Skip to main content

Process Operator Students’ Abilities to Assess OSH Risks

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Human Systems Engineering and Design II (IHSED 2019)

Abstract

Safety competence is an important process operator skill. Due to hazardous work assignment and environments, skills in assessing the risks related to occupational safety and health (OSH) are especially important. Carrying out risk assessments can be difficult, and several problems have been identified. The aim of this study was to discover how well process operator students are able to assess OSH-related risks. Risk assessment exercises with observations were carried out for students (n = 35) in three vocational education and training (VET) organizations. The results showed that all students were able to identify at least some hazards. The students identified the most probable, high-risk, and easily observable hazards. Those with previous training or experience in work and risk assessment were more capable of identifying a wide range of risks. We conclude that successful risk assessment requires related competence, which should be developed via theoretical and practical learning during VET.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 229.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 299.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Rodríguez, M., Díaz, I.: A systematic and integral hazards analysis technique applied to the process industry. J. Loss Prevent. Process Ind. 43, 721–729 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Nazir, S., Sorensen, L.J., Øvergård, K.I., Manca, D.: How distributed situation awareness influences process safety. Chem. Eng. Trans. 36, 409–414 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Tappura, S., Kivistö-Rahnasto, J.: Annual school safety activity calendar to promote safety in VET. In: Arezes, P.M., et al. (eds.) Occupational Safety and Hygiene VI: Proceedings of the 6th International Symposium on Occupation Safety and Hygiene (SHO 2018), pp. 131–135. CRC Press, London (2018)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  4. Tappura, S., Nenonen, S, Nenonen, N.: Developing safety competence process for vocational students. In: Ahram T., Karwowski W., Taiar, R. (eds.) Human Systems Engineering and Design, IHSED 2018. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol. 876, pp. 668–674. Springer, Cham (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Council Directive 89/391/EEC on the introduction of measures to encourage improvements in the safety and health of workers at work (1989)

    Google Scholar 

  6. European Agency for Safety and Health at Work: Summary - Second European Survey of Enterprises on New and Emerging Risks (ESENER 2). Publications Office of the European Union, Luxembourg (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Laberge, M., Ledoux, E.: Occupational health and safety issues affecting young workers: a literature review. Work 39(3), 215–232 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Salminen, S.: Have young workers more injuries than older ones? An international literature review. J. Saf. Res. 35(5), 513–521 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Albert, A., Hallowell, M.R., Skaggs, M., Kleiner, B.: Empirical measurement and improvement of hazard recognition skill. Saf. Sci. 93, 1–8 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Bahn, S.: Workplace hazard identification and management: the case of an underground mining operation. Saf. Sci. 57, 129–137 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Heikkilä, A.-M., Malmén, Y., Nissilä, M., Kortelainen, H.: Challenges in risk management in multi-company industrial parks. Saf. Sci. 48, 430–435 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Carter, G., Smith, S.: Safety hazard identification on construction projects. J. Construct. Eng. Manage. 132(2), 197–205 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Haslam, R.A., Hide, S.A., Gibb, A.G.F., Gyi, D.E., Pavitt, T., Atkinson, S., Duff, A.R.: Contributing factors in construction accidents. Appl. Ergon. 36, 401–415 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Ministry of Social Affairs and Health: Riskien arviointi työpaikalla – työkirja. Ministry of Social Affairs and Health and The Centre for Occupational Safety (2015)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors gratefully acknowledge the Finnish Work Environment Fund for the funding of this study and the teachers and students of the cooperating VET organizations for their contributions.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Noora Nenonen .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Appendix A: Results of the Hazard Identification by Hazard Category

Appendix A: Results of the Hazard Identification by Hazard Category

Categories and items in the checklist

Target 1a

Target 2a

Examples of identified hazards by category

Accident hazards

Sb

Tc

Sb

Tc

Slipping, stumbling, falling (down/over)

4

Y

7

Y

Crushing fingers between the sheet press; Dropping the weights of sheet mold; Stumbling on the platform used on sheet mold; Pieces of rocks can hurtle from the mill; Suffocation because of dust and allergic reaction

Fall of a person/falling from height

4

Y

3

Y

Electric shock or static electricity

3

Y

6

Y

Reduction of oxygen, suffocation

0

N

5

N

Goods transport and other traffic

1

N

4

Y

Objects being dropped or falling over

5

Y

8

Y

Objects/material being hurtled around or hit by a moving object

1

Y

9

Y

Being crushed between objects or entangled in a moving object

6

Y

6

Y

Being slashed, cut, or stabbed

0

N

6

Y

Physical hazards and strain

S

T

S

T

 

Noise

3

N

9

Y

Lifting heavy weights of the sheet mold in a circular motion repeatedly; The devices in the crushing room are noisy; Lifting the rock material in heavy buckets and using poor lifting postures; The crushing room can be hot

Hot and cold objects and surfaces

2

N

1

1

General and local ventilation

0

N

3

Y

Lightning

1

Y

1

N

Vibration

1

N

6

Y

Radiation

0

N

0

N

Poor working postures, repeated movements, and lifting or carrying with hands

2

Y

7

Y

Usability of tools, machinery, and devices

1

N

4

Y

Organization and personnel activities

S

T

S

T

 

Exceptional situations and disturbances (e.g., unexpected starting of machine)

2

Y

6

Y

Unexpected descent of sheet press when compressed air opened; Not obeying instructions

Unsafe activities

1

Y

8

Y

Safety arrangements

S

T

S

T

 

Personal protective equipment (PPE), safeguarding (condition and use)

1

Y

4

Y

Requiring more strictly the use of PPEs; Emergency exits are not clear (objects stored); Rehearsing emergency situations

Alarm and rescue equipment

2

Y

2

N

Walkways and corridors and their safety and indicator lightning

2

Y

6

Y

First aid arrangements and equipment

2

N

7

N

Chemical and biological hazards

S

T

S

T

 

List of chemicals

0

N

1

Y

Chemical register only available in teachers room in the laboratory; Dust from rock and ore material in the crushing room

Labeling of chemical packages

0

N

0

N

Hazardous or harmful chemicals (allergenic, carcinogenic, flammable, explosive)

0

N

2

N

Dust and fiber

1

N

7

Y

Gases, vapor, fumes, and smoke

0

N

1

N

Other hazard

0

Y

3

N

Cramped workspace

  1. aTarget 1: Sheet mold and press, Target 2: crushing room
  2. bS: Number of student groups (in target 1 n = 6, in target 2 n = 9) that identified a hazard or hazards related to this item
  3. cT: Did teachers identify a hazard or hazards related to this item (Y = yes, N = no)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Nenonen, N., Nenonen, S., Tappura, S. (2020). Process Operator Students’ Abilities to Assess OSH Risks. In: Ahram, T., Karwowski, W., Pickl, S., Taiar, R. (eds) Human Systems Engineering and Design II. IHSED 2019. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol 1026. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-27928-8_86

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics