Skip to main content

Surveillance, Monitoring, and Evaluation

Regulatory and Voluntary Approaches on Health, Safety, and Well-Being

  • Reference work entry
  • First Online:
Handbook of Disability, Work and Health

Part of the book series: Handbook Series in Occupational Health Sciences ((HDBSOHS,volume 1))

Abstract

The aim of this chapter is to present key policy approaches to surveillance, monitoring, and evaluation of health, safety, and well-being at work in terms of hard law (binding) and soft law (voluntary) approaches. Both hard and soft laws are important for employed people with a disability or those being at risk of disability. The chapter will first examine regulatory approaches, followed by voluntary approaches. It will present examples of both these types of approaches at the international, regional, and national levels while considering outcomes achieved. Finally the chapter will conclude by critically examining challenges in implementing these approaches for effective surveillance, monitoring, and evaluation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 279.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 379.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Abbott KW, Snidal D (2000) Hard and soft law in international governance. Int Organ 54:421–456

    Google Scholar 

  • Abbott KW, Keohane RO, Moravcsik A, Slaughter AM, Snidal D (2000) The concept of legalization. Int Organ 54:401–419

    Google Scholar 

  • Bain P (1997) Human resource malpractice: the deregulation of health and safety at work in the USA and Britain. Ind Relat J 28(3):176–191

    Google Scholar 

  • Barrett B, Howells R (1997) Occupational health and safety law. Pitman Publishing, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Blatter B, de Vroome E, van Hooff M, Smulders P (2007) Wat is de meerwaarde van de arboconvenanten? Een vergelijkende kwantitatieve analyse op basis van bestaand cijfermateriaal. TNO, Hoofddorp

    Google Scholar 

  • Chinkin CM (1989) The challenge of soft law: development and change in international law. Int Comp Law Q 38:850–866

    Google Scholar 

  • Di Tecco C, Jain A, Valenti A, Iavicoli S, Leka S (2017) An evaluation of the impact of a policy-level intervention to address psychosocial risks on organisational action in Italy. Saf Sci 100(1):103–109

    Google Scholar 

  • Ertel M, Stilijanow U, Iavicoli S, Natali E, Jain A, Leka S (2010) European social dialogue on psychosocial risks at work: benefits and challenges. Eur J Ind Relat 16(2):169–183

    Google Scholar 

  • European Agency for Safety and Health at Work (EU-OSHA) (2016) European directives. Retrieved from: http://osha.europa.eu/en/legislation/directives. Accessed 15 Dec 2017

  • European Agency for Safety and Health at Work (EU-OSHA) (2010) European survey of enterprises on new and emerging risks – Managing safety and health at work. Publications Office of the European Communities, Luxembourg

    Google Scholar 

  • European Commission (EC) (2004) Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of Regions on the practical implementation of the provisions of the Health and Safety at Work Directives 89/391 (Framework), 89/654 (Workplaces), 89/655 (Work Equipment), 89/656 (Personal Protective Equipment), 90/269 (Manual Handling of Loads) and 90/270 (Display Screen Equipment) (COM(2004) 62 final). European Commission, Brussels

    Google Scholar 

  • European Commission (EC) (2011) Report on the implementation of the European social partners – Framework Agreement on Work-related Stress. SEC(2011) 241 final, Commission staff working paper. European Commission, Brussels

    Google Scholar 

  • Frey DF, MacNaughton G (2016) A human rights lens on full employment and decent work in the 2030 Sustainable Development Agenda. J Work Rights 6(2):1–13

    Google Scholar 

  • Gold M, Duncan M (1993) EC health and safety policy – better safe than sorry. Eur Bus J 5(4):51–56

    Google Scholar 

  • Hämäläinen R-M (2006) Workplace health promotion in Europe – The role of national health policies and strategies. Finnish Institute of Occupational Health, Helsinki

    Google Scholar 

  • Hanberger A (2001) What is the policy problem? Evaluation 7(1):45–62

    Google Scholar 

  • Hasle P, Zwetsloot GIJM (2011) Occupational health and safety management systems: issues and challenges. Saf Sci 49(7):961–963

    Google Scholar 

  • Health and Safety Executive (HSE) (2001) Reducing risks, protecting people. HMSO, Norwich

    Google Scholar 

  • Health and Safety Executive (HSE) (2005) Occupational health and safety support systems for small and medium sized enterprises. HSE Books, Sudbury

    Google Scholar 

  • Hilgert J (2013) The future of workplace health and safety as a fundamental human right. Comp Labor Law J Policy J 34:715–736

    Google Scholar 

  • Iavicoli S, Leka S, Jain A, Persechino B, Rondinone BM, Ronchetti M, Valenti A (2014) Hard and soft law approaches to addressing psychosocial risks in Europe: lessons learned in the development of the Italian approach. J Risk Res 17(7):855–869

    Google Scholar 

  • Ikenberry J (2001) After victory: institutions, strategic restraint and the rebuilding order after major wars. Princeton University Press, Princeton

    Google Scholar 

  • International Labour Organization (ILO) (2004) Promotional framework for occupational safety and health. International Labour Organization, Geneva

    Google Scholar 

  • International Labour Organization (ILO) (2016) Conventions and Recommendations. Retrieved from: http://www.ilo.org/global/standards/introduction-to-international-labour-standards/conventions-and-recommendations/lang%2D%2Den/index.htm. Accessed 15 Dec 2017

  • Jain A, Leka S, Zwetsloot G (2018) Managing health safety and well-being: ethics, responsibility and sustainability. Springer, Dordrecht

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnstone R (2008) Harmonising occupational health and safety regulation in Australia: the first report of the national OHS review. J Appl Law Policy 1:35–58

    Google Scholar 

  • Joubert DM (2002) Occupational health challenges and success in developing countries: a South African perspective. Int J Occup Environ Health 8:119–124

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kirton JJ, Trebilcock MJ (eds) (2004) Hard choices, soft law: voluntary standards in global trade, environment and social governance. Ashgate, Aldershot

    Google Scholar 

  • Kobayashi Y, Kaneyoshi A, Yokota A, Kawakami N (2008) Effects of a worker participatory program for improving work environments on job stressors and mental health among workers: a controlled trial. J Occup Health 50(6):455–470

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Leka S, Jain A, Zwetsloot GIJM, Cox T (2010) Policy-level interventions and work-related psychosocial risk management in the European Union. Work Stress 24:298–307

    Google Scholar 

  • Leka S, Jain A, Widerszal-Bazyl M, Å»oÅ‚nierczyk-Zreda D, Zwetsloot GIJM (2011) Developing a standard for psychosocial risk management: PAS1010. Saf Sci 49(7):1047–1057

    Google Scholar 

  • Leka S, Jain A, Iavicoli S, Di Tecco C (2015) An evaluation of the policy context on psychosocial risks and mental health in the workplace in the European Union: achievements, challenges and the future. Biomed Res Int. https://doi.org/10.1155/2015/213089. Special issue on Psychosocial Factors and Workers’ Health & Safety

  • Mackay CJ, Cousins R, Kelly PJ, Lee S, McCaig RH (2004) Management standards and work-related stress in the UK: policy background and science. Work Stress 18:91–112

    Google Scholar 

  • McBarnet D (2009) Corporate Social Responsibility: beyond law through law for law. University of Edinburgh School of Law Working Paper No. 2009/03

    Google Scholar 

  • Nyam A (2006) National occupational safety and health profile of Mongolia. Geneva: International Labour Organization

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Connell R (2004) Making the case for OHSAS 18001. Occup Hazards 66(6):32–33

    Google Scholar 

  • Persechino B, Valenti A, Ronchetti M, Rondinone BM, Di Tecco C, Vitali S, Iavicoli S (2013) Work-related stress risk assessment in Italy: a methodological proposal adapted to regulatory guidelines. Saf Health Work 4(2):95–99

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Rantanen J, Benach J, Muntaner C, Kawakami T, Kim R (2013) Introduction to health in all policies and the analytical framework of the book. In: Leppo K, Ollila E, Peña S, Wismar M, Cook S (eds) Health in all policies: seizing opportunities, implementing policies. Ministry of Social Affairs and Health, Finland, Helsinki, pp 125–163

    Google Scholar 

  • Robson L, Clarke J, Cullen K, Bielecky A, Severin C, Bigelow P et al (2007) The effectiveness of occupational health and safety management systems: a systematic review. Saf Sci 45:329–353

    Google Scholar 

  • Safe Work Australia (2016) Guide to the model Work Health and Safety Act. Retrieved from: https://www.safeworkaustralia.gov.au/system/files/documents/1702/guide-to-the-whs-act-at-21-march-2016.pdf. Accessed 15 Dec 2017

  • Sparey T (2010) Does BS OHSAS 18001 work? The British Standards Institution. Retrieved from: https://www.bsigroup.com/LocalFiles/en-GB/bs-ohsas-18001/whitepapers/BSI-OHSAS-18001-Whitepaper-Does-BS-OHSAS-18001-work-UK-EN.pdf. Accessed 15 Dec 2017

  • Taris TW, van der Wal I, Kompier MAJ (2010) Large-scale job stress interventions: the Dutch experience. In: Houdmont J, Leka S (eds) Contemporary occupational health psychology: global perspectives in research and practice, vol 1. Wiley-Blackwell, Chichester, pp 77–97

    Google Scholar 

  • Veerman TJ, de Jong PH, de Vroom B, Bannink DBD, Mur SG, Ossewaarde MRR, … Vellekoop N (2007) Arboconvenant. Convenanten in context. Aggregatie en analyse van de werking en opbrengsten van het beleidsprogramma Arboconvenanten Ministerie van SZW, Den Haag

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson DJ, Takahashi K, Sakuragi S, Yoshino M, Hoshuyama T, Imai T, Takala J (2007) The ratification status of ILO conventions related to occupational safety and health and its relationship with reported occupational fatality rates. J Occup Health 49:72–29

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • World Health Organization (WHO) (2010) Healthy workplaces: a WHO global model for action. World Health Organization, Geneva

    Google Scholar 

  • Yoshikawa T, Kawakami N, Kogi K, Tsutsumi A, Shimazu M, Nagami M, Shimazu A (2007) Development of a mental health action checklist for improving workplace environment as means of job stress prevention. J Occup Health 49(4):127–142

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Stavroula Leka .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this entry

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this entry

Leka, S., Jain, A. (2020). Surveillance, Monitoring, and Evaluation. In: Bültmann, U., Siegrist, J. (eds) Handbook of Disability, Work and Health. Handbook Series in Occupational Health Sciences, vol 1. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-24334-0_14

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics