Abstract
Context: Organizations are increasingly challenged by dynamic and technical market environments. Traditional product roadmapping practices such as detailed and fixed long-term planning typically fail in such environments. Therefore, companies are actively seeking ways to improve their product roadmapping approach. Goal: This paper aims at identifying problems and challenges with respect to product roadmapping. In addition, it aims at understanding how companies succeed in improving their roadmapping practices in their respective company contexts. The study focuses on mid-sized and large companies developing software-intensive products in dynamic and technical market environments. Method: We conducted semi-structured expert interviews with 15 experts from 13 German companies and conducted a thematic data analysis. Results: The analysis showed that a significant number of companies is still struggling with traditional feature-based product-roadmapping and opinion-based prioritization of features. The most promising areas for improvement are stating the outcomes a company is trying to achieve and making them part of the roadmap, sharing or co-developing the roadmap with stakeholders, and the establishing discovery activities.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Kostoff, R.N., Schaller, R.: Science and technology roadmaps. IEEE Trans. Eng. Manag. 48(2), 132–143 (2001)
Kameoka, A., Kuwahara, T., Li, M.: Integrated strategy development: an integrated roadmapping approach. In: PICMET 2003: Portland International Conference on Management of Engineering and Technology Management for Reshaping the World, Portland, OR, USA, pp. 370–379 (2003)
Lombardo, C.T., McCarthy, B., Ryan, E., Conners, M.: Product Roadmaps Relaunched - How to Set Direction While Embracing Uncertainty. O’Reilly Media Inc., Gravenstein Highway North, Sebastopol (2017)
Münch J., Trieflinger S., Lang, D.: Product roadmap – from vision to reality: a systematic literature review. In: ICE/IEEE ITMC: International Conference on Engineering, Technology and Innovation, Valbonne, France (2019)
Münch J., Trieflinger S., Lang, D.: Why feature based roadmaps fail in rapidly changing markets: a qualitative survey. In: International workshop on Software-Intensive Business: Start-Ups, Ecosystems and Platforms, Espoo, Finland, pp. 202–218 (2018)
Euiyoung, K., Beckman, S.L., Agogino, A.: Design roadmapping in an uncertain world: implementing a customer-experience-focused strategy. Calif. Manag. Rev. 61(1), 43–70 (2018)
Phaal, R., Farrukh, C.J.P., David, R.: Technology roadmapping—A planning framework for evolution and revolution. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change 71(1–2), 5–26 (2004)
Groenveld, P.: Roadmapping integrates business and technology. Res.-Technol. Manag. 40(5), 48–55 (1997)
Lehtola, L., Kauppinen, M., Kujala, S.: Linking the business view to requirements engineering: long-term product planning by roadmapping. In: 13th IEEE International Conference on Requirements Engineering, RE 2005, Paris, France, pp. 439–443 (2005)
DeGregorio, G.: Technology management via a set of dynamically linked roadmaps. In: Proceedings of the 2000 IEEE Engineering Management Society, Albuquerque, NM, USA, pp. 184–190 (2000)
Komssi, M., Kauppinen M., Töhönen H., Lehtola L., Davis, A.M.: Integrating analysis of customers processes into roadmapping: the value-creation perspective. In: 2011 IEEE 19th International Requirements Engineering Conference, Trento, Italy, pp. 57–66 (2011)
Pora, U., Thawesaengskulthai, N.: Data-driven roadmapping turning challenges into opportunities. In: 2018 Portland International Conference on Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), Honolulu, HI, USA, pp. 1–11 (2018)
Fink, A.: Analysis on Qualitative Surveys. In: Fink, A. (ed.) The Survey Handbook, pp. 61–78. SAGE Publications, Thousand Oaks (2003)
Edwards, R., Holland, J.: What is Qualitative Interviewing?. Bloomsbury, London, New York (2013)
Bryman, A., Bell, E.: Business Research Methods, 4th edn. Oxford University Press, New York (2015)
Published on Figshare. https://figshare.com/s/2f872ac9997d6860640c. Accessed 14 June 2019
Yin, R.K.: Case Study Research: Design and Methods, 5th edn. SAGE Publications Inc., London (2014)
Münch, J., Trieflinger, S., Lang D.: DEEP: the product roadmap maturity model. In: Submitted to: International Workshop on Software-Intensive Business: Start-Ups, Ecosystems and Platforms, Tallinn, Estonia (2019)
Acknowledgements
We wish to thank the participants in the study for their time and contributions.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding authors
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Münch, J., Trieflinger, S., Lang, D. (2019). What’s Hot in Product Roadmapping? Key Practices and Success Factors. In: Franch, X., Männistö, T., Martínez-Fernández, S. (eds) Product-Focused Software Process Improvement. PROFES 2019. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 11915. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-35333-9_29
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-35333-9_29
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-35332-2
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-35333-9
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)