Skip to main content

A Multi-criteria Decision-Making Model for Digital Transformation in Manufacturing: A Case Study from Automotive Supplier Industry

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Proceedings of the International Symposium for Production Research 2019 (ISPR 2019, ISPR 2019)

Abstract

In digital transformation era, technology selection stands as a critical strategic technology management process for manufacturing companies in developing countries who struggle to adapt themselves to technological change despite their limited financial, technological and organizational resources and capabilities. In literature background, various scholars discussed that, regardless of scale, companies which had been able to apply lean production principles and techniques in their manufacturing processes, have the advantage of utilizing their process management (including measurement and control) systems as a leverage in effective needs and benefit analysis. However, determining both the various implications and costs together with the potential benefits of technology transfer requires a multidimensional analysis which includes technological, organizational, operational, economic, legal aspects in a common framework. Even if the company is competent in technology assessment, they may still face the challenge of combining multiple criteria that can enable contextual decision making for “appropriate” technology acquisition. In this framework, by utilizing a case study from a major automotive parts supplier company in Turkey, our study aims to explore the criteria and methods/techniques that can be used within a structured feasibility analysis (which may serve as a) decision making model for identifying appropriate technologies for effective digital transformation in accordance with the process improvement needs of manufacturing companies in developing country contexts. For this, after a detailed review of literature and similar practices in the selected industry, we defined the multiple dimensions of technology selection decision models. We also analysed current technology transfer needs of the selected company by process analysis techniques from lean production theory (Value Stream mapping, SPC) and also collected opinions of the practitioner experts. As the selected company is a supplier of a Japanese automotive manufacturer and has been applying lean production techniques for several decades, we could be able to use the information/data which the company provided. As well, to define the potential technologies that can respond to the defined needs, we applied technology auditing for available Industry 4.0 technologies with content analysis on literature and with interviews with the experts from the field. Together with the financial feasibility with NPV, ROI, Technology Acquisition Cost Analysis and Impact on labour productivity measures (where the horizon value is adapted for income/cost saving analysis), we designed a multi criteria decision making model which includes organizational, economic, technical and regulative factors and their sub-criteria, we proposed the feasibility analysis model. The proposed model is applied for the potential Industry 4.0 technologies which may respond to the process improvement needs of the studied company. To rank the feasibility results, we used TOPSIS multiple criteria decision-making method in the final phase.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Sanders, A., Elangeswaran, C., Wulfsberg, J.: Industry 4.0 implies lean manufacturing: research activities in Industry 4.0 function as enablers for lean manufacturing. J. Ind. Eng. Manag. 9(3), 811–833 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Küpper, D., Heidemann, A., Ströhle, J., Spindelndreier, D., Knizek, C.: When Lean Meets Industry 4.0: The Next Level of Operational Excellence. Boston Consulting Group, Boston (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Garbie, I.: Sustainability in Manufacturing Enterprises: Concepts, Analyses and Assessments for Industry 4.0. Springer International (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Deloitte Development LLC: Advanced Technologies Initiative Manufacturing & Innovation. McKinsey & Company (2015). Industry 4.0: How to navigate digitization of the manufacturing sector (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Nilsen, S., Nyberg, E.: The adoption of Industry 4.0-technologies in manufacturing – a multiple case study. (Master thesis). KTH Industrial Engineering and Management, Stockholm, Oesterreich (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Frost & Sullivan: From concept to production: A 5-step approach towards successful Industry 4.0 projects, A Frost & Sullivan white paper with contributions from Bosch Software Innovations (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  7. TÜSİAD & BCG: Industry 4.0 in Turkey as an Imperative for Global Competitiveness, an Emerging Market Perspective (Yayın No: T/2016 03/576), İstanbul (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Küpper, D., Kuhlmann, K., Köcher, S., Dauner, T., Burggräf, P.: The Factory of the Future. Boston Consulting Group, Boston (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Monden, Y.: Toyota Production System. Institute of Industrial Engineers Press, Norcross (1983)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Ohno, T.: Toyota Production System: Beyond Large-Scale Production. CRC Press, New York (1988)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Roos, D., Womack, J., Jones, D.: The Machine That Changed the World: The Story of Lean Production. Google Scholar, New York (1991)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Rother, M., Shook, J.: Learning to See: Value-Stream Mapping to Create Value and Eliminate MUDA; A Lean Tool Kit Method and Workbook. The Lean Enterprise Institute, Brookline (1999). ISBN 978-0966784305

    Google Scholar 

  13. Womack, J.P., Jones, D.T.: Lean Thinking, revised edn. (2003). Presentation-Smart-Manufacturing-Sept-13-2017_Vienna.pdf

    Google Scholar 

  14. Bosch, Nexeed Track and Trace Starter Kit. https://www.bosch-connected-industry.com/en/connected-logistics/nexeedtrack-and-trace/nexeed-track-and-trace-starter-kit/. Accessed 20 Nov 2018

  15. Bosch, Trackmytools. https://www.bosch.com/stories/trackmytools/. Accessed 20 Nov 2018

  16. Bosch Software Innovations: Industry 4.0 Product Catalog (2017). https://www.boschpresse.de/pressportal/de/media/migrated_download/Bosch_Industrie_4.0_EN.pdf. Accessed 15 Nov 2018

  17. Chalifoux, C.: Smart Cameras in a Manufacturing Environment: Today and in the Future. Quality, 6-7 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Finkenzeller, K.: RFID Handbook: Fundamentals and Applications in Contactless Smart Cards, Radio Frequency Identification and Near-Field Communication. Wiley, London (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Houti, M., Abbadi, L.E., Abouabdellah, A.: E-Kanban the New Generation of Traditional Kanban System, and the Impact of Its Implementation in the Enterprise, s. 1–11 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Hofmann-Wellenhof, B., Lichtenegger, H., Collins, J.: Global Positioning System: Theory and Practice. Springer, New York (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Jarupathirun, S., Ciganek, A.P., Chotiwankaewmanee, T., Kerdpitak, C.: Supply chain efficiencies through e-Kanban: a case study. Int. J. Comput. Internet Manag. 17(1), 55-1 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Kuka: KUKA Mobil Platform 1500 (2018). https://www.kuka.com/tr-tr/%C3%BCr%C3%BCnler-hizmetler/mobilite/mobil-platformlar/kmp-1500#. Accessed 10 Dec 2018

  23. Jetter, J., Eimecke, J., Rese, A.: Augmented reality tools for industrial applications: what are potential key performance indicators and who benefits? Comput. Hum. Behav. 87, 18–33 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Brick, I.E.: Lecture Notes in Introduction to Corporate Finance (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  25. PWC: Five trends transforming the Automotive Industry (2018). https://eu-smartcities.eu/sites/default/files/2018–03/pwc-five-trendstransforming-the-automotive-industry.compressed.pdf. Accessed 27 December 2018

  26. Bloomberg (2018). https://www.bloomberght.com/tahvil/faiz. Accessed 27 December 2018

  27. Bloomberg (2018). https://www.bloomberght.com/doviz/. Accessed 27 December 2018

  28. Liker, J.K., Meier, D.: The Toyota Way Fieldbook: A Practical Guide for Implementing Toyotas 4Ps. McGraw-Hill, New York (2006). ISBN: 0-07-144893-4

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hüseyin Furkan Beyaz .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Appendix 1

Appendix 1

Total Scores of Technologies by Feasibility Sub-Factors

figure a

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Beyaz, H.F., Yıldırım, N. (2020). A Multi-criteria Decision-Making Model for Digital Transformation in Manufacturing: A Case Study from Automotive Supplier Industry. In: Durakbasa, N., Gençyılmaz, M. (eds) Proceedings of the International Symposium for Production Research 2019. ISPR ISPR 2019 2019. Lecture Notes in Mechanical Engineering. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-31343-2_19

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-31343-2_19

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-31342-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-31343-2

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics