Abstract
A prominent illusion in time perception is the temporal oddball effect. Specifically, people overestimate the duration of rare events embedded in a stream of homogenous events. We will provide a comprehensive review of studies that are devoted to establish and understand the origin of this phenomenon. We give an overview about the various experimental approaches used in the investigation of the oddball effect as well as potential limitations and caveats associated with these methods. Then we consider various studies that examined the generality of the oddball effect and also propose explanations of why this effect occurs. The currently most plausible explanation assumes two independent mechanisms that exert opposite effects on the perceived duration: (a) low-level repetition suppression and (b) high-level stimulus expectations.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
- 1.
Note that the predictive coding view is akin to the OE accounts suggested by Tse et al. (2004) and Ulrich et al. (2006), who have argued that the OE reflects a higher pacemaker rate due to increased attention and immediate arousal, respectively. These accounts assume a higher activation of the pacemaker for oddballs than for standards, and hence interpret the OE within the traditional internal clock framework.
References
Allan, L. G. (1977). The time-order error in judgments of duration. Canadian Journal of Psychology/Revue Canadienne de Psychologie, 31, 24–31. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0081647
Bernstein, I. H., & Reese, C. (1965). Behavioral hypotheses and choice reaction time. Psychonomic Science, 3, 259–260.
Birngruber, T., Schröter, H., Schütt, E., & Ulrich, R. (2017). Stimulus expectation prolongs rather than shortens perceived duration: Evidence from self-generated expectations. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 44, 117–127. https://doi.org/10.1037/xhp0000433
Birngruber, T., Schröter, H., & Ulrich, R. (2014). Duration perception of visual and auditory oddball stimuli: Does judgment task modulate the temporal oddball effect? Attention, Perception & Psychophysics, 76, 814–828. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13414-013-0602-2
Birngruber, T., Schröter, H., & Ulrich, R. (2015a). Introducing a control condition in the classic oddball paradigm: Oddballs are overestimated in duration not only because of their oddness. Attention, Perception, and Psychophysics, 77, 1737–1749. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13414-015-0868-7
Birngruber, T., Schröter, H., & Ulrich, R. (2015b). The influence of stimulus repetition on duration judgments with simple stimuli. Frontiers in Psychology, 6, 1213. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01213
Birngruber, T., & Ulrich, R. (2018). Perceived duration increases not only with physical, but also with implicit size. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 45, 969–979. https://doi.org/10.1037/xlm0000628
Cai, M. B., Eagleman, D. M., & Ma, W. J. (2015). Perceived duration is reduced by repetition but not by high-level expectation. Journal of Vision, 15, 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1167/15.13.19
Casasanto, D., & Boroditsky, L. (2008). Time in the mind: Using space to think about time. Cognition, 106, 579–593. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2007.03.004
Chen, K.-M., & Yeh, S.-L. (2009). Asymmetric cross-modal effects in time perception. Acta Psychologica, 130, 225–234. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2008.12.008
Eagleman, D. M. (2008). Human time perception and its illusions. Current Opinion in Neurobiology, 18, 131–136. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conb.2008.06.002
Eagleman, D. M., & Pariyadath, V. (2009). Is subjective duration a signature of coding efficiency? Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological Sciences, 364, 1841–1851. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2009.0026
Ernst, B., Reichard, S. M., Riepl, R. F., Steinhauser, R., Zimmermann, S. F., & Steinhauser, M. (2017). The P3 and the subjective experience of time. Neuropsychologia, 103, 12–19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2017.06.033
Failing, M., & Theeuwes, J. (2016). Reward alters the perception of time. Cognition, 148, 19–26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2015.12.005
Fromboluti, E. K., & McAuley, J. D. (2018). Perceived duration of auditory oddballs: Test of a novel pitch-window hypothesis. Psychological Research. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00426-018-1124-2
Grondin, S. (2001). From physical time to the first and second moments of psychological time. Psychological Bulletin, 127, 22–44.
Grondin, S. (2010). Timing and time perception: A review of recent behavioral and neuroscience findings and theoretical directions. Attention, Perception and Psychophysics, 72, 561–582.
Grondin, S., & Rammsayer, T. (2003). Variable foreperiods and temporal discrimination. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Section A: Human Experimental Psychology, 56, 731–765. https://doi.org/10.1080/02724980244000611
Kim, E., & McAuley, J. D. (2013). Effects of pitch distance and likelihood on the perceived duration of deviant auditory events. Attention, Perception & Psychophysics, 75, 1547–1558. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13414-013-0490-5
Macar, F., Grondin, S., & Casini, L. (1994). Controlled attention sharing influences time estimation. Memory & Cognition, 22, 673–686. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03209252
Makwana, M., & Srinivasan, N. (2017). Intended outcome expands in time. Scientific Reports, 7, 6305. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-05803-1
Matthews, W. J. (2011). Stimulus repetition and the perception of time: The effects of prior exposure on temporal discrimination, judgment, and production. PLoS One, 6, e19815. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0019815
Matthews, W. J. (2015). Time perception: The surprising effects of surprising stimuli. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 144, 172–197. https://doi.org/10.1037/xge0000041
Matthews, W. J., & Gheorghiu, A. I. (2016). Repetition, expectation, and the perception of time. Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences, 8, 110–116. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cobeha.2016.02.019
Matthews, W. J., & Meck, W. H. (2016). Temporal cognition: Connecting subjective time to perception, attention, and memory. Psychological Bulletin, 142, 865–907. https://doi.org/10.1037/bul0000045
Mo, S. S., & George, E. J. (1977). Foreperiod effect on time estimation and simple reaction time. Acta Psychologica, 41, 47–59. https://doi.org/10.1016/0001-6918(77)90010-5
Mo, S. S., & Michalski, V. A. (1972). Judgment of temporal duration of area as a function of stimulus configuration. Psychonomic Science, 27, 97–98. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03328900
Nazari, M. A., Ebneabbasi, A., Jalalkamali, H., & Grondin, S. (2018). Time dilation caused by oddball serial position and pitch deviancy: A comparison of musicians and nonmusicians. Music Perception, 35, 425–436.
New, J. J., & Scholl, B. J. (2009). Subjective time dilation: Spatially local, object-based, or a global visual experience? Journal of Vision, 9, 4. https://doi.org/10.1167/9.2.4
Pariyadath, V., & Eagleman, D. (2007). The effect of predictability on subjective duration. PLoS One, 2, e1264.
Pariyadath, V., & Eagleman, D. M. (2008). Brief subjective durations contract with repetition. Journal of Vision, 8, 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1167/8.16.11
Pariyadath, V., & Eagleman, D. M. (2012). Subjective duration distortions mirror neural repetition suppression. PLoS One, 7, e49362. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0049362
Penton-Voak, I. S., Edwards, H., Percival, A., & Wearden, J. H. (1996). Speeding up an internal clock in humans? Effects of click trains on subjective duration. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 22, 307–320.
Rammsayer, T., & Ulrich, R. (2001). Counting models of temporal discrimination. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 8, 270–277.
Rammsayer, T. H., & Verner, M. (2014). The effect of nontemporal stimulus size on perceived duration as assessed by the method of reproduction. Journal of Vision, 14, 17. https://doi.org/10.1167/14.5.17
Schindel, R., Rowlands, J., & Arnold, D. (2011). The oddball effect: Perceived duration and predictive coding. Journal of Vision, 11, 17. https://doi.org/10.1167/11.2.17
Schneider, K. A., & Komlos, M. (2008). Attention biases decisions but does not alter appearance. Journal of Vision, 8, 3. https://doi.org/10.1167/8.15.3
Seifried, T., & Ulrich, R. (2010). Does the asymmetry effect inflate the temporal expansion of odd stimuli? Psychological Research, 74, 90–98. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00426-008-0187-x
Seifried, T., Ulrich, R., Bausenhart, K. M., Rolke, B., & Osman, A. (2010). Temporal preparation decreases perceptual latency: Evidence from a clock paradigm. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 63, 2432–2451. https://doi.org/10.1080/17470218.2010.485354
Skylark, W. J., & Gheorghiu, A. I. (2017). Further evidence that the effects of repetition on subjective time depend on repetition probability. Frontiers in Psychology, 8, 1915. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01915
Sokolov, E. N. (1963). Higher nervous functions: The orienting reflex. Annual Review of Physiology, 25, 545–580.
Thomas, E. A. C., & Weaver, W. B. (1975). Cognitive processing and time perception. Perception & Psychophysics, 17, 363–367. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03199347
Tse, P. U., Intriligator, J., Rivest, J., & Cavanagh, P. (2004). Attention and the subjective expansion of time. Perception & Psychophysics, 66, 1171–1189.
Ulrich, R., Nitschke, J., & Rammsayer, T. (2006). Perceived duration of expected and unexpected stimuli. Psychological Research, 70, 77–87.
Wearden, J. H. (2016). The psychology of time perception. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
Wehrman, J. J., Wearden, J., & Sowman, P. (2018). The expected oddball: Effects of implicit and explicit positional expectation on duration perception. Psychological Research, 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00426-018-1093-5
Zakay, D., & Block, R. A. (1997). Temporal cognition. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 6, 12–16. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8721.ep11512604
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Ulrich, R., Bausenhart, K.M. (2019). The Temporal Oddball Effect and Related Phenomena: Cognitive Mechanisms and Experimental Approaches. In: Arstila, V., Bardon, A., Power, S.E., Vatakis, A. (eds) The Illusions of Time. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-22048-8_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-22048-8_5
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-22047-1
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-22048-8
eBook Packages: Religion and PhilosophyPhilosophy and Religion (R0)