Skip to main content

The HighD Dataset: Is This Dataset Suitable for Calibration of Vehicular Traffic Models?

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Traffic and Granular Flow 2019

Part of the book series: Springer Proceedings in Physics ((SPPHY,volume 252))

Abstract

A large-scale naturalistic vehicle trajectory dataset from German highways called highD is used to investigate the car-following behavior of individual drivers. These data include trajectories of 1,10,000 vehicles with the total length of 16.5  h. Solving a nonlinear optimization problem, the Intelligent Driver Model is calibrated by minimizing the deviations between observed and simulated gaps, when following the prescribed leading vehicle. The averaged calibration error is 7.6%, which is a little bit lower compared to previous findings (NGSIM I-80). It can be explaind by the shorter highD trajectories, predominantly free flow traffic and good precision metrics of this dataset. The ratio between inter-driver and intra-driver variability is inversigated by performing global and platoon calibration. Inter-driver variation accounts for a larger part of the calibration errors than intra-driver variation does.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. M. Pourabdollah, et al., Calibration and evaluation of car-following models using real-world driving data, in Presented at the IEEE 20st International Conference on Intelligent Transportation Systems, Yokohama, Japan (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  2. L. Vasconcelos et al., Calibration of the gipps car-following model using trajectory data. Transp. Res. Proc. 3, 952–961 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. R. Krajewski, J. Bock, L. Kloeker, L. Eckstein, The highD dataset: a drone dataset of naturalistic vehicle trajectories on German highways for validation of highly automated driving systems, in Presented at the IEEE 21st International Conference on Intelligent Transportation Systems, Maui, Hawaii, USA (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  4. NGSIM, Next Generation Simulation. FHWA, U.S. Department of Transportation. www.ngsim.fhwa.dot.gov. Accessed 5 May 2007

  5. M. Treiber, A. Hennecke, D. Helbing, Congested traffic states in empirical observations and microscopic simulations. Phys. Rev. E 62(2), 1805–1824 (2000)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  6. B. Coifman, L. Li, A critical evaluation of the next generation simulation (NGSIM) vehicle trajectory dataset. Transp. Res. Part B Methodol. 105, 362–377 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. V. Kurtc, M. Treiber, Calibrating the local and platoon dynamics of car-following models on the reconstructed NGSIM data, in Traffic and Granular Flow’15, pp. 515–522. Springer, Switzerland (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  8. A. Duret, C. Buisson, N. Chiabaut, Estimating individual speed-spacing relationship and assessing ability of Newell’s car-following model to reproduce trajectories. Transp. Res. Record J. Transp. Res. Board 2088, 188–197 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. M. Montanino, V. Punzo, Trajectory data reconstruction and simulation-based validation against macroscopic traffic patterns. Transp. Res. Part B Methodol. 80, 82–106 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. C. Thiemann, M. Treiber, A. Kesting, Estimating acceleration and lane-changing dynamics from next generation simulation trajectory data. Transp. Res. Record J. Transp. Res. Board 2088, 90–101 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. M. Treiber, A. Kesting, Traffic Flow Dynamics (Springer, Heidelberg, 2013)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  12. S. Ossen, S.P. Hoogendoorn, B.G. Gorte, Inter-driver differences in car-following: a vehicle trajectory based study. Transp. Res. Record J. Transp. Res. Board 1965, 121–129 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. E. Brockfeld, D. Kuhne, P. Wagner, Calibration and validation of microscopic traffic flow models. Transp. Res. Record J. Transp. Res. Board 1876, 62–70 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. P. Ranjitkar, T. Nakatsuji, M. Asano, Performance evaluation of microscopic flow models with test track data. Transp. Res. Record J. Transp. Res. Board 1876, 90–100 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. V. Punzo, F. Simonelli, Analysis and comparison of microscopic flow models with real traffic microscopic data. Transp. Res. Record J. Transp. Res. Board 1934, 53–63 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Valentina Kurtc .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Kurtc, V. (2020). The HighD Dataset: Is This Dataset Suitable for Calibration of Vehicular Traffic Models?. In: Zuriguel, I., Garcimartin, A., Cruz, R. (eds) Traffic and Granular Flow 2019. Springer Proceedings in Physics, vol 252. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-55973-1_64

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics