Skip to main content

Integrating Personality and Relationship Science to Explain Physical and Mental Health

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Personality and Healthy Aging in Adulthood

Part of the book series: International Perspectives on Aging ((Int. Perspect. Aging,volume 26))

Abstract

The aim of the current chapter is to discuss how personality and relationship processes (i.e., relationship experiences and outcomes) may interact to influence physical and mental health across the lifespan. We begin with a discussion of how our romantic relationships contribute to our health and how two prominent personality theories (i.e., attachment theory and the Big Five model) can be used to predict some of the relationship outcomes and behaviours that are important in this connection. Next, we showcase some of the prominent models enabling researchers to characterize how personality and relationship factors can work together to influence health. We close with a discussion of future directions that will help to guide researchers who hope to examine the combined impact that personality and relationships have on health.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 149.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ahmetoglu, G., Swami, V., & Chamorro-Premuzic, T. (2010). The relationship between dimensions of love, personality, and relationship length. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 39(5), 1181–1190.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Badr, H., Laurenceau, J. P., Schart, L., Basen-Engquist, K., & Turk, D. (2010). The daily impact of pain from metastatic breast cancer on spousal relationships: A dyadic electronic diary study. Pain, 151(3), 644–654.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barelds, D. P. H. (2005). Self and partner personality in intimate relationships. European Journal of Personality, 19(6), 501–518.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baumeister, R. F., & Leary, M. R. (1995). The need to belong: Desire for interpersonal attachments as a fundamental human motivation. Psychological Bulletin, 117(3), 497–529.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bennett, K. M. (2006). Does marital status and marital status change predict physical health in older adults? Psychological Medicine, 36, 1313–1320.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bentler, P. M., & Newcomb, M. D. (1978). Longitudinal study of marital success and failure. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 46(5), 1053–1070.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Birnbaum, G. E., Orr, I., Mikulincer, M., & Florian, V. (1997). When marriage breaks up: Does attachment style contribute to coping and mental health? Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 14(5), 643–654.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bogg, T., & Roberts, B. W. (2004). Conscientiousness and health-related behaviors: A meta-analysis of the leading behavioral contributors to mortality. Psychological Bulletin, 130(6), 887–919.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bookwala, J. (2005). The role of marital quality in physical health during the mature years. Journal of Aging and Health, 17(1), 85–104.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bookwala, J., & Schultz, R. (1996). Spousal similarity in subjective well-being: The cardiovascular health study. Psychology and Aging, 11(4), 586–590.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bowlby, J. (1969). Attachment and loss: Vol. 1: Attachment. New York, NY: Basic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brennan, K. A., Clark, C. L., & Shaver, P. R. (1998). Self-report measurement of adult romantic attachment: An integrative overview. In J. A. Simpson & W. S. Rholes (Eds.), Attachment theory and close relationships (pp. 46–76). New York, NY: Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brunell, A. B., & Campbell, W. K. (2011). Narcissism and romantic relationships: Understanding the paradox. In W. K. Campbell & J. D. Miller (Eds.), The handbook of narcissism and narcissistic personality disorder: Theoretical approaches, empirical findings, and treatments (pp. 344–350). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, L., & Marshall, T. (2011). Anxious attachment and relationship processes: An interactionist perspective. Journal of Personality, 79(6), 1219–1250.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, L., Simpson, J. A., Boldry, J., & Kashy, D. A. (2005). Perceptions of conflict and support in romantic relationships: The role of attachment anxiety. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 88(3), 510–531.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2017). Leading causes of death. Retrieved from https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/fastats/leading-causes-of-death.htm

  • Choi, H., & Marks, N. F. (2008). Marital conflict, depressive symptoms, and functional impairment. Journal of Marriage and Family, 70(2), 377–390.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chopik, W. J., & Lucas, R. E. (2019). Actor, partner, and similarity effects of personality on global and experienced well-being. Journal of Research in Personality, 78, 249–261.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crowell, J., & Treboux, D. (2001). Attachment security in adult partnerships. In C. Clulow (Ed.), Adult attachment and couple psychotherapy: The ’secure base’ in practice and research (pp. 28–42). New York, NY: Brunner-Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Datta, G. D., Neville, B. A., Kawachi, I., Datta, N. S., & Earle, C. C. (2009). Marital status and survival following bladder cancer. Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health, 63(10), 807–813.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davila, J., & Bradbury, T. N. (2001). Attachment insecurity and the distinction between unhappy spouses who do and do not divorce. Journal of Family Psychology, 15(3), 371–393.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davila, J., Karney, B. R., & Bradbury, T. N. (1999). Attachment change processes in the early years of marriage. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 76(5), 783–802.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davila, J., Karney, B. R., Hall, T. W., & Bradbury, T. N. (2003). Depressive symptoms and marital satisfaction: Within-subject associations and the moderating effects of gender and neuroticism. Journal of Family Psychology, 17(4), 557–570.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ditzen, B., Hoppmann, C., & Klumb, P. (2008). Positive couple interactions and daily cortisol: On the stress-protecting role of intimacy. Psychosomatic Medicine, 70(8), 883–889.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Donnellan, M. B., Conger, R. D., & Bryant, C. M. (2004). The big five and enduring marriages. Journal of Research in Personality, 38(5), 481–504.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Duemmler, S. L., & Kobak, R. (2001). The development of commitment and attachment in dating relationships: Attachment security as relationship construct. Journal of Adolescence, 24(3), 401–415.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dupre, M. E., Beck, A. N., & Meadows, S. O. (2009). Marital trajectories and mortality among US adults. American Journal of Epidemiology, 170(5), 546–555.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dyrenforth, P. S., Kashy, D. A., Donnellan, M. B., & Lucas, R. E. (2010). Predicting relationship and life satisfaction from personality in nationally representative samples from three countries: The relative importance of actor, partner, and similarity effects. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 99(4), 690–702.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Engel, G., Olson, K. R., & Patrick, C. (2002). The personality of love: Fundamental motives and traits related to components of love. Personality and Individual Differences, 32(5), 839–853.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Etcheverry, P. E., Le, B., Wu, T. F., & Wei, M. (2013). Attachment and the investment model: Predictors of relationship commitment, maintenance, and persistence. Personal Relationships, 20(3), 546–567.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fincham, F. D., & Beach, S. R. H. (1999). Conflict in marriage: Implications for working with couples. Annual Review of Psychology, 50, 47–77.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fraley, R. C., & Shaver, P. R. (2000). Adult romantic attachment: Theoretical developments, emerging controversies, and unanswered questions. Review of General Psychology, 4(2), 132–154.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frech, A., & Williams, K. (2007). Depression and the psychological benefits of entering marriage. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 48(2), 149–163.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gottman, J. M., & Notarius, C. I. (2002). Marital research in the 20th century and a research agenda for the 21st century. Family Process, 41(2), 159–197.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gove, W. R., & Tudor, J. F. (1973). Adult sex roles and mental illness. American Journal of Sociology, 78, 812–835.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Graziano, W. G., Jensen-Campbell, L. A., & Hair, E. C. (1996). Perceiving interpersonal conflict and reacting to it: The case for agreeableness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70(4), 820–835.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hawkins, D. N., & Booth, A. (2005). Unhappily ever after: Effects of long-term, low-quality marriages on Well-being. Social Forces, 84(1), 451–471.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hazan, C., & Shaver, P. R. (1994). Attachment as an organizational framework for research on close relationships. Psychological Inquiry, 5((1)), 1–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Horwitz, A. V., White, H. R., & Howell-White, S. (1996). Becoming married and mental health: A longitudinal analysis of a cohort of young adults. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 58, 895–907.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jackson, J. J., Wood, D., Bogg, T., Walton, K., Harms, P., & Roberts, B. W. (2010). What do conscientious people do? Development and validation of the Behavioral Indicators of Conscientiousness Scale (BICS). Journal of Research in Personality, 44, 501–511.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jensen-Campbell, L. A., & Graziano, W. G. (2001). Agreeableness as a moderator of interpersonal conflict. Journal of Personality, 69(2), 323–362.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • John, O. P., & Srivastava, S. (1999). The Big Five Trait taxonomy: History, measurement, and theoretical perspectives. In L. A. Pervin & O. P. John (Eds.), Handbook of personality: Theory and research (pp. 102–138). New York, NY: Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kenny, D. A. (2018). Reflections on the actor–partner interdependence model. Personal Relationships, 25(2), 1–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kenny, D. A., Kashy, D. A., & Cook, W. L. (2006). Methodology in the social sciences (David A. Kenny, Series Editor). Dyadic data analysis. New York, NY: Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kessler, R. C., & Essex, M. (1982). Marital status and depression: The importance of coping resources. Social Forces, 61(2), 484–507.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kiecolt-Glaser, J. K. (2018). Marriage, divorce, and the immune system. American Psychologist, 73(9), 1098–1108.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kiecolt-Glaser, J. K., Loving, T. J., Stowell, J. R., Malarkey, W. B., Lemeshow, S., Dickinson, S. L., & Glaser, R. (2005). Hostile marital interactions, proinflammatory cytokine production, and wound healing. Archives of General Psychiatry, 62(12), 1377–1384.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kiecolt-Glaser, J. K., & Newton, T. L. (2001). Marriage and health: His and hers. Psychological Bulletin, 127(4), 472–503.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kim, E. S., Chopik, W. J., & Smith, J. (2014). Are people healthier if their partners are more optimistic? The dyadic effect of optimism on health among older adults. Journal of Psychosomatic Research, 76(6), 447–453.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kirkpatrick, L. A., & Davis, K. E. (1994). Attachment style, gender, and relationship stability: A longitudinal analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 66(3), 502–512.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kurdek, L. A. (1993). Predicting marital dissolution: A 5-year prospective longitudinal study of newlywed couples. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 64(2), 221–242.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lavy, S., Mikulincer, M., & Shaver, P. R. (2013). Intrusiveness from an attachment theory perspective: A dyadic diary study. Personality and Individual Differences, 55(8), 972–977.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ledermann, T., & Kenny, D. A. (2017). Analyzing dyadic data with multilevel modeling versus structural equation modeling: A tale of two methods. Journal of Family Psychology, 31(4), 442–452.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee-Baggley, D., Preece, M., & DeLongis, A. (2005). Coping with interpersonal stress: Role of big five traits. Journal of Personality, 73(5), 1141–1180.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Malouff, J. M., Thorsteinsson, E. B., Schutte, N. S., Bhullar, N., & Rooke, S. E. (2010). The Five-Factor Model of personality and relationship satisfaction of intimate partners: A meta-analysis. Journal of Research in Personality, 44(1), 124–127.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mikulincer, M., & Shaver, P. R. (2012). Attachment theory expanded: A behavioral systems approach. In K. Deaux & M. Snyder (Eds.), Oxford Library of Psychology. The Oxford handbook of personality and social psychology (pp. 467–492). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mikulincer, M., & Shaver, P. R. (2016). Attachment in adulthood: Structure, dynamics and change (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Guilfold Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, G. E., Dopp, J. M., Myers, H. F., Stevens, S. Y., & Fahey, J. L. (1999). Psychosocial predictors of natural killer cell mobilization during marital conflict. Health Psychology, 18(3), 262–271.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Murray, S. L., Rose, P., Bellavia, G. M., Holmes, J. G., & Kusche, A. G. (2002). When rejection stings: How self-esteem constrains relationship-enhancement processes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83(3), 556–573.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Neff, L. A., & Karney, B. R. (2009). Stress and reactivity to daily relationship experiences: How stress hinders adaptive processes in marriage. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 97(3), 435–450.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nilsson, P. M., Engstrom, G., & Hedblad, B. (2008). Long-term predictors of increased mortality risk in screened men with new hypertension: The Malmo preventive project. Journal of Hypertension, 26(12), 2284–2294.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Noftle, E. E., & Shaver, P. R. (2006). Attachment dimensions and the big five personality traits: Associations and comparative ability to predict relationship quality. Journal of Research in Personality, 40(2), 179–208.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Overbeek, G., Vollebergh, W., de Graaf, R., Scholte, R., de Kemp, R., & Engels, R. (2006). Longitudinal associations of marital quality and marital dissolution with the incidence of DSM-III-R disorders. Journal of Family Psychology, 20(2), 284–291.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pietromonaco, P. R., Uchino, B., & Dunkel Schetter, C. (2013). Close relationship processes and health: Implications of attachment theory for health and disease. Health Psychology, 32(5), 499–513.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Powers, S. I., Pietromonaco, P. R., Gunlicks, M., & Sayer, A. (2006). Dating couples’ attachment styles and patterns of cortisol reactivity and recovery in response to a relationship conflict. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 90(4), 613–628.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Proulx, C. M., Helms, H. M., & Buehler, C. (2007). Marital quality and personal well-being: A meta-analysis. Journal of Marriage and Family, 69(3), 576–593.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roberts, B. W., Kuncel, N. R., Shiner, R., Caspi, A., & Goldberg, L. R. (2007). The power of personality: The comparative validity of personality traits, socioeconomic status, and cognitive ability for predicting important life outcomes. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 2(4), 313–345.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roberts, B. W., Jackson, J. J., Fayard, J. V., Edmonds, G., & Meints, J. (2009a). Conscientiousness. In M. R. Leary & R. H. Hoyle (Eds.), Handbook of individual differences in social behavior (pp. 369–381). New York, NY: The Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roberts, B. W., Smith, J., Jackson, J. J., & Edmonds, G. (2009b). Compensatory conscientiousness and health in older couples. Psychological Science, 20(5), 553–559.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robins, R. W., Caspi, A., & Moffitt, T. E. (2002). It’s not just who you’re with, it’s who you are: Personality and relationship experiences across multiple relationships. Journal of Personality, 70(6), 925–964.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robles, T. F., & Kiecolt-Glaser, J. K. (2003). The physiology of marriage: Pathways to health. Physiology & Behavior, 79(3), 409–416.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robles, T. F., Slatcher, R. B., Trombello, J. M., & McGinn, M. M. (2014). Marital quality and health: A meta-analytic review. Psychological Bulletin, 140(1), 140–187.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rogers, R. G. (1995). Marriage, sex, and mortality. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 57(2), 515–526.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rohrer, J. E., Bernard, M. E., Zhang, Y., Rasmussen, N. H., & Woroncow, H. (2008). Marital status, feeling depressed and self-rated health in rural female primary care patients. Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice, 14(2), 214–217.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rook, K. S., & Zettel, L. A. (2005). The purported benefits of marriage viewed through the lens of physical health. Psychological Inquiry, 16(2), 116–121.

    Google Scholar 

  • Russell, R. J. H., & Wells, P. A. (1994). Predictors of happiness in married couples. Personality and Individual Differences, 17(3), 313–321.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shaver, P. R., & Mikulincer, M. (2007). Adult attachment strategies and the regulation of emotion. In J. J. Gross (Ed.), Handbook of emotion regulation (pp. 446–465). New York, NY: The Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simpson, J. A., Rholes, W. S., & Nelligan, J. S. (1992). Support seeking and support giving within couples in an anxiety-provoking situation: The role of attachment styles. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 62(3), 434–446.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Slatcher, R. B., & Selcuk, E. (2017). A social psychological perspective on the links between close relationships and health. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 26(1), 16–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Solomon, B. C., & Jackson, J. J. (2014). Why do personality traits predict divorce? Multiple pathways through satisfaction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 106(6), 978–996.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Statistics Canada. (2015). Leading causes of death in Canada, 2009. Retrieved from https://www150.statcan.gc.ca/n1/pub/84-215-x/2012001/hl-fs-eng.htm

  • Taraban, C. B., Hendrick, S. S., & Hendrick, C. (1998). Loving and liking. In P. A. Andersen & L. K. Guerrero (Eds.), Handbook of communication and emotion (pp. 331–351). San Diego, CA: Academic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tobin, R. M., Graziano, W. G., Vanman, E. J., & Tassinary, L. G. (2000). Personality, emotional experience, and efforts to control emotions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79(4), 656–669.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tucker, J. S., Friedman, H. S., Wingard, D. L., & Schwartz, J. E. (1996). Marital history at midlife as a predictor of longevity: Alternative explanations to the protective effect of marriage. Health Psychology, 15(2), 94–101.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Umberson, D. (1992). Gender, marital status and the social control of health behavior. Social Science & Medicine, 34(8), 907–917.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Umberson, D., & Williams, K. (1999). Family status and mental health. In C. S. Aneshensel & J. C. Phelan (Eds.), Handbook of sociology of mental health (pp. 225–253). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Umberson, D., Williams, K., Powers, D. A., Liu, H., & Needham, B. (2006). You make me sick: Marital quality and health over the life course. Journal of Health and Social Behaviour, 47(1), 1–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wadworth, T. (2016). Marriage and subjective well-being: How and why context matters. Social Indicators Research, 126(3), 1025–1048.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Waite, L. J., & Gallagher, M. (2000). The case for marriage: Why married people are happier, healthier and better off financially. New York, NY: Doubleday.

    Google Scholar 

  • Watson, D., Hubbard, B., & Wiese, D. (2000). Self–other agreement in personality and affectivity: The role of acquaintanceship, trait visibility, and assumed similarity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78(3), 546–558.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Whisman, M. A. (2001). The association between depression and marital dissatisfaction. In S. R. H. Beach (Ed.), Marital and family processes in depression: A scientific foundation for clinical practice (pp. 3–24). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Wickrama, K. A. S., Lorenz, F. O., Conger, R. D., & Elder, G. H. (1997). Marital quality and physical illness: A latent growth curve analysis. Journal of Marriage and Family, 59, 143–155.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williams, K., & Umberson, D. (2004). Marital status, marital transitions, and health: A gendered life course perspective. Journal of Health and Social Behaviour, 45(1), 81–98.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hannah Brazeau .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Brazeau, H., Chopik, W.J. (2020). Integrating Personality and Relationship Science to Explain Physical and Mental Health. In: Hill, P.L., Allemand, M. (eds) Personality and Healthy Aging in Adulthood. International Perspectives on Aging, vol 26. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-32053-9_2

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics