Abstract
This chapter explores how systemic approaches to science enable behaviorists and those of other disciplines with whom we collaborate to understand and intervene in larger social and cultural processes. In work with virtually all cultural and community issues, behavior science needs to plan and act in concert with specialists of other disciplines—and with members of, and cooperating and competing organizations within, the community systems involved. Such partnerships with community systems offer unique expertise regarding the variables and ecological conditions that are most involved in community issues—and solutions. This work requires attention to interlocking disciplinary systems, community systems, and their connections in terms of behavioral and cultural systems dynamics. In this chapter, core concepts of systems science as applied to Skinner’s third level of selection, and some of the controversies involved, are introduced and clarified, and examples of cultural (or—as some prefer—“culturo-behavioral”) analysis are provided and explored in depth. This content provides grounding for many of the chapters that follow.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
Metacontingency: A contingent relation between (1) recurring interlocking behavioral contingencies having an aggregate product and (2) selecting environmental events or conditions (Glenn et al., 2016).
- 2.
Self-organization and autopoiesis are commonly used interchangeably in contemporary systems science, although autopoietic systems were originally defined to require self-generation (Mobus & Kalton, 2015).
References
Allen, T. F. H., & Hoekstra, T. W. (2015). Toward a unified ecology (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Columbia University Press.
Andery, M. A. (1990). Uma tentativa de (re) construção do mundo: a ciência do comportamento como ferramenta de intervenção [An attempt to (re) construct the world: The science of behavior as an intervention tool] (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo, São Paulo, SP. Retrieved from https://tede2.pucsp.br/handle/handle/16960
Aspholm, R. (2020). Views from the streets: The transformation of gangs and violence on Chicago’s south side. New York, NY: Columbia University Press.
Aspholm, R. R., & Mattaini, M. A. (2017). Youth activism as violence prevention. In P. Sturmey (Ed.), The Wiley handbook of violence and aggression (page numbers unknown). New York, NY: Wiley. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119057574.whbva104
Baker, T., Schwenk, T., Piasecki, M., Smith, G. S., Reimer, D., Jacobs, N., … Houmanfar, R. A. (2015). Cultural change in a medical school: A data-driven management of entropy. Journal of Organizational Behavior Management, 35(1–2), 95–122. https://doi.org/10.1080/01608061.2015.1035826
Baum, W. M. (2012). Rethinking reinforcement: Allocation, induction, and contingency. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 97(1), 101–124. https://doi.org/10.1901/jeab.2012.97-101
Beckage, B., Kauffman, S., Gross, L. J., Zia, A., & Koliba, C. (2013). More complex complexity: Exploring the nature of computational irreducibility across physical, biological, and human social systems. In H. Zenil (Ed.), Irreducibility and computational equivalence: Emergence, complexity and computation (Vol. 2, pp. 79–88). New York, NY: Springer.
Biglan, A. (1995). Changing cultural practices: A contextualist framework for intervention research. Reno, NV: Context Press.
Biglan, A. (2015). The nurture effect: How the science of human behavior can improve our lives and our world. Oakland, CA: New Harbinger Publications.
Bogdanov, A. A. (1980). Essays in Tektology: The general science of organization (G. Gorelik, Trans). Seaside, CA: Intersystems Publications.
Braun, W. (2002). The system archetypes. Retrieved from http://my2.ewb.ca/site_media/static/attachments/group_topics_grouptopic/86984/systemarchetypes.pdf.pdf
Catania, A., & Harnad, S. E. (1988). The selection of behavior: The operant behaviorism of B. F. Skinner: Comments and consequences. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
Couto, K. C., & Sandaker, I. (2016). Natural, behavioral and cultural selection-analysis: An integrative approach. Behavior and Social Issues, 25, 54–60. https://doi.org/10.5210/bsi.v25i0.6891
Culture (2018). In Lexico. Retrieved from https://www.lexico.com/en/definition/culture
Diamond, J. (2011). Collapse: How societies choose to fail or succeed (Revised edition). New York, NY: Penguin.
Dixon, M. R., Belisle, J., Rehfeldt, R. A., & Root, W. B. (2018). Why we are still not acting to save the world: The upward challenge of a post-Skinnerian behavior science. Perspectives on Behavior Science, 41, 241–267. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40614-018-0162-9
Dyball, R., & Newell, B. (2015). Understanding human ecology. London, England: Routledge.
Entity. (2018). In the Oxford English dictionary (3rd ed.). Retrieved from http://www.oed.com/view/Entry/7646
Ferster, C. B., & Skinner, B. F. (1957). Schedules of reinforcement. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Folke, C., Biggs, R., Norström, A. V., Reyers, B., & Rockström, J. (2016). Social-ecological resilience and biosphere-based sustainability science. Ecology and Society, 21(3), 41–56. https://doi.org/10.5751/es-08748-210341
Glenn, S. S. (1986). Metacontingencies in Walden Two. Behavior Analysis and Social Action, 5(1–2), 2–8.
Glenn, S. S. (1988). Contingencies and metacontingencies: Toward a synthesis of behavior analysis and cultural materialism. The Behavior Analyst, 11(2), 161–179. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf03392470
Glenn, S. S., Malott, M. E., Andery, M. A. P. A., Benvenuti, M., Houmanfar, R. A., Sandaker, I., … Vasconcelos, L. A. (2016). Toward consistent terminology in a behaviorist approach to cultural analysis. Behavior and Social Issues, 25(1), 11–27. https://doi.org/10.5210/bsi.v25i0.6634
Grossmann, K., & Haase, A. (2016). Neighborhood change beyond clear storylines: What can assemblage and complexity theories contribute to understandings of seemingly paradoxical neighborhood development? Urban Geography, 37(5), 727–747. https://doi.org/10.1080/02723638.2015.1113807
Harris, M. (2001). Cultural materialism: The struggle for a science of culture (updated edition). Walnut Creek, CA: AltaMira Press.
Holtschneider, C. (2015). The impact of transitional living programs: Perspectives of homeless youth (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL.
Hörl, E., & Burton, J. (Eds.). (2017). General ecology: The new ecological paradigm. London, England: Bloomsbury Publishing.
Houmanfar, R., Rodrigues, N. J., & Ward, T. A. (2010). Emergence and metacontingency: Points of contact and departure. Behavior and Social Issues, 19(1), 53–78. https://doi.org/10.5210/bsi.v19i0.3065
Houmanfar, R. A., Alavosius, M. P., Morford, Z. H., Herbst, S. A., & Reimer, D. (2015). Functions of organizational leaders in cultural change: Financial and social well-being. Journal of Organizational Behavior Management, 35(1–2), 4–27. https://doi.org/10.1080/01608061.2015.1035827
Hudson, C. G. (2000). From social Darwinism to self-organization: Implications for social change theory. Social Service Review, 74, 533–559. https://doi.org/10.1086/516424
Jason, L., & Glenwick, D. (Eds.). (2016). Handbook of methodological approaches to community-based research: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
Killeen, P. R. (2019). The non-Darwinian evolution of behavers and behaviors. Behavioural Processes, 161, 45–53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.beproc.2017.12.024
Killeen, P. R., & Jacobs, K. W. (2017). Coal is not black, snow is not white, food is not a reinforcer: The roles of affordances and dispositions in the analysis of behavior. The Behavior Analyst, 40(1), 17–38. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40614-016-0080-7
Kohl, P., Crampin, E. J., Quinn, T. A., & Noble, D. (2010). Systems biology: An approach. Nature Publishing Group, 88(1), 25–33. https://doi.org/10.1038/clpt.2010.92
Krispin, J. V. (2016). What is the metacontingency? Deconstructing claims of emergence and cultural-level selection. Behavior and Social Issues, 25(1), 28–41. https://doi.org/10.5210/bsi.v25i0.6186
Krispin, J. (2017). Positive feedback loops of metacontingencies: A new conceptualization of cultural-level selection. Behavior and Social Issues, 26, 95–110. https://doi.org/10.5210/bsi.v26i0.7397
Krispin, J. V. (2019). Culturo-behavioral hypercycles and the metacontingency: Incorporating self-organizing dynamics into an expanded model of cultural change. Perspectives on Behavior Science, 42, 869-887. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40614-019-00212-3
Kwakkel, J. H., & Pruyt, E. (2015). Using system dynamics for grand challenges: The ESDMA approach. Systems Research and Behavioral Science, 32(3), 358–375. https://doi.org/10.1002/sres.2225
Mattaini, M. A. (1996). Envisioning cultural practices. The Behavior Analyst, 19(2), 257–272. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf03393168
Mattaini, M. A. (2013). Strategic nonviolent power: The science of satyagraha. Edmonton, Canada: Athabasca University Press.
Mattaini, M. A. (2019). Out of the lab: Shaping an ecological and constructional cultural systems science. Perspectives on Behavior Science, 42(4), 713–731. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40614-019-00208-z
Mattaini, M. A., & Holtschneider, C. (2017). Collective leadership and circles: Not invented here. Journal of Organizational Behavior Management, 37(2), 126–141. https://doi.org/10.1080/01608061.2017.1309334
Mattaini, M. A., & Huffman-Gottschling, K. (2012). Ecosystems theory. In B. A. Thyer (Ed.), Human behavior in the social environment: Theories for social work practice (pp. 298–325). New York, NY: Wiley.
Mobus, G. E., & Kalton, M. C. (2015). Principles of systems science. New York, NY: Springer.
Moroni, S. (2015). Complexity and the inherent limits of explanation and prediction: Urban codes for self-organising cities. Planning Theory, 14(3), 248–267. https://doi.org/10.1177/1473095214521104
Odum, H. T., & Odum, E. P. (1953). Fundamentals of ecology. Philadelphia, PA: Saunders.
Parsons, T., & Smelser, N. J. (1956). Economy and society: A study in the integration of economic and social theory. London, England: Routledge.
Roose, K., & Mattaini, M. A. (2020). Challenging violence: Toward a 21st century, science-based “Constructive Programme”. In M. A. Mattaini & T. M. Cihon (Eds.), Behavior science perspectives on culture and community. Cham, Switzerland: Springer.
Rylko-Bauer, B., & Farmer, P. (2016). Structural violence, poverty and social suffering. In D. Brady & L. M. Burton (Eds.), Oxford handbook of the social science of poverty (pp. 47–74). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
Skinner, B. F. (1938). The behavior of organisms. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Skinner, B. F. (1948). Walden two. New York, NY: Macmillan.
Skinner, B. F. (1953). Science and human behavior. New York, NY: Free Press.
Skinner, B. F. (1981). Selection by consequences. Science, 213(4507), 501–504. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.7244649
Skinner, B. F. (1984). The evolution of behavior. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 41(2), 217–221. https://doi.org/10.1901/jeab.1984.41-217
Stephan, M. J., & Thompson, T. P. (2018, April 4). Why you should never underestimate a bunch of well-organized teenager protesters. The Washington Post. Retrieved from https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/democracy-post/wp/2018/04/04/why-you-should-never-underestimate-a-bunch-of-well-organized-teenage-protesters/?utm_term=.9cebe5455b61
Swenson, C. C., Henggeler, S. W., Taylor, I. S., & Addison, O. W. (2005). Multisystemic therapy and neighborhood partnerships: Reducing adolescent violence and substance abuse. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
Von Bertalanffy, L. (1968). General system theory: Foundations, development, applications (rev. ed.). New York: George Brasiller.
Willems, E. P. (1974). Behavioral technology and behavioral ecology. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 7(1), 151–165. https://doi.org/10.1901/jaba.1974.7-151
Wilson, W. J. (2016). Urban poverty, race, and space. In D. Brady & L. M. Burton (Eds.), Oxford handbook of the social science of poverty (pp. 394–413). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
Wolfram, S. (2002). A new kind of science (Vol. 5, p. 130). Champaign, IL: Wolfram Media.
Zilio, D. (2019). On the function of science: An overview of 30 years of publication on metacontingency. Behavior and Social Issues, 28, 46–76. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42822-019-00006-x
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2020 Association for Behavior Analysis International
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Mattaini, M.A. (2020). Cultural Systems Analysis: An Emerging Science. In: Cihon, T.M., Mattaini, M.A. (eds) Behavior Science Perspectives on Culture and Community. Behavior Analysis: Theory, Research, and Practice. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-45421-0_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-45421-0_3
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-45420-3
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-45421-0
eBook Packages: Behavioral Science and PsychologyBehavioral Science and Psychology (R0)