Abstract
Both Rough Set Theory (RST) and Fuzzy Rough Set Theory (FRST) are related to intelligent granular computing (GrC) but primary with help of static granules. Our granules are sets of attributes measured from Parkinson’s disease (PD) patient in a certain moment of his/her disease. In order to look into PD development in time during our longitudinal study, we have introduced the complex granule (c-granule) approach with properties of granules that are evolving with disease progression.
We have used a RST/FRST approach in order to find similarities between attributes of different patients in different disease stages to another group of more advanced PD patients. We have compared group (G1) of 23 PD with attributes measured three times (visits V1 to V3) every half of the year (G1V1, G1V2, G1V3) to other group of 24 more advanced PD (G2V1). By means of RST/FRST we have found rules describing symptoms of G2V1 and applied them to G1V1, G1V2, and G1V3. With RST (FRST) we’ve got the following accuracies: G1V1 – 59 (38)%; G1V2 – 68(54)%; G1V3 – 86(61)% but global coverage for FRST was better. This means that c-granule attributes became more similar to the model.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Pawlak, Z.: Rough Sets - Theoretical Aspects of Reasoning About Data. Kluwer Academic Publisher, Dordrecht (1991)
Zadeh, L.A.: From computing with numbers to computing with words - from manipulation of measurements to manipulation of perceptions. Int. J. Appl. Math. Comput. Sci. 12, 307–324 (2002)
Przybyszewski, A.W.: The neurophysiological bases of cognitive computation using rough set theory. In: Peters, J.F., Skowron, A., Rybiński, H. (eds.) Transactions on Rough Sets IX. LNCS, vol. 5390, pp. 287–317. Springer, Heidelberg (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-89876-4_16
Przybyszewski, A.W.: SI: SCA measures - fuzzy rough set features of cognitive computations in the visual system. J. Intell. Fuzzy Syst. (2018, pre-press). https://doi.org/10.3233/JIFS-18401
Skowron, A., Dutta, S.: Rough sets: past, present, and future. Nat. Comput. 17, 855–876 (2018)
Dubois, D., Prade, H.: Rough fuzzy sets and fuzzy rough sets. Int. J. Gen. Syst. 17, 91–209 (1990)
Riza, L.S., et al.: Implementing algorithms of rough set theory and fuzzy rough set theory in the R package RoughSets. Inf. Sci. 287, 68–69 (2014)
Przybyszewski, A.W., et al.: Multimodal learning and intelligent prediction of symptom development in individual Parkinson’s Patients. Sensors 16(9), 1498 (2016). https://doi.org/10.3390/s16091498
Przybyszewski, A.W.: Fuzzy RST and RST rules can predict effects of different therapies in parkinson’s disease patients. In: Ceci, M., Japkowicz, N., Liu, J., Papadopoulos, G.A., Raś, Z.W. (eds.) ISMIS 2018. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 11177, pp. 409–416. Springer, Cham (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-01851-1_39
Przybyszewski, A.W., Szlufik, S., Habela, P., Koziorowski, D.M.: Multimodal learning determines rules of disease development in longitudinal course with parkinson’s patients. In: Bembenik, R., Skonieczny, Ł., Protaziuk, G., Kryszkiewicz, M., Rybinski, H. (eds.) Intelligent Methods and Big Data in Industrial Applications. SBD, vol. 40, pp. 235–246. Springer, Cham (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-77604-0_17
Tiwari, A.K.: Machine learning based approaches for prediction of Parkinson’s disease. Mach. Learn. Appl. Int. J. (MLAIJ) 3(2), 33–39 (2016)
Lerche, S., Heinzel, S., et al.: Aiming for study comparability in Parkinson’s disease: proposal for a modular set of biomarker assessments to be used in longitudinal studies. Front. Aging Neurosci. (2016). https://doi.org/10.3389/fnagi.2016.00121
Singh, G., Vadera, M., Samavedham, L., Lim, E.C.: Machine learning based framework for multi-class diagnosis of neurodegenerative diseases: a study on Parkinson’s disease. IFAC PaperOnLine 49(7), 990–995 (2016)
Goldman, J.G., Holden, S., Ouyang, B., Bernard, B., Goetz, C.G., Stebbins, G.T.: Diagnosing PD-MCI by MDST ask force criteria: how many and which neuropsychological tests? Mov. Disord. 30, 402–406 (2015)
Lawton, M., Kasten, M., May, M.T., et al.: Validation of conversion between mini-mental state examination and Montreal cognitive assessment. Mov. Disord. 31, 593–596 (2016)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Przybyszewski, A.W. (2019). Parkinson’s Disease Development Prediction by C-Granule Computing. In: Nguyen, N., Chbeir, R., Exposito, E., Aniorté, P., Trawiński, B. (eds) Computational Collective Intelligence. ICCCI 2019. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 11683. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-28377-3_24
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-28377-3_24
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-28376-6
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-28377-3
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)