Skip to main content

Post-processing of Pixel and Object-Based Land Cover Classifications of Very High Spatial Resolution Images

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Computational Science and Its Applications – ICCSA 2020 (ICCSA 2020)

Abstract

The state of the art is plenty of classification methods. Pixel-based methods include the most traditional ones. Although these achieved high accuracy when classifying remote sensing images, some limits emerged with the advent of very high-resolution images that enhanced the spectral heterogeneity within a class.

Therefore, in the last decade, new classification methods capable of overcoming these limits have undergone considerable development. Within this research, we compared the performances of an Object-based and a Pixel-Based classification method, the Random Forests (RF) and the Object-Based Image Analysis (OBIA), respectively. Their ability to quantify the extension and the perimeter of the elements of each class was evaluated through some performance indices. Algorithm parameters were calibrated on a subset, then, applied on the whole image. Since these algorithms perform accurately in quantifying the elements areas, but worse if we consider the perimeters length, hence, the aim of this research was to setup some post-processing techniques to improve, in particular, this latter performance.

Algorithms were applied on peculiar classes of an area comprising the Isole dello Stagnone di Marsala oriented natural reserve, in north-western corner of Si-cily, salt pans and agricultural settlements. The area was covered by a World View-2 multispectral image consisting of eight spectral bands spanning from visible to near-infrared wavelengths and characterized by a spatial resolution of two meters. Both classification algorithms did not quantify accurately object perimeters; especially RF. Post-processing algorithm improved the estimates, which however remained more accurate for OBIA than for RF.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Liu, D., Xia, F.: Assessing object-based classification: advantages and limitations. Rem. Sens. Lett. 1(4), 187–194 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Tarantino, E., Figorito, B.: Mapping rural areas with widespread plastic covered vineyards using true color aerial data. Rem. Sens. 4(7), 1913–1928 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Koc-San, D.: Evaluation of different classification techniques for the detection of glass and plastic greenhouses from WorldView-2 satellite imagery. J. Appl. Rem. Sens. 7(1), 073553 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Tehrany, M.S., Pradhan, B., Jebuv, M.N.: A comparative assessment between object and pixel-based classification approaches for land use/land cover mapping using SPOT 5 imagery. Geocarto Int. 29(4), 351–369 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Aggarwal, N., Srivastava, M., Dutta, M.: Comparative analysis of pixel-based and object-based classification of high resolution remote sensing images – a review. Int. J. Eng. Trends Technol. (IJETT) 38(1), 5–11 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Cai, L., Shi, W., Miao, Z., Hao, M.: Accuracy assessment measures for object extraction from remote sensing images. Rem. Sens 10(2), 303 (2108)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Tomas, I.L.: Spatial postprocessing of spectrally classified Landsat data. Photogram. Eng. Rem. Sens. 46, 1201–1206 (1980)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Townshend, J.R.G.: The enhancement of computer classification by logical smoothing. Photogram. Eng. Rem. Sens. 52, 213–221 (1986)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Benz, U.C., Hofmann, P., Willhauck, G., Lingenfelder, I., Heynen, M.: Multi-resolution, object-oriented fuzzy analysis of remote sensing data for GIS-ready information. ISPRS J. Photogram. Rem. Sens. 58, 239–258 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Jensen, J.R., Qiu, F., Patterson, K.: A neural network image interpretation system to extract rural and urban land use and land cover information from remote sensor data. Geocarto Int. 16(1), 1–10 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Weibel, R.: Generalization of spatial data: principles and selected algorithms. In: van Kreveld, M., Nievergelt, J., Roos, T., Widmayer, P. (eds.) CISM School 1996. LNCS, vol. 1340, pp. 99–152. Springer, Heidelberg (1997). https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-63818-0_5

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  12. Ciraolo, G., Cox, E., La Loggia, G., Maltese, A.: The classification of submerged vegetation using hyperspectral MIVIS data. Ann. Geophys. 49(1), 287–294 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Karpouzli, E., Malthus, T.: The empirical line method for the atmospheric correction of IKONOS imagery. Int. J. Rem. Sens. 24, 1143–1150 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Pipitone, C., Maltese, A., Dardanelli, G., Capodici, F., Lo Brutto, M., La Loggia, G.: Detection of a reservoir water level using shape similarity metrics. In: Remote Sensing for Agriculture, Ecosystems, and Hydrology XIX, Proceedings, vol. 10421, p. 104211L (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Duro, D., Franklin, E., Dubé, G.: A comparison of pixel-based and object-based image analysis with selected machine learning algorithms for the classification of agricultural landscapes using SPOT-5 HRG imagery. Rem. Sens. Environ. 1(18), 259–272 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Breiman, L.: Random Forests. Mach. Learn. 45, 5–32 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Böhner, J., Selige, T., Ringeler, A.: Image segmentation using representativeness analysis and region growing. Göttinger. Geogr. Abh. 115, 29–38 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Kass, M., Witkin, A., Terzopoulos, D.: Snakes: active contour models. In: Proceedings of the First International Conference on Computer Vision, pp. 259–268. IEEE Computer Society Press (1987)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Burghardt, D.: Glättung mit Snakes. Festschrift zum 65. Geburtstag von Prof. Dr. Ing. habil. Siegfried Meier. TU Dresden (2002)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank G. Ciraolo for helping in collecting spectroradiometric data and for his technical advices.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Antonino Maltese .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Sarzana, T., Maltese, A., Capolupo, A., Tarantino, E. (2020). Post-processing of Pixel and Object-Based Land Cover Classifications of Very High Spatial Resolution Images. In: Gervasi, O., et al. Computational Science and Its Applications – ICCSA 2020. ICCSA 2020. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 12252. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-58811-3_57

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-58811-3_57

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-58810-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-58811-3

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics