Skip to main content

Mutual Status Stereotypes Maintain Inequality

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
The Social Psychology of Inequality

Abstract

Status and power stratification seem virtually inevitable in human societies. The advantages of the powerful and higher status are exaggerated by inequality, increasing cross-class resentment. Across nations, high-SES people are stereotyped as competent but cold and low-SES people as incompetent (and sometimes as warm). So, upper classes feel disliked and lower classes feel disrespected. These societal stereotypes provide a rational account for inequality, a convenient target of resentment, and a strategy to maintain unequal systems. Additionally, more unequal societies use more mixed, ambivalent stereotype: Stereotypes of deserving and undeserving poor or deserving and undeserving rich disguise or at least complicate the blunt facts of unequal advantage. These mixed stereotypes operate in both directions, up and down the hierarchy (they are mutual), thus affecting cross-class interpersonal interactions. Reconciliation is possible but requires structural changes. Awareness of inequality and changes in ideologies supporting inequality (i.e., meritocracy) may also help the process. But all social classes have a role to play.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 139.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 179.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 179.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Alesina, A., Stantcheva, S., & Teso, E. (2018). Intergenerational mobility and preferences for redistribution. American Economic Review, 108, 521–554.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aydin, A. L., Ullrich, J., Siem, B., Locke, K. D., & Shnabel, N. (2018). The effect of social class on agency and communion: Reconciling identity-based and rank-based perspectives. Social Psychological and Personality Science. OnlineFirst publication. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550618785162

  • Barbalet, J. M. (1992). A macro sociology of emotion: Class resentment. Sociological Theory, 10, 150–163.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bensman, J., & Vidich, A. (1962). Business cycles, class and personality. Psychoanalysis and the Psychoanalytic Review, 49, 30–52.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bergsieker, H. B., Shelton, J. N., & Richeson, J. a. (2010). To be liked versus respected: Divergent goals in interracial interactions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 99, 248–264.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bourdieu, P. (1979). Les trois états du capital culturel. Actes de la Recherche en Sciences Sociales, 30, 3–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown-Iannuzzi, J. L., Dotsch, R., Cooley, E., & Payne, B. K. (2017). The relationship between mental representations of welfare recipients and attitudes toward welfare. Psychological Science, 28, 92–103.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bullock, H. E., & Reppond, H. A. (2018). Of “takers” and “makers”: A social psychological analysis of class and classism. In P. L. Hammack Jr. (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of social psychology and social justice (pp. 223–243). New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bullock, H. E., Wyche, K. F., & Williams, W. R. (2001). Media images of the poor. Journal of Social Issues, 57, 229–246.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bye, H. H., Herrebrøden, H., Hjetland, G. J., Røyset, G. Ø., & Westby, L. L. (2014). Stereotypes of Norwegian social groups. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 55, 469–476.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Christopher, A. N., & Schlenker, B. R. (2000). The impact of perceived material wealth and perceiver personality on first impressions. Journal of Economic Psychology, 21, 1–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Corak, M. (2013). Income inequality, equality of opportunity, and intergenerational mobility. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 27, 79–102.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cozzarelli, C., Wilkinson, A. V., & Tagler, M. J. (2001). Attitudes towards the poor and attributions for poverty. Journal of Social Issues, 57, 207–227.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cramer, K. J. (2016). The politics of resentment: Rural consciousness in Wisconsin and the rise of Scott Walker. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Darley, J. M., & Gross, P. H. (1983). A hypothesis-confirming bias in labeling effects. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 44, 20–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Day, M. V., & Fiske, S. T. (2017). Movin’on up? How perceptions of social mobility affect our willingness to defend the system. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 8, 267–274.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Dupree, C. H., & Fiske, S. T. (2019). Self-presentation in interracial settings: The competence downshift by White Liberals. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology., 117(3), 579–604.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Durante, F., Bearns Tablante, C. B., & Fiske, S. T. (2017). Poor but warm, rich but cold (and competent): Social classes in the Stereotype Content Model. Journal of Social Issues, 73, 138–157.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Durante, F., & Fiske, S. T. (2017). How social-class stereotypes maintain inequality. Current Opinion in Psychology, 18, 43–48.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Durante, F., & Fiske S. T. (2018). Inequality and ambivalent social class stereotypes across countries. Society for Personality and Social Psychology (SPSP) Annual Convention – Preconference: “The Psychology of Inequality and Social Class”, Atlanta, GA, USA, 1–3 Mar 2018.

    Google Scholar 

  • Durante, F., Fiske, S. T., Kervyn, N., Cuddy, A. J. C., Akande, A., Adetoun, B. E., et al. (2013). Nations’ income inequality predicts ambivalence in stereotype content: How societies mind the gap. British Journal of Social Psychology, 52, 726–746.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Exline, J. J., & Lobel, M. (1999). The perils of outperformance: Sensitivity about being the target of a threatening upward comparison. Psychological Bulletin, 125(3), 307–337.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Fenton, S. (2012). Resentment, class and social sentiments about the nation: The ethnic majority in England. Ethnicities, 12, 465–483.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fiske, S. T. (2010). Interpersonal stratification: Status, power, and subordination. In S. T. Fiske, D. T. Gilbert, & G. Lindzey (Eds.), Handbook of social psychology (5th ed., pp. 941–982). New York: Wiley.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Fiske, S. T. (2011). Envy up, scorn down: How status divides us. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fiske, S. T., Cuddy, A. C., & Glick, P. (2007). Universal dimensions of social cognition: Warmth and competence. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 11, 77–83.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Fiske, S. T., Cuddy, A. C., Glick, P., & Xu, J. (2002). A model of (often mixed) stereotype content: Competence and warmth respectively follow perceived status and competition. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82, 878–902.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Fiske, S. T., Dupree, C. H., Nicolas, G., & Swencionis, J. K. (2016). Status, power, and intergroup relations: The personal is the societal. Current Opinion in Psychology, 11, 44–48.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Flecker, J. (2007). Conclusions and policy implementations. In J. Flecker (Ed.), Changing working life and the appeal of the extreme right (pp. 239–249). Aldershot: Ashgate.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gimpelson, V., & Treisman, D. (2017). Misperceiving inequality. Economics and Politics, 30, 27–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gorski, P. C. (2012). Perceiving the problem of poverty and schooling: Deconstructing the class stereotype that mis-shape education practice and policy. Equity & Excellence in Education, 45, 302–319.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hochschild, A. R. (2016). Strangers in their own land: Anger and mourning on the American right. New York: New Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holoien, D. S., & Fiske, S. T. (2013). Downplaying positive impressions: Compensation between warmth and competence in impression management. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 49, 33–41.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Horwitz, S. R., & Dovidio, J. F. (2017). The rich—Love them or hate them? Divergent implicit and explicit attitudes toward the wealthy. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 20, 3–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hout, M., & Hochschild, A. R. (2018). Bridging racial resentments: Qualitative and quantitative evidence of Whites’ attitudes and voting patterns. Paper given at Annual Meeting of the National Academy of Sciences, 29 Apr 2018.

    Google Scholar 

  • Isenberg, N. (2017). White trash: The 400-year untold history of class in America. New York: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jetten, J., Mols, F., Healy, N., & Spears, R. (2017). Fear of falling: Economic instability enhances collective angst among societies’ wealthy class. Journal of Social Issues, 73, 61–79.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jetten, J., Mols, F., & Postmes, T. (2015). Relative deprivation and relative wealth enhances anti-immigrant sentiments: The V-curve re-examined. PLoS One, 10(10), e0139156. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0139156

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Judd, C. M., James-Hawkins, L. J., Yzerbyt, V., & Kashima, Y. (2005). Fundamental dimensions of social judgment: Understanding the relations between judgments of competence and warmth. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 89, 899–913.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kay, A. C., Jost, J. T., Mandisodza, A. N., Sherman, S. J., Petrocelli, J. V., & Johnson, A. L. (2007). Panglossian ideology in the service of system justification: How complementary stereotypes help us to rationalize inequality. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 39, 305–358.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kervyn, N., Yzerbyt, V. Y., & Judd, C. M. (2010). Compensation between warmth and competence: Antecedents and consequences of a negative relation between the two fundamental dimensions of social perception. European Review of Social Psychology, 21, 155–187.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lindqvist, A., Björklund, F., & Bäckström, M. (2017). The perception of the poor: Capturing stereotype content with different measures. Nordic Psychology, 69, 231–247.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lott, B. (2002). Cognitive and behavioral distancing from the poor. American Psychologist, 57, 100–110.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Loughnan, S., Haslam, N., Sutton, R. M., & Spencer, B. (2014). Dehumanization and social class. Animality in the stereotypes of “White Trash,” “Chavs,” and “Bogans”. Social Psychology, 45, 54–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mattan, B. D., Kubota, J. T., & Cloutier, J. (2017). How social status shapes person perception and evaluation: A social neuroscience perspective. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 12, 468–507.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mols, F., & Jetten, J. (2016). Explaining the appeal of populist right-wing parties in times of economic prosperity. Political Psychology, 37, 275–292.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mols, F., & Jetten, J. (2017). The wealth paradox. Economic prosperity and the hardening of attitudes. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Niehues, J. (2014). Subjective perceptions of inequality and redistributive preferences: An international comparison. Working Paper, 1–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Noor, M., Shnabel, N., Halabi, S., & Nadler, A. (2012). When suffering begets suffering: The psychology of competitive victimhood between adversarial groups in violent conflicts. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 16, 351–374.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Parker, K. (2012). Yes, the rich are different. Pew Charitable Trust. Retrieved from http://www.pewsocialtrends.org/2012/08/27/yes-the-rich-are-different/

  • Petersen, M. B., Sznycer, D., Cosmides, L., & Tooby, J. (2012). Who deserves help? Evolutionary psychology, social emotions, and public opinion about welfare. Political Psychology, 33, 395–418.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Pettigrew, T. F., & Tropp, L. R. (2006). A meta-analytic test of intergroup contact theory. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 90(5), 751–783.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Piff, P. K., Kraus, M. W., & Keltner, D. (2018). Unpacking the inequality paradox: The psychological roots of inequality and social class. In J. M. Olson (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 57, pp. 53–124). Burlington, VT: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ragusa, J. M. (2015). Socioeconomic stereotypes: Explaining variation in preferences for taxing the rich. American Politics Research, 43, 327–359.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Salmela, M., & von Scheve, C. (2017). Emotional roots of right-wing political populism. Social Science Information, 56, 567–595.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shariff, A. F., Wiwad, D., & Aknin, L. B. (2016). Income mobility breeds tolerance for income inequality: Cross-national and experimental evidence. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 11, 373–380.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sherman, J. (2009). Those who work, those who don’t. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Silva, J. M. (2013). Coming up short: Working-class adulthood in an age of uncertainty. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Swencionis, J. K., & Fiske, S. T. (2016). Promote up, ingratiate down: Status comparisons drive warmth-competence tradeoffs in impression management. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 64, 27–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tajfel, H. (1981). Human groups and social categories. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vance, J. D. (2016). Hillbilly elegy: A memoir of a family and a culture in crisis. New York: Harper.

    Google Scholar 

  • Volpato, C., Andrighetto, L., & Baldissarri, C. (2017). Perceptions of low-status workers and the maintenance of the social class status quo. Journal of Social Issues, 73, 192–210.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vorauer, J. D., Main, K. J., & O’Connell, G. B. (1998). How do individuals expect to be viewed by members of lower status groups? Content and implications of meta-stereotypes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75, 917–937.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Williams, J. C. (2017). White working class: Overcoming class cluelessness in America. Brighton, MA: Harvard Business Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wu, S. J., Bai, X., & Fiske, S. T. (2018). Admired rich or resented rich? How two cultures vary in envy. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 49, 1009–1026.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wuthnow, R. (2018). The left behind: Decline and rage in rural America. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Young, M. (1958). The rise of the meritocracy 1870–2033: An essay on education and society. London, UK: Thames and Hudson.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Susan T. Fiske .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Fiske, S.T., Durante, F. (2019). Mutual Status Stereotypes Maintain Inequality. In: Jetten, J., Peters, K. (eds) The Social Psychology of Inequality. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-28856-3_21

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics