Skip to main content

Plastic Bag Ban in the Context of Corporate Social Responsibility: Consumption and Trade vis-a′-vis Environmental Sustainability Concerns

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
International Business, Trade and Institutional Sustainability

Part of the book series: World Sustainability Series ((WSUSE))

Abstract

A corporate social responsibility (CSR) initiative by supermarkets have made significant contributions to the elimination of plastic bags consumption, hence establishing a new norm in the society. This means that the various initiatives conducted in promoting a sustainable shopping lifestyle have challenged the ‘status quo’ of providing free single-use plastic bags for consumers’ convenience. Moreover, pressure from global environmental challenges for plastic pollution and the multifaceted global trade environment affect the corporate sector’s operation. This paper analyses the multifaceted involvement of the CSR initiatives of supermarkets in a global movement on the anti-plastic bag ban by examining Malaysia’s No Plastic Bag Campaign (NPBC) as a case study. The studies have deployed the Carroll’s global CSR pyramid framework to defragment the complexities of the supermarkets’ CSR initiatives by using content analysis. Furthermore, the result reinforced by the descriptive analysis of the consumer’s survey and revealed several competitive advantages of the corporate sector’s involvement in anti-plastic bag initiatives. These advantages include elaborating on the concept of supermarket CSR in the context of the plastic bag ban, detangling the multifaceted discussion around supermarket CSR, provide platform to nudge sustainable shopping behaviour lifestyle practices and clarifying the crucial role of supermarket CSR in the governance of  the plastic bag ban from the business sector’s perspective. Finally, by deploying the global CSR pyramid framework, the study outlined the CSR initiatives of supermarkets in terms of the anti-plastic bag campaign from four key responsibilities; economic, ethical, legislative and philanthropy. Hence, the involvement of the CSR supermarket initiative’s contribution to a global movement of anti-plastic bag ban is crucial.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 109.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abdul Rashid MZ, Abdullah I (1991) Managers attitudes towards corporate social responsibility. In: Proceeding of Pan Pacific conference, Kuala Lumpur, pp 218–220

    Google Scholar 

  • Abdul Rashid MZ, Ibrahim S (2002) Executive and management attitudes towards corporate social responsibility in Malaysia. Corp Gov 2(4):10–16

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Adane L, Muleta D (2011) Survey on the usage of plastic bags, their disposal and adverse impacts on environment: a case study in Jimma City, Southwestern Ethiopia. J Toxicol Environ Health Sci 3(8):234–248

    Google Scholar 

  • Afroz R, Rahman A, Masud MM, Akhtar R (2016) The knowledge, awareness, attitude and motivational analysis of plastic waste and household perspective in Malaysia. Environ Sci Pollut Res, pp. 1–12

    Google Scholar 

  • Akulian A, Karp C, Austin K, Durbin D (2007) Plastic bag externalities and policy in Rhode Island. Environ Res Econ 38:1–11

    Google Scholar 

  • Ali W, Rizwan M (2013) Factors influencing corporate social and environmental disclosure (CSED) practices in the developing countries: an institutional theoretical perspective. Int J Asian Soc Sci 3(3):590–609

    Google Scholar 

  • Atan R, Abdul Halim NA (2011) Corporate social responsibility: the perception of Muslim consumers

    Google Scholar 

  • Ayalon O, Goldrath T, Rosenthal G, Grossman M (2009) Reduction of plastic carrier bag use: an analysis of alternatives in Israel. Waste Manag 29(7):2025–2032

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bansal P (2005) Evolving sustainably: a longitudinal study of corporate sustainable development. Strateg Manag J 26:197–218

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bansal P, Roth K (2000) Why companies go green: a model of ecological responsiveness. Acad Manag J 43:717–736

    Google Scholar 

  • Beckman S (2007) Consumers and corporate social responsibility. Australas Mark J 15(1):27–36

    Google Scholar 

  • Bernstein S (2001) The compromise of liberal environmentalism. New York, Columbia University Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Bowen HR (1953) Social responsibility of the businessmen. Harper Row, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Branco MC, Rodrigues LL (2007) Positioning stakeholder theory within the debate on corporate social responsibility. Electr J Bus Ethics Organ Stud 12(1):5–15

    Google Scholar 

  • Business for Social Responsibility (2010) Building long-term solutions: retail shopping bag impacts and options

    Google Scholar 

  • Carroll AB (1979) A three dimensional conceptual model of corporate performance. Acad Manag Rev 4(4):497–505

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carroll AB (1991) The pyramid of corporate social responsibility: towards the moral management of organizational stakeholders. Business Horizons, July-August: 42. In: An alternative to the pyramid is a Venn-diagram model presented in MS Schwartz, AB Carroll (2003) Corporate social responsibility: a three-domain approach. Bus Ethics Q 13(4): 503–530

    Google Scholar 

  • Carroll AB (1999) Corporate social responsibility. Bus Soc 38(3):268–295

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carroll AB (2004) Managing ethically with global stakeholders: a present and future challenge. Acad Manage Perspect 18(2):114–120

    Google Scholar 

  • Carroll AB (2016) Carroll’s pyramid of CSR: taking another look. Int J Corp Soc Responsib 1(1):3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chan RY, Wong YH, Leung TK (2008) Applying ethical concepts to the study of “green” consumer behaviour: an analysis of Chinese consumers’ intentions to bring their own shopping bags. J Bus Ethics 79(4):469

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clapp J, Swanston L (2009) Doing away with plastic shopping bags: international patterns of norm emergence and policy implementation. Environ Polit 18(3):315–332

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Commission of the European Communities (2001) Promoting a European framework for corporate social responsibility. Available at http://europa.eu.int/eur-lex/en/comgpr/2001/com2001_0366en01.pdf

  • Commission of the European Communities (2002) Communication from the commission concerning corporate social responsibility: a business contribution to sustainable development. Available at http://europa.eu.int/comm?employment_social/soc-dial/csr/csr2002_en.pdf

  • Convery F, McDonnell S, Ferreira S (2007) The most popular tax in Europe? Lessons from the Irish plastic bags levy. Environ Res Econ 18(4):367–371

    Google Scholar 

  • Creyer EH, Ross WT Jr (1997) The influence of firm behaviour on purchase intention: do consumers really care about business ethics? J Consum Market 14(6):419–432

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dauvergne P (2010) The problem of consumption. Global Environ Polit 10(2):1–10

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davis K (1973) The case for and against business assumptions of social responsibility. Acad Manag J 16(2):312–322

    Google Scholar 

  • Department of Statistic (2006) Section methodology and research. Department of Statistics Malaysia

    Google Scholar 

  • Derraik JG (2002) The pollution of the marine environment by plastic debris: a review. Marine Pollut Bull 44(9):842–852

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dikgang J, Visser M (2010) Behavioral response to plastic bag legislation in Botswana discussion. Papers dp-10-13-efd. Resources for the future

    Google Scholar 

  • Dikgang J, Leiman A, Visser M (2012) Elasticity of demand, price and time: lessons from South Africa’s plastic-bag levy. Appl Econ 44(26):3339–3342

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunn KE, Rakes GC, Rakes TA (2014) Influence of academic self-regulation, critical thinking, and age on online graduate students’ academic help-seeking. Distance Educ 35(1):75–89

    Google Scholar 

  • Environment Australia (2002) Plastic shopping bags—analysis of levies and environmental impacts. Victoria

    Google Scholar 

  • Epstein MJ (2018) Making sustainability work: best practices in managing and measuring corporate social, environmental and economic impacts, Routledge

    Google Scholar 

  • Epstein MJ, Roy MJ (2001) Sustainability in action: identifying and measuring the key performance drivers. Long Range Plann 34:585–604

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Epstein MJ, Roy MJ (2003) Making the business case for sustainability. J Corp Citizensh 9(1):79–96

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ernst & Young (2002) Corporate social responsibility. Available at www.ey.nl/download/publicatie/doemload/corporate_social_responsibility.pdf

  • Fernández B, Souto F (2009) Crisis and corporate social responsibility: threat or opportunity? Int J Econ Sci Appl Res 2(1):36–50

    Google Scholar 

  • Garriga E, Melé D (2004) Corporate social responsibility theories: mapping the territory. J Bus Ethics 53:51–71

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gifford B (1991) The greening of the golden arches-McDonald’s teams with environmental group to cut waste. The San Diego Union, August 19, C1, C4

    Google Scholar 

  • Girod S, Bryane M (2003) Branding in European retailing: a corporate social responsibility perspective, European Retail Dig 38(2):1–6

    Google Scholar 

  • Greene J (2011) Life cycle assessment of reusable and single-use plastic bags in California. California

    Google Scholar 

  • Gupta K (2011) Consumer responses to incentives to reduce plastic bag use: evidence from a field experiment in urban India. SAMDEE

    Google Scholar 

  • Handelman JM, Arnold SJ (1999) The role of marketing actions with a social dimension: appeals to the institutional environment. J Market 63(3):33–48

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hasson R, Leiman A, Visser M (2007) The economics of plastic bag legislation in South Africa. South Afr J Econ 75:66–83

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hume S (1991) Consumer doubletalk makes companies wary. Advert Age 62(46):62–64

    Google Scholar 

  • Jakovcevic A, Steg L, Mazzeo N, Caballero R, Franco P, Putrino N, Favara J (2014) Charges for plastic bags: motivational and behaviorial effects. J Environ Psychol 40:372–380

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jambeck JR, Geyer R, Wilcox C, Siegler TR, Perryman M, Andrady A, Law KL (2015) Plastic waste inputs from land into the ocean. Science 347(6223):768–771

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kates RW (2017) Sustainability science. In: Richardson D, Castree N, Goodchild MF, Kobayashi AL, Liu W, Marston RA (eds) The international encyclopedia of geography, Wiley, Hoboken. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118786352.wbieg0279

  • Kaur S (2002) 1 million plastic bags change hands each day. The Straits Times, 3rd April 2002

    Google Scholar 

  • Kotler P, Lee N (2005) Corporate social responsibility: doing the most good for your company and your cause. Wiley, New Jersey, EUA

    Google Scholar 

  • Lantos GP (2001) The boundaries of strategic corporate social responsibility. J Consum Market 18(7):595–632

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lehner M, Mont O, Heiskanen E (2016) Nudging—a promising tool for sustainable consumption behaviour? J Clean Prod 134:166–177

    Google Scholar 

  • Loorbach D (2002) Transition management: governance for sustainability, paper presented at the international conference on Governance and sustainability, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  • Loorbach D (2010) Transition management for sustainable development: a prescriptive, complexity-based governance framework. Int J Policy Adm Inst 23(1):161–183

    Google Scholar 

  • Maignan I (2001) Consumers’ perceptions of corporate social responsibilities: a cross-cultural comparison. J Bus Ethics 30(1):57

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Matten D, Crane A, Chapple W (2003) Behind de mask: revealing the true face of corporate citizenship. J Bus Ethics 45(1–2):109–120

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miller TL, Grimes MG, McMullen JS, Vogus TJ (2012) Venturing for others with heart and head: how compassion encourages social entrepreneurship. Acad Manage Rev 37(4):616–640

    Google Scholar 

  • Mohr LA, Webb DJ, Harris KE (2001) Do consumers expect companies to be socially responsible? The impact of corporate social responsibility on buying behaviour. J Consum Aff 35(I):45

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Patten DM (2002) Give or take on the internet: an examination of the disclosure practices of insurance firm web innovators. J Bus Ethics 36(3):247–259

    Google Scholar 

  • Pearce D, Turner RK (1992) Packaging waste and the polluter pays principle: alleviation solution. J Environ Plann Manage 35(1):5–15

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Piercy NF, Lane N (2009) Corporate social responsibility: impacts on strategic marketing and customer value. Market Rev 9(4):335–360

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Poortinga W, Whitmarsh L, Suffolk C (2013) The introduction of a single-use carrier bag charge in Wales: attitude change and behavioural spillover effects. J Environ Psychol 36:240–247

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Porter ME, Kramer MR (2006) The link between competitive advantage and corporate social responsibility. Harvard Bus Rev 84(12):78–92

    Google Scholar 

  • Ramasamy B, Yeung M (2009) Chinese consumers’ perception of corporate social responsibility (CSR). J Bus Ethics 88(1):119–132

    Google Scholar 

  • Richards C, Zen IS (2016) From surface to deep corporate social responsibility. J Global Responsib 7(2):275–287

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ritchie J, Spencer L (1994) In Bryman A, Burgess RG (eds) Analyzing qualitativedata, pp 173–194

    Google Scholar 

  • Rotmans Jan, Grin John, Schot Johan, Smits Ruud (2004) Multi- inter- and transdisciplinary research program into transitions and system innovations. Maastricht University, Maastricht

    Google Scholar 

  • Sharp A, Hoj S, Wheeler M (2010) Proscription and its impact on anti-consumption behaviour and attitude: the case of plastic bags. J Consum Behav 9:4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shrivastava P (1995) The role of corporations in achieving ecological sustainability. Acad Manag Rev 20:936–960

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spaargaren G, Oosterveer P (2010) Citizen-consumers as agents of change in globalizing modernity: the case of sustainable consumption. Sustainability 2: 1887–1908. https://doi.org/10.3390/su2071887. www.mdpi.com/journal/sustainability

  • Srivastava A, Thomson SB (2009) Framework analysis: a qualitative methodology for applied policy research. Research Note JOAAG 4:2

    Google Scholar 

  • Stringer L (2009) The green workplace. Palgrave Macmillan, New York, NY

    Google Scholar 

  • Suki NM (2013) Green awareness effects on consumers’ purchasing decision: some insights from Malaysia. Int J Asia-Pacific Stud 9(2)

    Google Scholar 

  • Teoh Hai-Yap, Gregory Thong TS (1986) Another look at corporate social responsibility and reporting: an empirical study in a developing country. Malays Manag Rev 21(3):36–51

    Google Scholar 

  • Thaler R, Sunstein CR (2008) Nudge—improving decisions about health, wealth and happiness. New Haven, CT, Yale University Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Marrewijk M (2003) Concept and definitions of CSR and corporate sustainability: between agency and communion. J Bus Ethics 44:95–105

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vince J, Hardesty BD (2017) Plastic pollution challenges in marine and coastal environments: from local to global governance. Restor Ecol 25(1):123–128

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vince J, Hardesty BD (2018) Governance solutions to the tragedy of the commons that marine plastics have become. Front Mar Sci 5:214

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Warner BM (2009) Sacking the culture of convenience: regulating plastic shopping bags to prevent further environmental harm. U Mem L Rev 40:645

    Google Scholar 

  • Whooley N (2004) Social responsibility in Europe. Available at: www.pwc.com/extweb/newcolth.nsf/0/503508DDA107A61885256F35005C1E35?

  • Woerle A (2011) New branding strategy meets corporate social responsibility. Reg Bus Stud 3(1):825–831

    Google Scholar 

  • Zen IS (2018) Nudge to promotes sustainable shopping lifestyle. In: Proceedings 2(22): 1394. https://doi.org/10.3390/proceedings2221394

  • Zen IS, Ahamad R, Omar W (2013) No plastic bag campaign day in Malaysia and the policy implication. Environ Dev Sustain 1(11):1259

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zen IS, Kaur CR, Arisman (2017) The potential for sustainability science approach for multi-level marine science governance: a case study of Wakatobi national park. Policy Brief CSEAS (Center for Southeast Asia Study). Series 1, Indonesia. February

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The study was conducted as a part of the Research University Grant from Ministry of Education, Malaysia (Vot 08J98)

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Irina Safitri Zen .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Zen, I.S. (2020). Plastic Bag Ban in the Context of Corporate Social Responsibility: Consumption and Trade vis-a′-vis Environmental Sustainability Concerns. In: Leal Filho, W., Borges de Brito, P., Frankenberger, F. (eds) International Business, Trade and Institutional Sustainability. World Sustainability Series. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-26759-9_3

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics