Skip to main content

The Effect of Individual Coordination Ability on Cognitive-Load in Tacit Coordination Games

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Information Systems and Neuroscience (NeuroIS 2020)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Information Systems and Organisation ((LNISO,volume 43))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

Tacit coordination games are coordination games in which communication between the players is not allowed or not possible. Some players manage to reason about the selections made by the co-player while others fail to do so and might turn to rely on guessing. The aim of this study is to examine whether good coordinators are associated with a higher or lower cognitive load relative to weaker coordinators. We aimed to answer this question by using an electrophysiological marker of cognitive load, i.e., Theta/Beta Ratio. Results show that good coordinators are associated with a higher cognitive load with respect to weaker coordinators.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. McAdams, R.H.: Conventions and norms (Philosophical aspects). In: International Encyclopedia of Social & Behavioral Sciences (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Belloc, M., Bilancini, E., Boncinelli, L., D’Alessandro, S.: Intuition and deliberation in the stag hunt game. Sci. Rep. 9, 1–7 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. De Freitas, J., Thomas, K., DeScioli, P., Pinker, S.: Common knowledge, coordination, and strategic mentalizing in human social life. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 116, 13751–13758 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Duffy, S., Smith, J.: Cognitive load in the multi-player prisoner’s dilemma game: are there brains in games? J. Behav. Exp. Econ. 51, 47–56 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Mizrahi, D., Laufer, I., Zuckerman, I.: Individual strategic profiles in tacit coordination games. J. Exp. Theor. Artif. Intell. 1–16 (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Mizrahi, D., Laufer, I., Zuckerman, I.: Collectivism-individualism: strategic behavior in tacit coordination games. PLoS ONE 15, e0226929 (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Poulsen, A., Sonntag, A.: Focality is intuitive - experimental evidence on the effects of time pressure in coordination games (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Krueger, J.I.: From social projection to social behaviour. Eur. Rev. Soc. Psychol. 18, 1–35 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1080/10463280701284645

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Sitzia, S., Zheng, J.: Group behaviour in tacit coordination games with focal points - an experimental investigation. Games Econ. Behav. 117, 461–478 (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  10. van Son, D., de Rover, M., De Blasio, F.M., van der Does, W., Barry, R.J., Putman, P.: Electroencephalography theta/beta ratio covaries with mind wandering and functional connectivity in the executive control network. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 1452, 52–64 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Gartner, M., Grimm, S., Bajbouj, M.: Frontal midline theta oscillations during mental arithmetic: effects of stress. Front. Behav. Neurosci. 9, 1–8 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Bagyaraj, S., Ravindran, G., Shenbaga Devi, S.: Analysis of spectral features of EEG during four different cognitive tasks. Int. J. Eng. Technol. 6, 725–734 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Renard, Y., Lotte, F., Gibert, G., Congedo, M., Maby, E., Delannoy, V., Bertrand, O., Lécuyer, A.: Openvibe: an open-source software platform to design, test, and use brain–computer interfaces in real and virtual environments. Presence Teleoperators Virtual Environ. 19, 35–53 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Bardsley, N., Mehta, J., Starmer, C., Whitehead, K.: Explaining focal points: cognitive hierarchy theory versus team reasoning about the centre or contact. Econ. J. 120, 40–79 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Schelling, T.C.: The Strategy of Conflict, Cambridge (1960)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Mehta, J., Starmer, C., Sugden, R.: Focal points in pure coordination games: an experimental investigation. Theory Decis. 36, 163–185 (1994)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Mizrahi, D., Laufer, I., Zuckerman, I.: Modeling individual tacit coordination abilities. In: International Conference on Brain Informatics, pp. 29–38. Springer, Cham (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Antonenko, P., Paas, F., Grabner, R., van Gog, T.: Using electroencephalography to measure cognitive load. Educ. Psychol. Rev. 22, 425–438 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Zarjam, P., Epps, J., Chen, F.: Spectral EEG features for evaluating cognitive load. In: Proceedings of the Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society, EMBS, pp. 3841–3844 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Kumar, N., Kumar, J.: Measurement of cognitive load in HCI systems using EEG power spectrum: an experimental study. Procedia Comput. Sci. 84, 70–78 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Friedman, N., Fekete, T., Gal, K., Shriki, O.: EEG-based prediction of cognitive load in intelligence tests. Front. Hum. Neurosci. 13, 191 (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Müller-Putz, G.R., Riedl, R., Wriessnegger, S.C.: Electroencephalography (EEG) as a research tool in the information systems discipline: foundations, measurement, and applications. Commun. Assoc. Inf. Syst. 37, 46 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Sheehan, T.C., Sreekumar, V., Inati, S.K., Zaghloul, K.A.: Signal complexity of human intracranial EEG tracks successful associative-memory formation across individuals. J. Neurosci. 38, 1744–1755 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Stokić, M., Milovanović, D., Ljubisavljević, M.R., Nenadović, V., Čukić, M.: Memory load effect in auditory–verbal short-term memory task: EEG fractal and spectral analysis. Exp. Brain Res. 233(10), 3023 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Escudero, J., Abásolo, D., Hornero, R., Espino, P., López, M.: Analysis of electroencephalograms in Alzheimer’s disease patients with multiscale entropy. Physiol. Meas. 27, 1091–1106 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  26. Peng, C.K., Havlin, S., Stanley, H.E., Goldberger, A.L.: Quantification of scaling exponents and crossover phenomena in nonstationary heartbeat time series. Chaos 5, 82–87 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.166141

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Rubin, D., Fekete, T., Mujica-Parodi, L.R.: Optimizing complexity measures for fMRI data: algorithm, artifact, and sensitivity. PLoS ONE 8 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0063448

  28. Xie, B., Salvendy, G.: Review and reappraisal of modelling and predicting mental workload in single-and multi-task environments. Work Stress 14, 74–99 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Xie, B., Salvendy, G.: Prediction of mental workload in single and multiple tasks environments. Int. J. Cogn. Ergon. 4, 213–242 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327566IJCE0403

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. De Vico Fallani, F., Nicosia, V., Sinatra, R., Astolfi, L., Cincotti, F., Mattia, D., Wilke, C., Doud, A., Latora, V., He, B., Babiloni, F.: Defecting or not defecting: how to “read” human behavior during cooperative games by EEG measurements. PLoS ONE 5, e14187 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  31. Boudewyn, M., Roberts, B.M., Mizrak, E., Ranganath, C., Carter, C.S.: Prefrontal transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) enhances behavioral and EEG markers of proactive control. Cogn. Neurosci. 10, 57–65 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Moliadze, V., Sierau, L., Lyzhko, E., Stenner, T., Werchowski, M., Siniatchkin, M., Hartwigsen, G.: After-effects of 10 Hz tACS over the prefrontal cortex on phonological word decisions. Brain Stimul. 12, 1464–1474 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Shensa, M.J.: The discrete wavelet transform: wedding the. A trous and mallat algorithms. IEEE Trans. signal Process. 40, 2464–2482 (1992)

    Google Scholar 

  34. Jensen, A., la Cour-Harbo, A.: Ripples in Mathematics: The Discrete Wavelet Transform. Springer (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  35. Hazarika, N., Chen, J.Z., Tsoi, A.C., Sergejew, A.: Classification of EEG signals using the wavelet transform. Signal Process. 59, 61–72 (1997)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Kahneman, D.: Thinking, Fast and Slow. Macmillan, London (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  37. Haier, R.J., Siegel, B.V., MacLachlan, A., Soderling, E., Lottenberg, S., Buchsbaum, M.S.: Regional glucose metabolic changes after learning a complex visuospatial/motor task: a positron emission tomographic study. Brain Res. 570, 134–143 (1992)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Haier, R.J., LaFalase, J., Katz, M., Nuechterlein, K., Buchsbaum, M.S.: Brain efficiency and intelligence: inverse correlations between cerebral glucose metabolic rate and abstract reasoning. Manuscript submitted for publication (1992)

    Google Scholar 

  39. Hazletr, E.: Cortical glucose metabolic rate correlates of abstract reasoning and attention studied with positron emission tomography. Intelligence 12, 199–217 (1988)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Leger, P.-M., René, R., vom Brocke, J.: Emotions and ERP information sourcing: the moderating role of expertise. Ind. Manag. Data Syst. 114(3), 456–471 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Hong, J.C., Liu, M.C.: A study on thinking strategy between experts and novices of computer games. Comput. Hum. Behav. 19, 245–258 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Hung, S.Y.: Expert versus novice use of the executive support systems: an empirical study. In: Proceedings of the 34th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (2003). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-7206(02)00003-4

  43. Cox, T.H., Lobel, S.A., Mcleod, P.L.: Effects of ethnic group cultural differences on cooperative and competitive behavior on a group task. Acad. Manag. J. 34, 827–847 (1991)

    Google Scholar 

  44. Mizrahi, D., Laufer, I., Zuckerman, I., Zhang, T.: The effect of culture and social orientation on player’s performances in tacit coordination games. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Brain Informatics – BI 2018 Arlington, TX, USA, 7–9 December 2018, pp. 437–447 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgement

This research was supported by grant number RA1900000666 provided by the Data Science and Artificial Intelligence center at Ariel University.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Dor Mizrahi .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Mizrahi, D., Laufer, I., Zuckerman, I. (2020). The Effect of Individual Coordination Ability on Cognitive-Load in Tacit Coordination Games. In: Davis, F.D., Riedl, R., vom Brocke, J., Léger, PM., Randolph, A.B., Fischer, T. (eds) Information Systems and Neuroscience. NeuroIS 2020. Lecture Notes in Information Systems and Organisation, vol 43. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-60073-0_28

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-60073-0_28

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-60072-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-60073-0

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics