Skip to main content

Analysis of Improvement Potentials in Current Virtual Reality Applications by Using Different Ways of Locomotion

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Systems, Software and Services Process Improvement (EuroSPI 2020)

Part of the book series: Communications in Computer and Information Science ((CCIS,volume 1251))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

It has become common knowledge that the use of virtual reality (VR) applications can very often cause typical symptoms of motion sickness such as nausea and dizziness. For this reason, however, there are also more and more attempts to contain or completely avoid the side effect, which is meanwhile called cybersickness. This paper elaborates on a pre-study of a large-scale study investigating whether the use of treadmills for real, physical movement in virtual worlds can reduce the incidence of motion sickness compared to other common VR locomotion techniques and therefore enlarge the time participants can use VR for training or simulation in companies.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Nabiyouni, M., Saktheeswaran, A., Bowman, D.A., Karanth, A.: Comparing the performance of natural, semi-natural, and non-natural locomotion techniques in virtual reality. In: 2015 IEEE Symposium on 3D User Interfaces (3DUI), Arles, France, pp. 3–10 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1109/3dui.2015.7131717

  2. Irwin, J.A.: The pathology of sea-sickness. Lancet 118(3039), 907–909 (1881). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(02)38129-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Reason, J.T., Brand, J.J.: Motion Sickness. Academic Press, Cambridge (1975)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Kennedy, R.S., Hettinger, L.J., Lilienthal, M.G.: Simulator sickness. In: Motion and Space Sickness, chap. 15, pp. 317–341. CRC Press, Florida (1990)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Riccio, G.E., Stoffregen, T.A.: An ecological theory of motion sickness and postural instability. Ecol. Psychol. 3(3), 195–240 (1991). https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326969eco0303_2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Crampton, G.H.: Motion and Space Sickness. CRC Press, Boca Raton (1990)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Cheung, B.S., Howard, I.P., Money, K.E.: Visually-induced sickness in normal and bilaterally labyrinthine-defective subjects. Aviat. Space Environ. Med. 62(6), 527–531 (1991)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Weiss, P., Kizony, R., Feintuch, U.: Virtual reality applications in neurorehabilitation. In: Textbook of Neural Repair and Rehabilitation. Cambridge University Press, New York (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Davis, S., Nesbitt, K., Nalivaiko, E.: A Systematic review of cybersickness. In: Proceedings of the 2014 Conference on Interactive Entertainment - IE2014, Newcastle, NSW, Australia, pp. 1–9 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1145/2677758.2677780

  10. Omnifinity. http://omnifinity.se/. Accessed 16 Mar 2020

  11. Friedman, L.M., Furberg, C.D., DeMets, D.L., Reboussin, D.M., Granger, C.B.: Fundamentals of Clinical Trials. Springer, Cham (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-18539-2_23

    Book  Google Scholar 

  12. Wang, D., Bakhai, A. (eds.): Clinical Trials: A Practical Guide to Design, Analysis, and Reporting. Remedica, London (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Hulley, S.B. (ed.): Designing clinical research, 4th edn. Wolters Kluwer/Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Philadelphia (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Hager, W. (ed.): Evaluation psychologischer Interventionsmaßnahmen: Standards und Kriterien: ein Handbuch, 1st edn. Huber, Bern (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Zobel, B., Werning, S., Berkemeier, L., Thomas, O.: Augmented- und Virtual-Reality-Technologien zur Digitalisierung der Aus- und Weiterbildung – Überblick, Klassifikation und Vergleich. In: Thomas, O., Metzger, D., Niegemann, H. (eds.) Digitalisierung in der Aus- und Weiterbildung, pp. 20–34. Springer, Heidelberg (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-56551-3_2

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  16. VIVE Pro Eye | VIVE. https://www.vive.com/de/product/vive-pro-eye/. Accessed 19 Mar 2020

  17. MSE Omnifinity AB: Manual - Omnideck User Guide C-00968-B. Omnifinity, 05 March 2019

    Google Scholar 

  18. IMC FH Krems Web: eVRyLab - Project Scan2VR. https://www.fh-krems.ac.at/en/research/department-of-business/. Accessed 17 Mar 2020

  19. Neukum, A., Grattenthaler, H.: Abschlussbericht – Teil II: Kinetose in der Fahrsimulation (Projekt: Simulation von Einsatzfahrten im Auftrag des Präsidiums der Bayerischen Bereitschaftspolizei). Inter-disziplinäres Zentrum für Verkehrswissenschaften an der Universität Würzburg, July 2006

    Google Scholar 

  20. Kennedy, R.S., Fowlkes, J.E., Berbaum, K.S., Lilienthal, M.G.: Use of a motion sickness history questionnaire for prediction of simulator sickness. Aviat. Space Environ. Med. 63(7), 588–593 (1992)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Kennedy, R.S., Graybiel, A.: The dial test - a standardized procedure for the experimental production of canal sickness symptomatology in a rotating environment. U. S. Naval Schoole of Aviation Medicine, Pensacola (1965)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Kennedy, R.S., Lane, N.E., Berbaum, K.S., Lilienthal, M.G.: Simulator sickness questionnaire: an enhanced method for quantifying simulator sickness. Int. J. Aviat. Psychol. 3(3), 203–220 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327108ijap0303_3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Unipark: Unipark. https://www.unipark.com/en/. Accessed 05 Mar 2020

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Michael Reiner .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Appendix

Appendix

Questionnaire:

BEFORE the VR demo was held, the following questions were asked:

  • Age: x

  • Gender: x

  • Country of origin: x

  • Previous experience with VR: x

  • Good spatial imagination? yes/no

  • State of health: (based on 2.3.4.1 Individual factors) [55, p. 20]

  • When did you get up this morning? Approx. around x o’clock

  • How many hours did you sleep last night?

  • When did you eat your last meal? Approx. around x o’clock

  • Do you take medication regularly? yes/no

  • Have you recently been vaccinated against flu? yes/no

Suffer from

  • Exhaustion: yes/no

  • Cold: yes/no

  • Fatigue: yes/no

  • Stomach discomfort: yes/no

  • Emotional stress: yes/no

  • Ear infections/ear blockages

  • Aftermath of excessive alcohol consumption: yes/no

Motion disposition/inclination to motion sickness:

How well do you contract these situations? (very bad/bad/medium/good/very good)

  • Ride a roller coaster

  • Driving along in the back seat of a car

  • Sitting backwards to the direction of travel on the train

  • Carousel driving

  • Travelling in a car in childhood

  • Long rides in the car or bus

  • Reading while driving in a car

  • Boat trips

Initial situation - Questionnaire for the detection of SSQ symptoms:

Please check how much the following statements apply to you (not at all/something/medium/strong)

  • General discomfort

  • Fatigue

  • Strained eyes

  • Increased saliva flow

  • Difficulty seeing sharply

  • Nausea

  • Difficulty concentrating

  • Head pressure

  • Blurred vision

  • Dizziness (eyes open)

  • Dizziness (eyes closed)

  • Belching

  • Sweating

  • Stomach makes itself noticeable

  • Headache

  • Balance disorders

Directly AFTER the execution of the respective demo the following questions were asked:

Demo questions:

What demo did you see?/What form of VR movement have you experienced? No Demo/Passive (Video)/Teleport/”Flying”/Active Walking on OmniDeck

Could you see/execute the demo to the end? yes/no

If not, when was the demo cancelled? After about x minutes

Simulation-related questionnaire for the detection of SSQ symptoms:

Please check how much the following statements apply to you. (not at all/something/medium/strong)

  • General discomfort

  • Fatigue

  • Strained eyes

  • Increased saliva flow

  • Difficulty seeing sharply

  • Nausea

  • Difficulty concentrating

  • Head pressure

  • Blurred vision

  • Dizziness (eyes open)

  • Dizziness (eyes closed)

  • Belching

  • Sweating

  • Stomach makes itself noticeable

  • Headache

  • Balance disorders

Other comments/special features:

------

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Horvath, N., Pfiel, S., Tiefenbacher, F., Schuster, R., Reiner, M. (2020). Analysis of Improvement Potentials in Current Virtual Reality Applications by Using Different Ways of Locomotion. In: Yilmaz, M., Niemann, J., Clarke, P., Messnarz, R. (eds) Systems, Software and Services Process Improvement. EuroSPI 2020. Communications in Computer and Information Science, vol 1251. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-56441-4_61

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-56441-4_61

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-56440-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-56441-4

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics