California public schools: Kindergarten through grade twelve. Sacramento, CA: California Department of Education. https://www.cde.ca.gov/ci/ma/cf/documents/mathfw-appendixb.pdf
Carpenter, & Romberg. (2004). Powerful practices in mathematics and science. Madison, WI: National Center for Improving Student Learning and Achievement in Mathematics and Science.
Carr, P. G. (2018, May 25). Implementing the proposed mathematics framework: Recommendations for PISA 2021. National Center for Education Statistics (NCES).
Cirillo, M., Bartell, T. G., & Wager, A. A. (2016). Teaching mathematics for social justice through mathematical modeling. In C. Hirsch (Ed.), Annual perspectives in mathematics education: Mathematical modeling and modeling mathematics (pp. 87–96). Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
Common Core State Standards for Mathematics. (2013). http://www.corestandards.org/Math/
Crismond, D. P., & Adams, R. S. (2012). The informed design teaching and learning matrix. Journal of Engineering Education, 101(4), 738–797.
Dorie, B. L., Cardella, M. E., & Svarovsky, G. N. (2014). Capturing the design thinking of young children interacting with a parent. Paper presented at the 121st SEE annual conference & exposition, Indianapolis.
English, L. D. (2010). Modeling with complex data in the primary school. In R. Lesh, P. Galbraith, C. R. Haines, & A. Hurford (Eds.), Modeling students’ mathematical modeling competencies (pp. 287–300). New York, NY: Springer.
English, L. D. (2013). Modeling as a vehicle for philosophical inquiry in the mathematics classroom. The Journal of Analytic Teaching and Philosophical Praxis, 34(1), 46–57.
English, L. D. (2014). Promoting statistical literacy through data modelling in the early school years. In E. Chernoff & B. Sriraman (Eds.), Probabilistic thinking: Presenting plural perspectives (pp. 441–458). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer.
English, L. D. (2017). Advancing elementary and middle school STEM education. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 15(Supplement 1), 5–24.
English, L. D. (2018a, online first). Learning while designing in a fourth-grade integrated STEM problem. International Journal of Technology and Design Education. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-018-9482-z.
English, L. D. (2018b). Disruption and learning innovation across STEM. Plenary presented at the 5th international conference of STEM in education. Brisbane. https://stem-in-ed2018.com.au/proceedings-2/
English, L. D., Arleback, J. B., & Mousoulides, N. (2016). Reflections on progress in mathematical modelling research. In A. Gutierrez, G. Leder, & P. Boero (Eds.), The second handbook of research on the psychology of mathematics education (pp. 383–413). Rotterdam, The Netherlands: Sense Publishers.
English, L. D., & King, D. T. (2015). STEM learning through engineering design: Fourth- grade students’ investigations in aerospace. International Journal of STEM Education, 2(14), 1–18.
English, L. D., & King, D. T. (online, July 2018). STEM integration in 6th grade: Designing and constructing paper bridges. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education. https://link.springer.com/journal/10763.10.1007/s10763-018-9912-0
English, L. D., & Moore, T. J. (2018). Early engineering learning. Singapore, Singapore: Springer.
English, L. D., & Sriraman, B. (2010). In B. Sriraman & L. D. English (Eds.), Theories of mathematics education: Seeking new frontiers (Advances in mathematics education series, pp. 263–285). Berlin, Germany/Heidelberg, Germany: Springer.
Gadanidis, G., & Hughes, J. (2011). Performing big math ideas across the grades. Teaching children mathematics, 17(8), 486–496.
Gainsburg, J. (2006). The mathematical modeling of structural engineers. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 8(1), 3–36.
Garfunkel, S., & Montgomery, M. (Eds.). (2016). Guidelines for assessment and instruction in mathematical modeling education (GAIMME) report. Boston, MA: Consortium for Mathematics and Its Applications (COMAP)/Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics (SIAM).
Greer, B., Verschaffel, L., & Mukhopadhyay, S. (2007). Modeling for life: Mathematics and children’s experience. In W. Blum, W. Henne, & M. Niss (Eds.), Applications and modeling in mathematics education (ICMI study 14) (pp. 89–98). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer.
Guidelines for assessment & instruction in mathematical modeling education (GAIMME, 2nd edn.). (2019). Consortium for Mathematics and Its Applications (COMAP) and Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics (SIAM).
Gunaratne, N. M., Fuentes, S., Gunaratne, T. M., Torrico, D. D., et al. (2019). Effects of packaging design on sensory liking and willingness to purchase: A study using novel chocolate packaging. Heliyon, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2019.e01696
Honey, M., Pearson, G., & Schweingruber (Eds.). (2014). STEM integration in K-12 education: Status, prospects, and an agenda for research. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
Kelley, T. R., & Sung, E. (2016). Sketching by design: Teaching sketching to young learners. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 27(3). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-016-9354-3
Kennedy, N. S. (2012). Lipman, Dewey, and philosophical inquiry in the mathematics classroom. Education and Culture, 28(2), 81–94.
Leavy, A., & Hourigan, M. (2018). The role of perceptual similarity, context, and situation when selecting attributes: Considerations made by 5–6-year-olds in data modeling environments. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 97, 163–183.
Lehrer, R., & English, L. D. (2018). Introducing children to modeling variability. In D. Ben-Zvi, K. Makar, & J. Garfield (Eds.), International handbook of research in statistics education (Springer international handbooks of education) (pp. 229–260). Springer.
Lehrer, R., Jones, R. S., & Kim, M. J. (2014, July). Model-based informal inference. Paper presented at the 9th international conference on teaching statistics, Flagstaff, AZ.
Lehrer, R., & Romberg, T. (1996). Exploring children’s data modeling. Cognition and Instruction, 14(1), 69–108.
Lehrer, R., & Schauble, L. (2000). Inventing data structures for representational purposes: Elementary grade students’ classification models. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 2, 49–72.
Lehrer, R., & Schauble, L. (Eds.). (2002). Investigating real data in the classroom: Expanding children’s understanding of math and science. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
Lehrer, R., & Schauble, L. (2004). Modeling natural variation through distribution. American Educational Research Journal, 41(3), 635–679.
Lehrer, R., & Schauble, L. (2005). Developing modeling and argument in the elementary grades. In T. Romberg, T. Carpenter, & F. Dremock (Eds.), Understanding mathematics and science matters (pp. 29–53). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Lesh, R., & Doerr, H. (Eds.). (2003a). Beyond constructivism: Models and modeling perspectives on mathematics problem solving learning and teaching. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Lesh, R., & Doerr, H. M. (2003b). Foundations of a models and modeling perspective on mathematics teaching, learning, and problem solving. In R. Lesh & H. M. Doerr (Eds.), Beyond constructivism: Models and modeling perspectives on mathematics problem solving, learning, and teaching (pp. 3–33). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Lesh, R., English, L. D., & Sevis, & S. Riggs, C. (2013). Modeling as a means for making powerful ideas accessible to children at an early age. In S. Hegedus & J. Roschelle (Eds.), The SimCalc vision and contributions: Democratizing access to important mathematics (pp. 419–436). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer.
Lesh, R., & Zawojewski, J. S. (2007). Problem solving and modeling. In F. Lester (Ed.), Second handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning (pp. 763–804). Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing.
Lipman, M. (1988). Philosophy goes to school. Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press.
Lucas, B., Claxton, G., & Hanson, J., (2014). Thinking like an engineer: Implications for the education system. A report for the Royal Academy of Engineering Standing Committee for Education and Training. Royal Academy of Engineers.
Makar, K. (2016). Developing young children’s emergent inferential practices in statistics. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 18(1), 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1080/10986065.2016.1107820
McKenna, A. F. (2014). Adaptive expertise and knowledge fluency in design and innovation. In A. Johri & B. M. Olds (Eds.), Cambridge handbook of engineering education research (pp. 227–242). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
Moore, T. J., & Smith, K. A. (2014). Advancing the state of the art of STEM integration. Journal of STEM Education, 15(1), 5–10.
Mukhopadhyay, S., & Greer, B. (2007). How many deaths? Education for statistical empathy. In B. Sriraman (Ed.), International perspectives on social justice in mathematics education (pp. 169–189). Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing.
Next Generation Science Standards: For States by States (2014). https://www.nextgenscience.org/search/node. Accessed 21 Feb 2019.
OECD. (2015). PISA 2015 draft mathematics framework. Paris, France: OECD Publishing.
OECD. (2018). PISA for development mathematics framework. In In PISA for development assessment and analytical framework: Reading, mathematics and science. Paris, France: OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264305274-5-en
Poling, L. P., Naresh, N., & Goodson-Espy, T. (2018). Empowering mathematics through modeling. Mathematics Teaching in the Middle School, 24(3), 138–146.
Portsmore, M., Watkins, J., & McCormick, M. (2012). Planning, drawing and elementary students in an integrated engineering design and literacy activity. Paper presented at the 2nd P-12 Engineering and Design Education Research Summit. Washington, DC.
Shaughnessy, M. (2013). By way of introduction: Mathematics in a STEM context. Mathematics Teaching in the Middle School, 18(6), 324.
Splitter, L. (1995). Teaching for better thinking: The classroom community of inquiry. Melbourne, Australia: The Australian Council for Educational Research.
Suh, J., Britton, L., Burke, K., Matson, K., Ferguson, L., Jamieson, S., & Seshaiyer, P. (2018). Every penny counts: Promoting community engagement to engage students in mathematical modeling. In I. Goffney & R. Gutierrez (Eds.), Rehumanizing mathematics for black, indigenous, and Latinx students (pp. 63–76). Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
Suh, J. M., Matson, K., & Seshaiyer, P. (2017). Engaging elementary students in the creative process of mathematizing their world through mathematical modeling. Educational Sciences, 7(62). https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci7020062
Suh, J. M., & Seshaiyer, P. (2019). Co-designing and implementing PBL through mathematical modeling in STEM contexts. In M. Moallem, W. Hung, & N. Dabbagh (Eds.), Handbook of problem based learning (pp. 529–550). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley-Blackwell Publishing.
Turner, E. E., Aguirre, J. M., Foote, M. Q. Anhalt, C. O., Roth McDuffie, A., Civil, M. (2018). Mathematizing the world: Routines and tasks that foster mathematical modeling with cultural and community contexts. Presentation at the bi-annual meeting of TODOS: Mathematics for all, Scottsdale, AZ.
Turner, E. E., Aguirre, J. M., Foote, M. Q., & Roth McDuffie, A. M. (2018, April) Learning to leverage mathematical resources of elementary Latinx children through community-based mathematical modeling tasks. In M. Civil (Chair), Foregrounding cultural ways of being in mathematics teacher education: Cases From Latinx and Pāsifika communities. Presentation as part of a symposium at the annual research conference of the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New York, NY.
Vasquez, J., Sneider, C., & Comer, M. (2013). STEM lesson essentials, grades 3–8: Integrating science, technology, engineering, and mathematics. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
Wright, N., & Wrigley, C. (2017). Broadening design-led education horizons: Conceptual insights and future research directions. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 27(4).
Zawojewski, J. (2010). Problem solving versus modeling. In R. A. Lesh, P. L. Galbraith, C. R. Haines, & A. Hurford (Eds.), Modeling students’ mathematical modeling competencies (pp. 237–244). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer.
Zawojewski, J. S., Hjalmarson, M. A., Bowman, K. J., & Lesh, R. (2008). A modeling perspective on learning and teaching in engineering education. In J. S. Zawojewski, H. Diefes-Dux, & K. Bowman (Eds.), Models and modeling in engineering education: Designing experiences for all students (pp. 1–16). Rotterdam, The Netherlands: Sense Publishers.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2021 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
English, L.D. (2021). Mathematical and Interdisciplinary Modeling in Optimizing Young Children’s Learning. In: Suh, J.M., Wickstrom, M.H., English, L.D. (eds) Exploring Mathematical Modeling with Young Learners. Early Mathematics Learning and Development. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-63900-6_1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-63900-6_1
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-63899-3
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-63900-6
eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)