Abstract
Educational assessments always reflect the values and power of those with access to influence educational tools and strongly affect the practices to which they belong. Depending on their form and use, assessments can also influence teachers’ pedagogy and activities in classroom settings. As analyzed by sociologists such as Bourdieu, such an influence occurs in implicit ways. Assessments thus largely form a practice by which power can be expressed and exercised, but in ways that are mostly invisible, and which could therefore compromise democratic principles. This chapter considers how the Programme for International Student Assessment (PISA) can strongly affect local national educational policy and practice. Since these processes largely occur without being explicitly expressed or addressed by politicians, one can ask whether PISA and its corresponding practice can be considered a challenge to democracy and democratic processes. Denmark is an interesting context for investigating this problem and is used as a case and example. The insights from the Danish case are discussed more generally in relation to other countries and education systems.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
- 1.
All translations of research literature and primary sources from Danish to English used in this chapter were produced by the author unless otherwise stated.
References
Allerup, P. (2018). PISA’s metoder – et ambitiøst projekt, der ikke virkede efter hensigten. In D. Sommer & J. Klitmøller (Eds.), Hinsides PISA – nordiske perspektiver på uddannelse (pp. 107–134). Copenhagen: Hans Reitzels Forlag.
Andreasen, K. E., & Kousholt, K. (2015). De nationale test som ny praksis i den danske folkeskole: Betydninger i klassens sociale fællesskab. In K. E. Andreasen, M. Buchardt, A. Rasmussen, & C. Ydesen (Eds.), Test og prøvelser: Oprindelse, udvikling, aktualitet (pp. 29–49). Aalborg: Aalborg Universitetsforlag.
Andersen, A. M., Egelund, N., Jensen, T. P., Krone, M., Lindenskov, L., & Mejding, J. (2001). Forventninger og færdigheder – Danske unge i international sammenligning. [Expectations and skills – Danish Youth in an international comparison]. Copenhagen. Denmark. AKF, DPU and SFI Survey. (The Danish PISA 2000 report, in Danish).
Biesta, G. J. J. (2006). Beyond learning. Democratic education for a human future. Boulder, CO: Paradigm Publishers.
Biesta, G. J. J. (2007). ‘Don’t count me in’. Democracy, education and the question of inclusion. Nordisk Pedagogik, 27, 18–31.
Biesta, G. J. J. (2010). Good education in an age of measurement: Ethics, politics, democracy. Boulder, CO: Paradigm Publishers.
Biesta, G. (2011). Learning democracy in school and society: Education, lifelong learning, and the politics of citizenship. Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.
Bourdieu, P., & Passeron, J. C. (1996). Reproduction in education, society and culture. London: Sage Publications.
Breakspear, S. (2012). The policy impact of PISA: An exploration of the normative effects of international benchmarking in school system performance. OECD education working papers, no. 71. Retrieved April 29, 2019, from https://doi.org/10.1787/5k9fdfqffr28-en. https://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/education/the-policy-impact-of-pisa_5k9fdfqffr28-en.
Dewey, J. (1916). Democracy and education: An introduction to the philosophy of education. New York: Macmillan.
Elbro, C., Jansen, M., & Löb, M. (1981). Hvor godt læser og staver børn i dag? – om læsning og retstavning i folkeskolens danskundervisning: processer, standpunkter, vilkår, problemstillinger. Working paper. Copenhagen: Det Centrale Uddannelsesråd, Modersmålsopgaven.
Grek, S., & Ydesen, C. (2021). Paving the way for PISA – The OECD’s International Education Indicators Project (INES). Globalisation, Societies and Education (forthcoming).
Gustafsson, R. L. (2012). What did you learn in school today? How ideas mattered for policy changes in Danish and Swedish schools 1990–2011. Aarhus: Forlaget Politica.
Haarder, B. (2005a). L 101 Forslag til lov om ændring af lov om folkeskolen. (Styrket evaluering og anvendelse af nationale test som pædagogisk redskab samt obligatoriske prøver m.v.). Folketinget. Resume. Uddannelsesudvalget, fremsat Oct. 10th 2005. Retrieved February 17, 2019, from https://www.ft.dk/samling/20051/lovforslag/L101/index.htm.
Haarder, B. (2005b). Fremsættelsestale. L 101 Forslag til lov om ændring af lov om folkeskolen. (Styrket evaluering og anvendelse af nationale test som pædagogisk redskab samt obligatoriske prøver m.v.). Undervisningsministeriet. Uddannelsesudvalget. October 7, 2005. Retrieved February 17, 2019, from https://www.ft.dk/samling/20051/lovforslag/l101/20051_l101_fremsaettelsestale.htm.
Held, D. (1987/1996). Models of democracy. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
Henningsen, I., & Allerup, P. (2017). Pisa – matematik: holdninger og fakta. Samsoe: Forlaget Matematik.
Kreiner, S., & Christensen, K. B. (2014). Analyses of model fit and robustness. A new look at the PISA scaling model underlying ranking of countries according to reading literacy. Psychometrika, 79(2), 210–231.
Lawn, M., & Grek, S. (2012). Europeanizing education. Governing a new policy space. Oxford: Symposium Books.
Lindblad, S., Pettersson, D., & Popkewitz, T. D. (2018). Education by the numbers and the making of society: The expertise of international assessments. New York: Routledge.
Lundgren, U. (2011). PISA as a political instrument: One history behind the formulating of the PISA programme. In M. A. Pereyra, H.-G. Kotthoff, & R. Cowen (Eds.), PISA under examination: Changing knowledge, changing tests, and changing schools (pp. 17–30). Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.
Mejding, J. (1994). Den grimme ælling og svanerne? – Om danske elevers læsefærdigheder. Copenhagen: Danmarks Pædagogiske Institut.
Meyer, H.-D., & Benavot, A. (2013). PISA and the globalization of education governance: Some puzzles and problems. In H.-D. Meyer & A. Benavot (Eds.), PISA, power, and policy: The emergence of global educational governance (pp. 9–26). Oxford: Symposium Books.
Morgan, C. (2007). OECD programme for international student assessment: Unraveling a knowledge network. Ottawa, ON: School of Public Policy and Administration, Carleton University.
OECD. (2001). Knowledge and skills for life: First results from the OECD Programme for International Student Assessment (PISA) 2000. Paris, France: OECD, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development.
OECD. (2012). Historical summary of CERI’s main activities. OECD. Retrieved April 29, 2019, from http://www.oecd.org/education/ceri/50234306.pdf.
OECD. (2017). OECD handbook for internationally comparative education statistics: Concepts, standards, definitions and classifications. Paris: OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264279889-en.
OECD. (2018). PISA results 2015 in focus. Paris: OECD Publishing.
OECD. (2019). OECD Centre for educational research and innovation. OECD. Retrieved April 29, 2019, from http://www.oecd.org/education/ceri/brochure.pdf.
Papadopoulos, G. S. (1994). Education 1960–1990: The OECD perspective. Paris: OECD.
Pereyra, M. A., Kotthoff, H.-H., & Cowen, R. (2011). PISA under examination: Changing knowledge, changing tests, and changing schools. In M. A. Pereyra, H.-G. Kotthoff, & R. Cowen (Eds.), PISA under examination: Changing knowledge, changing tests, and changing schools (pp. 1–14). Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.
Popkewitz, T. (2011). PISA: Numbers, standardizing conduct, and the alchemy of school subjects. In M. A. Pereyra, H.-G. Kotthoff, & R. Cowen (Eds.), PISA under examination: Changing knowledge, changing tests, and changing schools (pp. 31–46). Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.
Regeringen. (2004). Modernisering af prøver, eksamener og karakterer. [Modernization of assessments, exams and grades]. Undervisningsministeriet Copenhagen, Denmark [Danish Ministry of Education].
Regeringen. (2010). Danmark 2020. Viden>Vækst>Vekstand>Velfærd. Statsministeriet. Retrieved April 29, 2019, from http://www.stm.dk/multimedia/Danmark_2020_Viden__v_kst__velstand__velf_rd.pdf.
Shewbridge, C., Jang, E., Matthews, P., & Santiago, P. (2011). OECD reviews of evaluation and assessment in education. DENMARK. OECD. Retrieved February 15, 2019, from https://www.oecd.org/denmark/47696663.pdf.
Sjøberg, S. (2016). OECD, PISA, and globalization: The influence of the international assessment regime. In C. H. Tienken & C. A. Mullen (Eds.), Education policy perils. Tackling the tough issues (pp. 102–133). New York: Routledge.
Spring, J. H. (2015). Economization of education: Human capital, global corporations, skills-based schooling. New York; London: Routledge.
Undervisningsministeriet. (2004a). Betænkning om indførelse af en ny karakterskala til erstatning af 13-skalaen. Bidrag afgivet af karakterkommissionen, November 2004. Undervisningsministeriet, Uddannelsesstyrelsen. [Report on a new grading Scale to replace the 13-step scale. Copenhagen: Danish Ministry of Education].
Undervisningsministeriet. (2004b). OECD-rapport om grundskolen i Danmark – 2004. Uddannelsesstyrelsens temahæfteserie no. 5, 2004. Undervisningsministeriets Forlag. [OECD Report on the Danish public School – 2004. Publication No. 5, 2004. Copenhagen: Danish Ministry of Education].
Undervisningsministeriet. (2006). Lov om ændring af lov om folkeskolen (Styrket evaluering og anvendelse af nationale test som pædagogisk redskab samt obligatoriske prøver m.v.). [Law about changes to the Act of the Folkeskole, Act no. 313 of 19/04/2006].
Undervisningsministeriet. (2017). Lempelse af bindinger i regelsættet om Fælles Mål. Undervisningsministeriet. Retrieved April 29, 2019, from https://uvm.dk/folkeskolen/fag-timetal-og-overgange/faelles-maal/lempelse-af-faelles-maal/lempelse-af-bindinger-i-regelsaettet-om-faelles-maal.
UNESCO. (1945). Constitution of the United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organisation (UNESCO), 16 November 1945. Retrieved April 29, 2019, from http://www.refworld.org/docid/3ddb73094.html.
Ydesen, C. (2014). High-stakes educational testing and democracy – antagonistic or symbiotic relationship? Education, Citizenship and Social Justice, 9(2), 97–113. https://doi.org/10.1177/1746197914520646.
Ydesen, C., & Andreasen, K. E. (2014). Accountability practices in the history of Danish primary: Public education from the 1660s to the present. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 22(120), 1–31.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Andreasen, K.E. (2019). The Impact of PISA Studies on Education Policy in a Democratic Perspective: The Implementation of National Tests in Denmark. In: Ydesen, C. (eds) The OECD’s Historical Rise in Education. Global Histories of Education. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-33799-5_7
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-33799-5_7
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-33798-8
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-33799-5
eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)