Skip to main content

Mathematics, Narrative, and Temporality

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
The Palgrave Handbook of Literature and Mathematics

Abstract

This chapter embodies a form of “mathematical criticism” that is similar in spirit to that advocated by Imre Lakatos over forty years ago. In essence, it contends that mathematical texts (especially proofs) possess literary qualities which render them amenable to literary-critical scrutiny. The discussion focuses on several classic proofs from the eighteenth and nineteenth centuries that were given by influential mathematicians such as Leonhard Euler and Carl Friedrich Gauss. Various aspects of narrative structure manifest in these texts are examined, particularly the artful shifts in tense that occur at pivotal moments. Although it is often assumed that mathematical proofs exist only in a disembodied form of the present tense, the examples explored in this chapter show that temporal transitions frequently reveal underlying conceptual limitations and methodological uncertainties.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 149.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Aigner, Martin, and Günter M. Ziegler (eds.). 2014. Proofs from The Book, 4th ed. Berlin, Heidelberg, New York: Springer-Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alsina, Claudi and Roger B. Nelsen. 2010. Charming Proofs: A Journey into Elegant Mathematics. Washington DC: The Mathematical Association of America.

    Google Scholar 

  • Basu, Soham, and Daniel J. Velleman. 2017. On Gauss’ First Proof of the Fundamental Theorem of Algebra. American Mathematical Monthly 124 (8): 688–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bruner, Jerome. 1986. Actual Minds, Possible Worlds. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Cain, Alan J. Cain. 2010. “Deus Ex Machina and the Aesthetic of Proof.” Mathematical Intelligencer 32 (3): 7–11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Colyvan, Mark. 2008. “Mark Colyvan.” In Philosophy of Mathematics: 5 Questions, edited by Vincent F. Hendricks and Hannes Leitgeb, 75−85. Pennsylvania: Automatic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cornell, Gary, Joseph H. Silverman, and Glenn Stevens (eds.). 1997. Modular Forms and Fermat’s Last Theorem. New York: Springer-Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Currie, Mark. 2007. About Time: Narrative, Fiction, and the Philosophy of Time. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Curtin, Deane W. Curtin, ed. 1982. The Aesthetic Dimension of Science. New York: Philosophical Library.

    Google Scholar 

  • Day, Gary. 2008. Literary Criticism: A New History. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Derrida, Jacque. 2016. Of Grammatology. Translated by Gayatri Chakravorty Spivak, 40th anniversary edition. Baltimore: John Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Doxiadis, Apostolos, and Barry Mazur (eds.). 2012. Circles Disturbed: The Interplay of Mathematics and Narrative. Princeton and Oxford: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Euler, Leonhard. 1744. De fractionibus Continuis Dissertation. In Commentarii Academiae Scientiarum Petropolitanae 9: 98–137.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fletcher, Charles R., Sarah Lucas, and Corinne M. Baron. 2010. “Comprehension of Mathematical Proofs.” In Narrative Comprehension, Causality, and Coherence: Essays in Honor of Tom Trabasso, edited by Susan R. Goldman, Arthur C. Graesser and Paul Van Den Broek, 195−208. London and New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gaither, Carl C., and Alma E. Cavazos-Gaither (eds.). 2003. Astronomically Speaking: A Dictionary of Quotations on Astronomy and Physics. Bristol and Philadelphia: Institute of Physics Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gauss, Carl Friedrich. 1799. Demonstratio nova theorematis omnem functionem algebraicam rationalem integram unius variabilis in factores reales primi vel secundi gradus resolvi posse. Helmstedt.

    Google Scholar 

  • Genette, Gérard. 1983. Narrative Discourse: An Essay in Method. Translated by Jane E. Lewin. Ithaca, New York: Cornell University Press [based on ‘Discours du récit’, a portion of Figures III (1972)].

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldbach, Christian. 1728. De terminis generalibus serierum In Commentarii academiae scientiarum imperialis Petropolitanae 3: 164–73.

    Google Scholar 

  • Graves, Robert Percival. 1882. Life of Sir William Rowan Hamilton, vol. 1. Dublin: Hodges Figgis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hardy, G.H. 1967. A Mathematician’s Apology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harris, Michael. 2012. “Do Androids Prove Theorems In Their Sleep?” In Circles Disturbed: The Interplay of Mathematics and Narrative, edited by Apostolos Doxiadis and Barry Mazur, 130−82. Princeton and Oxford: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2017. Mathematics Without Apologies: Portrait of a Problematic Vocation. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Havil, Julian. 2003. Gamma: Exploring Euler’s Constant. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Healy, Lulu and Celia Hoyles. 2000. “A Study of Proof Conceptions in Algebra.” Journal for Research in Mathematical Education 31 (4): 396−428.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lakatos, Imre. 1993. Proofs and Refutations: The Logic of Mathematical Discovery, reprint. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Metzidakis, Stamos. 2012. Difference Unbound: The Rise of Pluralism in Literature and Criticism. Amsterdam: Rodopi.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Netz, Reviel. 2009. Ludic Proof: Greek Mathematics and the Alexandrian Aesthetic. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Ostrowski Alexander. 1920. “Über den ersten und vierten Gaussschen Beweis des Fundamentalsatzes der Algebra.” In Nachrichten der Gesellschaft der Wissenschaften Göttingen 2: 1–18. Reprinted in Carl Friedrich Gauss. 2011. Werke, vol. 10, part 2, various editors, 299−316. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paulos, John Allen. 1998. Once Upon a Number: The Hidden Mathematical Logic of Stories. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smale, Stephen. 1981. “The Fundamental Theorem of Algebra and Complexity Theory.” Bulletin of the American Mathematical Society 4: 1–36.

    Google Scholar 

  • Takeuti, Gaisi. 1987. Proof Theory, 2nd ed. Amsterdam: North Holland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomas, R.S.D. 2002. “Mathematics and Narrative.” Mathematical Intelligencer 24 (3): 43−46.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tomalin, Marcus. 2009. “William Rowan Hamilton and the Poetry of Science.” Romanticism and Victorianism On the Net 54. http://www.erudit.org/revue/ravon/2009/v/n54/038763ar.

  • Trollope, Anthony. 1950. Barchester Towers. New York: Random House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Velleman, Daniel J. 1994. How to Prove it: A Structured Approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Waugh, Patricia (ed.). 2006. Literary Theory and Criticism: An Oxford Guide. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wellek, René. 1963. Concepts of Criticism. New Haven and London: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiles, Andrew. 1995. “Modular Elliptic Curves and Fermat Last Theorem.” Annals of Mathematics 114: 443−551.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wohlgemuth, Andrew. 1990. Introduction to Proof in Abstract Mathematics. Philadelphia: Saunders College Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Tomalin, M. (2021). Mathematics, Narrative, and Temporality. In: Tubbs, R., Jenkins, A., Engelhardt, N. (eds) The Palgrave Handbook of Literature and Mathematics. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-55478-1_31

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics