Abstract
Learning anatomy traditionally has depended on traditional techniques like human cadaveric dissection and the use of textbooks. As technology advances at an ever-rapid speed, there are revolutionary ways to learn anatomy. A number of technologies, techniques and methodologies are utilised in anatomical education, but ones specifically receiving a lot of interest and traction is that of augmented reality and virtual reality. Although there has been a surge in interest in the use of these technologies, the literature is sparse in terms of its evaluation as to the effectiveness of such tools. Therefore, the purpose of this study is to examine in greater detail the literature specifically to see what the best practice in this field could be. By undertaking a systematic review using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines, we searched for articles in both Web of Science and PubMed. Using the terms “augmented reality and teaching anatomy” yielded 88 articles. We then used “virtual reality and teaching anatomy” which resulted in 200 articles. We examined these articles, including that on augmented reality and virtual reality used to teach anatomy to undergraduate and postgraduate students, residents, dentistry, nursing and veterinary students. Articles were excluded if they were systematic reviews, literature reviews, review articles, news articles, articles not written in English and any literature that presented how a virtual model was created without the evidence of students testing it. The inclusion and exclusion criteria for virtual reality were the same as augmented reality. In addition, we examined the articles to identify if they contained data which was quantitative, qualitative or both. The articles were further separated into those which were pro, neutral or against for the use of these digital technologies. Of the 288 articles, duplicate articles totalling 67 were removed and 134 articles were excluded according to our exclusion criteria. Of the 31 articles related to augmented reality, 30 were pro, one neutral and no articles against the use of this technology. Fifty-six articles related to virtual reality were categorised resulted in 45 pro, eight neutral and three against the use of this technology. Overall, the results indicate most articles identified related to both virtual and augmented reality were for the use of those technologies, than neutral or against. This systemic review highlights the recent advances of both augmented reality and virtual reality to implementing the technology into the anatomy course.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Aebersold M, Voepel-Lewis T, Cherara L, Weber M, Khouri C, Levine R, Tait A (2018) Interactive anatomy-augmented virtual simulation training. Clin Simul Nurs 15:34–41
Arth C, Gruber L, Grasset R, Langlotz T, Mulloni A, Schmalstieg D, Wagner D (2015) The history of mobile augmented reality: developments in mobile AR over the last almost 50 years. [ebook] Austria: Inst. for Computer Graphics and Vision, pp 3–8. Available at: https://arxiv.org/pdf/1505.01319.pdf . Accessed 24 Dec 2018
Astur RS, Tropp J, Sava S, Constable RT, Markus EJ (2004) Sex differences and correlations in a virtual Morris water task, a virtual radial arm maze, and mental rotation. Behav Brain Res 151(1–2):103–115
Azer S, Azer S (2016) 3D anatomy models and impact on learning: a review of the quality of the literature. Health Prof Educ 2(2):80–98
Azuma (1997) A survey of augmented reality. Presence Teleop Virt 6:355–385
Bacca J, Baldiris S, Fabregat R, Graf S, Kinshuk (2014) Augmented reality trends in education: a systematic review of research and applications. Educ Technol Soc 17(4):133–149
Bork F, Barmaki R, Eck U, Fallavolita P, Fuerst B, Navab N (2017a) Exploring non-reversing magic mirrors for screen-based augmented reality systems. 2017 IEEE Virtual Reality (VR), pp 373–374
Bork F, Barmaki R, Eck U, Yu K, Sandor C, Navab N (2017b) Empirical Study of Non-Reversing Magic Mirrors for Augmented Reality Anatomy Learning. 2017 IEEE International Symposium on Mixed and Augmented Reality (ISMAR), pp 169–176
Breimer G, Haji F, Bodani V, Cunningham M, Lopez-Rios A, Okrainec A, Drake J (2016) Simulation-based education for endoscopic third ventriculostomy. Oper Neurosurg 13(1):89–95
Camp C, Krych A, Stuart M, Regnier T, Mills K, Turner N (2016) Improving resident performance in knee arthroscopy. J Bone Joint Surg 98(3):220–225
Davis M, Can D, Pindrik J, Rocque B, Johnston J (2016) Virtual interactive presence in global surgical education: international collaboration through augmented reality. World Neurosurg 86:103–111
Dissabandara L, Nirthanan S, Khoo T, Tedman R (2015) Role of cadaveric dissections in modern medical curricula: a study on student perceptions. Anat Cell Biol 48(3):205
Dünser A, Steinbügl K, Kaufmann H, Glück J (2006) Virtual and augmented reality as spatial ability training tools. In: Christchurch, New Zealand. [online] New York, USA: CHINZ ‘06 Proceedings of the 7th ACM SIGCHI New Zealand chapter’s international conference on Computer-human interaction: design centered HCI, pp 125–132. Available at: http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.71.4510&rep=rep1&type=pdf . Accessed 1 Jan 2019
Ellington D, Shum P, Dennis E, Willis H, Szychowski J, Richter H (2018) Female pelvic floor immersive simulation: a randomized trial to test the effectiveness of a virtual reality anatomical model on resident knowledge of female pelvic anatomy. J Minim Invasive Gynecol:1–58
Estai M, Bunt S (2016) Best teaching practices in anatomy education: a critical review. Ann Anat Anatomischer Anzeiger 208:151–157
Fang T, Wang P, Liu C, Su M, Yeh S (2014) Evaluation of a haptics-based virtual reality temporal bone simulator for anatomy and surgery training. Comput Methods Prog Biomed 113(2):674–681
Ferrer-Torregrosa J, Torralba J, Jimenez M, García S, Barcia J (2014) ARBOOK: development and assessment of a tool based on augmented reality for anatomy. J Sci Educ Technol 24(1):119–124
Ferrer-Torregrosa J, Jiménez-Rodríguez M, Torralba-Estelles J, Garzón-Farinós F, Pérez-Bermejo M, Fernández-Ehrling N (2016) Distance learning ects and flipped classroom in the anatomy learning: comparative study of the use of augmented reality, video and notes. BMC Med Educ 16(1)
Gopal M, Skobodzinski A, Sterbling H, Rao S, LaChapelle C, Suzuki K, Litle V (2018) Bronchoscopy simulation training as a tool in medical school education. Ann Thorac Surg 106(1):280–286
Granger NA (2004) Dissection laboratory is vital to medical gross anatomy education. Anat Rec (Part B: New Anat) 281:6–8
Hamacher A, Whangbo T, Kim S, Chung K (2018) Virtual reality and simulation for progressive treatments in urology. Int Neurourol J 22(3):151–160
Huang Z, Song W, Zhang Y, Zhang Q, Zhou D, Zhou X, He Y (2018) Three-dimensional printing model improves morphological understanding in acetabular fracture learning: a multicenter, randomized, controlled study. PLoS One 13(1):e0191328
Jang S, Vitale J, Jyung R, Black J (2017) Direct manipulation is better than passive viewing for learning anatomy in a three-dimensional virtual reality environment. Comput Educ 106:150–165
Keri Z, Sydor D, Ungi T, Holden M, McGraw R, Mousavi P, Borschneck D, Fichtinger G, Jaeger M (2015) Computerized training system for ultrasound-guided lumbar puncture on abnormal spine models: a randomized controlled trial. Can J Anesth/J Canadien d’anesthésie 62(7):777–784
Küçük S, Kapakin S, Göktaş Y (2016) Learning anatomy via mobile augmented reality: effects on achievement and cognitive load. Anat Sci Educ 9(5):411–421
Kugelmann D, Stratmann L, Nühlen N, Bork F, Hoffmann S, Samarbarksh G, Pferschy A, von der Heide A, Eimannsberger A, Fallavollita P, Navab N, Waschke J (2018) An augmented reality magic mirror as additive teaching device for gross anatomy. Ann Anat Anatomischer Anzeiger 215:71–77
Langlois J, Wells G, Lecourtois M, Bergeron G, Yetisir E, Martin M (2014) Spatial abilities of medical graduates and choice of residency programs. Anat Sci Educ 8(2):111–119
Larson P, Rizzo AA, Buckwalter JG, Van Rooyen A, Kratz K, Neumann U, Kesselman C, Thiebaux M, Van Der Zaag C (1999) Gender issues in the use of virtual environments. CyberPsychol Behav 2(2):113–123
Latif R, Bautista A, Duan X, Neamtu A, Wu D, Wadhwa A, Akça O (2015) Teaching basic fiberoptic intubation skills in a simulator: initial learning and skills decay. J Anesth 30(1):12–19
Lee S, Lee J, Lee A, Park N, Lee S, Song S, Seo A, Lee H, Kim J, Eom K (2013) Augmented reality intravenous injection simulator based 3D medical imaging for veterinary medicine. Vet J 196(2):197–202
Lochner L, Wieser H, Waldboth S, Mischo-Kelling M (2016) Combining traditional anatomy lectures with e-learning activities: how do students perceive their learning experience? Int J Med Educ 7:69–74
Locketz G, Lui J, Chan S, Salisbury K, Dort J, Youngblood P, Blevins N (2017) Anatomy-specific virtual reality simulation in temporal bone dissection: perceived utility and impact on surgeon confidence. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 156(6):1142–1149
Ma M, Fallavollita P, Seelbach I, Von Der Heide A, Euler E, Waschke J, Navab N (2015) Personalized augmented reality for anatomy education. Clin Anat 29(4):446–453
Madrigal E, Prajapati S, Hernandez-Prera J (2016) Introducing a virtual reality experience in anatomic pathology education. Am J Clin Pathol 146(4):462–468
Mandal S (2013) Brief introduction of virtual reality & its challenges. [pdf]: Int J Sci Eng Res. Available at: https://www.ijser.org/researchpaper/Brief-Introduction-of-Virtual-Reality-its-Challenges.pdf . Accessed 24 Dec 2018
Manrique-Juan C, Grostieta-Dominguez Z, Rojas-Ruiz R, Alencastre-Miranda M, Muñoz-Gómez L, Silva-Muñoz C (2017) A portable augmented-reality anatomy learning system using a depth camera in real time. Am Biol Teach 79(3):176–183
Maresky H, Oikonomou A, Ali I, Ditkofsky N, Pakkal M, Ballyk B (2018) Virtual reality and cardiac anatomy: exploring immersive three-dimensional cardiac imaging, a pilot study in undergraduate medical anatomy education. Clin Anat
Memon I (2018) Cadaver dissection is obsolete in medical training! A misinterpreted notion. Med Princ Pract 27(3):201–210
Moro C, Štromberga Z, Raikos A, Stirling A (2017) The effectiveness of virtual and augmented reality in health sciences and medical anatomy. Anat Sci Educ 10(6):549–559
Peterson D, Mlynarczyk G (2016) Analysis of traditional versus three-dimensional augmented curriculum on anatomical learning outcome measures. Anat Sci Educ 9(6):529–536
Rahm S, Wieser K, Bauer D, Waibel F, Meyer D, Gerber C, Fucentese S (2018) Efficacy of standardized training on a virtual reality simulator to advance knee and shoulder arthroscopic motor skills. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 19(1)
Rebenitsch L, Owen C (2016) Review on cybersickness in applications and visual displays. Virtual Reality 20:101–125
Siff L, Mehta N (2018) An interactive holographic curriculum for Urogynecologic surgery. Obstet Gynecol 132:27S–32S
Srivastava K, Chaudhury S, Das R (2014) Virtual reality applications in mental health: challenges and perspectives. Ind Psychiatry J 23(2):83
Stepan K, Zeiger J, Hanchuk S, Del Signore A, Shrivastava R, Govindaraj S, Iloreta A (2017) Immersive virtual reality as a teaching tool for neuroanatomy. Int Forum Allergy Rhinol 7(10):1006–1013
Sural I (2018) Augmented reality experience: initial perceptions of higher education students. Int J Instr 11(4):565–576
Sweller J (1988) Cognitive load during problem solving: effects on learning. Cogn Sci 12(2):257–285
Thomas R, William John N, Delieu J (2010) Augmented reality for anatomical education. J Vis Commun Med 33(1):6–15
Van Nuland S, Rogers K (2017) The skeletons in our closet: E-learning tools and what happens when one side does not fit all. Anat Sci Educ 10(6):570–588
Von Staden H (1992) The discovery of the body: human dissection in its cultural contexts in ancient Greece. Yale J Bio Med 65:223–241
Wijewickrema S, Piromchai P, Zhou Y, Ioannou I, Bailey J, Kennedy G, O’Leary S (2015) Developing effective automated feedback in temporal bone surgery simulation. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 152(6):1082–1088
Yudkowsky R, Luciano C, Banerjee P, Schwartz A, Alaraj A, Lemole G, Charbel F, Smith K, Rizzi S, Byrne R, Bendok B, Frim D (2013) Practice on an augmented reality/haptic simulator and library of virtual brains improves residents’ ability to perform a Ventriculostomy. Simul Healthcare: J Soc Simul Healthcare 8(1):25–31
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Uruthiralingam, U., Rea, P.M. (2020). Augmented and Virtual Reality in Anatomical Education – A Systematic Review. In: Rea, P. (eds) Biomedical Visualisation . Advances in Experimental Medicine and Biology, vol 1235. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-37639-0_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-37639-0_5
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-37638-3
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-37639-0
eBook Packages: Biomedical and Life SciencesBiomedical and Life Sciences (R0)