Abstract
The work of teacher educators juxtaposes mathematics and pedagogy and often involves the use of pedagogically oriented tasks to help teachers extend their understanding of the underlying mathematics. However, in teacher education programmes, where students come from different mathematical backgrounds, the nature and extent of the participants’ prior mathematical knowledge varies significantly. How then can a teacher educator get a “scan” of a group’s knowledge and understanding of a mathematical topic in order to plan for, or adjust, subsequent instruction? We address this question with illustrative examples relating to two topics: the concept of a function and irrational exponents. We describe pedagogical tasks that unveil the related mathematical knowledge of teachers and demonstrate how subsequent instructional choices build upon and expand this knowledge while highlighting links between tertiary and school mathematics.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
Change history
12 June 2021
The original version of this chapter was revised due to some errors (listed below) in the text at page numbers 98 and 99.
Notes
- 1.
All participant names are pseudonyms.
References
Ayalon, M., Watson, A., & Lerman, S. (2017). Students’ conceptualisations of function revealed through definitions and examples. Research in Mathematics Education, 19(1), 1–19.
Biza, I., Nardi, E., & Zachariades, T. (2007). Using tasks to explore teacher knowledge in situation-specific contexts. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 10, 301–309.
Biza, I., Nardi, E., & Zachariades, T. (2018). Competences of mathematics teachers in diagnosing teaching situations and offering feedback to students: Specificity, consistency and reification of pedagogical and mathematical discourses. In T. Leuders, J. Leuders, & K. Philipp (Eds.), Diagnostic competence of mathematics teachers: Unpacking a complex construct in teacher education and teacher practice (pp. 55–78). New York: Springer.
Brown, S. (2018). Difficult dialogs about degenerate cases: A proof script study. Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 52, 61–76.
Confrey, J. (1991). The concept of exponential functions: A student’s perspective. In L. P. Steffe (Ed.), Epistemological foundations of mathematical experience (pp. 124–159). New York: Springer.
Confrey, J., & Smith, E. (1995). Splitting, covariation, and their role in the development of exponential functions. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 26(1), 66–86.
Davis, B. (2014). Toward a more power-full school mathematics. For the Learning of Mathematics, 34(1), 12–17.
Davis, J. D. (2009). Understanding the influence of two mathematics textbooks on prospective secondary teachers’ knowledge. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 12(5), 365–389.
Dreyfus, T., & Eisenberg, T. (1983). The function concept in college students: Linearity, smoothness and periodicity. Focus on Learning Problems in Mathematics, 5(3), 119–132.
Dubinsky, E., & Wilson, R. T. (2013). High school students’ understanding of the function concept. Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 32(1), 83–101.
Euler, L. (1988). Introduction to analysis of the infinite: Book I. New York: Springer Science+Business Media.
Even, R. (1990). Subject matter knowledge for teaching and the case of functions. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 21(6), 521–544.
Fischbein, E., Jehiam, R., & Cohen, D. (1995). The concept of irrational numbers in high-school students and prospective teachers. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 29(1), 29–44.
Grossman, P., Hammerness, K., & McDonald, M. (2009). Redefining teaching, re-imagining teacher education. Teachers and Teaching, 15(2), 273–289.
Hewitt, D. (1996). Mathematical fluency: The nature of practice and the role of subordination. For the Learning of Mathematics, 16(2), 28–35.
Hitt, F. (1998). Difficulties in the articulation of different representations linked to the concept of function. Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 17(1), 123–134.
Jaworski, B. (2008). Mathematics teacher educator learning and development: An introduction. In B. Jaworski & T. Wood (Eds.), The mathematics teacher educator as a developing professional (pp. 1–13). Rotterdam, The Netherlands: Sense Publishers.
Kidron, I. (2018). Students’ conceptions of irrational numbers. International Journal of Research in Undergraduate Mathematics Education, 4(1), 94–118.
Kjeldsen, T. H., & Blomhøj, M. (2012). Beyond motivation: History as a method for learning meta-discursive rules in mathematics. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 80(3), 327–349.
Kjeldsen, T. H., & Petersen, P. H. (2014). Bridging history of the concept of function with learning of mathematics: Students’ meta-discursive rules, concept formation and historical awareness. Science and Education, 23(1), 29–45.
Kleiner, I. (1993). Functions: Historical and pedagogical aspects. Science and Education, 2(2), 183–209.
Koichu, B., & Zazkis, R. (2013). Decoding a proof of Fermat’s Little Theorem via script writing. Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 32(3), 364–376.
Lakatos, I. (1976). Proofs and refutations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Leikin, R., & Zazkis, R. (2010). Teachers’ opportunities to learn mathematics through teaching. In R. Leikin & R. Zazkis (Eds.), Learning through teaching mathematics (pp. 3–21). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer.
Liljedahl, P. G., Chernoff, E., & Zazkis, R. (2007). Interweaving mathematics and pedagogy in task design: A tale of one task. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 10(4–6), 239–249.
Markovits, Z., Eylon, B. S., & Bruckheimer, M. (1986). Functions today and yesterday. For the Learning of Mathematics, 6(2), 18–24.
Paz, T., & Leron, U. (2009). The slippery road from actions on objects to functions and variables. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 40(1), 18–39.
Peng, A. (2007). Knowledge growth of mathematics teachers during professional activity based on the task of lesson explaining. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 10, 289–299.
Schwarz, B. B., & Hershkowitz, R. (1999). Prototypes: Brakes or levers in learning the function concept? The role of computer tools. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 30(4), 362–389.
Sirotic, N., & Zazkis, R. (2007a). Irrational numbers: The gap between formal and intuitive knowledge. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 65(1), 49–76.
Sirotic, N., & Zazkis, R. (2007b). Irrational numbers on the number line – Where are they? International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 38(4), 477–488.
Steele, M. D., Hillen, A. F., & Smith, M. S. (2013). Developing mathematical knowledge for teaching in a methods course: The case of function. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 16(6), 451–482.
Thomas, M. (2003). The role of representation in teacher understanding of function. Paper presented at the 27th International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education conference held jointly with the 25th PME-NA conference, Honolulu, HI. Retrieved from https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED501144.pdf
Usiskin, Z., Peressini, A. L., Marchisotto, E., & Stanley, D. (2003). Mathematics for high school teachers: An advanced perspective. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Education Inc.
Wasserman, N. H. (2016). Abstract algebra for algebra teaching: Influencing school mathematics instruction. Canadian Journal of Science, Mathematics and Technology Education, 16(1), 28–47.
Watson, A., & Harel, G. (2013). The role of teachers’ knowledge of functions in their teaching: A conceptual approach with illustrations from two cases. Canadian Journal of Science, Mathematics and Technology Education, 13(2), 154–168.
Watson, A., & Mason, J. (2005). Mathematics as a constructive activity: Learners generating examples. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Weber, K. (2002). Students’ understanding of exponential and logarithmic functions. Paper presented at the second conference on the teaching of mathematics, Crete. Retrieved from https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED477690.pdf.
Zazkis, R., & Kontorovich, I. (2016). A curious case of superscript (−1): Prospective secondary mathematics teachers explain. Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 43, 98–110.
Zazkis, R., & Leikin, R. (2007). Generating examples: From pedagogical tool to a research tool. For the Learning of Mathematics, 27(2), 15–21.
Zazkis, R., Liljedahl, P. G., & Sinclair, N. (2009). Lesson plays: Planning teaching versus teaching planning. For the Learning of Mathematics, 29(1), 40–47.
Zazkis, R., Sinclair, N., & Liljedahl, P. G. (2013). Lesson play in mathematics education: A tool for research and professional development. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer.
Zazkis, R., & Sirotic, N. (2010). Representing and defining irrational numbers: Exposing the missing link. CBMS Issues in Mathematics Education, 16, 1–27.
Zazkis, R., & Zazkis, D. (2014). Script writing in the mathematics classroom: Imaginary conversations on the structure of numbers. Research in Mathematics Education, 16(1), 54–70.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2021 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Zazkis, R., Marmur, O. (2021). Pedagogical Tasks Toward Extending Mathematical Knowledge: Notes on the Work of Teacher Educators. In: Goos, M., Beswick, K. (eds) The Learning and Development of Mathematics Teacher Educators. Research in Mathematics Education. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-62408-8_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-62408-8_5
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-62407-1
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-62408-8
eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)