Skip to main content

The RealEstateCore Ontology

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
The Semantic Web – ISWC 2019 (ISWC 2019)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNISA,volume 11779))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

Recent developments in data analysis and machine learning support novel data-driven operations optimizations in the real estate industry, enabling new services, improved well-being for tenants, and reduced environmental footprints. The real estate industry is, however, fragmented in terms of systems and data formats. This paper introduces RealEstateCore (REC), an OWL 2 ontology which enables data integration for smart buildings. REC is developed by a consortium including some of the largest real estate companies in northern Europe. It is available under the permissive MIT license, is developed and hosted at GitHub, and is seeing adoption among both its creator companies and other product and service companies in the Nordic real estate market. We present and discuss the ontology’s development drivers and process, its structure, deployments within several companies, and the organization and plan for maintaining and evolving REC in the future.

Resource Type: Ontology

IRI: https://w3id.org/rec/full/3.0/

DOI: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.2628367

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 69.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 89.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    https://realestatecore.io/.

  2. 2.

    At Vasakronan, a key REC sponsor and user, a September 2018 inventory of the deployed building automation systems identified more than 10 different archetypes (climate control, access control, fire alarm, elevator control, etc.) and up to 30 different vendors and version combinations—it’s a mess.

  3. 3.

    We have used the cpannotationschema:coversRequirements annotation property for this purpose; while it was originally designed to cover CQ requirements on ODPs, we have found no more suitable vocabulary for expressing CQ:s over ontologies.

  4. 4.

    owl:equivalentClass, owl:equivalentProperty, rdfs:seeAlso, owl:sameAs, skos:related, etc.

  5. 5.

    https://github.com/RealEstateCore/rec.

  6. 6.

    http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/.

  7. 7.

    http://creativecommons.org/ns.

  8. 8.

    http://purl.org/vocab/vann/.

  9. 9.

    http://xmlns.com/foaf/spec/.

  10. 10.

    https://doc.realestatecore.io/3.0/full/.

  11. 11.

    https://lov.linkeddata.es.

  12. 12.

    http://qudt.org/schema/qudt/.

  13. 13.

    https://thingsboard.io/.

  14. 14.

    https://web.archive.org/web/20190405122638/https://github.com/BuildingsLabs/EboIoTEdgeConnector.

  15. 15.

    https://w3id.org/rec/api/2.3/graph/.

  16. 16.

    https://w3id.org/rec/api/2.3/streaming/.

References

  1. Balaji, B., et al.: Brick: towards a unified metadata schema for buildings. In: Proceedings of the 3rd ACM International Conference on Systems for Energy-Efficient Built Environments, pp. 41–50. ACM (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Bazjanac, V., Crawley, D.: Industry foundation classes and interoperable commercial software in support of design of energy-efficient buildings. In: Proceedings of Building Simulation 1999, vol. 2, pp. 661–667 (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Bazjanac, V., Crawley, D.B.: The implementation of industry foundation classes in simulation tools for the building industry. Technical report, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Beetz, J., Van Leeuwen, J., De Vries, B.: Ifcowl: a case of transforming express schemas into ontologies. Ai Edam 23(1), 89–101 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Blomqvist, E., Hammar, K., Presutti, V.: Engineering ontologies with patterns - the eXtreme design methodology. In: Hitzler, P., Gangemi, A., Janowicz, K., Krisnadhi, A., Presutti, V. (eds.) Ontology Engineering with Ontology Design Patterns: Foundations and Applications, pp. 23–50. IOS Press, Amsterdam (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Daniele, L., den Hartog, F., Roes, J.: Created in close interaction with the industry: the Smart Appliances REFerence (SAREF) ontology. In: Cuel, R., Young, R. (eds.) FOMI 2015. LNBIP, vol. 225, pp. 100–112. Springer, Cham (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-21545-7_9

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  7. Evans, R., Gao, J.: DeepMind AI reduces energy used for cooling Google data centers by 40%, July 2016. https://web.archive.org/web/20190322212318/blog.google/outreach-initiatives/environment/deepmind-ai-reduces-energy-used-for/. Accessed 26 Mar 2019

  8. Froese, T., et al.: Industry foundation classes for project management-a trial implementation. Electron. J. Inf. Technol. Constr. 4, 17–36 (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Garijo, D.: WIDOCO: a wizard for documenting ontologies. In: d’Amato, C., et al. (eds.) ISWC 2017. LNCS, vol. 10588, pp. 94–102. Springer, Cham (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-68204-4_9

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  10. Haller, A., et al.: The modular SSN ontology: a joint W3C and OGC standard specifying the semantics of sensors, observations, sampling, and actuation. Semantic Web 10(1), 9–32 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Hammar, K.: Content Ontology Design Patterns: Qualities, Methods, and Tools, vol. 1879. Linköping University Electronic Press, Oslo (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Janowicz, K., Haller, A., Cox, S.J., Le Phuoc, D., Lefrançois, M.: SOSA: a lightweight ontology for sensors, observations, samples, and actuators. J. Web Semantics 56, 1–10 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Klein, M.C., Fensel, D.: Ontology versioning on the semantic web. In: SWWS, pp. 75–91 (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Lohmann, S., Negru, S., Haag, F., Ertl, T.: Visualizing ontologies with VOWL. Semantic Web 7(4), 399–419 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Preston-Werner, T.: Semantic versioning 2.0.0. https://web.archive.org/web/20190321081743/semver.org/spec/v2.0.0.html. Accessed 26 Mar 2019

  16. Wiens, V., Lohmann, S., Auer, S.: WebVOWL editor: device-independent visual ontology modeling. In: Proceedings of the ISWC 2018 Posters & Demonstrations, Industry and Blue Sky Ideas Tracks. CEUR Workshop Proceedings, vol. 2180. CEUR-WS.org (2018)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Karl Hammar .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Hammar, K., Wallin, E.O., Karlberg, P., Hälleberg, D. (2019). The RealEstateCore Ontology. In: Ghidini, C., et al. The Semantic Web – ISWC 2019. ISWC 2019. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 11779. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-30796-7_9

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-30796-7_9

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-30795-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-30796-7

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics