Skip to main content

Migration Partnership Framework and the Externalization of European Union’s (EU) Migration Policy in West Africa: The Case of Mali and Niger

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Regional Integration and Migration Governance in the Global South

Part of the book series: United Nations University Series on Regionalism ((UNSR,volume 20))

Abstract

This chapter examines how the European Union (EU) externalizes its migration policies in West African countries through various cooperation tools established as part of the 2016 European Agenda on Migration. The chapter analyses the generations of migration agreements between the EU and West African Countries, revealing that returns and readmission are the main focus of the European Union’s migration cooperation with West African countries. The case study on Niger and Mali examines the effect of the European Trust Fund for Africa (EUTF), EU’s development policies and the securitization of migration in shaping their migration policies. This analysis unpacks the effect of EU cooperation on migration with West African countries on the agenda of free movement at the regional level, especially within the Economic Community of West African States (ECOWAS). The chapter concludes that the proposed framing and linkages between migration, security, readmission, labor mobility and trade in the cooperation between EU and West African countries would undermine the regional migration agenda in ECOWAS and lead to a rise in national tendencies and restrictive border practices in the region.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    The agreement refers to ‘illegal migration’ as opposed to ‘irregular migration’ used by the author in the chapter.

References

  • Adeopju, A., van Noorloss, F., & Zoomers, A. (2009). Europe’s migration agreements with migrant-sending countries in the Global South: A critical review. International Migration, 48(3), 42–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Adepoju, A. (2001). Regional organizations and intra-regional migration in Sub Saharan Africa: Challenges and prospects. International Migration, 39(6), 43–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • African Union. (2018). Revised migration policy framework for Africa. Addis Ababa: African Union.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alternatives. (2016a). Campagne sur la libre circulation des personnes et des biens dans l’espace CEDEAO. Retrieved March 1, 2019, from http://www.alternativeniger.net/campagne-sur-la-libre-circulation-des-personnes-et-des-biens-dans-lespace-cedeao/

  • Alternatives. (2016b, October 22). Carotte, Bâton et Migrations: le déclin d’une civilisation. Retrieved March 1, 2019, from http://www.alternativeniger.net/carotte-baton-et-migrations-le-declin-dune-civilisation/

  • Bisong, A. (2019). Trans-regional institutional cooperation as multilevel governance: ECOWAS migration policy and the EU. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 45(8), 1294–1309.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Borzel, T., & Risse, T. (2016). Introduction. In T. A. Börzel & T. Risse (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of comparative regionalism. London: Oxford University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Brachet, J. (2018). Manufacturing smugglers: From irregular to clandestine mobility in the Sahara. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 676(1), 16–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brocza, S., & Paulhart, K. (2015). EU mobility partnerships: A smart instrument for the externalization of migration control. European Journal of Futures Research, 3(1), 15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Castillejo, C. (2017). The EU migration partnership framework: Time for a rethink. Discussion Paper 28. Deutsches Institut für Entwicklungspolitik.

    Google Scholar 

  • Charrière, F., & Frèsia, M. (2012). West Africa as a migration and protection area. UNHCR.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chou, M., & Gibert, M. (2012). The EU-Senegal mobility partnership: From launch to suspension and negotiation failure. Journal of Contemporary European Research, 8(4), 408–427.

    Google Scholar 

  • Collet, E., & Ahad, A. (2017). EU migration partnership: A work in progress. Brussels: Migration Policy Institute Europe.

    Google Scholar 

  • Concord. (2018). Partnership or conditionality? Monitoring the migration compacts and EU Trust Fund for Africa.

    Google Scholar 

  • Council of the European Union. (2008). Cape Verde mobility partnership with the European Union. Brussels: European Commission.

    Google Scholar 

  • Council of the European Union. (2016, December). Second progress report: First deliverables on the partnership framework with third countries under the European agenda on migration. Brussels: European Union.

    Google Scholar 

  • Council of the European Union. (2017, September). Fifth progress report on the partnership framework with third countries under the European agenda on migration. Brussels: European Commission.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crawley, H., & Blitz, B. K. (2019). Common agenda or Europe’s agenda? International protection, human rights and migration from the Horn of Africa. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 45(12), 2258–2274.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cross, H. (2009). Migration, mobility and borders: The EU and West African migrant communities. Leeds African Studies Bulletin, 71, 46–51.

    Google Scholar 

  • de Haas, H. (2008). Migration and development: A theoretical perspective. International Migration Institute, No. 61.

    Google Scholar 

  • den Hertog, L. (2016). Money talks: Mapping the funding for EU external migration policy. CEPS Paper in Liberty and Security in Europe, No. 58. Brussels: CEPS.

    Google Scholar 

  • EU, I. (2017). Rabat process: Euro African dialogue on migration and development. Retrieved March 1, 2019, from https://www.rabat-process.org/en/about/rabat-process

  • European Commission. (2015). Valleta summit on migration action plan. Brussels: European Commission.

    Google Scholar 

  • European Commission. (2016a). Communication from the Commission on establishing a new partnership framework with third countries under the European agenda on migration. Brussels: European Commission.

    Google Scholar 

  • European Commission. (2016b). Migration partnership. Retrieved March 1, 2019, from https://eeas.europa.eu/headquarters/headquarters-homepage_en/408/Migration%20partnership

  • European Council. (2018). Valletta Summit on migration, 11–12 November 2015. Accessed May 8, 2018 from http://www.consilium.europa.eu/en/meetings/international-summit/2015/11/11-12/

  • European Commission. (2019). Global approach to migration and mobility. Retrieved March 1, 2019, from https://ec.europa.eu/home-affairs/what-we-do/policies/international-affairs/global-approach-to-migration_en

  • Flahaux, M.-L., & De Haas, H. (2016). African migration: Trends, patterns, drivers. Comparative Migration Studies, 4(1), 1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gabrielli, L. (2016, Winter). Multilevel inter-regional governance of mobility between Africa and Europe: Towards a deeper and broader externalisation. GRITIM-UPF Working Paper Series, No. 30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Howden, D., & Zandonini, G. (2018). Niger: Europe’s migration laboratory. Refugees Deeply.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keita, S. (2016). Note on the strategies to engage the Malian diaspora. Thematic meeting on diaspora engagement strategies. Bamako: Rabat Process.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kipp, D. (2018). From exception to the rule—The EU Trust Fund for Africa. SWP Research Paper, No. 130. Berlin: Stiftung Wissenschaft und Politik.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kirwin, M., & Anderson, J. (2018). Identifying the factors driving West African migration. OECD West African Papers. Paris: OECD.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koenig, N. (2017, April 6). The EU’s external migration policy: Towards win-win-win partnerships. Policy Paper. Berlin: Jacques Delors Institut Berlin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Landau, L. B. (2019). A chronotope of containment development: Europe’s migrant crisis and Africa’s reterritorialisation. Antipode, 51(1), 169–186.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lavenex, S. (2006). Shifting up and out: The foreign policy of European immigration control. West European Politics, 29(2), 329–350.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lavenex, S., & Uçarer, E. M. (2002). Migration and the externalities of European integration. Lanham: Lexington Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lavenex, S., et al. (2016). Regional migration governance. In T. A. Börzel & T. Risse (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of comparative regionalism. London: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lebovich, A. (2018, September). Halting ambition: EU migration and security policy in the Sahel. London: European Council on Foreign Relations.

    Google Scholar 

  • Natter, K. (2018). Rethinking immigration policy theory beyond ‘Western liberal democracies’. Comparative Migration Studies, 6(1), 4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nossiter, A. (2018, February 25). At French outpost in African migrant hub, asylum for a select few. New York: The New York Times.

    Google Scholar 

  • ORTM. (2019). Communique du conseil des ministres du jeudi 28 fevrier 2019. ORTM Mali. Bamako: ORTM.

    Google Scholar 

  • Republique du Niger. (2015). Loi No 2015-36. Niamey: Republique du Niger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reslow, N. (2012). EU migration cooperation with Cape Verde. Maastricht: Maastricht Graduate School of Governance.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reslow, N. (2017a). “Not everything that counts can be counted”: Assessing ‘success’ of EU external migration policy. International Migration, 55(6), 156–169.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reslow, N. (2017b). Old wine in new wineskins? The EU’s migration partnership framework. JuWissBlog 2019.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reslow, N., & Vink, M. (2015). Three level games in EU external migration policy: Negotiating mobility partnerships in West Africa. Journal of Common Market Studies, 53(4), 857–874.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reuveny, R. (2007). Climate change-induced migration and violent conflict. Political Geography, 26, 656–673.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sieff, K., & Stanley-Becker, I. (2017). Europe is trying to cut the flow of migrants from Africa. It won’t be easy. Washington: The Washington Post.

    Google Scholar 

  • Song, S. (2018). Political theories of migration. Annual Review of Political Science, 21, 385–402.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Souleyman, C. (2019). La France négocie avec le Mali le retour des migrants irréguliers. Bamako: Info Mali.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tinti, P. (2017). The EU’s hollow success over migrant smuggling in Niger. Refugees Deeply.

    Google Scholar 

  • Usro, G. (2017). Migration profile Mali. Structural migration profile and flash migration profile (August–October 2016). Joint Research Centre. E. J. R. S. Hub. Ispra: EU JRC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Criekinge, T. (2008). The EU-Africa migration partnership: An assessment of EU constraints and African leverage—A case study of Ghana and Senegal. Paper presented at the EUSA Conference 22–25 April 2008, Los Angeles, CA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Criekinge, T. (2010). The EU-Africa migration partnership: A case study of the EU’s migration dialogue with Ghana and Senegal. Florence: EUI Migration Working Group.

    Google Scholar 

  • van Dillen, B. (2016, June). The EU agenda behind the migration partnership framework. Caritas.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wagner, F. (2018). E.U. deportations risk further destabilizing Mali. Refugees Deeply, News Deeply.

    Google Scholar 

  • World Bank. (2018). Personal remittances received as % of GDP. Retrieved March 1, 2019, from https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/bx.trf.pwkr.dt.gd.zs

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Amanda Bisong .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Bisong, A. (2020). Migration Partnership Framework and the Externalization of European Union’s (EU) Migration Policy in West Africa: The Case of Mali and Niger. In: Rayp, G., Ruyssen, I., Marchand, K. (eds) Regional Integration and Migration Governance in the Global South. United Nations University Series on Regionalism, vol 20. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-43942-2_10

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics