Skip to main content

Scientometrics for Success and Influence in the Microsoft Academic Graph

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Complex Networks and Their Applications VIII (COMPLEX NETWORKS 2019)

Abstract

Measuring and evaluating an author’s impact has been a withstanding challenge in the academic world with profound effects on society. Apart from its practical usage for academic evaluation, it enhances transparency and reinforces scientific excellence. In this demo paper we present our efforts to address this problem capitalizing on the field-based citations and the author oriented citation network extracted from the Microsoft Academic Graph, to our knowledge the largest network of its kind. We separate impact into two dimensions: success and influence over the network, and provide two novel scientometrics to quantify some of their aspects: (i) the distribution of the h-index for specific scientific fields and a search engine to visualize an authors’ position in it as well as the top percentile she belongs to, (ii) recomputing our previously introduced D-core influence metric on this huge network and presenting authority/integration of the authors in the form of D-core frontiers. In addition we present interesting insights on the most dense scientific domains and the most influential authors. We believe the proposed analytics highlight under-examined aspects in the area of scientific evaluation and pave the way for more involved scientometrics.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    http://graphdegeneracy.org/scientometrics/.

  2. 2.

    https://bit.ly/2mboMBY.

  3. 3.

    Created at 9/2/2019.

  4. 4.

    https://aminer.org/.

  5. 5.

    All the queries were performed in PySpark in a cluster of 32 nodes, 16 GB ram each, Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2407 v2 @ 2.40 GHz.

References

  1. The number that’s devouring science. https://www.chronicle.com/article/the-number-thats-devouring/26481. Accessed 19 May 2019

  2. Bornmann, L., Daniel, H.D.: What do we know about the h index? J. Am. Soc. Inform. Sci. Technol. 58(9), 1381–1385 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Chompalov, I., Genuth, J., Shrum, W.: The organization of scientific collaborations. Res. Policy 31(5), 749–767 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Giatsidis, C., Nikolentzos, G., Zhang, C., Tang, J., Vazirgiannis, M.: Rooted citation graphs density metrics for research papers influence evaluation. J. Informetr. 13(2), 757–768 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Giatsidis, C., Thilikos, D.M., Vazirgiannis, M.: D-cores: measuring collaboration of directed graphs based on degeneracy. Knowl. Inf. Syst. 35(2), 311–343 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Hirsch, J.E.: An index to quantify an individual’s scientific research output. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 102(46), 16569–16572 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Malliaros, F., Giatsidis, C., Papadopoulos, A., Vazirgiannis, M.: The core decomposition of networks: theory, algorithms and applications (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Massucci, F.A., Docampo, D.: Measuring the academic reputation through citation networks via pagerank. J. Informetr. 13(1), 185–201 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Mohammed, B.: Scientometrics 2.0: toward new metrics of scholarly impact on the social web. First Monday 15(7) (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Panagopoulos, G., Tsatsaronis, G., Varlamis, I.: Detecting rising stars in dynamic collaborative networks. J. Informetr. 11(1), 198–222 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Sarigöl, E., Pfitzner, R., Scholtes, I., Garas, A., Schweitzer, F.: Predicting scientific success based on coauthorship networks. EPJ Data Sci. 3(1), 9 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Shen, Z., Ma, H., Wang, K.: A web-scale system for scientific knowledge exploration. arXiv preprint arXiv:1805.12216 (2018)

  13. Sinha, A., Shen, Z., Song, Y., Ma, H., Eide, D., Hsu, B.j.P., Wang, K.: An overview of Microsoft Academic Service (MAS) and applications. In: International Conference on World Wide Web (The WebConf) (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Tang, J., Zhang, J., Yao, L., Li, J., Zhang, L., Su, Z.: ArnetMiner: extraction and mining of academic social networks. In: Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining (KDD), pp. 990–998 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Valenzuela, M., Ha, V., Etzioni, O.: Identifying meaningful citations. In: Workshops at the Twenty-Ninth AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Waaijer, C.J., Teelken, C., Wouters, P.F., van der Weijden, I.C.: Competition in science: links between publication pressure, grant pressure and the academic job market. High. Educ. Policy 31(2), 225–243 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Waltman, L., Van Eck, N.J.: The inconsistency of the h-index. J. Am. Soc. Inform. Sci. Technol. 63(2), 406–415 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Zhang, Y., Zhang, F., Yao, P., Tang, J.: Name disambiguation in Aminer: clustering, maintenance, and human in the loop. In: Knowledge Discovery & Data Mining (KDD), pp. 1002–1011 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Zitt, M., Small, H.: Modifying the journal impact factor by fractional citation weighting: the audience factor. J. Am. Soc. Inform. Sci. Technol. 59(11), 1856–1860 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to George Panagopoulos .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Panagopoulos, G., Xypolopoulos, C., Skianis, K., Giatsidis, C., Tang, J., Vazirgiannis, M. (2020). Scientometrics for Success and Influence in the Microsoft Academic Graph. In: Cherifi, H., Gaito, S., Mendes, J., Moro, E., Rocha, L. (eds) Complex Networks and Their Applications VIII. COMPLEX NETWORKS 2019. Studies in Computational Intelligence, vol 882. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-36683-4_80

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics