Skip to main content

Intelligent Risk Prediction of Storage Tank Leakage Using an Ishikawa Diagram with Probability and Impact Analysis

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Intelligent Systems and Applications (IntelliSys 2020)

Abstract

Intelligent probability and impact analysis are used with an Ishikawa diagram. Causes of tank leakage events are identified. Causes were ranked and weights assigned to show their relative importance in the diagram. A Risk Score for each category of causes is identified using probability and impact analysis. The application is explored to predict the risk of leakage in a storage tank. That risk can be mixed with real time data to create an intelligent system. Various methods can be used to predict future system states centred upon an analysis of trends within historic or past data. A simple human computer interface is presented to display the results by overlaying ‘Fail’ or ‘Warning’ states on a schematic of a storage tank. Important information can be flagged alongside conditions. As an example, a surface graph, representing the storage tank condition over a ten-week period is displayed. A continuing deterioration in the score connected with “lack of operating procedures” is presented.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Daqing, W., Peng, Z., Liqiong, C.: Fuzzy fault tree analysis for fire and explosion of crude oil tanks. J. Loss Prev. Process Ind. 26, 1390–1398 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Marhavilas, P.K., Koulouriotis, D., Gemeni, V.: Risk analysis and assessment methodologies in the work sites: on a review, classification and comparative study of the scientific literature of the period 2000–2009. J. Loss Prev. Process Ind. 1924, 477–523 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  3. José, L., Carmen, G.-C., Cristina, G.-G., Piedad, B.: Risk analysis of a fuel storage terminal using HAZOP and FTA. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 14, 705 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Juran, J.M.: Juran’s Quality Handbook, 5th edn. McGraw-Hill, New York (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Watson, G.: The legacy of Ishikawa. Qual. Prog. 37(4), 54–57 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Ciocoiu, C.N.: Managementul riscului. Teorii, practici, metodologii. ASE, Bucharest (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Institute of Ergonomics & Human Factors. http://www.ergonomics.org.uk/. Accessed 15 June 2018

  8. Ilie, G.: De la management la guvernare prin risc. UTI Press & Detectiv, Bucharest (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  9. James, C., Cheng-Chung, L.: A study of storage tank accidents. J. Loss Prev. Process Ind. 19(1), 51–59 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Ilie, G., Carmen, N.C.: Application of fishbone diagram to determine the risk of an event with multiple causes. Manag. Res. Pract. 2(1), 1–22 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Ikwan, F.: Reducing energy losses and alleviating risk in petroleum engineering using decision making and alarm systems. J. Comput. Syst. Eng. 422–429 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Haddad, M., Sanders, D., Gegov, A., Hassan Sayed, M., Huang, Y., Al-Mosawi, M.: Combining multiple criteria decision making with vector manipulation to decide on the direction for a powered wheelchair. In: Intelligent Systems and Applications, Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol. 1037, pp. 680–693. Springer (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Haddad, M., Sanders, D., Bausch, N.: Selecting a robust decision making method to evaluate employee performance. Int. J. Manag. Decis. Making 18(4), 333–351 (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Haddad, M., Sanders, D., Tewkesbury, G.: Selecting a discrete Multiple Criteria Decision Making method to decide on a corporate relocation. Arch. Bus. Res. 7(5), 48–67 (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Haddad, M., Sanders, D.: Selecting a best compromise direction for a powered wheelchair using PROMETHEE. IEEE Trans. Neural Syst. Rehabil. Eng. 27(2), 228–235 (2019)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Malik Haddad .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Ikwan, F. et al. (2021). Intelligent Risk Prediction of Storage Tank Leakage Using an Ishikawa Diagram with Probability and Impact Analysis. In: Arai, K., Kapoor, S., Bhatia, R. (eds) Intelligent Systems and Applications. IntelliSys 2020. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol 1252. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-55190-2_45

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics