Skip to main content

Gauge Is More Than Mathematical Redundancy

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
One Hundred Years of Gauge Theory

Part of the book series: Fundamental Theories of Physics ((FTPH,volume 199))

Abstract

Physical systems may couple to other systems through variables that are not gauge invariant. When we split a gauge system into two subsystems, the gauge-invariant variables of the two subsystems have less information than the gauge-invariant variables of the original system; the missing information regards degrees of freedom that express relations between the subsystems. All this shows that gauge invariance is a formalization of the relational nature of physical degrees of freedom. The recent developments on boundary variables and boundary charges are clarified by this observation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    I thank Laurent Freidel for pointing out this example.

References

  1. C. Rovelli, Why gauge? Found. Phys. 44, 91–104 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  2. N. Teh, Some remarks on Rovelli’s ‘Why Gauge?’. http://philsci-archive.pitt.edu/10050/

  3. M.M. Amaral, Some remarks on relational nature of Gauge symmetry. http://philsci-archive.pitt.edu/10995/

  4. H. Gomes, Holism as the significance of Gauge symmetries. arXiv:1910.05330

  5. H. Gomes, A. Riello, The quasilocal degrees of freedom in gauge theories. arXiv:1906.00992

  6. L. Freidel, F. Girelli, B. Shoshany, 2+1D loop quantum gravity on the edge. Phys. Rev. D 99, 046003 (2019)

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  7. A. Vanrietvelde, P.A. Hoehn, F. Giacomini, Switching quantum reference frames in the N-body problem and the absence of global relational perspectives. arXiv:1809.05093

  8. J.-L. Gervais, B. Sakita, S. Wadia, The surface term in Gauge theories. Phys. Lett. B 63, 55–58 (1976)

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  9. A.P. Balachandran, S. Vaidya, Spontaneous Lorentz violation in Gauge theories. Eur. Phys. J. Plus 128, 1–9 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. W. Donnelly, L. Freidel, Local subsystems in gauge theory and gravity. J. High Energy Phys. 09, 102 (2016)

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  11. M. Geiller, Lorentz-diffeomorphism edge modes in 3d gravity. J. High Energy Phys. 02, 029 (2018)

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  12. A.J. Speranza, Local phase space and edge modes for diffeomorphism-invariant theories. J. High Energy Phys. 02, 021 (2018)

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  13. L. Freidel, A. Perez, D. Pranzetti, Loop gravity string. Phys. Rev. D 95, 106002 (2017)

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  14. L. Freidel, D. Pranzetti, Electromagnetic duality and central charge. Phys. Rev. D 98, 116008 (2018)

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  15. E. Leader, C. Lorcé, The angular momentum controversy: what’s it all about and does it matter? Phys. Rep. 541, 163–248 (2014)

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  16. R. Alkofer, G. Eichmann, C.S. Fischer, M. Hopfer, M. Vujinovic, R. Williams, A. Windisch, On propagators and three-point functions in Landau gauge QCD and QCD-like theories, in Proceedings of Science, vol. 193 (2014) (PoS (QCD-TNT-III) 003)

    Google Scholar 

  17. A. Strominger, Asymptotic symmetries of Yang-Mills theory. J. High Energy Phys. 07, 151 (2014)

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  18. D. Kapec, M. Pate, A. Strominger, New symmetries of QED. Adv. Theor. Math. Phys. 21, 1769–1785 (2017)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  19. D. Kapec, M. Perry, A.M. Raclariu, A. Strominger, Infrared divergences in QED, revisited. Phys. Rev. D 96, 085002 (2017)

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  20. M. Campiglia, R. Eyheralde, Asymptotic U(1) charges at spatial infinity. J. High Energy Phys. 11, 168 (2017)

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  21. A. Nande, M. Pate, A. Strominger, Soft factorization in QED from 2D Kac-Moody symmetry. J. High Energy Phys. 02, 079 (2018)

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Carlo Rovelli .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Rovelli, C. (2020). Gauge Is More Than Mathematical Redundancy. In: De Bianchi, S., Kiefer, C. (eds) One Hundred Years of Gauge Theory. Fundamental Theories of Physics, vol 199. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-51197-5_4

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics