Abstract
Authentic engagement of people as research participants in a meaningful, collaborative, and mutually beneficial way involves investment in the development of a relationship between the researcher and the person who is participating in the research process. The development of an authentic research partnership is rooted in three components. First is the development of a relationship of mutual respect by both the researcher and the research participant for each other. Through sharing, listening, dialogue, and active communication, both the researcher and the research participant may value the experiences of the other to form understanding of their similarities and uniqueness. Second is the development of a collaborative relationship “rooted in trust, reciprocity, and diversity, where shared learning is valued” (Murray Alzheimer Research and Education Program (MAREP), 2019). Throughout the relationship, both the researcher and the research participant should have opportunities to learn, grow, and receive positive benefits. Third is viewing the relationship as more than for the sole purpose of participating in a single research project.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Castleden, H., Sloan Morgan, V., & Lamb, C. (2012). “I spent the first year drinking tea”: Exploring Canadian university researchers’ perspectives on the ethical and institutional tensions of community-based participatory research involving indigenous peoples. The Canadian Geographer, 56(2), 160–179.
First Nations Information Governance Centre (FNIGC). (2019). The First Nations Principles of OCAP®. http://fnigc.ca/ocap.html.
Fung, K., Lo, H. T., Srivastava, R., & Andermann, L. (2012). Organizational cultural competence consultation to a mental health institution. Transcultural Psychiatry, 49(2), 165–184.
Godoy, L., & Carter, A. S. (2013). Identifying and addressing mental health risks and problems in primary care pediatric settings: A model to promote developmental and cultural competence. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 83(1), 73–88.
Gregory, H., Van Orden, O., Jordan, L., Portnoy, G. A., Welsh, E., Betkowski, J., … DiClemente, C. C. (2012). New directions in capacity building: Incorporating cultural competence into the interactive systems framework. American Journal of Community Psychology, 50(3–4), 321–333.
Kirmayer, L. J. (2012). Cultural competence and evidence-based practice in mental health: Epistemic communities and the politics of pluralism. Social Science & Medicine, 75(2), 249–256.
Smith, D. E. (2005). Institutional ethnography: A sociology for people. New York: Rowman & Littlefield.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2021 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Freeman, S., Skinner, K., Middleton, L., Xiong, B., Fang, M.L. (2021). Building Relationships with Hard-to-Reach, Hidden, and Seldom-Heard Populations in Research. In: Sixsmith, A., Sixsmith, J., Mihailidis, A., Fang, M.L. (eds) Knowledge, Innovation, and Impact: A Guide for the Engaged Health Researcher. International Perspectives on Social Policy, Administration, and Practice. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-34390-3_15
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-34390-3_15
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-34389-7
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-34390-3
eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)