Skip to main content

Language Assessment Literacy: Task Analysis in Saudi Universities

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
The Assessment of L2 Written English across the MENA Region

Abstract

Language assessment literacy is defined as the ‘language instructor’s familiarity with testing definitions and the application of this knowledge to classroom practices in general and specifically to issues related to assessing language’. Recent times have witnessed a phenomenal increase in the role of teachers in language testing and assessment. They are involved in assessing students and evaluating assessment data to improve student learning and their own instructional strategies (Malone, 2013). This highlights the significance of teachers’ assessment literacy in influencing how they construct and implement high-quality assessment instruments that adequately assess students’ specified learning outcomes (e.g. Stiggins, 2002). In Saudi Arabia, research indicates major gaps in EFL teachers’ assessment literacy and therefore this study investigates Saudi EFL teachers’ development of assessment tasks and the extent that these tasks are aligned with student learning outcomes. The study examines the gaps in teachers’ knowledge of assessment practices in classrooms and any incongruity between the tasks and learning outcomes. Suggestions are made for how teachers’ language assessment literacy can be improved through future professional development courses.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Alderson, J. C., & Wall, D. (1993). Does washback exist? Applied Linguistics, 14(2), 115–129.

    Google Scholar 

  • American Federation of Teachers, National Council on Measurement in Education & National Education Association. (1990). Standards for teacher competence in educational assessment of students. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 9(4), 30–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bachman, L. (2002). Some reflections on task-based language performance assessment. Language Testing, 19, 453–476.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beneditti, K. D. (2006). Language testing: Some problems and solutions. MEXTESOL Journal, 30(1), 25–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bereiter, C., & Scardamalia, M. (1989). Intentional learning as a goal of instruction. In L. Resnick (Ed.), Knowledge, learning and instruction (pp. 361–392). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beziat, T. L., & Coleman, B. K. (2015). Classroom assessment literacy: Evaluating pre-service teachers. The Researcher, 27(1), 25–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Biggs, J. (2003). Aligning teaching and learning to course objectives. Paper presented at the International conference on Teaching and learning in higher education: New trends and innovations. University of Aveiro.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brookhart, S. (2011). Educational assessment knowledge and skills for teachers. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 30(1), 3–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bruce, J. C., & Lack, M. L. (2009). Using subjective judgement to determine the validity of a tutorial performance-evaluation instrument. Health SA Gesondheid, 14(1), 1–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coombe, C., & Evans, J. (2005). Writing assessment scales: Making the right choice. In D. Lloyd, P. Davidson, & C. Coombe (Eds.), Fundamentals of language assessment: A practical guide for teachers (pp. 99–104). Dubai: TESOL Arabia Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coombe, C., Troudi, S., & Al-Hamly, M. (2012). Foreign and second language teacher assessment literacy: Issues, challenges, recommendations. In C. Coombe, P. Davidson, B. O’Sullivan, & S. Stoynoff (Eds.), The Cambridge guide to second language assessment (pp. 20–29). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • David, H. A. (1963). The method of paired comparison. London: Charles Griffin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davies, A. (2008). Textbook trends in teaching language testing. Language Testing, 25(3), 327–347.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deluca, C., & Klinger, D. A. (2010). Assessment literacy development: Identifying gaps in teacher candidates’ learning. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 17(4), 419–438.

    Google Scholar 

  • El-Ebyary, K. (2009). Deconstructing the complexity of washback relation to formative assessment in Egypt. Cambridge ESOL: Research Notes, 35, 2–5.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elshawa, N., Abdullah, A. N., & Rashid, S. M. (2017). Malaysian instructor’s assessment beliefs in tertiary ESL classrooms. International Journal of Education & Literacy Studies, 5(2), 29–46.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ezza, E. S. (2017). Criteria for assessing writing at Majmah University. In S. Hidri, & C. Coombe (Eds.), Evaluation in foreign language education in the Middle East and North Africa, second language learning and teaching (pp. 185–200). Switzerland: Springer International Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferman, I. (2004). The washback of an EFL national oral matriculation test to teaching and learning. In L. Cheng, Y. Watanabe, & A. Curtis (Eds.), Washback in language testing: Research context and methods (pp. 191–210). London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fulcher, G. (2012). Assessment literacy for language classroom. Language Assessment Quarterly, 9(2), 113–132.

    Google Scholar 

  • Galluzo, G. R. (2005). Performance assessment and renewing teacher education. Clearing House: A Journal of Educational Strategies, Issues and Ideas, 78(4), 142–145.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Garies, C. R., & Grant, L. W. (2015). Teacher-made assessments: How to connect curriculum, instruction, and student learning. New York, NY: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Gijbels, D., Segers, M., & Struyf, E. (2008). Constructivist learning environments and the (im)possibility to change students’ perceptions of assessment demands and approaches to learning. Instructional Science, 36(5), 431–443.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giraldo, F. (2018). Language assessment literacy: Implications for language teachers. Profile: Issues in Teachers’ Professional Development, 20(1), 179–195.

    Google Scholar 

  • Green, A. (2007). Washback to learning outcomes: A comparative study of IELTS preparation and university pre-sessional language courses. Assessment in Education, 14(1), 75–97.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guerriero, S. (2017). Teachers’ pedagogical knowledge and the teaching profession: Background report and project objectives. OECD.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hakim, B. (2015). English language teachers’ ideology of ELT assessment literacy. International Journal of Education and Literacy Studies, 14(1), 75–97.

    Google Scholar 

  • Herman, J., Osmundson, E., Yunyun, D., Ringstaff, C., & Timms, M. (2015). Investigating the dynamics of formative assessment: Relationship between teacher knowledge, assessment practice and learning. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 22, 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1080/0969594X.2015.1006521.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hidri, S. (2016). Conceptions of assessment: Investigating what assessment means to secondary and university teachers. Arab Journal of Applied Linguistics, 1(1), 19–43.

    Google Scholar 

  • Inbar-Lourie, O. (2013). Guest editorial to the special issue on language assessment literacy. Language Testing, 30(3), 301–307.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krippendorff, K. (2004). Content analysis: An introduction to its methodology. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacLellan, E. (2004). Initial knowledge states about assessment: Novice teachers’ conceptualizations. Teaching and Teacher Education, 20, 523–535.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Malone, M. E. (2013). The essentials of assessment literacy: Contrasts between testers and users. Language Testing, 30(3), 329–344.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mertler, C. A. (2003). Preservice versus inservice teachers’ assessment literacy: Does classroom experience make a difference? Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Mid-Western Educational Research Association, Columbus, OH.

    Google Scholar 

  • Obeid, R. (2017). Second language writing and assessment: Voices from within the Saudi EFL context. English Language Teaching, 10(6), 174–181.

    Google Scholar 

  • Plake, B. S. (1993). Teacher assessment literacy: Teachers’ competencies in the educational assessment of students. Mid-Western Educational Researcher, 6(1), 21–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Plake, B. S. (2015). Assessment in the service of learning. Paper presented in the Second International Conference for assessment and evaluation: Learning outcome assessment.

    Google Scholar 

  • Plake, B., & Impara, J. C. (1996). Teacher assessment literacy: What do teachers know about assessment? In G. D. Phye (Ed.), Handbook of Classroom Assessment: Learning, Achievement and Adjustment (pp. 53–68). New York, NY: Academic Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Plake, B. S., Impara, J., & Fager, J. (1993). Assessment competencies of teachers: A national survey. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practices, 12(4), 10–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Popham, W. J. (2009). Assessment literacy for teachers: Faddish or fundamental? Theory into Practice, 48(1), 4–11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Popham, W. J. (2011). Assessment literacy overlooked: A teacher educator’s confession. The Teacher Educator, 46(4), 265–273.

    Google Scholar 

  • Popham, W. J. (2013). Classroom assessment: What teachers need to know. Boston, MA: Pearson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rea-Dickens, P. (2004). Understanding teachers as agents of assessment. Language Testing, 21(3), 249–258.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saville, N., & Hawkey, R. (2004). The IELTS impact study: Investigating washback on teaching mater. In L. Cheng, A. Watanabe, & A. Curtis (Eds.), Washback in language testing: Research context and methods (pp. 73–96). London, UK: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scouller, K. (1998). The influence of assessment method on students’ learning approaches: Multiple choice question examination versus assignment essay. Higher Education, 35, 453–472.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shohamy, E. (1993). The power of tests: The impact of language tests on teaching and learning. Washington: National Foreign Language Center.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stecher, B., Barron, S., Chun, T., & Ross, K. (2004). The effects of assessment-driven reform on the teaching of writing in Washington state. In L. Cheng, Y. Watanabe, & A. Curtis (Eds.), Washback in language testing: Research context and measures (pp. 53–71). London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associated.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stiggins, R. J. (1991). Assessment literacy. The Phi Delta Kappan, 72(7), 534–539.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stiggins, R. J. (1995). Assessment literacy for the 21st century. Phi Delta Kappan, 77(3), 238–245.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stiggins, R. J. (2002). Assessment crisis: The absence of assessment for learning. Phi Delta Kappan, 83, 758–765.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stiggins, R. J. (2006). Assessment for learning: A key to student motivation and learning. Phi Delta Kappa Edge, 2(2), 1–19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stiggins, R. J. (2007). Conquering the formative assessment frontier. In J. McMillan (Ed.), Formative classroom assessment: Theory into practice (pp. 8–28). New York, NY: Columbia University Teachers College Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stiggins, R. J., & Conklin, N. (1992). In teachers’ hands: Investigating the practice of classroom assessment. Albany, NY: SUNY Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sweedler-Brown, C. O. (1993). ESL essay evaluation: The influence of sentence-level and rhetorical features. Journal of Second Language Writing, 2(1), 3–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Umer, M., Farooq, M. U., & Gulzar, M. A. (2016). Formative assessment has to be made formative: It does not work itself. Journal of Education and Research, 12(2), 1–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Umer, M., Javid, C. Z., & Farooq, M. U. (2015). Formative assessment and consequential validity: A practice yet to be effectively implemented in Saudi higher education. Paper presented in the Second International Conference for assessment and evaluation: Learning outcomes assessment.

    Google Scholar 

  • Umer, M., Zakaria, M. H., & Alshara, M. A. (2018). Investigating Saudi University EFL teachers’ assessment literacy: Theory and practice. International Journal of English Linguistics, 8(3), 345–356.

    Google Scholar 

  • Volante, L., & Fazio, X. (2007). Exploring teacher candidates’ assessment literacy: Implications for teacher reform and professional development. Canadian Journal of Education, 30(3), 749–770.

    Google Scholar 

  • Webb, N. L. (1997). Criteria for alignment of expectations and assessment in mathematics and science education (Research Monograph No. 6). Washington: National Institute for Science Education Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Webb, N. L. (2002). An analysis of the alignment between language arts standards and assessments for four states. Wisconsin: Wisconsin Centre of Educational Research, University of Wisconson-Madison.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weigle, S. C. (2007). Teaching writing teachers about assessment. Journal of Second Language Writing, 16, 194–209.

    Google Scholar 

  • White, E. (2009). Are you assessment literate? Some fundamental questions regarding effective classroom-based assessment. OnCue Journal, 3(1), 3–25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yan, Z., & Cheng, E. K. (2015). Primary teachers’ attitude, intentions, and practices regarding formative assessment. Teaching and Teacher Education, 45, 128–136.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mubina Rauf .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Appendix 1: Learning Outcomes and Selected Course and Test Items

Appendix 1: Learning Outcomes and Selected Course and Test Items

University 1 (Course: ENG 102)

Writing SLOs

  1. 1.

    Can write short simple emails providing and asking for personal information (e.g. about family, people, possessions and local environment) incorporating correct spelling and punctuation.

  2. 2.

    Can write a series of simple sentences providing information about their own and others’ habits, routines and preferences.

  3. 3.

    Can produce drafts and a revised final draft of a cohesive analytical paragraph describing the essential features of a job.

  4. 4.

    Can write sentences using so and because to show reason and result, with correct punctuation.

  5. 5.

    Can use a/an, the or no article appropriately with familiar countable and uncountable nouns.

  6. 6.

    Can begin the process of planning writing by generating ideas on a familiar topic through free writing.

  7. 7.

    Can revise writing by understanding and implementing peer and instructor feedback and by checking own writing for simple mechanical and grammatical mistakes.

Test item 1

Write a comparison of two malls. Your paragraph should:

Have a topic sentence, supporting ideas and a concluding sentence.

Compare location, age, size, hours, and number of floors, shops and car park spaces.

Use comparative adjectives. Write 90–120 words (Table 4).

Table 4 Test item details for ‘University 1’

University 2 (Course: REAP 1)

Writing SLOs

  1. 1.

    Write simple phrases and sentences about themselves and imaginary people, where they live and what they do.

  2. 2.

    Write numbers and dates, own name, nationality, address, age, date of birth or arrival in the country, etc.

  3. 3.

    Write correct simple phrases and sentences.

  4. 4.

    Use very basic linear connectors such as and or then correctly to link words or groups of words.

  5. 5.

    Employ basic punctuation such as full stops, commas and capital letters correctly.

  6. 6.

    Use appropriate word order in subject-verb, subject-verb-object, subject-verb-adjective and subject-verb-adverb sentence structures.

  7. 7

    Write a 4 to 5 paragraph essay including an introduction, body and conclusion.

  8. 8.

    Use simple, compound and complex sentences in writings (Fig. 1).

    Fig. 1
    figure 1

    Test item 1 instructions ‘University 2’

Test item 1

University 3 (Course: Pre-intermediate)

Pre-Int (SLOs/Writing)

Pre/W1 demonstrate some fluency in cursive writing in sentences and paragraphs

  1. a.

    legible form

Pre/W2 use appropriate punctuation symbols in sentences

  1. a.

    full stops

  2. b.

    capital letters

  3. c.

    proper nouns

  4. d.

    question marks

Pre/W3 write simple and compound sentences on familiar topics

  1. a.

    correct word order

  2. b.

    appropriate use of tense

  3. c.

    subject-verb agreements

  4. d.

    simple grammatical structures

  5. e.

    use simple connectors to construct clauses

Pre/W4 spell familiar words with reasonable phonetic accuracy

  1. a.

    identify simple letter patterns

Pre/W5 complete a simple questionnaire or standardized form using words, phrases and short sentences

Pre/W6 write simple descriptions using simple and compound sentences on familiar topics

  1. a.

    use simple grammatical structures accurately

  2. b.

    use simple adjectives

Pre/W7 write simple texts for different genres identifying appropriate format (Fig. 2)

Fig. 2
figure 2

Test item 1 instructions for ‘University 3’

Test item 1

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Rauf, M., McCallum, L. (2020). Language Assessment Literacy: Task Analysis in Saudi Universities. In: McCallum, L., Coombe, C. (eds) The Assessment of L2 Written English across the MENA Region. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-53254-3_2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-53254-3_2

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-53253-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-53254-3

  • eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics