Abstract
Deep learning is the state-of-the-art machine learning approach. The success of deep learning in many pattern recognition applications has brought excitement and high expectations that deep learning, or artificial intelligence (AI), can bring revolutionary changes in health care. Early studies of deep learning applied to lesion detection or classification have reported superior performance compared to those by conventional techniques or even better than radiologists in some tasks. The potential of applying deep-learning-based medical image analysis to computer-aided diagnosis (CAD), thus providing decision support to clinicians and improving the accuracy and efficiency of various diagnostic and treatment processes, has spurred new research and development efforts in CAD. Despite the optimism in this new era of machine learning, the development and implementation of CAD or AI tools in clinical practice face many challenges. In this chapter, we will discuss some of these issues and efforts needed to develop robust deep-learning-based CAD tools and integrate these tools into the clinical workflow, thereby advancing towards the goal of providing reliable intelligent aids for patient care.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Winsberg F, Elkin M, Macy J, Bordaz V, Weymouth W (1967) Detection of radiographic abnormalities in mammograms by means of optical scanning and computer analysis. Radiology 89:211–215
Kimme C, O’Laughlin BJ, Sklansky J (1977) Automatic detection of suspicious abnormalities in breast radiographs. Data structures, computer graphics and pattern recognition. Academic Press, New York
Spiesberger W (1979) Mammogram inspection by computer. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 26:213–219
Semmlow JL, Shadagopappan A, Ackerman LV, Hand W, Alcorn FS (1980) A fully automated system for screening mammograms. Comput Biomed Res 13:350–362
Doi K (2015) Chapter 1. Historical overview. In: Li Q, Nishikawa RM (eds) Computer-aided detection and diagnosis in medical imaging. Taylor & Francis Group, LLC, CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL, pp 1–17
Chan H-P, Doi K, Galhotra S, Vyborny CJ, MacMahon H, Jokich PM (1987) Image feature analysis and computer-aided diagnosis in digital radiography. 1. Automated detection of microcalcifications in mammography. Med Phys 14:538–548
Chan H-P, Doi K, Vyborny CJ, Schmidt RA, Metz CE, Lam KL et al (1990) Improvement in radiologists’ detection of clustered microcalcifications on mammograms. The potential of computer-aided diagnosis. Investig Radiol 25:1102–1110
LeCun Y, Bengio Y, Hinton G (2015) Deep learning. Nature 521:436–444
Fukushima K, Miyake S (1982) Neocognitron: a new algorithm for pattern recognition tolerant of deformations and shifts in position. Pattern Recogn 15:455–469
LeCun Y, Boser B, Denker JS, Henderson D, Howard RE, Hubbard W et al (1990) Handwritten digit recognition with a back-propagation network. Proc Adv Neural Inf Process Syst:396–404
Lo SCB, Lin JS, Freedman MT, Mun SK (1993) Computer-assisted diagnosis of lung nodule detection using artificial convolution neural network. Proc SPIE 1898:859–869
Lo SCB, Chan H-P, Lin JS, Li H, Freedman M, Mun SK (1995) Artificial convolution neural network for medical image pattern recognition. Neural Netw 8:1201–1214
Chan H-P, Lo SCB, Helvie MA, Goodsitt MM, Cheng SNC, Adler DD (1993) Recognition of mammographic microcalcifications with artificial neural network. Radiology 189(P):318
Chan H-P, Lo SCB, Sahiner B, Lam KL, Helvie MA (1995) Computer-aided detection of mammographic microcalcifications: pattern recognition with an artificial neural network. Med Phys 22:1555–1567
Chan H-P, Sahiner B, Lo SCB, Helvie MA, Petrick N, Adler DD et al (1994) Computer-aided diagnosis in mammography: detection of masses by artificial neural network. Med Phys 21:875–876
Sahiner B, Chan H-P, Petrick N, Wei D, Helvie MA, Adler DD et al (1995) Image classification using artificial neural networks. Proc SPIE 2434:838–845
Wei D, Sahiner B, Chan H-P, Petrick N (1995) Detection of masses on mammograms using a convolution neural network. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing. 95CH2431-5, pp 3483–3486
Sahiner B, Chan H-P, Petrick N, Wei D, Helvie MA, Adler DD et al (1996) Classification of mass and normal breast tissue: a convolution neural network classifier with spatial domain and texture images. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 15:598–610
Zhang W, Doi K, Giger ML, Wu Y, Nishikawa RM, Schmidt RA (1994) Computerized detection of clustered microcalcifications in digital mammograms using a shift-invariant artificial neural network. Med Phys 21:517–524
Hinton GE, Osindero S, Teh Y-W (2006) A fast learning algorithm for deep belief nets. Neural Comput 18(7):1527–1554
Bengio Y, Lamblin P, Popovici D, Larochelle H (2006) Greedy layer-wise training of deep networks. Proc Adv Neural Inf Process Syst 19:153–160
Erhan D, Bengio Y, Courville A, Manzagol P-A, Vincent P, Bengio S (2010) Why does unsupervised pre-training help deep learning? J Mach Learn Res 11:625–660
Nair V, Hinton GE (2010) Rectified linear units improve restricted boltzmann machines. In: Proceedings of the 27th International Conference on Machine Learning, pp 807–814
Glorot X, Bordes A, Yoshua B (2011) Deep sparse rectifier neural networks. In: Proceedings of the 14th International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Statistics, pp 315–323
Ranzato MA, Huang FJ, Boureau Y-L, LeCun Y (eds) (2007) Unsupervised learning of invariant feature hierarchies with applications to object recognition. In: IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), 17–22 June 2007. Minneapolis, MN, USA
Srivastava N, Hinton G, Krizhevsky A, Sutskever I, Salakhutdinov R (2014) Dropout: a simple way to prevent neural networks from overfitting. J Mach Learn Res 15:1929–1958
Ioffe S, Szegedy C (2015) Batch normalization: accelerating deep network training by reducing internal covariate shift. In: Proceedings of the 32nd International Conference on Machine Learning (ICML’15), vol 37, pp 448–456. arXiv:1502.03167
Krizhevsky A, Sutskever I, Hinton GE (2012) ImageNet classification with deep convolutional neural networks. Adv Neural Inf Process Syst:1097–1105
Russakovsky O, Deng J, Su H, Krause J, Satheesh S, Ma S et al (2015) Imagenet large scale visual recognition challenge. Int J Comput Vis 115(3):211–252
He K, Zhang X, Ren S, Sun J (2015) Deep residual learning for image recognition. In: Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), pp 770–778. arXiv:1512.03385
Sun C, Shrivastava A, Singh S, Gupta A (2017) Revisiting unreasonable effectiveness of data in deep learning era. arXiv:1707.02968
Litjens G, Kooi T, Bejnordi BE, Setio AAA, Ciompi F, Ghafoorian M et al (2017) A survey on deep learning in medical image analysis. Med Image Anal 42:60–88
Sahiner B, Pezeshk A, Hadjiiski LM, Wang X, Drukker K, Cha KH et al (2019) Deep learning in medical imaging and radiation therapy. Med Phys 46(1):e1–e36
Mazurowski MA, Buda M, Saha A, Bashir MR (2019) Deep learning in radiology: an overview of the concepts and a survey of the state of the art with focus on MRI. J Magn Reson Imaging 49(4):939–954
Fauw JD, Ledsam JR, Romera-Paredes B, Nikolov S, Tomasev N, Blackwell S et al (2018) Clinically applicable deep learning for diagnosis and referral in retinal disease. Nat Med 24(9):1342–1350
Janowczyk A, Madahushi A (2016) Deep learning for digital pathology image analysis: a comprehensive tutorial with selected use cases. J Pathol Inform 7:29
Chan H-P, Hadjiiski LM, Samala RK (2019) Computer-aided diagnosis in the era of deep learning. Med Phys (accepted)
Cole EB, Zhang Z, Marques HS, Hendrick RE, Yaffe MJ, Pisano ED (2014) Impact of computer-aided detection systems on radiologist accuracy with digital mammography. AJR Am J Roentgenol 203:909–916
Gilbert FJ, Astley SM, Gillan MGC, Agbaje OF, Wallis MG, James J et al (2008) Single reading with computer-aided detection for screening mammography. N Engl J Med 359(16):1675–1684
Gromet M (2008) Comparison of computer-aided detection to double reading of screening mammograms: review of 231,221 mammograms. Am J Roentgenol 190(4):854–859. https://doi.org/10.2214/ajr.07.2812
Taylor P, Potts HWW (2008) Computer aids and human second reading as interventions in screening mammography: two systematic reviews to compare effects on cancer detection and recall rate. Eur J Cancer 44:798–807
Fenton JJ, Abraham L, Taplin SH, Geller BM, Carney PA, D’Orsi C et al (2011) Effectiveness of computer-aided detection in community mammography practice. J Natl Cancer Inst 103(15):1152–1161. https://doi.org/10.1093/jnci/djr206
Lehman CD, Wellman RD, Buist DSM, Kerlikowske K, Tosteson ANA, Miglioretti DL (2015) Diagnostic accuracy of digital screening mammography with and without computer-aided detection. JAMA Intern Med 175(11):1828–1837
Zech J, Pain M, Titano J, Badgeley M, Schefflein J, Su A et al (2018) Natural language-based machine learning models for the annotation of clinical radiology reports. Radiology 287(2):570–580. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2018171093
Yan K, Wang X, Lu L, Summers RM (2018) DeepLesion: automated mining of large-scale lesion annotations and universal lesion detection with deep learning. J Med Imaging 5(3):036501
Oakden-Rayner L (2017) Exploring the ChestXray14 dataset: problems.https://lukeoakdenrayner.word press.com/2017/12/18/the-chestxray14-dataset-problems/
The Digital mammograph DREAM Challenge (2017).
Yosinski J, Clune J, Bengio Y, Lipson H (2014) How transferable are features in deep neural networks? In: Proceedings of the Advances in neural information processing systems (NIPS’14), pp 3320–3328
Samala RK, Chan H-P, Hadjiiski LM, Helvie MA, Richter CD, Cha K (2019) Breast cancer diagnosis in digital breast tomosynthesis: effects of training sample size on multi-stage transfer learning using deep neural nets. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 38(3):686–696
Taylor L, Nitschke G (2017) Improving deep learning using generic data augmentation. arXiv:1708.06020
Wang J, Perez L (2017) The effectiveness of data augmentation in image classification using deep learning. arXiv:1712.04621
Goodfellow IJ, Pouget-Abadie J, Mirza M, Xu B, Warde-Farley D, Ozairy S et al (2014) Generative Adversarial Nets. arXiv:1406.2661v1
Badano A, Graff CG, Badal A et al (2018) Evaluation of digital breast tomosynthesis as replacement of full-field digital mammography using an in silico imaging trial. JAMA Network Open 1(7):e185474. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2018.5474
Cha KH, Petrick N, Pezeshk A, Graff CG, Sharma D, Badal A et al (2019) Reducing overfitting of a deep learning breast mass detection algorithm in mammography using synthetic images. Proc SPIE 10950:1095004
Pezeshk A, Petrick N, Chen W, Sahiner B (2017) Seamless lesion insertion for data augmentation in CAD training. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 36(4):1005–1015
Efron B (1983) Estimating the error rate of a prediction rule: improvement on cross-validation. J Am Stat Assoc 78:316–331
Fukunaga K, Hayes RR (1989) Effects of sample size on classifier design. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell 11:873–885
Hastie T, Tibshirani R, Friedman J (2001) The elements of statistical learning. Springer-Verlag, New York
Bishop CM (1995) Neural networks for pattern recognition. Clarendon Press, Oxford
Chan H-P, Sahiner B, Wagner RF, Petrick N (1999) Classifier design for computer-aided diagnosis: effects of finite sample size on the mean performance of classical and neural network classifiers. Med Phys 26:2654–2668
Sahiner B, Chan H-P, Petrick N, Wagner RF, Hadjiiski LM (2000) Feature selection and classifier performance in computer-aided diagnosis: the effect of finite sample size. Med Phys 27:1509–1522
Petrick N, Sahiner B, Armato SG, Bert A, Correale L, Delsanto S et al (2013) Evaluation of computer-aided detection and diagnosis systems. Med Phys 40(8):087001. https://doi.org/10.1118/1.4816310
Zech JR, Badgeley MA, Liu M, Costa AB, Titano JJ, Oermann EK (2018) Variable generalization performance of a deep learning model to detect pneumonia in chest radiographs: a cross-sectional study. PLOS Med 15(11):e1002683
Conant EF, Toledano AY, Periaswamy S, Fotin SV, Go J, Hoffmeister JW et al (2018) Improving accuracy and efficiency with concurrent use of artificial intelligence for digital breast tomosynthesis screening. In: Radiological Society of North America Scientific Assembly and Annual Meeting. RC215-14
Kyono T, Gilbert FJ, van der Schaar M (2019) Improving workflow efficiency for mammography using machine learning. J Am Coll Radiol. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacr.2019.05.012
Huo ZM, Summers RM, Paquerault S, Lo J, Hoffmeister J, Armato SG et al (2013) Quality assurance and training procedures for computer-aided detection and diagnosis systems in clinical use. Med Phys 40(7):077001. https://doi.org/10.1118/1.4807642
Zeiler MD, Fergus R (2014) Visualizing and understanding convolutional networks. In: Lecture Notes in Computer Science Computer Vision – European Conference on Computer Vision (ECCV) 2014, vol 8689, pp 818–833
Yosinski J, Clune J, Nguyen A, Fuchs T, Lipson H (2015) Understanding neural networks through deep visualization. arXiv:1506.06579v1
Zhou B, Khosla A, Lapedriza A, Oliva A, Torralba A (2016) Learning deep features for discriminative localization. In: Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), pp 2921–2929
Samala RK, Chan H-P, Hadjiiski LM, Helvie MA, Cha KH, Richter CD (2017) Multi-task transfer learning deep convolutional neural network: application to computer-aided diagnosis of breast cancer on mammograms. Phys Med Biol 62:8894–8908
Acknowledgment
This work is supported by National Institutes of Health award number R01 CA214981.
Disclosures
The authors have no conflicts to disclose.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Chan, HP., Samala, R.K., Hadjiiski, L.M., Zhou, C. (2020). Deep Learning in Medical Image Analysis. In: Lee, G., Fujita, H. (eds) Deep Learning in Medical Image Analysis . Advances in Experimental Medicine and Biology, vol 1213. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-33128-3_1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-33128-3_1
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-33127-6
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-33128-3
eBook Packages: Biomedical and Life SciencesBiomedical and Life Sciences (R0)