Skip to main content

Snake oil or hard struggle? Research to address the reality of social injustice in education

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Educational Research for Social Justice

Abstract

In recent years two particular tendencies have coincided to bring about new approaches in educational research. These tendencies may raise questions about the rigour and validity of the research. The two tendencies to be considered in this chapter are: (1) the increasing ‘commercialisation’ of educational research, through the influence of both profit making and not for profit organisations, all of whom are competing for resources within a limited ‘market’ and, (2) the growth of ‘teacher research’ as an important aspect of teacher professionalism. The chapter focuses mainly on England and draws on work undertaken on a range of projects over recent years, most notably on ‘Closing the Gap – Test and Learn’, a nationwide attempt to involve hundreds of schoolteachers in forms of quasi-experimental research. The argument developed in the chapter is that, in the pursuit of social justice in and through education, the engagement of teachers in school-based research is a very positive development. However such engagement needs to be tempered by careful deployment of research methods, an avoidance of a search for ‘easy answers’ and a healthy dose of critical scepticism.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 119.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Ball, S. (2012). Global Education Inc.: New policy networks and the neo-liberal imaginary. London: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Ball, S. (2017). The education debate (3rd ed.). Bristol: Policy Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ball, S., & Junemann, C. (2012). Networks, new governance and education. Bristol: Policy Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Ball, S., Bowe, R., & Gewirtz, S. (1995). Circuits of schooling: A sociological exploration of parental choice of school in social class contexts. The Sociological Review, 43(1), 53–78.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • BERA–RSA [British Educational Research Association – Royal Society of Arts]. (2014). Research and the teaching profession: Building the capacity for a self-improving teaching profession. London: BERA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bernstein, B. (1970). Education cannot compensate for society. New Society, 15(387), 344–347.

    Google Scholar 

  • Biesta, G. (2007). Why ‘what works’ won’t work: Evidence-based practice and the democratic deficit in educational research. Educational Theory, 57(1), 1–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Biesta, G. (2010). Good education in an age of measurement: Ethics, politics, democracy. Boulder: Paradigm.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, A., & Wisby, E. (Eds.). (2020). Knowledge, policy and practice in education and the struggle for social justice: Essays inspired by the work of Geoff Whitty. London: UCL Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carter, A. (2015). Carter review of initial teacher training: Sir Andrew Carter’s report on initial teacher training to the Secretary of State for Education. London: Department for Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cartwright, N., & Hardie, J. (2012). Evidence-based policy. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Chapman, C., & Ainscow, M. (2019). Using research to promote equity within education systems: Possibilities and barriers. British Educational Research Journal, 45(5), 899–917.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Childs, A., & Fancourt, N. (2018). Building research capacity and relationships in schools: The consequences of involvement in Closing the Gap. In A. Childs & I. Menter (Eds.), Mobilising teacher researchers: Challenging educational inequality (pp. 141–158). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Childs, A., & Menter, I. (2013). Teacher education in the 21st century in England: A case study in neo-liberal policy. Revista Espanola de Educacion Comparada, 22, 93–116.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Childs, A., & Menter, I. (Eds.). (2018). Mobilising teacher researchers – Challenging educational inequality. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Childs, A., Firth, R., & Thompson, I. (2018). Who, how and why? Motives and agendas for key stakeholders in Closing the Gap. In A. Childs & I. Menter (Eds.), Mobilising teacher researchers: Challenging educational inequality (pp. 11–33). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chitty, C., & Simon, B. (Eds.). (1993). Education answers back: Critical responses to Government policy. London: Lawrence & Wishart.

    Google Scholar 

  • Churches, R. (2016). Closing the Gap: Test and learn. Research report, DfE-RR500b. London: DfE/National College for Teaching and Leadership.

    Google Scholar 

  • Churches, R., & Dommett, E. (2016). Teacher-led research: Designing and implementing randomised controlled trials and other forms of experimental research. Carmarthen: Crown House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Churches, R., Hall, R., & Brooks, J. (2018). Closing the Gap: Test and learn – An unprecedented national educational research project. In A. Childs & I. Menter (Eds.), Mobilising teacher researchers: Challenging educational inequality (pp. 34–56). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davies, H., Nutley, S., & Smith, P. (Eds.). (2000). What works? Evidence-based policy and practice in public services. Bristol: Policy Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • DfE [Department for Education]. (2010a). The importance of teaching: The Schools White paper (Cm 7980). London: Department for Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • DfE. (2010b). New endowment fund to turn around weakest schools and raise standards for disadvantaged pupils [Press release], 3 November. Retrieved from https://www.gov.uk/government/news/new-endowment-fund-to-turn-around-weakest-schools-and-raise-standards-for-disadvantaged-pupils

  • DfE. (2019a). ITT core content framework. London: Department for Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Donaldson, G. (2011). Teaching Scotland’s future: Report of a review of teacher education in Scotland. Edinburgh: The Scottish Government.

    Google Scholar 

  • EEF [Education Endowment Foundation]. (2018a). Putting evidence to work: A school’s guide to implementation. EEF Guidance Report. Retrieved from https://www.educationendowmentfoundation.org.uk/tools/guidance-reports/a-schools-guide-to-implementation/

  • EEF. (2018b). Teaching and learning toolkit. Retrieved from https://educationendowmentfoundation.org.uk/evidence-summaries/teaching-learning-toolkit/

  • Elliot, J. (1991). Action research for educational change. Milton Keynes. Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gale, T. (2018). What’s not to like about RCTs in education? In A. Childs & I. Menter (Eds.), Mobilising teacher researchers: Challenging educational inequality (pp. 207–223). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gewirtz, S. (2002). The managerial school: Post-welfarism and social justice in education. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gewirtz, S., Bowe, R., & Ball, S. (1995). Markets, choice and equity in education. Buckingham: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giddens, A. (1998). The third way: The renewal of social democracy. Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldacre, B. (2013). Building evidence into education. London: DfE.

    Google Scholar 

  • Helgetun, J., & Menter, I. (2020). From an age of measurement to an age of evidence? Policy-making in English teacher education. Journal of Education Policy. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1080/02680939.2020.1748722

  • Helsby, G. (1999). Changing teachers’ work: The ‘reform’ of secondary schooling. Buckingham: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hulme, M., & Menter, I. (2011). South and north – Teacher education policy in England and Scotland: A comparative textual analysis. Scottish Educational Review, 43(2), 70–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hutchings, M. (2021a). Accountability, social justice and educational research. In A. Ross (Ed.), Educational research for social justice (pp. 45–78). Cham: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mansell, W. (2007). Education by numbers: The tyranny of testing. London: Politico’s.

    Google Scholar 

  • Menter, I. (2016). Use, misuse and abuse of research in the education White Paper. Times Higher Education. 1 April. Retrieved from https://www.timeshighereducation.com/blog/use-misuse-and-abuse-research-education-white-paper

  • Menter, I. (2017). Reasons for education research. In D. Wyse, N. Selwyn, E. Smith, & L. Suter (Eds.), The BERA/SAGE handbook of educational research (Vol. 1, pp. 37–52). Thousand Oaks: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Menter, I., & Thompson, I. (2018). Closing the evidence gap? The challenges of the research design of the Closing the Gap Test and Learn project. In A. Childs & I. Menter (Eds.), Mobilising teacher researchers: Challenging educational inequality (pp. 57–72). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Menter, I., Hulme, M., Elliot, D., & Lewin, J. (2010). Literature review on teacher education in the 21st century. Edinburgh: The Scottish Government.

    Google Scholar 

  • Menter, I., Hulme, M., & Sangster, P. (2012). Performance in teacher education and research – A double whammy for teacher educators? In B. Jeffrey & G. Troman (Eds.), Performativity in education in the UK: Effects, consequences and agency (pp. 23–40). Painswick: E&E Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Menter, I., Mutton, T., & Burn, K. (2019). Learning to teach in England: Reviewing policy and research trends. In M. T. Tatto & I. Menter (Eds.), Knowledge, policy and practice in teacher education – A cross-national study (pp. 60–80). London: Bloomsbury.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mutton, T., Burn, K., & Menter, I. (2017). Deconstructing the Carter Review: Competing conceptions of quality in England’s ‘school-led’ system of initial teacher education. Journal of Education Policy, 32(1), 14–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Newman, J., & Clarke, J. (1997). The managerial state: Policy, power and ideology in the remaking of social welfare. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nutley, S., Walter, I., & Davies, H. (2008). Using evidence: How research can inform public services. Bristol: Policy Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Osborn, M., McNess, E., & Broadfoot, P., with Pollard, A., & Triggs, P. (2000). What teachers do: Changing policy and practice in primary education. London: Continuum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parker, S., Gulson, K., & Gale, T. (Eds.). (2017). Policy and inequality in education. Singapore: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pring, R. (2014). John Dewey. London: Bloomsbury.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pring, R., & Thomas, G. (Eds.). (2004). Evidence-based practice in education. Maidenhead: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rickinson, M., Sebba, J., & Edwards, A. (2011). Improving research through user engagement. London: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Ross, A. (2021a). Introduction: What does educational science and the public good mean in the context of educational research and social justice? In A. Ross (Ed.), Educational research for social justice (pp. 1–28). Cham: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sahlberg, P. (2011). Finnish lessons: What can the world learn from educational change in Finland? New York: Teachers’ College Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saunders, L. (2007). Educational research and policy-making: Exploring the border country between research and policy. London: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Smyth, J., & Wrigley, T. (2013). Living on the edge: Rethinking poverty, class and schooling. New York: Peter Lang.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Sorensen, N. (Ed.). (2019). Diversity in teacher education. London: UCL IoE Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stenhouse, L. (1975). An introduction to curriculum research and development. London: Heinemann.

    Google Scholar 

  • Teacher Education Group (The). (2016). Teacher education in times of change. Bristol: Policy Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whiting, C., Whitty, G., Menter, I., Black, P., Hordern, J., Parfitt, A., Reynolds, K., & Sorenson, N. (2018). Diversity and complexity: Becoming a teacher in England in 2015–16. Review of Education, 6(1), 69–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Whitty, G. with Wisby, E. (2016). Education(al) research and education policy in an imperfect world. In G. Whitty (Ed.), Research and policy in education: Evidence, ideology and impact (pp. 1–19). London: UCL IOE Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Young, T. (2014). Prisoners of the blob: Why most education experts are wrong about nearly everything. London: Civitas.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ian Menter .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Menter, I. (2021). Snake oil or hard struggle? Research to address the reality of social injustice in education. In: Ross, A. (eds) Educational Research for Social Justice . Education Science, Evidence, and the Public Good, vol 1. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-62572-6_2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-62572-6_2

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-62571-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-62572-6

  • eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics