Skip to main content

Introduction—Threats: An Indispensable Debate

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Societies Under Threat

Part of the book series: Frontiers in Sociology and Social Research ((FSSR,volume 3))

Abstract

Certain social phenomena take on particular importance in certain historical periods or at certain moments in social life. Even if they have always existed, due to specific socially sensitive conjunctures they are suddenly afforded special attention by the public, as well as in political and scientific circles.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Beck, U. (1992). Risk society: Towards a new modernity. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boudia, S., & Demortain, D. (2014). La production d’un instrument générique de gouvernement. Le «livre rouge» de l’analyse des risques. Gouvernement et action publique, 3(3), 33–53.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bourg, D., Joly, P. B., & Kaufman, A. (2013). Du risque à la menace. Penser la catastrophe. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Dupuy, J. P. (2002). Pour un catastrophisme éclairé. Paris: Seuil.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eber, N. (2006). Le dilemme du prisonnier. Paris: La Découverte.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Festinger, L. (1957). A theory of cognitive dissonance. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Festinger, L., Riecken, H. W., & Schachter, S. (1956). When prophecy fails: A social and psychological study of a modern group that predicted the destruction of the world. Minnesota: University of Minnesota Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Frodeman, R., Klein, J., & Mitcham, C. (Eds.). (2010). The Oxford handbook of interdisciplinarity. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gibbons, M., et al. (1994). The new production of knowledge. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1984). Choices, values, and frames. American Psychologist,39, 341–350.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tucker, A. W. (1950). A two-person dilemma. mimeo, Stanford University. In Rasmunsen E. (Ed.), (2001). Readings in Games and Information (pp. 7–8) Malden: Blackwell Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiervorka, M. (2007). Les sciences sociales en mutation. In M. Wievorka, A. Debarle, & J. Ohana (Eds.), Les sciences humaines en mutation. Paris: Editions Sciences Humaines.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Denise Jodelet .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Jodelet, D., Vala, J., Drozda-Senkowska, E. (2020). Introduction—Threats: An Indispensable Debate. In: Jodelet, D., Vala, J., Drozda-Senkowska, E. (eds) Societies Under Threat. Frontiers in Sociology and Social Research, vol 3. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-39315-1_1

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics