Skip to main content

Open Government Data from the Perspective of Information Needs - A Tentative Conceptual Model

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Electronic Government (EGOV 2020)

Abstract

Information seekers can use products and services based on open government data (OGD) to satisfy their information needs. These solutions are provided by data transformers reusing OGD shared by publishers. OGD is believed to lead to several benefits, such as transparency and innovation. However, there is a noted lack of OGD use, and little seems to be known about the need for OGD. Therefore, we developed a tentative conceptual model, from which data transformers and publishers can understand and consider the information needs of information seekers. We used design science research to develop the model based on previous research and empirical material from workshops. We conducted workshops in Belgium with nine researchers and eleven students and presented the model at a Scandinavian e-government workshop. The findings from the study show that information needs are complex and can be challenging to capture, but are one possible way to understand how the benefits of OGD could be realized. One practical implication is that publishers and data transformers should identify information needs in society, study existing solutions, and attempt to go beyond them with OGD. The synthesized theoretical implication is that information needs might help to guide on the role of OGD in society.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 99.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Attard, J., Orlandi, F., Scerri, S., Auer, S.: A systematic review of open government data initiatives. Gov. Inf. Q. 32(4), 399–418 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Barbosa Tavares, R., Hepworth, M., De Souza Costa, S.M.: Investigating citizens’ information needs through participative research: a pilot study in Candangolândia, Brazil. Inf. Dev. 27(2), 125–138 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Belkin, N.J., Vickery, A.: Interaction in information systems: a review of research from document retrieval to knowledge-based systems, No. 025.04 BEL. CIMMYT (1985)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Cabitza, F., Locoro, A., Batini, C.: Making open data more personal through a social value perspective: a methodological approach. Inf. Syst. Front. 22, 1–18 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Carrara, W., Oudkerk, F., Van Steenbergen, E., Tinholt, D.: Open data goldbook for data managers and data holders (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Cronin, P., Ryan, F., Coughlan, M.: Undertaking a literature review: a step-by-step approach. Br. J. Nurs. 17(1), 38–43 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Crusoe, J.R., Ahlin, K.: Users’ activities for using open government data-a process framework. People, Process and Policy, Transforming Government (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Daft, R.L., Lengel, R.H.: Organizational information requirements, media richness and structural design. Manag. Sci. 32(5), 554–571 (1986)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Davies, T.: Open data, democracy and public sector reform. A look at open government data use from data.gov.uk, pp. 1–47 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Dawes, S.S., Vidiasova, L., Parkhimovich, O.: Planning and designing open government data programs: an ecosystem approach. Gov. Inf. Q. 33(1), 15–27 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Erdelez, S.: Information encountering: it’s more than just bumping into information. Bull. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci. Technol. 25(3), 26–29 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Fernández-Güell, J.M., Collado-Lara, M., Guzmán-Araña, S., Fernández-Añez, V.: Incorporating a systemic and foresight approach into smart city initiatives: the case of Spanish cities. J. Urban Technol. 23(3), 43–67 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Gebka, E., Crusoe, J., Ahlin, K.: Open data reuse and information needs satisfaction: a method to bridge the gap. In: Proceedings of CEUREGOV-CeDEM-ePart (2020). ongoing Research; Accepted; Not Published

    Google Scholar 

  14. Hellberg, A.S., Hedström, K.: The story of the sixth myth of open data and open government. Transform. Gov.: People Process Policy 9(1), 35–51 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Hey, J.: The data, information, knowledge, wisdom chain: the metaphorical link. Intergov. Oceanogr. Comm. 26, 1–18 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Lindman, J., Kinnari, T., Rossi, M.: Business roles in the emerging open-data ecosystem. IEEE Softw. 33(5), 54–59 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Madsen, C.Ø., Hofmann, S., Pieterson, W.: Channel choice complications - exploring the multiplex nature of citizens’ channel choices. In: Lindgren, I., et al. (eds.) EGOV 2019. LNCS, vol. 11685, pp. 139–151. Springer, Cham (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-27325-5_11

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  18. March, S.T., Smith, G.F.: Design and natural science research on information technology. Decis. Support Syst. 15(4), 251–266 (1995)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Maxwell, J.A.: Qualitative Research Design. SAGE Publications Inc., Thousand Oaks (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Nicholas, D., Herman, E.: Assessing Information Needs in the Age of the Digital Consumer. Routledge, Abingdon (2010)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  21. Peffers, K., Tuunanen, T., Rothenberger, M.A., Chatterjee, S.: A design science research methodology for information systems research. J. Manag. Inf. Syst. 24(3), 45–77 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Safarov, I., Meijer, A., Grimmelikhuijsen, S.: Utilization of open government data: a systematic literature review of types, conditions, effects and users. Inf. Polity 22(1), 1–24 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Walters, W.H.: Comparative recall and precision of simple and expert searches in google scholar and eight other databases. Portal: Libr. Acad. 11(4), 971–1006 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Wilson, T.D.: On user studies and information needs. J. Doc. 37(1), 3–15 (1981)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  25. Zuiderwijk, A., Janssen, M.: Barriers and development directions for the publication and usage of open data: a socio-technical view. In: Gascó-Hernández, M. (ed.) Open Government. PAIT, vol. 4, pp. 115–135. Springer, New York (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-9563-5_8

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  26. Zuiderwijk, A., Janssen, M., Davis, C.: Innovation with open data: essential elements of open data ecosystems. Inf. Polity 19(1–2), 17–33 (2014). https://doi.org/10.3233/IP-140329

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jonathan Crusoe .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 IFIP International Federation for Information Processing

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Crusoe, J., Gebka, E., Ahlin, K. (2020). Open Government Data from the Perspective of Information Needs - A Tentative Conceptual Model. In: Viale Pereira, G., et al. Electronic Government. EGOV 2020. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 12219. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-57599-1_19

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-57599-1_19

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-57598-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-57599-1

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics