Carbon Capture via Mixed-Matrix Membranes Containing Nanomaterials and Metal–Organic Frameworks

Sarfraz, Muhammad

doi:10.1007/978-3-030-33978-4_2

Muhammad Sarfraz⁷

Part of the book series: Environmental Chemistry for a Sustainable World ((ECSW,volume 42))

682 Accesses
7 Citations

Abstract

Global warming issues arise due to the emission of carbon dioxide gas into the atmosphere. Carbon dioxide concentration in the environment has appreciably increased due to burning of carbon-based fossil fuels which releases large quantities of greenhouse gas into the atmosphere. Global warming can be controlled by minimizing greenhouse gas emissions into the atmosphere by capturing carbon dioxide from current effluent sources by applying carbon capture and sequestration technology. Carbon dioxide can be readily captured from post-combustion flue gas using mixed-matrix membranes filled with various nanofillers. This chapter comprehensively discusses recent developments made in the field of carbon capture from post-combustion flue gas using polymer-based mixed-matrix membranes containing different microporous metal–organic frameworks and other nanomaterials to signify their prospective application on an industrial scale. A comparison of membrane separation technology with conventional processes in terms of carbon capture performance is made here. Carbon capture performance of various mixed-matrix membranes prepared from different polymer matrices and selected microporous nanofillers is reviewed in terms of CO₂ permeability and CO₂/N₂ selectivity. Notable polymer matrices used to prepare mixed-matrix membranes include polysulfone, polyimide, polydimethylsiloxane, Matrimid^®, Ultrason^®, Pebax, SPEEK, and Ultem^®. Currently investigated prominent nanomaterials comprise carbon nanotubes, graphene oxide nanosheets, and silica, while noteworthy microporous metal–organic frameworks encompass HKUST-1, ZIF-7, ZIF-8, ZIF-300, ZIF-301, ZIF-302, MIL-53, and MIL-101. Nanomaterial-filled membranes offer superior carbon dioxide separation performance as compared to their respective pure polymer counterparts and higher selectivities than the associated pure metal–organic framework membranes. Main advantages of these membranes include easy processability, casting and handling, improved mechanical and chemical properties, and superior gas separation performances.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution

Chapter: USD 29.95; Price excludes VAT (USA)

eBook: USD 129.00; Price excludes VAT (USA)

Softcover Book: USD 169.00; Price excludes VAT (USA)

Hardcover Book: USD 169.99; Price excludes VAT (USA)

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

Adams R, Carson C, Ward J, Tannenbaum R, Koros W (2010) Metal organic framework mixed matrix membranes for gas separations. Microporous Mesoporous Mater 131:13–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.micromeso.2009.11.035
Article CAS Google Scholar
Ahmad AL, Salaudeen YO, Jawad ZA (2017) Synthesis of asymmetric polyetherimide membrane for CO₂/N₂ separation. IOP Conf Ser: Mater Sci Eng 206:012068. https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899X/206/1/012068
Article Google Scholar
Ahn J, Chung W-J, Pinnau I, Guiver MD (2008) Polysulfone/silica nanoparticle mixed-matrix membranes for gas separation. J Membr Sci 314:123–133. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2008.01.031
Article CAS Google Scholar
Allen CA, Boissonnault JA, Cirera J, Gulland R, Paesani F, Cohen SM (2013) Chemically crosslinked isoreticular metal-organic frameworks. Chem Commun 49:3200–3202. https://doi.org/10.1039/C3CC40635K
Article CAS Google Scholar
Ataeivarjovi E, Tang Z, Chen J (2018) Study on CO₂ desorption behavior of a PDMS-SiO₂ hybrid membrane applied in a novel CO₂ capture process. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 10:28992–29002. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.8b08630
Article CAS Google Scholar
Bae TH, Lee JS, Qiu W, Koros WJ, Jones CW, Nair S (2010) A high-performance gas-separation membrane containing submicrometer-sized metal-organic framework crystals. Angew Chem Int Ed Engl 49:9863–9866. https://doi.org/10.1002/anie.201006141
Article CAS Google Scholar
Baker RW (2002) Future directions of membrane gas separation technology. Ind Eng Chem Res 41:1393–1411. https://doi.org/10.1021/ie0108088
Article CAS Google Scholar
Barooah M, Mandal B (2018) Enhanced CO₂ separation performance by PVA/PEG/silica mixed matrix membrane. J Appl Polym Sci 135:46481–46483. https://doi.org/10.1002/app.46481
Article CAS Google Scholar
Basu S, Khan AL, Odena AC, Liu C, Vankelecom IFJ (2010a) Membrane-based technologies for biogas separations. Chem Soc Rev 39:750–768. https://doi.org/10.1039/b817050a
Article CAS Google Scholar
Basu S, Odena AC, Vankelecom IFJ (2010b) Asymmetric Matrimid®/[Cu₃(BTC)₂] mixed-matrix membranes for gas separations. J Membr Sci 362:478–487. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2010.07.005
Article CAS Google Scholar
Basu S, Odena AC, Vankelecom IFJ (2011) MOF-containing mixed-matrix membranes for CO₂/CH₄ and CO₂/N₂ binary gas mixture separations. Sep Purif Technol 81:31–40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seppur.2011.06.037
Article CAS Google Scholar
Benavides ME, David O, Johnson T, Łozińska MM, Orsic A, Wright PA, Mastel S, Hillenbrand R, Kapteijn F, Gascon J (2018) High performance mixed matrix membranes (MMMs) composed of ZIF-94 filler and 6FDA-DAM polymer. J Membr Sci 550:198–207. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2017.12.033
Article CAS Google Scholar
Benemann JR (1993) Utilization of carbon dioxide from fossil fuel-burning power plants with biological systems. Energy Convers Manag 34:999–1004. https://doi.org/10.1016/0196-8904(93)90047-E
Article CAS Google Scholar
Burgaz E, Erciyes A, Andac M, Andac O (2019) Synthesis and characterization of nano-sized metal organic framework-5 (MOF-5) by using consecutive combination of ultrasound and microwave irradiation methods. Inorg Chim Acta 485:118–124. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ica.2018.10.014
Article CAS Google Scholar
Caro J, Noack M (2008) Zeolite membranes – recent developments and progress. Microporous Mesoporous Mater 115:215–233. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.micromeso.2008.03.008
Article CAS Google Scholar
Choi S, Drese JH, Jones CW (2010) Adsorbent materials for carbon dioxide capture from large anthropogenic point sources. ChemSusChem 2:796–854. https://doi.org/10.1002/cssc.200900036
Article CAS Google Scholar
Cheetham AK, Al-Muhtaseb SA, Sivaniah E (2012) Zeolitic imidazolate framework (ZIF-8) based polymer nanocomposite membranes for gas separation. Energy Environ Sci 5:8359–8369. https://doi.org/10.1039/C2EE21996D
Article CAS Google Scholar
Chui SS, Lo SM, Charmant JPH, Orpen AG, Williams ID (2007) A chemically functionalizable nanoporous material [Cu₃(TMA)₂(H₂O)₃]_n. Science 283:1148–1150. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.283.5405.1148
Article Google Scholar
Chung TS, Jiang LY, Li Y, Kulprathipanja S (2007) Mixed matrix membranes (MMMs) comprising organic polymers with dispersed inorganic fillers for gas separation. Prog Polym Sci 32:483–507. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2007.01.008
Article CAS Google Scholar
Dai Z, Løining V, Deng J, Ansaloni L, Deng L (2018) Poly(1-trimethylsilyl-1-propyne)-based hybrid membranes: effects of various nanofillers and feed gas humidity on CO₂ permeation. Membranes 8:76. https://doi.org/10.3390/membranes8030076
Article CAS Google Scholar
Das AK, Vemuri RS, Kutnyakov I, McGrail BP, Motkuria RK (2016) An efficient synthesis strategy for metal-organic frameworks: dry-gel synthesis of MOF-74 framework with high yield and improved performance. Sci Rep 6:28050–28057. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep28050
Article CAS Google Scholar
Daturi M, Chang JS (2011) Why hybrid porous solids capture greenhouse gases? Chem Soc Rev 40(2):550-562. https://doi.org/10.1039/c0cs00040j
Article Google Scholar
David H, Wagener V, Rochelle GT (2011) Stripper configurations for CO₂ capture by aqueous monoethanolamine and piperazine. Energy Procedia 4:1323–1330. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2011.01.190
Article CAS Google Scholar
Dey C, Kundu T, Biswal BP, Mallick A, Banerjee R (2014) Crystalline metal-organic frameworks (MOFs): synthesis, structure and function. Acta Cryst 70:3–10. https://doi.org/10.1107/S2052520613029557
Article CAS Google Scholar
ESRL (2019) Trends in atmospheric carbon dioxide. Earth System Research Laboratory, Global Monitoring Division, 2019
Google Scholar
Ferey G, Serre C, Devic T, Maurin G, Jobic H, Llewellyn PL, De Weireld G, Vimont A, Daturi M, Chang JS (2011) Why hybrid porous solids capture greenhouse gases? Chem Soc Rev 40(2):550–562. https://doi.org/10.1039/c0cs00040j
Article CAS Google Scholar
Furukawa H, Cordova KE, O’Keeffe M, Yaghi OM (2013) The chemistry and applications of metal-organic frameworks. Science 341:1230444–1230456. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1230444
Article CAS Google Scholar
Galve A, Sieffert D, Vispe E, Tellez C, Coronas J, Staudt C (2011) Copolyimide mixed matrix membranes with oriented microporous titanosilicate JDF-L1 sheet particles. J Membr Sci 370:131–140. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2011.01.011
Article CAS Google Scholar
Gao Y, Qiao Z, Zhao S, Wang Z, Wang J (2018) In situ synthesis of polymer grafted ZIFs and application in mixed matrix membrane for CO₂ separation. J Mater Chem A 6:3151–3161. https://doi.org/10.1039/C7TA10322K
Article CAS Google Scholar
Gascon J, Aktay U, Alonso MDH, van Klink GPM, Kapteijn F (2009) Amino-based metal-organic frameworks as stable, highly active basic catalysts. J Catal 261:75–87. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcat.2008.11.010
Article CAS Google Scholar
Gascon J, Kapteijn F, Zornoza B, Sebastian V, Casado C, Coronas J (2012) Practical approach to zeolitic membranes and coatings: state of the art, opportunities, barriers, and future perspectives. Chem Mater 24:2829–2844. https://doi.org/10.1021/cm301435j
Article CAS Google Scholar
Ge BS, Wang T, Sun HX, Gao W, Zhao HR (2018) Preparation of mixed matrix membranes based on polyimide and aminated graphene oxide for CO₂ separation. Polym Adv Technol 29:1334–1343. https://doi.org/10.1002/pat.4245
Article CAS Google Scholar
Girault F, Adhikari LB, Lanord CF, Agrinier P, Koirala BP, Bhattarai M, Mahat SS, Groppo C, Rolfo F, Bollinger L, Perrier F (2018) Persistent CO₂ emissions and hydrothermal unrest following the 2015 earthquake in Nepal. Nat Commun 9:2956–2965. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-018-05138-z
Article CAS Google Scholar
Gong X, Wnag Y, Kuang T (2017) ZIF-8-based membranes for carbon dioxide capture and separation. ACS Sustain Chem Eng 5:11204–11214. https://doi.org/10.1021/acssuschemeng.7b03613
Article CAS Google Scholar
Guerrero G, Hägg MB, Simon C, Peters T, Rival N, Denonville C (2018) CO₂ separation in nanocomposite membranes by the addition of amidine and lactamide functionalized POSS® nanoparticles into a PVA layer. Membranes 8:28. https://doi.org/10.3390/membranes8020028
Article CAS Google Scholar
Guo HL, Zhu GS, Hewitt IJ, Qiu SL (2009) “Twin copper source” growth of metal-organic framework membrane: Cu₃(BTC)₂ with high permeability and selectivity for recycling H₂. J Am Chem Soc 131:1646–1647. https://doi.org/10.1021/ja8074874
Article CAS Google Scholar
Guo X, Huang H, Ban Y, Yang Q, Xiao Y, Li Y, Yang W, Zhong C (2015) Mixed matrix membranes incorporated with amine-functionalized titanium-based metal-organic framework for CO₂/CH₄ separation. J Membr Sci 478:130–139. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2015.01.007
Article CAS Google Scholar
Hassanpoor A, Mirzaei M, Eshtiagh-Hosseini H (2018) Syntheses and characterization of two new coordination compounds containing an azide ligand in the presence of o-donor co-ligands with nickel and copper(II) metal ions and an investigation into the effects of sonochemical methods on morphology and particle size. J Iran Chem Soc 15:1287–1292. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13738-018-1327-x
Article CAS Google Scholar
Haszeldine RS (2009) Carbon capture and storage: how green can black be? Science 325:1647–1652. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1172246
Article CAS Google Scholar
Hedin N, Chen L, Laaksonen A (2010) Sorbents for CO₂ capture from flue gas- aspects from materials and theoretical chemistry. Nanoscale 2:1819–1841. https://doi.org/10.1039/C0NR00042F
Article CAS Google Scholar
Hu J, Cai H, Ren H, Wei YM, Xu Z, Liu H, Hu Y (2010) Mixed-matrix membrane hollow fibers of Cu₃(BTC)₂ MOF and polyimide for gas separation and adsorption. Ind Eng Chem Res 49:12605–12612. https://doi.org/10.1021/ie1014958
Article CAS Google Scholar
Ismail AF, David L (2001) A review on the latest development of carbon membranes for gas separation. J Membr Sci 193:1–18. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0376-7388(01)00510-5
Article CAS Google Scholar
Ismail AF, Kusworo TD, Mustafa A (2008) Enhanced gas permeation performance of polyethersulfone mixed matrix hollow fiber membranes using novel Dynasylan Ameo silane agent. J Membr Sci 319:306–312. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2008.03.067
Article CAS Google Scholar
Jeazet HT, Staudt C, Janiak C (2012) Metal-organic frameworks in mixed-matrix membranes for gas separation. Dalton Trans 41:14003–14027. https://doi.org/10.1039/C2DT31550E
Article Google Scholar
Keskin S, Sholl DS (2010) Selecting metal organic frameworks as enabling materials in mixed matrix membranes for high efficiency natural gas purification. Energy Environ Sci 3:343–351. https://doi.org/10.1039/B923980B
Article CAS Google Scholar
Keskin S, Liu J, Johnson JK, Sholl DS (2009) Atomically detailed models of gas mixture diffusion through CuBTC membranes. Microporous Mesoporous Mater 125:101–106. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.micromeso.2009.01.016
Article CAS Google Scholar
Keskin S, van Heest TM, Sholl DS (2010) Can metal-organic framework materials play a useful role in large-scale carbon dioxide separations? ChemSusChem 3(8):879–891. https://doi.org/10.1002/cssc.201000114
Article CAS Google Scholar
Khalilinejad I, Kargari A, Sanaeepur H (2017) Preparation and characterization of (Pebax 1657 + silica nanoparticle)/PVC mixed matrix composite membrane for CO₂/N₂ separation. Chem Pap 71:803–818. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11696-016-0084-5
Article CAS Google Scholar
Kim S, Chen L, Johnson JK, Marand E (2007) Polysulfone and functionalized carbon nanotube mixed matrix membranes for gas separation: theory and experiment. J Membr Sci 294:147–158. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2007.02.028
Article CAS Google Scholar
Kitagawa S, Matsuda R (2007) Chemistry of coordination space of porous coordination polymers. Coord Chem Rev 251:2490–2509. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ccr.2007.07.009
Article CAS Google Scholar
Klimakow M, Klobes P, Thünemann AF, Rademann K, Emmerling F (2010) Mechanochemical synthesis of metal−organic frameworks: a fast and facile approach toward quantitative yields and high specific surface areas. Chem Mater 22:5216–5221. https://doi.org/10.1021/cm1012119
Article CAS Google Scholar
Klinowski J, Paz FAA, Silva P, Rocha J (2011) Microwave-assisted synthesis of metal-organic frameworks. Dalton Trans 40:321–330. https://doi.org/10.1039/C0DT00708K
Article CAS Google Scholar
Koros WJ, Mahajan R (2000) Pushing the limits on possibilities for large scale gas separation: which strategies? J Membr Sci 175:181–196. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0376-7388(00)00418-X
Article CAS Google Scholar
Kumar B, Smieja JM, Kubiak CP (2010) Photoreduction of CO₂ on p-type silicon using Re(bipy-Bu^t)(CO)₃Cl: Photovoltages exceeding 600 mV for the selective reduction of CO₂ to CO. J Phys Chem C 114:14220–14223. https://doi.org/10.1021/jp105171b
Article CAS Google Scholar
Kwak KO, Jung SJ, Chung SY, Kang CM, Huh YI, Bae SO (2006) Optimization of culture conditions for CO₂ fixation by a chemoautotrophic microorganism, strain YN-1 using factorial design. Biochem Eng J 31:1–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bej.2006.05.001
Article CAS Google Scholar
Li M, Dinca M (2011) Reductive electrosynthesis of crystalline metal-organic frameworks. J Am Chem Soc 133:12926–12929. https://doi.org/10.1021/ja2041546
Article CAS Google Scholar
Li JR, Kuppler RJ, Zhou HC (2009) Selective gas adsorption and separation in metal-organic frameworks. Chem Soc Rev 38:1477–1504. https://doi.org/10.1039/b802426j
Article CAS Google Scholar
Li X, Sun Q, Liu J, Xiao B, Li R, Sun X (2016) Tunable porous structure of metal organic framework derived carbon and the application in lithium-sulfur batteries. J Power Sources 302:174–179. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpowsour.2015.10.049
Article CAS Google Scholar
Lin R, Ge L, Diao H, Rudolph V, Zhu Z (2016) Ionic liquids as the MOFs/polymer interfacial binder for efficient membrane separation. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 8:32041–32049. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.6b11074
Article CAS Google Scholar
Liu L, Chakma A, Feng X (2005) CO₂/N₂ separation by poly(ether block amide) thin film hollow fiber composite membranes. Ind Eng Chem Res 44:6874–6882. https://doi.org/10.1021/ie050306k
Article CAS Google Scholar
Mahajan R, Koros WJ (2000) Factors controlling successful formation of mixed-matrix gas separation materials. Ind Eng Chem Res 39:2692–2696. https://doi.org/10.1021/ie990799r
Article CAS Google Scholar
Maji TK, Kitagawa S (2007) Chemistry of porous coordination polymers. Pure Appl Chem 79:2155–2177. https://doi.org/10.1351/pac200779122155
Article CAS Google Scholar
McCarthy MC, Guerrero VV, Barnett GV, Jeong HK (2010) Synthesis of zeolitic imidazolate framework films and membranes with controlled microstructures. Langmuir 26:14636–14641. https://doi.org/10.1021/la102409e
Article CAS Google Scholar
Metz B, Davidson O, de Coninck H, Loos M, Meyer L (2005) IPCC special report on carbon dioxide capture and storage. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 1–431
Google Scholar
Mirzaei S, Shamiri A, Aroua MK (2015) A review of different solvents, mass transfer, and hydrodynamics for postcombustion CO₂ capture. Int J Eng Res 3:742–744. https://doi.org/10.1515/revce-2014-0045
Article CAS Google Scholar
Nafisi V, Hägg MB (2014) Gas separation properties of ZIF-8/6FDA-durene diamine mixed matrix membrane. Sep & Purif Technol 128:31–38. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seppur.2014.03.006
Article CAS Google Scholar
Noble RD (2011) Perspectives on mixed matrix membranes. J Membr Sci 378:393–397. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2011.05.031
Article CAS Google Scholar
Ockwig NW, Nenoff TM (2007) Membranes for hydrogen separation. Chem Rev 107:4078–4110. https://doi.org/10.1021/cr0501792
Article CAS Google Scholar
Ohlrogge K, Stürken K (2001) The separation of organic vapors from gas streams by means of membranes. In: Membrane technology: in the chemical industry. Wiley, Weinheim. https://doi.org/10.1002/3527600388.ch7. Ch II-1
Chapter Google Scholar
Oral CA (2018) Gas permeability of polydimethylsiloxane membranes filled with clinoptilolite in different cationic forms. Turk J Chem 42:112–120. https://doi.org/10.3906/kim-1707-8
Article CAS Google Scholar
Pachauri RK, Reisinger A (2007) Contribution of working groups I, II and III to the fourth assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change. In: IPCC climate change 2007: synthesis report, pp 1–104
Google Scholar
Pal R (2008) Permeation models for mixed matrix membranes. J Colloid Interface Sci 317:191–198. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcis.2007.09.032
Article CAS Google Scholar
Prasetya N, Teck AA, Ladewig BP (2018) Matrimid-JUC-62 and Matrimid-PCN-250 mixed matrix membranes displaying light-responsive gas separation and beneficial ageing characteristics for CO₂/N₂ separation. Sci Rep 8:2944. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-21263-7
Article CAS Google Scholar
Quadrelli R, Peterson S (2007) The energy-climate challenge: recent trends in CO₂ emissions from fuel combustion. Energy Policy 35:5938–5952. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2007.07.001
Article Google Scholar
Ranjan R, Tsapatsis M (2009) Microporous metal organic framework membrane on porous support using the seeded growth method. Chem Mater 21:4920–4924. https://doi.org/10.1021/cm902032y
Article CAS Google Scholar
Robeson LM (2008) The upper bound revisited. J Membr Sci 320:390–400. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2008.04.030
Article CAS Google Scholar
Russo G, Prpich G, Anthony EJ, Montagnaro F, Jurado N, Lorenzo GD, Darabkhani HG (2017) Selective-exhaust gas recirculation for CO₂ capture using membrane technology. J Membr Sci 549:649–659. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2017.10.052
Article CAS Google Scholar
Sabetghadam A, Seoane B, Keskin D, Duim N, Rodenas T, Shahid S, Sorribas S (2016) Metal organic framework crystals in mixed-matrix membranes: impact of the filler morphology on the gas separation performance. Adv Funct Mater 26:3154–3163. https://doi.org/10.1002/adfm.201505352
Article CAS Google Scholar
Sadrzadeh M, Shahidi K, Mohammadi T (2010) Synthesis and gas permeation properties of a single layer PDMS membrane. J Appl Polym Sci 117:33–48. https://doi.org/10.1002/app.31180
Article CAS Google Scholar
Saracco G, Neomagus HWJP, Versteeg GF, van Swaaij WPM (1999) High-temperature membrane reactors: potential and problems. Chem Eng Sci 54:1997–2017. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0009-2509(99)00009-3
Article CAS Google Scholar
Sarfraz M, Ba-Shammakh M (2016a) A novel zeolitic imidazolate framework based mixed-matrix membrane for efficient CO₂ separation under wet conditions. J Taiwan Inst Chem Eng 65:427–436. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtice.2016.04.033
Article CAS Google Scholar
Sarfraz M, Ba-Shammakh M (2016b) Combined effect of CNTs with ZIF-302 into polysulfone to fabricate MMMs for enhanced CO₂ separation from flue gases. Arab J Sci Eng 41:2573–2582. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13369-016-2096-4
Article CAS Google Scholar
Sarfraz M, Ba-Shammakh M (2016c) Synergistic effect of adding graphene oxide and ZIF-301 to polysulfone to develop high performance mixed matrix membranes for selective carbon dioxide separation from post combustion flue gas. J Membr Sci 514:35–43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2016.04.029
Article CAS Google Scholar
Sarfraz M, Ba-Shammakh M (2016d) Synergistic effect of incorporating ZIF-302 and graphene oxide to polysulfone to develop highly selective mixed-matrix membranes for carbon dioxide separation from wet post-combustion flue gases. J Ind Eng Chem 36:154–162. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jiec.2016.01.032
Article CAS Google Scholar
Sarfraz M, Ba-Shammakh M (2018a) Water-stable ZIF-300/Ultrason® mixed-matrix membranes for selective CO₂ capture from humid post combustion flue gas. Chin J Chem Eng 26:1012–1021. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cjche.2017.11.007
Article CAS Google Scholar
Sarfraz M, Ba-Shammakh M (2018b) ZIF-based water-stable mixed-matrix membranes for effective CO₂ separation from humid flue gas. Can J Chem Eng 96:2475–2483. https://doi.org/10.1002/cjce.23170
Article CAS Google Scholar
Sarfraz M, Ba-Shammakh M (2018c) Harmonious interaction of incorporating CNTs and zeolitic imidazole frameworks into polysulfone to prepare high performance MMMs for CO₂ separation from humidified post combustion gases. Braz J Chem Eng 35:217–228. https://doi.org/10.1590/0104-6632.20180351s20150595
Article CAS Google Scholar
Sarfraz M, Ba-Shammakh M (2018d) Pursuit of efficient CO₂-capture membranes: graphene oxide- and MOF-integrated Ultrason® membranes. Polym Bull 75:5039–5059. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00289-018-2301-6
Article CAS Google Scholar
Shen J, Liu G, Huang K, Li Q, Guan K, Li Y, Jin W (2016) UiO-66-polyether block amide mixed matrix membranes for CO₂ separation. J Membr Sci 513:155–165. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2016.04.045
Article CAS Google Scholar
Silva EA, Windmoller D, Silva GG, Figueiredo KCS (2017) Polydimethylsiloxane membranes containing multi-walled carbon nanotubes for gas separation. Mater Res 20:1454–1460. https://doi.org/10.1590/1980-5373-MR-2016-0825
Article Google Scholar
Smart S, Lin CXC, Ding L, Thambimuthu K, da Costa JCD (2010) Ceramic membranes for gas processing in coal gasification. Energy Environ Sci 3:268–278. https://doi.org/10.1039/B924327E
Article CAS Google Scholar
Sodeifian G, Raji M, Asghari M, Rezakazemi M, Dashti A (2018) Polyurethane-SAPO-34 mixed matrix membrane for CO₂/CH₄ and CO₂/N₂ separation. Chin J Chem Eng. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cjche.2018.03.012
Article Google Scholar
Song Q, Nataraj SK, Roussenova MV, Tan JC, Hughes DJ, Li W, Bourgoin P, Alam MA, Cheetham AK, Al-Muhtaseb SA, Sivaniah E (2012) Zeolitic imidazolate framework (ZIF-8) based polymer nanocomposite membranes for gas separation. Energy Environ Sci 5:8359–8369. https://doi.org/10.1039/C2EE21996D
Article CAS Google Scholar
Stock N, Biswas S (2012) Synthesis of metal-organic frameworks (MOFs): routes to various MOF topologies, morphologies, and composites. Chem Rev 112:933–969. https://doi.org/10.1021/cr200304e
Article CAS Google Scholar
Strathmann H (2012) Introduction to membrane science and technology. Wiley-VCH. Ch 3, p 114. https://doi.org/10.1002/anie.201205786
Article CAS Google Scholar
Suleman MS, Lau KK, Yeong YF (2016) Development and performance evaluation of polydimethyl siloxane/polysulfone (PDMS/PSF) composite membrane for CO₂/CH₄ separation. IOP Conf Ser: Earth Environ Sci 36:012014. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/36/1/012014
Article Google Scholar
Sumida K, Rogow DL, Mason JA, McDonald TM, Bloch ED, Herm ZR, Bae TH, Long JR (2012) Carbon dioxide capture in metal-organic frameworks. Chem Rev 112:724–781. https://doi.org/10.1021/cr2003272
Article CAS Google Scholar
Sun J, Yi Z, Zhao X, Zhou Y, Gao C (2017) CO₂ separation membranes with high permeability and CO₂/N₂ selectivity prepared by electrostatic self-assembly of polyethylenimine on reverse osmosis membranes. RSC Adv 7:14678–14687. https://doi.org/10.1039/c7ra00094d
Article CAS Google Scholar
Thompson JA, Chapman KW, Koros WJ, Jones CW, Nair S (2012) Sonication-induced Ostwald ripening of ZIF-8 nanoparticles and formation of ZIF-8/polymer composite membranes. Microporous Mesoporous Mater 158:292–299. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.micromeso.2012.03.052
Article CAS Google Scholar
Venna SR, Carreon MA (2010) Highly permeable zeolite imidazolate framework-8 membranes for CO₂/CH₄ separation. J Am Chem Soc 132:76–78. https://doi.org/10.1021/ja909263x
Article CAS Google Scholar
Vu DQ, Koros WJ, Miller SJ (2003) Mixed matrix membranes using carbon molecular sieves. J Membr Sci 211:335–348. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0376-7388(02)00429-5
Article CAS Google Scholar
Wang ZQ, Cohen SM (2009) Postsynthetic modification of metal-organic frameworks. Chem Soc Rev 38:1315–1329. https://doi.org/10.1039/b802258p
Article CAS Google Scholar
Wappel D, Gronald G, Kalb R, Draxler J (2010) Ionic liquids for post-combustion CO₂ absorption. Int J Greenhouse Gas Control 4:486–494. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijggc.2009.11.012
Article CAS Google Scholar
Wijenayake SN, Panapitiya NP, Versteeg SH, Nguyen CN, Goel S, Balkus KJ Jr, Musselman IH, Ferraris JP (2013) Surface cross-linking of ZIF-8/polyimide mixed matrix membranes (MMMs) for gas separation. Ind Eng Chem Res 52:6991–7001. https://doi.org/10.1021/ie400149e
Article CAS Google Scholar
Wu X, Yuan B, Bao Z, Deng S (2014) Adsorption of carbon dioxide, methane and nitrogen on an ultramicroporous copper metal-organic framework. J Colloid Interface Sci 430:78–84. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcis.2014.05.021
Article CAS Google Scholar
Xin Q, Ouyang J, Liu T, Li Z, Li Z, Liu Y, Wang S, Wu H, Jiang Z, Cao X (2015) Enhanced interfacial interaction and CO₂ separation performance of mixed matrix membrane by incorporating polyethylenimine-decorated metal-organic frameworks. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 7:1065–1077. https://doi.org/10.1021/am504742q
Article CAS Google Scholar
Yaghi OM, O’Keeffe M, Ockwig NW, Chae HK, Eddaoudi M, Kim J (2003) Reticular synthesis and the design of new material. Nature 423:705–714. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature01650
Article CAS Google Scholar
Yoo Y, Lai Z, Jeong HK (2009) Fabrication of MOF-5 membranes using microwave-induced rapid seeding and solvothermal secondary growth. Microporous Mesoporous Mater 123:100–106. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.micromeso.2009.03.036
Article CAS Google Scholar
You H, Hossain I, Kim TH (2018) Piperazinium-mediated crosslinked polyimide-polydimethylsiloxane (PI-PDMS) copolymer membranes: the effect of PDMS content on CO₂ separation. RSC Adv 8:1328–1336. https://doi.org/10.1039/c7ra10949k
Article CAS Google Scholar
Yuan D, Zhao D, Sun D, Zhou HC (2010) An isoreticular series of metal-organic frameworks with dendritic hexacarboxylate ligands and exceptionally high gas-uptake capacity. Angew Chem Int Ed 49:5357–5361. https://doi.org/10.1002/anie.201001009
Article CAS Google Scholar
Zhao D, Yuan DQ, Sun DF, Zhou HC (2009) Stabilization of metal-organic frameworks with high surface areas by the incorporation of mesocavities with microwindows. J Am Chem Soc 131:9186–9188. https://doi.org/10.1021/ja901109t
Article CAS Google Scholar
Zhou HC, Long JR, Yaghi OM (2012) Introduction to metal-organic frameworks. Chem Rev 112:673–674. https://doi.org/10.1021/cr300014x
Article CAS Google Scholar
Zhu H, Jie X, Cao Y (2017) Fabrication of functionalized MOFs incorporated mixed matrix hollow fiber membrane for gas separation. J Chem 2017:1–9. https://doi.org/10.1155/2017/2548957
Article CAS Google Scholar
Zimmerman CM, Singh A, Koros WJ (1997) Tailoring mixed matrix composite membranes for gas separations. J Membr Sci 137:145–154. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0376-7388(97)00194-4
Article CAS Google Scholar
Zornoza B, Irusta S, Tellez C, Coronas J (2009) Mesoporous silica sphere-polysulfone mixed matrix membranes for gas separation. Langmuir 25:5903–5909. https://doi.org/10.1021/la900656z
Article CAS Google Scholar
Zornoza B, Seoane B, Zamaro JM, Téllez C, Coronas J (2011a) Combination of MOFs and zeolites for mixed-matrix membranes. ChemPhysChem 12:2781–2785. https://doi.org/10.1002/cphc.201100583
Article CAS Google Scholar
Zornoza B, Esekhile O, Koros WJ, Tellez C, Coronas J (2011b) Hollow silicalite-1 sphere-polymer mixed matrix membranes for gas separation. Sep Purif Technol 77:137–145. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seppur.2010.11.033
Article CAS Google Scholar
Zornoza B, Tellez C, Coronas J, Gascon J, Kapteijn F (2013) Metal organic framework based mixed matrix membranes: an increasingly important field of research with a large application potential. Microporous Mesoporous Mater 166:67–78. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.micromeso.2012.03.012
Article CAS Google Scholar
Zou X, Zhang F, Thomas S, Zhu G, Valtchev V, Mintova S (2011) Co₃(HCOO)₆ microporous metal-organic framework membrane for separation of CO₂/CH₄ mixtures. Chem-Eur J 17:12076–12083. https://doi.org/10.1002/chem.201101733
Article CAS Google Scholar

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Department of Polymer and Process Engineering, University of Engineering and Technology, Lahore, Pakistan
Muhammad Sarfraz

Authors

Muhammad Sarfraz
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Muhammad Sarfraz .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

William G. Lowrie Department of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA
Zhien Zhang
Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Faculty of Science, University of Macau, Macau, China
Wenxiang Zhang
Aix-Marseille University, CNRS, IRD, INRA, Coll France, CEREGE, Aix-en-Provence, France
Eric Lichtfouse

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Sarfraz, M. (2020). Carbon Capture via Mixed-Matrix Membranes Containing Nanomaterials and Metal–Organic Frameworks. In: Zhang, Z., Zhang, W., Lichtfouse, E. (eds) Membranes for Environmental Applications. Environmental Chemistry for a Sustainable World, vol 42. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-33978-4_2

Download citation

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-33978-4_2
Published: 01 March 2020
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-33977-7
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-33978-4
eBook Packages: Earth and Environmental ScienceEarth and Environmental Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics