Abstract
Nowadays, from the military perspective, development of autonomous weapon systems (AWS) represents opportunity especially for States to enhance their military power and change their status in the system of international relations probably with the presumptions of the new Revolution in Military Affairs (RMA). Not-only the most powerful States such as the U.S., People’s Republic of China, or Russian Federation, but practically all State and non-State actors closely scrutinize this process and its implication for the future security environment. On the other hand, implementation of the AWS technologies poses many challenges (for example independence of AWS on the human control and decision-making processes), which are connected with almost completely new nature of these weapon systems and their influence on the relations across the humankind and its general character. The aim of this paper is to analyse one possible set of such challenges focusing on legal and legitimate (ethical) aspects of the AWS and their compliance with the public international law. Analyses will focus on norms of international humanitarian law and their connections with ethical perspective. This paper will provide necessary understanding of the AWS’ (non)conformity with the international norms based on the international customs and treaties relevant (and binding) for the NATO members State and their efforts to implement such technologies.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Fučík, J., Frank, L., Stojar, R.: Autonomous systems and Chinese strategic thinking. In: Mazal, J. (ed.) MESAS 2018. LNCS, vol. 11472, pp. 588–598. Springer, Cham (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-14984-0_44
Hodický, J.: Modelling and simulation in the autonomous systems’ domain – current status and way ahead. In: Hodický, J. (ed.) MESAS 2015. LNCS, vol. 9055, pp. 17–23. Springer, Cham (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-22383-4_2
Scharre, P.: Autonomy, “Killer Robots,” and Human Control in the Use of Force – Part I. Just Security, vol. 7, no. 1 (2014). https://www.justsecurity.org/12708/autonomy-killer-robots-human-control-force-part/
Hodicky, J., Prochazka, D.: Challenges in the implementation of autonomous systems into the battlefield. In: ICMT 2017 - 6th International Conference on Military Technologies, Brno, pp. 743–744. IEEE (2017). https://doi.org/10.1109/miltechs.2017.7988855
Hodický, J.: Použití experimentu ve vojenství (Experiment in the Military Domain). Vojenské rozhledy 27(2), 19–32 (2018). https://doi.org/10.3849/2336-2995.27.2018.02.19-32
Drozd, J.: Experiment of the tactical decision support system within company defensive operation. In: Mazal, J. (ed.) MESAS 2018. LNCS, vol. 11472, pp. 544–552. Springer, Cham (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-14984-0_40
Knapp, V.: Teorie práva (Law Theory), p. 212. C.H.Beck, Prague (2012)
von Liszt, F.: The rationale for the nullum crimen principle. J. Int. Crim. Justice 5(4), 1009–1013 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1093/jicj/mqm054
Declaration concerning the Prohibition of the Use of Bullets which can Easily Expand or Change their Form inside the Human Body such as Bullets with a Hard Covering which does not Completely Cover the Core, or containing Indentations
Hague Convention IV, Art. 23
Additional Protocol to Geneva Conventions I, Art. 51, para. 5(b)
Hague Convention IV, art. 23(e) and Additional Protocol to Geneva Conventions I, Art. 35, para. 2
Additional Protocol to Geneva Conventions I, Art. 36
Especially in terms of so called social contract - for further details see Locke, J.: Two Treatises of Government: In the Former, the False Principles, and Foundation of Sir Robert Filmer, and His Followers, are Detected and Overthrown. The Latter is an Essay Concerning the True Original, Extent, and End of Civil Government. Awnsham Churchill, London (1689)
Chiuyuki, A.: Legitimacy and the Use of Armed Forces, Stability Missions in the Post-Cold War Era. Routledge, New York (2011)
Kolín, V.: The legitimacy of humanitarian intervention: a moral perspective. Obrana a Strategie 7(1), 5–28 (2007)
SIPRI Yearbook 2009: The Legitimacy of Peace Operations. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2009). https://www.sipri.org/sites/default/files/SIPRIYB0903.pdf
Wareham, M.: Banning Killer Robots in 2017. The Cipher Brief (2017). https://www.thecipherbrief.com/article/tech/banning-killer-robots-2017-1092
Toscano, C.P.: Friend of humans: an argument for developing autonomous weapons systems. J. Nat. Secur. Law Policy 8(1), 207 (2015)
Stojar, R.: Bezpilotní prostředky a problematika jejich nasazení v soudobých konfliktech (the unmanned aerial vehicles and issues connected with their use in contemporary conflicts). Obrana a Strategie 16(2), 5–18 (2016). https://doi.org/10.3849/1802-7199.16.2016.02.005-018
Stojar, R., Frank, L.: Changes in armed forces and their significance for the regular armed forces. In: The 18th International Conference. The Knowledge-Based Organization: Conference Proceedings 1 - Management and Military Sciences, vol. 1, pp. 142–145 (2012)
Stodola, P., Kozůbek, J., Drozd, J.: Using unmanned aerial systems in military operations for autonomous reconnaissance. In: Mazal, J. (ed.) MESAS 2018. LNCS, vol. 11472, pp. 514–529. Springer, Cham (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-14984-0_38
ICRC: Autonomous Weapon Systems: Implications of Increasing Autonomy in the Critical Functions of Weapons. Versoix (2016)
ICRC: A Guide to the Legal Review of New Weapons, Means and Methods of Warfare: Measures to Implement Article 36 of Additional Protocol I of 1977. Geneva (2006). www.icrc.org/eng/assets/files/other/icrc_002_0902.pdf
Wagner, M.: The dehumanization of international humanitarian law: legal, ethical, and political implications of autonomous weapon systems. Vanderbilt J. Transnational Law 47(15–1), 1371–1424 (2014)
Acknowledgements
The work presented in this paper has been supported by the Ministry of Defence of the Czech Republic (Research Project “STRATAL” No. 907930101023).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Fučík, J., Frank, L., Stojar, R. (2020). Legality and Legitimacy of the Autonomous Weapon Systems. In: Mazal, J., Fagiolini, A., Vasik, P. (eds) Modelling and Simulation for Autonomous Systems. MESAS 2019. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 11995. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-43890-6_33
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-43890-6_33
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-43889-0
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-43890-6
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)