Skip to main content

Mapping Mentalising in the Brain

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
The Neural Basis of Mentalizing

Abstract

This is a short history of mentalising research embedded in the framework of cognitive neuroscience. It is guided by our personal experience of research with neurotypical and autistic individuals, children and adults. We review our reasons for treating the mentalising system as a specialised system within the social brain and speculate on the role of its major components, mPFC, TPJ/STS and precuneus/PCC regions. We reflect on the origins of the concept of mentalising as a baffling cognitive ability to attribute mental states to others and oneself, and look at changes in our understanding of this concept. The most far-reaching change was probably driven by the need to differentiate between explicit and implicit mentalising, while a further change seems to be heralded by the systematic study of metacognitive processes in the brain. We conclude that future research will benefit from the development of computational models and greater use of interactive paradigms.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Apperly, I. A., & Butterfill, S. A. (2009). Do humans have two systems to track beliefs and belief-like states? Psychological Review, 116(4), 953–970.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Arora, A., Schurz, M., & Perner, J. (2017). Systematic comparison of brain imaging meta-analyses of ToM with vPT. BioMed Research International, 2017, 6875850. Retrieved from https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28367446

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Auger, S. D., & Maguire, E. A. (2018). Retrosplenial cortex indexes stability beyond the spatial domain. Journal of Neuroscience, 38(6), 1472–1481.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Baron-Cohen, S., Leslie, A. M., & Frith, U. (1985). Does the autistic child have a “theory of mind”? Cognition, 21(1), 37–46.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Baron-Cohen, S., Leslie, A. M., & Frith, U. (1986). Mechanical, behavioural and intentional understanding of picture stories in autistic children. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 4(2), 113–125.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beck, D. M., Rees, G., Frith, C. D., & Lavie, N. (2001). Neural correlates of change detection and change blindness. Nature Neuroscience, 4(6), 645–650.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Behrens, T. E., Hunt, L. T., Woolrich, M. W., & Rushworth, M. F. (2008). Associative learning of social value. Nature, 456(7219), 245–249.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Bennett, J. (1978). Some remarks about concepts. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 1(4), 557–560.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beran, M. J., Brandl, J. L., Perner, J., & Proust, J. (2012). Foundations of metacognition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bonda, E., Petrides, M., Ostry, D., & Evans, A. (1996). Specific involvement of human parietal systems and the amygdala in the perception of biological motion. The Journal of Neuroscience, 16(11), 3737–3744.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Brass, M., & Heyes, C. (2005). Imitation: Is cognitive neuroscience solving the correspondence problem? Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 9(10), 489–495. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2005.08.007. S1364-6613(05)00238-X [pii].

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Brentano, F. (1995/1874). Psychology from an empirical standpoint. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brothers, L. (1990). The social brain: A project for integrating primate behavior and neurophysiology in a new domain. Concepts in Neuroscience, 1, 27–51.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brothers, L., Ring, B., & Kling, A. (1990). Response of neurons in the macaque amygdala to complex social stimuli. Behavioural Brain Research, 41(3), 199–213.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Brunet, E., Sarfati, Y., Hardy-Bayle, M. C., & Decety, J. (2000). A PET investigation of the attribution of intentions with a nonverbal task. NeuroImage, 11(2), 157–166.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Butterfill, S. A., & Apperly, I. A. (2016). Is goal ascription possible in minimal mindreading? Psychological Review, 123(2), 228–233.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Byrne, R., & Whiten, A. (Eds.). (1989). Machiavellian intelligence: Social expertise and the evolution of intellect in monkeys, apes, and humans. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Camerer, C. F., Ho, T.-H., & Chong, J.-K. (2004). A cognitive hierarchy model of games. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 119(3), 861–898.

    Google Scholar 

  • Castelli, F., Frith, C., Happe, F., & Frith, U. (2002). Autism, Asperger syndrome and brain mechanisms for the attribution of mental states to animated shapes. Brain, 125(Pt 8), 1839–1849.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Chrastil, E. R. (2018). Heterogeneity in human retrosplenial cortex: A review of function and connectivity. Behavioral Neuroscience, 132(5), 317–338.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Clayton, N. S., Dally, J. M., & Emery, N. J. (2007). Social cognition by food-caching corvids. The western scrub-jay as a natural psychologist. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological Sciences, 362(1480), 507–522.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Clements, W. A., & Perner, J. (1994). Implicit understanding of false beliefs. Cognitive Development, 9(4), 377–395.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coricelli, G., & Nagel, R. (2009). Neural correlates of depth of strategic reasoning in medial prefrontal cortex. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 106(23), 9163–9168.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Craig, A. D. (2002). How do you feel? Interoception: The sense of the physiological condition of the body. Nature Reviews. Neuroscience, 3(8), 655–666.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Crawford, V. P., Costa-Gomes, M. A., & Iriberri, N. (2013). Structural models of nonequilibrium strategic thinking: Theory, evidence, and applications. Journal of Economic Literature, 51(1), 5–62.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cross, E. S., Liepelt, R., Hamilton, A. F., Parkinson, J., Ramsey, R., Stadler, W., & Prinz, W. (2012). Robotic movement preferentially engages the action observation network. Human Brain Mapping, 33(9), 2238–2254.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cunningham, W. A., Johnson, M. K., Raye, C. L., Gatenby, J. C., Gore, J. C., & Banaji, M. R. (2004). Separable neural components in the processing of black and white faces. Psychological Science, 15(12), 806–813.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • de Lange, F. P., Spronk, M., Willems, R. M., Toni, I., & Bekkering, H. (2008). Complementary systems for understanding action intentions. Current Biology, 18(6), 454–457.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Dehaene, S., Naccache, L., Cohen, L., Bihan, D. L., Mangin, J. F., Poline, J. B., & Riviere, D. (2001). Cerebral mechanisms of word masking and unconscious repetition priming. Nature Neuroscience, 4(7), 752–758.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Dennett, D. C. (1978). Beliefs about beliefs. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 1(4), 568–570.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dennett, D. C. (1987). The intentional stance. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Denny, B. T., Kober, H., Wager, T. D., & Ochsner, K. N. (2012). A meta-analysis of functional neuroimaging studies of self- and other judgments reveals a spatial gradient for mentalizing in medial prefrontal cortex. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 24(8), 1742–1752.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Devaine, M., Hollard, G., & Daunizeau, J. (2014). The social Bayesian brain: Does mentalizing make a difference when we learn? PLoS Computational Biology, 10(12), e1003992.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Evans, J. S. (2008). Dual-processing accounts of reasoning, judgment, and social cognition. Annual Review of Psychology, 59, 255–278.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Evans, J. S. B. T., & Stanovich, K. E. (2013). Dual-process theories of higher cognition: Advancing the debate. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 8(3), 223–241.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Fan, Y.-T., Decety, J., Yang, C.-Y., Liu, J.-L., & Cheng, Y. (2010). Unbroken mirror neurons in autism spectrum disorders. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 51(9), 981–988.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • FeldmanHall, O., Mobbs, D., Evans, D., Hiscox, L., Navrady, L., & Dalgleish, T. (2012). What we say and what we do: The relationship between real and hypothetical moral choices. Cognition, 123(3), 434–441.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Fleming, S. M., & Daw, N. D. (2017). Self-evaluation of decision-making: A general Bayesian framework for metacognitive computation. Psychological Review, 124(1), 91–114.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Fletcher, P. C., Happe, F., Frith, U., Baker, S. C., Dolan, R. J., Frackowiak, R. S., & Frith, C. D. (1995). Other minds in the brain: A functional imaging study of “theory of mind” in story comprehension. Cognition, 57(2), 109–128.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Flombaum, J. I., & Santos, L. R. (2005). Rhesus monkeys attribute perceptions to others. Current Biology, 15(5), 447–452.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Friston, K. J., & Frith, C. D. (2015). Active inference, communication and hermeneutics. Cortex, 68, 129–143.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Frith, C. D., & Frith, U. (1999). Interacting minds--A biological basis. Science, 286(5445), 1692–1695.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Frith, C. D., & Frith, U. (2007). Social cognition in humans. Current Biology, 17(16), R724–R732.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Frith, C. D., & Frith, U. (2008). Implicit and explicit processes in social cognition. Neuron, 60(3), 503–510.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Frith, U. (1989). Autism: Explaining the enigma. Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frith, U. (2004). Emanuel Miller lecture: Confusions and controversies about Asperger syndrome. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 45(4), 672–686.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Frith, U. (2013). Are there innate mechanisms that make us social beings? Paper presented at the Neurosciences and the Human Person: New Perspectives on Human Activities, Vatican City. Retrieved from http://www.pas.va/content/dam/accademia/pdf/sv121/sv121-frithu.pdf

  • Frith, U., & Frith, C. (2010). The social brain: Allowing humans to boldly go where no other species has been. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological Sciences, 365(1537), 165–176.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Frith, U., & Happé, F. (1994). Autism: Beyond “theory of mind”. Cognition, 50(1), 115–132.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Frith, U., Morton, J., & Leslie, A. M. (1991). The cognitive basis of a biological disorder: Autism. Trends in Neurosciences, 14(10), 433–438.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gallagher, H. L., Jack, A. I., Roepstorff, A., & Frith, C. D. (2002). Imaging the intentional stance in a competitive game. NeuroImage, 16(3 Pt 1), 814–821.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gallese, V., & Goldman, A. (1998). Mirror neurons and the simulation theory of mind-reading. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 2(12), 493–501.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gilead, M., Trope, Y., & Liberman, N. (2019). Above and beyond the concrete: The diverse representational substrates of the predictive brain. In Behavioral and brain science (pp. 1–63). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goel, V., Grafman, J., Sadato, N., & Hallett, M. (1995). Modeling other minds. Neuroreport, 6(13), 1741–1746.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gordon, R. M. (1986). Folk psychology as simulation. Mind & Language, 1(2), 158–171.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grèzes, J., Frith, C. D., & Passingham, R. E. (2004). Inferring false beliefs from the actions of oneself and others: An fMRI study. NeuroImage, 21(2), 744–750.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gu, X., Hof, P. R., Friston, K. J., & Fan, J. (2013). Anterior insular cortex and emotional awareness. The Journal of Comparative Neurology, 521(15), 3371–3388.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Hamilton, A. F., Brindley, R. M., & Frith, U. (2007). Imitation and action understanding in autistic spectrum disorders: How valid is the hypothesis of a deficit in the mirror neuron system? Neuropsychologia, 45(8), 1859–1868.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hampton, A. N., Bossaerts, P., & O’Doherty, J. P. (2008). Neural correlates of mentalizing-related computations during strategic interactions in humans. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 105(18), 6741–6746.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Happé, F. G. E. (1995). The role of age and verbal ability in the theory of mind task performance of subjects with autism. Child Development, 66(3), 843–855.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Harman, G. (1978). Studying the chimpanzee’s theory of mind. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 1(4), 576–577.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hartley, T., Maguire, E. A., Spiers, H. J., & Burgess, N. (2003). The well-worn route and the path less traveled: Distinct neural bases of route following and wayfinding in humans. Neuron, 37(5), 877–888.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Heider, F., & Simmel, M. (1944). An experimental study of apparent behavior. American Journal of Psychology, 57, 243–249.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heyes, C. M., & Frith, C. D. (2014). The cultural evolution of mind reading. Science, 344(6190), 1243091.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hillebrandt, H., Friston, K. J., & Blakemore, S.-J. (2014). Effective connectivity during animacy perception – Dynamic causal modelling of human connectome project data. Scientific Reports, 4, 6240. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep06240

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Humphrey, N. K. (1976). The social function of intellect. In P. P. G. Bateson & R. A. Hinde (Eds.), Growing points in ethology (pp. 303–317). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huntenburg, J. M., Bazin, P.-L., & Margulies, D. S. (2018). Large-scale gradients in human cortical organization. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 22(1), 21–31.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Iacoboni, M., Molnar-Szakacs, I., Gallese, V., Buccino, G., Mazziotta, J. C., & Rizzolatti, G. (2005). Grasping the intentions of others with one’s own mirror neuron system. PLoS Biology, 3(3), e79.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Jack, A. I., Dawson, A. J., Begany, K. L., Leckie, R. L., Barry, K. P., Ciccia, A. H., & Snyder, A. Z. (2013). fMRI reveals reciprocal inhibition between social and physical cognitive domains. NeuroImage, 66, 385–401.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Jacob, P., & Jeannerod, M. (2005). The motor theory of social cognition: A critique. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 9(1), 21–25.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Jellema, T., & Perrett, D. I. (2003). Cells in monkey STS responsive to articulated body motions and consequent static posture: A case of implied motion? Neuropsychologia, 41(13), 1728–1737.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Jouravlev, O., Schwartz, R., Ayyash, D., Mineroff, Z., Gibson, E., & Fedorenko, E. (2018). Tracking colisteners’ knowledge states during language comprehension. Psychological Science, 30(1), 3–19.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Kahneman, D. (2011). Thinking, fast and slow. New York, NY: Farrar, Straus and Giroux.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keynes, J. M. (1936). General theory of employment interest and money. London: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kilner, J. M. (2009). Dissociable functional roles of the human action-observation network (Commentary on E. S. Cross et al.). The European Journal of Neuroscience, 30(7), 1382–1382.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Kilner, J. M., Friston, K. J., & Frith, C. D. (2007). Predictive coding: An account of the mirror neuron system. Cognitive Processing, 8(3), 159–166.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Klapper, A., Ramsey, R., Wigboldus, D., & Cross, E. S. (2014). The control of automatic imitation based on bottom–up and top–down cues to animacy: Insights from brain and behavior. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 26(11), 2503–2513.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Koster-Hale, J., & Saxe, R. (2013). Theory of mind: A neural prediction problem. Neuron, 79(5), 836–848.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Kovács, Á. M., Téglás, E., & Endress, A. D. (2010). The social sense: Susceptibility to others’ beliefs in human infants and adults. Science, 330(6012), 1830–1834.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Krupenye, C., Kano, F., Hirata, S., Call, J., & Tomasello, M. (2016). Great apes anticipate that other individuals will act according to false beliefs. Science, 354(6308), 110.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lepage, M., Ghaffar, O., Nyberg, L., & Tulving, E. (2000). Prefrontal cortex and episodic memory retrieval mode. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 97(1), 506–511.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leslie, A. M. (1987). Pretense and representation: The origins of “theory of mind”. Psychological Review, 94(4), 412–426.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mars, R. B., Sallet, J., Neubert, F. X., & Rushworth, M. F. (2013). Connectivity profiles reveal the relationship between brain areas for social cognition in human and monkey temporoparietal cortex. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 110(26), 10806–10811.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Marsh, L. E., & Hamilton, A. F. C. (2011). Dissociation of mirroring and mentalising systems in autism. NeuroImage, 56(3), 1511–1519.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell, A. S., Czajkowski, R., Zhang, N., Jeffery, K., & Nelson, A. J. D. (2018). Retrosplenial cortex and its role in spatial cognition. Brain and Neuroscience Advances, 2, 1–13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moessnang, C., Otto, K., Bilek, E., Schafer, A., Baumeister, S., Hohmann, S., … Meyer-Lindenberg, A. (2017). Differential responses of the dorsomedial prefrontal cortex and right posterior superior temporal sulcus to spontaneous mentalizing. Human Brain Mapping, 38(8), 3791–3803.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Molenberghs, P., Johnson, H., Henry, J. D., & Mattingley, J. B. (2016). Understanding the minds of others: A neuroimaging meta-analysis. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews, 65, 276–291.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Morris, J. S., Ohman, A., & Dolan, R. J. (1999). A subcortical pathway to the right amygdala mediating “unseen” fear. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 96(4), 1680–1685.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Naughtin, C. K., Horne, K., Schneider, D., Venini, D., York, A., & Dux, P. E. (2017). Do implicit and explicit belief processing share neural substrates? Human Brain Mapping, 38(9), 4760–4772.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • O’Doherty, J. P., Hampton, A., & Kim, H. (2007). Model-based fMRI and its application to reward learning and decision making. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1104, 35–53.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ochsner, K. N., Silvers, J. A., & Buhle, J. T. (2012). Functional imaging studies of emotion regulation: A synthetic review and evolving model of the cognitive control of emotion. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1251, E1–E24.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Onishi, K. H., & Baillargeon, R. (2005). Do 15-month-old infants understand false beliefs? Science, 308(5719), 255–258.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Pellegrino, G. d., Fadiga, L., Fogassi, L., Gallese, V., & Rizzolatti, G. (1992). Understanding motor events: A neurophysiological study. Experimental Brain Research, 91(1), 176–180.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Pelphrey, K. A., Singerman, J. D., Allison, T., & McCarthy, G. (2003). Brain activation evoked by perception of gaze shifts: The influence of context. Neuropsychologia, 41(2), 156–170.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Perner, J., & Ruffman, T. (2005). Infants’ insight into the mind: How deep? Science, 308(5719), 214–216.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Phelps, E. A., O’Connor, K. J., Cunningham, W. A., Funayama, E. S., Gatenby, J. C., Gore, J. C., & Banaji, M. R. (2000). Performance on indirect measures of race evaluation predicts amygdala activation. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 12(5), 729–738.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Poldrack, R. A. (2006). Can cognitive processes be inferred from neuroimaging data? Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 10(2), 59–63.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Premack, D., & Woodruff, G. (1978). Does the chimpanzee have a theory of mind? Behavioural and Brain Sciences, 4, 515–526.

    Google Scholar 

  • Puce, A., Allison, T., Bentin, S., Gore, J. C., & McCarthy, G. (1998). Temporal cortex activation in humans viewing eye and mouth movements. The Journal of Neuroscience, 18(6), 2188.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Qureshi, A. W., Apperly, I. A., & Samson, D. (2010). Executive function is necessary for perspective selection, not Level-1 visual perspective calculation: Evidence from a dual-task study of adults. Cognition, 117(2), 230–236.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rabinowitz, N. C., Perbet, F., Song, H. F., Zhang, C., Eslami, S. M. A., & Botvinick, M. (2018). Machine theory of mind. arXiv. Retrieved from https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/\#abs/2018arXiv180207740R

  • Ramachandran, V. S., & Oberman, L. M. (2006). Broken mirrors: A theory of autism. Scientific American, 295(5), 62–69.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Redcay, E., & Schilbach, L. (2019). Using second-person neuroscience to elucidate the mechanisms of social interaction. Nature Reviews. Neuroscience, 20, 495. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41583-019-0179-4

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Rilling, J. K., Sanfey, A. G., Aronson, J. A., Nystrom, L. E., & Cohen, J. D. (2004). The neural correlates of theory of mind within interpersonal interactions. NeuroImage, 22(4), 1694–1703.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Robalino, N., & Robson, A. (2012). The economic approach to ‘theory of mind’. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological Sciences, 367(1599), 2224–2233.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Ronald, A., Viding, E., Happe, F., & Plomin, R. (2006). Individual differences in theory of mind ability in middle childhood and links with verbal ability and autistic traits: A twin study. Social Neuroscience, 1(3-4), 412–425.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rosenblau, G., Kliemann, D., Heekeren, H. R., & Dziobek, I. (2015). Approximating implicit and explicit mentalizing with two naturalistic video-based tasks in typical development and autism spectrum disorder. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 45(4), 953–965.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Royzman, E. B., Cassidy, K. W., & Baron, J. (2003). “I know, you know”: Epistemic egocentrism in children and adults. Review of General Psychology, 7(1), 38–65.

    Google Scholar 

  • Russell, J. (1997). How executive disorders can bring about an inadequate ‘theory of mind’. In Autism as an executive disorder (pp. 256–304). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Samson, D., Apperly, I. A., Braithwaite, J. J., Andrews, B. J., & Bodley Scott, S. E. (2010). Seeing it their way: Evidence for rapid and involuntary computation of what other people see. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Human Perception and Performance, 36(5), 1255–1266.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Satpute, A. B., & Lieberman, M. D. (2006). Integrating automatic and controlled processes into neurocognitive models of social cognition. Brain Research, 1079(1), 86–97.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Saxe, R., & Kanwisher, N. (2003). People thinking about thinking people. The role of the temporo-parietal junction in “theory of mind”. NeuroImage, 19(4), 1835–1842.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Saxe, R., Scholz, J., Moran, J. M., & Gabrieli, J. (2006). Overlapping and non-overlapping brain regions for theory of mind and self reflection in individual subjects. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 1(3), 229–234.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Saxe, R., Xiao, D. K., Kovacs, G., Perrett, D. I., & Kanwisher, N. (2004). A region of right posterior superior temporal sulcus responds to observed intentional actions. Neuropsychologia, 42(11), 1435–1446.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Schafer, M., & Schiller, D. (2018). Navigating social space. Neuron, 100(2), 476–489.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Schilbach, L., Timmermans, B., Reddy, V., Costall, A., Bente, G., Schlicht, T., & Vogeley, K. (2013). Toward a second-person neuroscience. The Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 36(4), 393–414.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Schneider, D., Slaughter, V. P., Bayliss, A. P., & Dux, P. E. (2013). A temporally sustained implicit theory of mind deficit in autism spectrum disorders. Cognition, 129(2), 410–417.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Schneider, D., Slaughter, V. P., Becker, S. I., & Dux, P. E. (2014). Implicit false-belief processing in the human brain. NeuroImage, 101, 268–275.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Schneider, D., Slaughter, V. P., & Dux, P. E. (2017). Current evidence for automatic theory of mind processing in adults. Cognition, 162, 27–31.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Schou, A. (2005, September 22). Gæt-et-tal konkurrence afslører at vi er irrationelle. Politiken.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schurz, M., Radua, J., Aichhorn, M., Richlan, F., & Perner, J. (2014). Fractionating theory of mind: A meta-analysis of functional brain imaging studies. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 42, 9–34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schuwerk, T., Jarvers, I., Vuori, M., & Sodian, B. (2016). Implicit mentalizing persists beyond early childhood and is profoundly impaired in children with autism spectrum condition. Frontiers in Psychology, 7, 1696.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Searle, J. R. (1995). The construction of social reality. New York, NY: Simon and Schuster.

    Google Scholar 

  • Senju, A., Southgate, V., White, S., & Frith, U. (2009). Mindblind eyes: An absence of spontaneous theory of mind in Asperger syndrome. Science, 325(5942), 883–885.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sevgi, M., Diaconescu, A. O., Tittgemeyer, M., & Schilbach, L. (2016). Social Bayes: Using Bayesian modeling to study autistic trait-related differences in social cognition. Biological Psychiatry, 80(2), 112–119.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Silani, G., Bird, G., Brindley, R., Singer, T., Frith, C., & Frith, U. (2008). Levels of emotional awareness and autism: An fMRI study. Social Neuroscience, 3(2), 97–112.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Skyrms, B. (2003). The stag hunt and the evolution of social structure. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Southgate, V., Senju, A., & Csibra, G. (2007). Action anticipation through attribution of false belief by 2-year-olds. Psychological Science, 18(7), 587–592.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Spengler, S., von Cramon, D. Y., & Brass, M. (2009). Control of shared representations relies on key processes involved in mental state attribution. Human Brain Mapping, 30(11), 3704–3718.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Sperber, D., & Wilson, D. (1986). Relevance: Communication and cognition. Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spunt, R. P., & Lieberman, M. D. (2012). Dissociating modality-specific and supramodal neural systems for action understanding. The Journal of Neuroscience, 32(10), 3575–3583.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Stanley, J., Gowen, E., & Miall, R. C. (2010). How instructions modify perception: An fMRI study investigating brain areas involved in attributing human agency. NeuroImage, 52(1), 389–400.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Stel, M., van Dijk, E., & Olivier, E. (2009). You want to know the truth? Then don’t mimic! Psychological Science, 20(6), 693–699.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Tavares, R. M., Mendelsohn, A., Grossman, Y., Williams, C. H., Shapiro, M., Trope, Y., & Schiller, D. (2015). A map for social navigation in the human brain. Neuron, 87(1), 231–243.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Theriault, J. E., & Young, L. (2017). Social prediction in the theory of mind network. PsyArXiv. Retrieved from https://psyarxiv.com/hvn54/

  • Thornton, M. A., Weaverdyck, M. E., & Tamir, D. I. (2019). The social brain automatically predicts others’ future mental states. The Journal of Neuroscience, 39(1), 140–148.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Van Overwalle, F. (2009). Social cognition and the brain: A meta-analysis. Human Brain Mapping, 30(3), 829–858.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Van Overwalle, F., & Vandekerckhove, M. (2013). Implicit and explicit social mentalizing: Dual processes driven by a shared neural network. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 7, 560.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Vogeley, K., May, M., Ritzl, A., Falkai, P., Zilles, K., & Fink, G. R. (2004). Neural correlates of first-person perspective as one constituent of human self-consciousness. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 16(5), 817–827.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Vukovic, N., & Shtyrov, Y. (2017). Cortical networks for reference-frame processing are shared by language and spatial navigation systems. NeuroImage, 161, 120–133.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wellman, H. M., Cross, D., & Watson, J. (2001). Meta-analysis of theory-of-mind development: The truth about false belief. Child Development, 72(3), 655–684.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wheatley, T., Boncz, A., Toni, I., & Stolk, A. (2019). Beyond the isolated brain: The promise and challenge of interacting minds. Neuron, 103(2), 186–188.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Wimmer, H., & Perner, J. (1983). Beliefs about beliefs - Representation and constraining function of wrong beliefs in young children’s understanding of deception. Cognition, 13(1), 103–128.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wittmann, M. K., Lockwood, P. L., & Rushworth, M. F. S. (2018). Neural mechanisms of social cognition in primates. Annual Review of Neuroscience, 41, 99–118. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-neuro-080317-061450

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Woodruff, G., & Premack, D. (1979). Intentional communication in the chimpanzee: The development of deception. Cognition, 7(4), 333–362.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yoshida, W., Seymour, B., Friston, K. J., & Dolan, R. J. (2010). Neural mechanisms of belief inference during cooperative games. The Journal of Neuroscience, 30(32), 10744–10751.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We are grateful to Richard Passingham, Leo Schilbach, Kevin Ochsner, and Michael Gilead for their insightful comments on earlier drafts of this chapter.

Chris and Uta Frith receive no funding and declare no conflicts of interest.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Chris D. Frith .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Frith, C.D., Frith, U. (2021). Mapping Mentalising in the Brain. In: Gilead, M., Ochsner, K.N. (eds) The Neural Basis of Mentalizing. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-51890-5_2

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics